Not every instrument is backed by its official text yet. At least one law or rulebook covered here has no official source (tier 1) retrieved for it yet. No finding on this page is shown with confidence above “Probable” until stronger sources are retrieved.

Financial Integrity Monitor

Costa Rica CR

Domains covered
8 of 8
Sources
137
Role actions
8
Horizon <90d
3
Jurisdiction profile
FATF status: Clean Tier: B Risk direction: Increasing Enablement vs enforcement: Mixed

Costa Rica's AML/CFT regime rests on Law 7786 (as amended), supervised by SUGEF/CONASSIF for financial institutions and by the DNN and SUGEF for DNFBPs, with a non-public beneficial-ownership registry (RTBF, Decree 41040-H) and FIU functions housed within the Costa Rican Drug Institute (ICD).

MoreGAFILAT's Fourth Round enhanced follow-up (Feb 2024) recorded technical-compliance upgrades (R17 to Compliant; R22, R28 to Largely Compliant) but flagged residual DNFBP customer-due-diligence gaps ahead of the Fifth Round evaluation.

Key deficiencies
  • DNFBP (notary/lawyer/accountant) CDD gaps for company-formation 'contributions' under Recommendation 22
  • Free-trade-zone and Caribbean port customs oversight vulnerable to trade-based money-laundering concealment in agricultural export flows
  • Non-public beneficial-ownership registry (RTBF) whose effectiveness remains untested ahead of the Fifth Round evaluation
  • Absence of a dedicated virtual-asset service provider (VASP) licensing and supervisory regime
Recent developments (18m)
  • OFAC designated a Costa Rican narcotrafficking network and an affiliated law firm under EO 14059 (Aug 2025)
  • OFAC designated the Picado Grijalba narcotics-trafficking network and Costa Rican front companies (Jan 2026)
  • Costa Rica's OIJ arrested ex-Security Minister/Supreme Court Justice Celso Gamboa Sánchez on a US drug-trafficking extradition request (Jun 2025)
  • Legislative Assembly narrowly failed to strip President Chaves' immunity over an alleged influence-peddling investigation (Sept 2025)
  • EU Commission's Dec 2025 high-risk third-country list update did not add Costa Rica, keeping it off the EU HRTC list
Brief

Lead signal

Lead Signal

Costa Rica has opened a public consultation on amending Acuerdo Sugef 13-19, the instrument that would bring virtual-asset service providers directly under the AML customer-identification and suspicious-activity-reporting regime supervised by Sugef. The proposal was published through La Gaceta Alcance N.164/N.187 on 5 October 2026 by the National Council for Supervision of the Financial System (CONASSIF), and press reporting as of 23-24 October 2026 confirms the consultation remains open. As drafted, virtual-asset operators would need to identify their clients at a reported threshold around US$1,000, attribute wallet addresses to verified clients, retain records of their operations, and report suspicious transactions to Sugef and the financial intelligence unit. This is a structural development rather than an enforcement incident: Costa Rica currently has no operative AML customer-identification or reporting rule for virtual-asset operators beyond the bare registration duty created by Law 10961, so the amendment would be the first substantive supervisory layer placed on the sector.

Read full brief

Lead Signal

Costa Rica has opened a public consultation on amending Acuerdo Sugef 13-19, the instrument that would bring virtual-asset service providers directly under the AML customer-identification and suspicious-activity-reporting regime supervised by Sugef. The proposal was published through La Gaceta Alcance N.164/N.187 on 5 October 2026 by the National Council for Supervision of the Financial System (CONASSIF), and press reporting as of 23-24 October 2026 confirms the consultation remains open. As drafted, virtual-asset operators would need to identify their clients at a reported threshold around US$1,000, attribute wallet addresses to verified clients, retain records of their operations, and report suspicious transactions to Sugef and the financial intelligence unit. This is a structural development rather than an enforcement incident: Costa Rica currently has no operative AML customer-identification or reporting rule for virtual-asset operators beyond the bare registration duty created by Law 10961, so the amendment would be the first substantive supervisory layer placed on the sector.

Commentary accompanying the proposal is notably explicit that registration under the amended framework would not constitute an operating authorization or license, a distinction that matters for how the market and counterparties read compliance signals once any registration regime takes effect. The consultation's closing date and final text were not reachable through primary-tier sources this pass, so the standing position rests on secondary press and commentary rather than the official gazette or regulator portal directly.

Other Developments

No other Costa Rica-specific material met this cycle's bar. Sanctions exposure, beneficial-ownership and corporate-transparency architecture, enabler-jurisdiction dynamics, conflict-finance nexus, compliance-technology posture, the broader AML/CTF regime, and commercial-activity findings for Costa Rica were all assessed and found stable, with no new material movement to report this cycle. The published standing positions for those areas remain in force unchanged.

Cross-Monitor Connections

The Sugef 13-19 amendment sits at the intersection of financial-integrity supervision and digital-asset market structure: a jurisdiction moving a previously unsupervised VASP population into an identification-and-reporting perimeter is the kind of structural change that affects how illicit-finance typologies routed through virtual-asset rails get surfaced, independent of whether any single enforcement action follows. Where other monitors track commodity flows, state-capture dynamics, or information operations that obscure illicit money movement, a jurisdiction newly imposing customer-identification duties on VASPs changes the friction such flows encounter if they transit Costa Rican-registered virtual-asset operators. No cross-jurisdictional linkage beyond Costa Rica itself was evidenced this cycle, and the connections above are offered as structural orientation rather than an asserted finding of cross-border flow.

Outlook

The consultation is expected to progress toward a final text within the fourth quarter of 2026, as scheduled, though the record does not establish whether the comment period has closed or whether CONASSIF has set a definitive adoption date, so this should be read as the proposal standing at the consultation stage rather than as enacted law. Should the amendment be adopted substantially as drafted, Costa Rica-registered virtual-asset operators would move from a bare registration duty to a full identification, record-keeping and suspicious-activity-reporting obligation, which is a meaningful compliance-architecture shift for that sector specifically. Subsequent reporting should be watched for the gazetted final text, the effective date, and any penalty provisions attached to non-compliance, none of which were available in the material reviewed this cycle.

Earlier periodic briefs (7)
3 Nov 2026 · fim-2026-11-03

Lead Signal

Costa Rica has opened a public consultation on amending Acuerdo Sugef 13-19, the instrument that would bring virtual-asset service providers directly under the AML customer-identification and suspicious-activity-reporting regime supervised by Sugef. The proposal was published through La Gaceta Alcance N.164/N.187 on 5 October 2026 by the National Council for Supervision of the Financial System (CONASSIF), and press reporting as of 23-24 October 2026 confirms the consultation remains open. As drafted, virtual-asset operators would need to identify their clients at a reported threshold around US$1,000, attribute wallet addresses to verified clients, retain records of their operations, and report suspicious transactions to Sugef and the financial intelligence unit. This is a structural development rather than an enforcement incident: Costa Rica currently has no operative AML customer-identification or reporting rule for virtual-asset operators beyond the bare registration duty created by Law 10961, so the amendment would be the first substantive supervisory layer placed on the sector.

Commentary accompanying the proposal is notably explicit that registration under the amended framework would not constitute an operating authorization or license, a distinction that matters for how the market and counterparties read compliance signals once any registration regime takes effect. The consultation's closing date and final text were not reachable through primary-tier sources this pass, so the standing position rests on secondary press and commentary rather than the official gazette or regulator portal directly.

Other Developments

No other Costa Rica-specific material met the bar. Sanctions exposure, beneficial-ownership and corporate-transparency architecture, enabler-jurisdiction dynamics, conflict-finance nexus, compliance-technology posture, the broader AML/CTF regime, and commercial-activity findings for Costa Rica were all assessed and found stable, with no new material movement to report. The published standing positions for those areas remain in force unchanged.

Cross-Monitor Connections

The Sugef 13-19 amendment sits at the intersection of financial-integrity supervision and digital-asset market structure: a jurisdiction moving a previously unsupervised VASP population into an identification-and-reporting perimeter is the kind of structural change that affects how illicit-finance typologies routed through virtual-asset rails get surfaced, independent of whether any single enforcement action follows. Where other monitors track commodity flows, state-capture dynamics, or information operations that obscure illicit money movement, a jurisdiction newly imposing customer-identification duties on VASPs changes the friction such flows encounter if they transit Costa Rican-registered virtual-asset operators. No cross-jurisdictional linkage beyond Costa Rica itself was evidenced, and the connections above are offered as structural orientation rather than an asserted finding of cross-border flow.

Outlook

The consultation is expected to progress toward a final text within the fourth quarter of 2026, as scheduled, though the record does not establish whether the comment period has closed or whether CONASSIF has set a definitive adoption date, so this should be read as the proposal standing at the consultation stage rather than as enacted law. Should the amendment be adopted substantially as drafted, Costa Rica-registered virtual-asset operators would move from a bare registration duty to a full identification, record-keeping and suspicious-activity-reporting obligation, which is a meaningful compliance-architecture shift for that sector specifically. Subsequent reporting should be watched for the gazetted final text, the effective date, and any penalty provisions attached to non-compliance, none of which were available in the material reviewed.

25 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-25

Lead Signal

Costa Rica has moved to close a long-flagged gap in its anti-money-laundering architecture for virtual asset service providers. Following the June 2026 enactment of Law 10961, which added Article 15 quater to the base AML statute Law 7786 and placed virtual asset service providers under the supervision of the national financial supervisor SUGEF, the National Council for Financial System Supervision opened a public consultation in early October 2026 on a draft amendment to Acuerdo SUGEF 13-19. The draft would operationalise the new registration requirement with risk-based customer due diligence, new-product and new-technology risk assessment, and suspicious-transaction reporting duties for registered virtual asset providers. The statutory registration requirement itself is well evidenced in the official gazette, but the substantive content of the draft amendment currently rests on secondary press reporting rather than the consultation text itself, so the shape of the final rule should be treated as probable rather than settled.

This is best read as a remediation step rather than a new vulnerability. Costa Rica's virtual-asset sector had sat for years in a supervisory vacuum, a posture long associated with a non-compliant rating against the Financial Action Task Force's Recommendation 15 on new technologies. The consultation does not create a licensing regime, and commentary accompanying the statutory change has been explicit that registration with SUGEF is not an authorisation or permit to operate, but it does create the first formal AML perimeter around virtual asset activity in the jurisdiction.

Other Developments

A long-standing casino obligation provides useful context for the new virtual-asset perimeter. Costa Rican casinos, whether physical or internet-based, have been designated AML-obliged entities under Article 15 bis of Law 7786 since 2017, and have been supervised under the same Acuerdo SUGEF 13-19 framework since December 2020. This is not a development of the current cycle but a standing feature of the regime, confirmed directly from SUGEF's own training materials. It is worth noting because it demonstrates that SUGEF already has an operating model for bringing non-bank, high-cash-intensity obliged entities into its supervisory perimeter, a model the virtual-asset consultation appears to be extending to a new sector rather than inventing from scratch.

Costa Rica's broader standing with the regional mutual-evaluation process remains unchanged but is approaching a new test. The jurisdiction is not on the Financial Action Task Force's list of countries with strategic deficiencies, and no grey-listing or black-listing development occurred. However, the Latin American Financial Action Task Force body has listed a possible onsite visit for its Fifth Round Mutual Evaluation of Costa Rica for 1 November 2026, with a possible plenary discussion around July 2027. This evaluation would reassess the country's technical compliance and effectiveness against the full set of international AML/CTF recommendations, several of which remained below full compliance at the 2015 Fourth Round evaluation.

Cross-Monitor Connections

The virtual-asset registration and consultation activity sits squarely at the intersection of financial-crime supervision and digital-asset market structure: the same Article 15 quater registration requirement and the same draft SUGEF 13-19 amendment are material to institutions tracking Costa Rica's crypto licensing and market-access posture, since the AML registration gateway is, at present, the only formal regulatory foothold a virtual asset provider has in the jurisdiction. The absence of a parallel licensing or consumer-protection regime means the AML perimeter is currently doing double duty as the primary point of regulatory contact for the sector, a dynamic worth tracking jointly rather than treating the AML and market-structure threads as independent.

Outlook

The SUGEF 13-19 consultation was still open as of late October 2026, with no confirmed closing date or adoption timeline independently verified; secondary reporting has referenced a short consultation window and unresolved questions on compliance-officer appointment criteria for registered providers. Whether the amendment is adopted substantially as drafted, and whether it is adopted before the possible November 2026 GAFILAT onsite visit, are both open questions worth monitoring together, since a credible operationalisation of the Article 15 quater registration regime ahead of the onsite visit would be a relevant data point for the Fifth Round evaluation's assessment of Recommendation 15 compliance.

18 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-18

Lead Signal

Costa Rica's financial-integrity architecture moved on two fronts in October 2026. CONASSIF approved Acuerdo 2055-2026 unanimously and in firm vote on 5 October 2026, at its session 2055-2026, publishing the measure in Gazette Supplement No. 138 on 14 October 2026. The agreement amends the securities-offering regulation to require issuers to disclose, in prospectuses, any shareholder, direct, indirect or linked through an economic group, holding 10 percent or more of the issuer. Investment managers and administrators face new fit-and-proper screening covering experience, background and international sanctions and watch-list exposure. The measure took effect on publication, with a six-month compliance window for already-registered issuers, and it reads as a deliberate beneficial-ownership tightening in the securities-market segment of the AML perimeter.

Alongside this, the Virtual Asset Service Provider registration duty created under Ley 10961, in force since 19 September 2026, remains in an implementation gap. As of 2 October 2026 CONASSIF had not published, or even opened consultation on, the implementing regulation that would give the registration duty an actual form, platform or window. Costa Rica therefore has a binding legal obligation with no operative mechanism behind it, a structural condition rather than a single incident.

Other Developments

Fintech governance under discussion. The Banco Central de Costa Rica board, at its ordinary session of 16 September 2026, considered consolidating governance of the fintech sector under CONASSIF rather than retaining direct administration at the central bank. No instrument has been adopted and the matter remains at the deliberation stage, but if carried through it would centralise payments, fintech and crypto AML supervisory architecture under a single body.

Standing sanctions exposure. The U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control designated five Costa Rican nationals and five Costa Rica-based entities in connection with narcotics trafficking and money laundering. This action predates the current reporting window and is carried forward unchanged as a standing fact rather than a new development.

FATF and GAFILAT standing. Costa Rica remains outside both the FATF call-for-action list and the increased-monitoring list, and continues under GAFILAT's enhanced follow-up process against its 2024 mutual evaluation ratings of 17 Compliant and 20 Largely Compliant. No change in this status occurred this cycle.

Commercial activity, thin signal. Aggregator data describes a Costa Rican fintech sector of 123 companies, 28 of them funded, with cumulative venture funding of 70.4 million dollars and three acquisitions recorded to date. No single dated transaction within this window was independently verified against a primary source, so this remains background texture rather than a dated finding.

Cross-Monitor Connections

The CONASSIF beneficial-ownership tightening intersects directly with corporate-transparency questions that the World Payments Monitor and the data-protection monitor track from their own angles, particularly where investment-firm ownership disclosure touches entities also active in payments or data processing. The VASP registration implementation gap is the same underlying fact the crypto monitor examines from a licensing-architecture perspective and the World Payments Monitor notes via its Sentinel feed; here the emphasis is the AML-supervisory consequence of a statute in force without an operative registration mechanism. The prospective BCCR-to-CONASSIF governance transfer, if it proceeds, would be a structural supervisory-architecture event relevant to any monitor tracking fintech or crypto oversight in Costa Rica.

Outlook

The CONASSIF implementing regulation for VASP registration is expected in Q4 2026, though this estimate carries quarter-level uncertainty and industry has no confirmed registration platform, threshold schedule, or fee structure to work from as scheduled. Whether the regulation closes the current gap before year end will determine whether Costa Rica's VASP AML perimeter becomes operationally real or remains a paper obligation into 2027. The BCCR governance question remains at the discussion stage, and its resolution either way will shape how fintech and crypto supervision in Costa Rica is organised going forward. The securities-market beneficial-ownership tightening under Acuerdo 2055-2026 is now in force, with the six-month compliance window for registered issuers the next milestone to watch.

4 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-04

Lead Signal

Costa Rica enacted its first AML/CFT registration perimeter for virtual asset service providers this cycle. Law N.246 10961, published in La Gaceta Alcance N.246 78 on 19 June 2026, added Article 15 quater to Law 7786, the countrys core AML/CFT statute, obliging VASPs engaged in exchange, transfer, custody or control, or issuance-related financial services to register with SUGEF and comply with AML/CFT/CPF duties. The provision entered into force around 19 September 2026, three months after publication. Registration is explicitly not an operating licence, a structural choice that closes part of the FATF Recommendation 15 gap for virtual assets while leaving authorisation-level scrutiny thinner than a full licensing regime would provide. CONASSIF, the financial-system oversight body, is due to publish implementing regulations covering thresholds, scope, exclusions and technical requirements within three months of entry into force, expected around the fourth quarter of 2026; that regulation has not yet been published.

Other Developments

Penalty schedule under amended Article 81 is substantial. Breach of registration, customer-due-diligence or reporting duties under Article 15 quater carries penalties of 5% to 50% of the transaction amount, or 2 to 100 base salaries, scaled to gravity and recidivism, under Law 7786 Article 81 as amended by Law 10961 Article 3. Beneficial-ownership filing extension remains unconfirmed. Secondary legal commentary states that VASPs will also need to file annually into Costa Ricas existing Transparencia y Beneficiarios Finales beneficial-ownership registry with the Central Bank, extending BO-registry coverage to the new VASP population as Article 15 quater is implemented; this has not been independently confirmed against the gazette text. Illicit trade flagged as the countrys top criminal-financing channel. Costa Ricas Chamber of Commerce, through its Illicit Trade Observatory, estimated illicit trade at approximately CRC 1.6 trillion, roughly US$3.6 billion, reported 10 September 2026 as the countrys principal source of criminal financing, alongside an estimated CRC 664 billion, roughly US$1.5 billion, in forgone tax revenue; this rests on a single Tier-3 press account relaying a non-governmental trade-association estimate rather than a primary government or Chamber report. GAFILAT evaluation calendar shows forward movement. FATFs global assessment calendar lists a possible onsite period for Costa Ricas 5th-round mutual evaluation in November 2026 and a possible plenary discussion in July 2027, which would be the first assessment of the new VASP registration perimeters real-world effectiveness; Costa Ricas 4th-round evaluation rated it Compliant on 17 and Largely Compliant on 20 of the 40 FATF Recommendations, with no current grey-list status.

Cross-Monitor Connections

The same statutory event is tracked by the crypto monitor as a licensing-and-classification development and by the world-payments monitor as a correspondent-banking consequence: Law 7786, as amended, now bars SUGEF-regulated banks from maintaining commercial relationships with VASPs required to register under Articles 15, 15 bis, 15 ter or 15 quater who are not duly registered. That banking-access bar functions as a de-risking lever independent of the underlying AML substance, and operators unable to register promptly face a practical banking-access consequence layered on top of the AML registration duty itself.

Outlook

The near-term marker is CONASSIFs implementing regulation, expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, which will determine the practical scope of SUGEFs VASP register, including de minimis thresholds and technical and fit-and-proper requirements. Over a longer horizon, the possible GAFILAT onsite in November 2026 and plenary discussion in July 2027 would provide the first independent assessment of whether the registration-without-licensing model closes the Recommendation 15 gap in substance as well as in statute. Whether the RTBF beneficial-ownership extension to VASPs is confirmed, and whether the Chamber of Commerce illicit-trade estimate is corroborated by a primary source, remain open questions that would sharpen Costa Ricas enabler-jurisdiction risk profile if resolved.

28 Sep 2026 · fim-2026-09-28

Lead Signal

Costa Rica has closed a longstanding FATF Recommendation 15 gap by formally bringing virtual asset service providers within AML/CFT obligated-entity status. New Article 15 quater of Law No. 7786, added by Legislative Decree No. 10961, was unanimously approved in the Legislative Assembly on 25 and 27 May 2026. VASPs must now register with SUGEF for AML/CFT supervisory purposes, though this registration is explicitly stated not to constitute an operating licence. This is an architecture-level shift: the country has extended its AML/CFT perimeter to a sector it had not previously reached, without simultaneously building a substantive licensing regime for that sector.

Other Developments

GAFILAT follow-up concludes with three upgrades. Costa Rica's enhanced follow-up process for its fourth-round mutual evaluation concluded with upgrades on Recommendation 17 from partially compliant to compliant, Recommendation 22 from partially compliant to largely compliant, and Recommendation 28 from non-compliant to largely compliant. This is a technical-compliance improvement across customer due diligence for financial institutions, DNFBP coverage, and regulation and supervision of DNFBPs respectively, reducing the count of identified deficiencies against Costa Rica's mutual evaluation. Comprehensive AML bill reported to pass third reading. A single legal-commentary source reports that Bill 6593, described as a comprehensive AML/CFT law, passed its third reading on 14 April 2026. This claim has not been independently corroborated, and the bill's scope and its relationship to the existing Law 7786 framework remain unverified this cycle; it is treated as an uncertain development pending confirmation against a primary legislative record.

Cross-Monitor Connections

The VASP AML/CFT registration reform is directly relevant to the crypto monitor's licensing coverage of Costa Rica, which is tracking the same Article 15 quater reform from a licensing-perimeter perspective; that monitor's crypto_licensing module is the appropriate venue for analysis of what the registration requirement does and does not confer in terms of operating authorisation. The world-payments monitor's AML/CFT and financial-crime module for this jurisdiction is supplied from this same D7 and D1 material and should be read as consistent with the account given here.

Outlook

The near-term question is whether Costa Rica's next GAFILAT or FATF assessment cycle will register the VASP AML/CFT reform as a further closure of outstanding technical-compliance gaps, building on the R.17, R.22 and R.28 upgrades already achieved. Separately, confirmation of Bill 6593's actual content, scope and legislative status against a primary source remains an open item; until that confirmation arrives, its relationship to the existing Law 7786 AML/CFT framework, and whether it represents a distinct overhaul or a related but separate instrument, cannot be stated with confidence.

14 Sep 2026 · fim-2026-08-21

Lead Signal

Costa Rica registered two rounds of unilateral U.S. Treasury sanctions action this cycle, both assessed at High confidence from Tier 1 sourcing. In August 2025, OFAC designated Celso Manuel Gamboa Sanchez, a former Vice Minister of Public Security, together with his law firm and a soccer club, under Executive Order 14059 for facilitating narcotics-trafficking-linked money laundering. In January 2026, a second action designated five Costa Rican nationals and five Costa Rica-based entities connected to the Luis Manuel Picado Grijalba cocaine-trafficking network under the same authority. Both actions carry a severity_preliminary rating of CRITICAL in the interpreter record, reflecting the direct implication of a former senior security official and a coordinated multi-entity network rather than an isolated individual designation. No corresponding European Union Council or UK OFSI designation against either set of targets has been identified, a divergence consistent with a broader pattern of US-led autonomous listing against Costa Rica-linked narcotics money laundering that the interpreter record flags as worth sustained tracking rather than a one-off enforcement episode.

Other Developments

Professional and commercial vehicles as laundering fronts. The January 2026 OFAC action named a law firm and a sports club as facilitation vehicles, alongside several Costa Rica-based entities used for storage and transport within the cocaine-trafficking network. Because the designated facilitators include a law firm — a category of professional gatekeeper whose services carry an inherent presumption of legitimacy — the finding illustrates the architecture-over-incident principle directly: the exposure is structural, professional-services capture, rather than confined to the individual transaction chain the designation formally targets. This is consistent with an enabler-jurisdiction characterization assessed at Assessed confidence.

VASP registration reform closes a FATF gap. Costa Rica's Legislative Assembly unanimously approved Amendment No. 25.340 to Law No. 7786 on 27 May 2026, inserting a new Article 15 quater that brings virtual-asset service providers into the AML/CFT obligated-entity perimeter via mandatory SUGEF registration; the amendment was published as Legislative Decree No. 10961 in La Gaceta on 19 June 2026. The interpreter record treats this as closing a documented FATF Recommendation 15 gap on virtual-asset activity, though it is explicitly a registration-for-supervision regime rather than an operating licence, and the corroborating sourcing this cycle is Tier 3 professional-services commentary rather than a retrieved primary La Gaceta text. The reform's practical reach is still unsettled: SUGEF implementing regulations for VASP registration are expected within roughly three months of the gazette publication, but their issuance has not yet been confirmed, leaving open how customer due diligence, record-keeping and suspicious-transaction-reporting mechanics will actually operate in practice.

Comprehensive AML statute progressing, single-sourced. A Comprehensive AML Law, Bill 6593, is reported to have passed its third reading in the Legislative Assembly on 14 April 2026, replacing decree-level provisions dating to 2001. This claim carries only Low confidence this cycle, resting on a single Tier 3 source with no corroborating primary legislative record retrieved. Separately, Costa Rica is confirmed, at Assessed confidence from a Tier 1 FATF/GAFILAT source, to remain outside the FATF grey list while continuing in GAFILAT's enhanced follow-up process stemming from its 2015 Mutual Evaluation, with follow-up reporting through 2024.

Cross-Monitor Connections

The VASP registration reform is the clearest cross-monitor node this cycle. The same SUGEF registration requirement that closes the FATF R.15 gap for this monitor is the substrate for the Crypto Monitor's own crypto_licensing and cross_border_transfer findings, which read the identical Article 15 quater / Decree 10961 reform as a supervisory-perimeter expansion rather than an operating-licence regime. Neither monitor's registration record yet extends to a confirmed operating-licence framework for the underlying crypto-asset activity itself, a gap both this monitor's D5 tracker and the Crypto Monitor's own crypto_licensing module independently flag as the more consequential open question going into the next cycle. The World Payments Monitor's fintech-sector tracking, which records Costa Rica's growing domestic payments and lending fintech population, sits adjacent to this same reform: an expanding fintech and virtual-asset sector operating without a licensing framework, now newly subject to AML/CFT registration, is the structural condition this monitor's D5 and D7 findings and World Payments' product-innovation tracking are both, independently, describing from their respective lenses.

Outlook

The immediate items to watch are whether SUGEF issues the implementing regulations for VASP registration expected within roughly three months of the 19 June 2026 gazette publication, and whether Bill 6593's reported third-reading passage is corroborated by a primary legislative record next cycle. Continued unilateral OFAC designation activity against Costa Rica-linked narcotics-money-laundering targets, absent any EU or UK parallel action, is a sanctions-regime divergence pattern worth sustained tracking rather than a single-cycle anomaly. A third OFAC action against a Costa Rica-linked target without a parallel EU Council or OFSI listing would harden this observation from an assessed pattern into a more confidently structural finding.

11 Aug 2026 · fim-2026-08-05

Lead Signal

Costa Rica closed a long-flagged gap in its anti-money-laundering architecture this cycle. Legislative Decree No. 10961, amending Article 15 quater of Law 7786 and published in La Gaceta on 19 June 2026, brings virtual-asset service providers into a mandatory SUGEF registration regime for the first time (fim-2026-W32-001). The decree is explicit that SUGEF registration is not an operating licence, but it is the mechanism by which Costa Rica closes the FATF Recommendation 15 gap identified in its mutual-evaluation follow-up process. The architecture matters more than any single enforcement action here: Costa Rica has moved from having no dedicated AML supervisor for virtual-asset activity to having a registration gateway, even though the implementing detail, the CONASSIF regulation that will specify KYC, travel-rule, and suspicious-transaction-reporting infrastructure, remains pending, expected in the third quarter of 2026 (fim-2026-W32-006). Many smaller virtual-asset service providers domiciled in Costa Rica have operated to date with no formal AML supervisor at all, and the gap between the registration mandate now in force and the implementing regulation still pending is itself a supervisory window worth tracking.

Other Developments

Sustained unilateral sanctions pressure. The United States Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control designated a cocaine-trafficking and money-laundering network centred on Costa Rica on 22 January 2026, naming five individuals and five Costa Rica-based entities, with the Moin seaport identified as a transshipment and laundering node amid rising violence in the Limon region (fim-2026-W32-002, fim-2026-W32-007). This followed an August 2025 designation of Celso Manuel Gamboa Sanchez, a former Vice Minister of Public Security, together with his law firm and a football club, for selling counter-narcotics intelligence to trafficking targets his ministry was meant to be pursuing (fim-2026-W32-003). Two rounds of unilateral OFAC action inside twelve months, against a former senior security official and a large trafficking network alike, is a sustained cadence rather than an isolated event, and no corresponding EU Council or OFSI designation has been identified alongside it. The pairing of a trafficking-network designation with a former security official designation illustrates how sanctions-architecture and state-capture risk can co-locate within a single enabler corridor.

Extradition-bar repeal reduces enabler function, unevenly. Ley N.10730, the 2025 reform to Article 32 of the Constitucion Politica, removed the constitutional prohibition on extraditing Costa Rican nationals in narco-trafficking and terrorism cases. Approximately twenty nationals have been the subject of extradition requests since, and the first transfer, Gamboa himself, was completed in March 2026 (fim-2026-W32-004). This materially reduces the historic function of Costa Rica as a safe haven for laundering-linked nationals. It sits alongside a more static picture at the professional-services layer: the Fourth Round enhanced follow-up of GAFILAT upgraded the rating of Costa Rica on Recommendation 17 to Compliant and on Recommendations 22 and 28 to Largely Compliant in February 2024, but continues to flag customer-due-diligence gaps in the notary, legal, and accounting channels used for company formation, ahead of the Fifth Round evaluation (fim-2026-W32-005, fim-2026-W32-008). The enabler-jurisdiction picture is therefore one of improvement at the state level and persistence of weakness at the gatekeeper level.

Cross-Monitor Connections

The Gamboa designation is a state-capture signal as much as a sanctions one: a former Vice Minister of Public Security monetising counter-narcotics intelligence sits squarely in the territory the World Democracy Monitor tracks as institutional compromise, and financial-integrity and governance-integrity readings of the same underlying fact should be read together rather than separately. The VASP registration regime also intersects directly with payments-monitor coverage of Costa Rica crypto-asset and stablecoin-settlement infrastructure: a de facto banking-access precondition for unregistered virtual-asset service providers is simultaneously an AML-architecture finding and a market-access finding, and the two monitors are tracking the same instrument from adjacent angles.

Outlook

The decisive item for the next cycle is the CONASSIF implementing regulation for Article 15 quater, expected in the third quarter of 2026; its content will determine whether the new VASP perimeter of Costa Rica closes the FATF R.15 gap in substance or only in form. The Fifth Round GAFILAT evaluation, not yet scheduled with precision, will test whether the persistent DNFBP customer-due-diligence weakness has been addressed or remains the residual enabler-jurisdiction risk it has been through the Fourth Round follow-up. Continued OFAC designation activity against Costa Rica-linked networks, absent so far any parallel EU or UK action, remains the clearest near-term signal of where sanctions-architecture risk concentrates.

Domain intelligence (D1–D8)

D1 Sanctions

no_changeno_changestanding position

Sanctions Architecture and Evasion

Costa Rica this cycle offers a clean illustration of the F2 three-level analysis, scheme, enabling architecture, strategic consequence, applied to a single jurisdiction. At the scheme level, the Office of Foreign Assets Control designated, under Executive Order 14059, a Costa Rican narcotics-trafficking network and an affiliated law firm, Bufete Celso Gamboa y Asociados, in August 2025, and separately the Picado Grijalba trafficking network together with associated Costa Rican front entities including a fishing association, a beauty salon and real-estate corporations, in January 2026. Both actions target the counter-narcotics program rather than a jurisdiction-wide sanctions regime, consistent with the targeted-designation approach OFAC has applied to Costa Rica.

Continue reading

At the architecture level, the recurrence of these designations against domestic front companies indicates that individual sanctions actions are exposing, rather than dismantling, a durable laundering infrastructure built on Costa Rica low-barrier corporate incorporation regime and its non-public beneficial-ownership registry. Naming one set of entities does not appear to alter the conditions that allowed those entities to be formed and used in the first instance, which is the analytical distinction between an incident and an architecture.

At the strategic-consequence level, the European Commission December 2025 Delegated Regulation update to the EU high-risk third-country list, which added Russia, Bolivia and the British Virgin Islands, again did not add Costa Rica, sustaining a divergence between US targeted-designation practice and EU jurisdiction-wide risk listing. This divergence most plausibly reflects differing sanctions philosophies rather than a substantive disagreement between Washington and Brussels on the underlying risk level Costa Rica presents, since the same narcotics-driven exposure evidenced by the OFAC designations has not been judged by the European Commission to meet the jurisdiction-wide listing threshold.

A further structural point concerns what is absent. No Costa Rica-flagged dark-fleet, shipping, or technology-procurement corridor has been identified in connection with Russian sanctions evasion this cycle. Costa Rica illicit-finance exposure in the review window is overwhelmingly narcotics-driven rather than sanctions-evasion-driven in the Russia-specific sense that dominates sanctions-architecture analysis elsewhere. This absence is itself a signal under the enablement doctrine applied across this monitor, it indicates that Costa Rica functions in this period principally as a counter-narcotics sanctions target rather than as a node in the broader Russian sanctions-evasion architecture tracked elsewhere in this monitor.

The practical consequence for institutions operating across both the US and EU regulatory perimeters is compliance friction rather than compliance conflict, obliged entities screening against the OFAC SDN list will encounter Costa Rica-linked designations that do not correspond to any enhanced due diligence trigger under the EU high-risk third-country mechanism, requiring firms to maintain a Costa Rica risk posture calibrated to targeted-entity screening rather than jurisdiction-wide enhanced due diligence.

Outlook

The next material test of this divergence pattern is the European Commission next Article 9 high-risk third-country list update cycle, expected in the fourth quarter of 2026 following the October 2026 FATF plenary, which could either add Costa Rica for the first time or continue the exclusion pattern observed in the December 2025 update. Separately, the next annual US State Department International Narcotics Control Strategy Report Volume II cycle, expected in the first quarter of 2027, will indicate whether the accumulation of OFAC designations and the port-based trade-based money-laundering exposure documented this cycle shift Costa Rica classification as a jurisdiction of money-laundering concern, a change that would recalibrate correspondent-banking risk appetite toward Costa Rica among institutions that key their country-risk models to the INCSR classification.

Judgment: No CR-specific sanctions-evasion development identified this cycle. Uncertain
Cumulative analysis

Sanctions Architecture and Evasion — Cumulative Analysis

Across the two most recent monitoring cycles, the Costa Rica sanctions-architecture profile has been defined by a widening gap between escalating US Treasury enforcement action and a static European sanctions-listing posture, partially offset by an unrelated but consequential domestic structural reform. The baseline enforcement track begins with the August 2025 OFAC designation of former Vice Minister of Public Security Celso Gamboa Sanchez, his law firm Bufete Celso Gamboa y Asociados, and a football club he used as laundering vehicles, which exposed a front-company apparatus built on nominally unrelated domestic vehicles, including a fishing association, a beauty salon, and real-estate corporations, registered under the low-barrier Costa Rica SA incorporation regime and shielded by a non-public beneficial-ownership registry. The European Commission December 2025 Delegated Regulation update to the EU high-risk third-country list, which added Russia, Bolivia, and the British Virgin Islands, again excluded Costa Rica despite this OFAC action, establishing an early divergence pattern between the two blocs approach to sanctions-listing philosophy: US targeted, network-specific designation against EU jurisdiction-wide risk listing.

This cycle extends and partially reframes that pattern. OFAC designated the Picado Grijalba cocaine-trafficking and money-laundering network, five individuals and five Costa Rica-based entities, on 22 January 2026, a second consecutive wave that indicates the underlying trafficking-finance network survived the removal of the Gamboa node rather than being dismantled by it. The Moin seaport has now been explicitly identified as the transshipment and laundering corridor connecting both designation waves, adding a logistics dimension to what had previously read as a purely corporate-vehicle laundering pattern. No EU Council or OFSI designation has emerged to parallel either OFAC wave, and the standing sanctions-regime-divergence tracker now formally records two rounds of unilateral US action against Costa Rica in the past twelve months with no corresponding European action, hardening the divergence first observed after the Gamboa designation into a documented multi-cycle pattern rather than a single-instance anomaly.

The most consequential integrated development, however, is structural rather than enforcement-driven: Costa Rica repealed its constitutional prohibition on extraditing nationals via the Ley 10730 reform to Article 32 of the Constitucion Politica, and completed its first transfer, Gamboa himself, in March 2026, with roughly twenty further extradition requests for Costa Rican nationals pending. This is the first mechanism identified across these cycles capable of addressing the impunity dimension of Costa Rica sanctions exposure directly, since OFAC designations alone name entities without altering the jurisdictional protections that had historically shielded designated individuals from prosecution. Read cumulatively, the GAFILAT Fourth Round Enhanced Follow-up upgrades on Recommendations 17, 22, and 28 sit alongside this reform as evidence of a genuine, if partial, structural improvement trajectory, even as the enforcement-volume trendline against Costa Rica continues to rise.

The state-capture dimension of the Gamboa case, now flagged for WDM analysis, remains the single most analytically significant thread running through this domain across both cycles: a former senior security official compromised by the same trafficking networks OFAC has since sanctioned twice illustrates a durable vulnerability at the interface between Costa Rica security apparatus and its narcotics-finance architecture, one that neither designation wave nor the extradition reform has yet been shown to resolve at the institutional level, only at the level of the individuals so far identified.

Outlook

The next material tests spanning both cycles are the European Commission Article 9 high-risk third-country list update expected in the fourth quarter of 2026 following the October 2026 FATF plenary, which will show whether the now twice-repeated exclusion pattern continues; the annual US State Department INCSR Volume II review, which will indicate whether the accumulated designation record and Moin seaport exposure shift Costa Rica classification; and the resolution pace of the roughly twenty pending extradition requests, which will determine whether the Ley 10730 reform becomes a durable deterrent or remains a single-case demonstration.

domain_sub_briefs · D1 · Cumulative analysis
Periodic updates (2)
14 Sep 2026 · fim-2026-08-21

Sanctions

Costa Rica registered two distinct rounds of U.S. Treasury sanctions action this cycle, both assessed at High confidence from Tier 1 primary sourcing. In the first, OFAC designated Celso Manuel Gamboa Sanchez — a former Vice Minister of Public Security — together with his law firm and a soccer club, under Executive Order 14059, for facilitating money laundering tied to narcotics trafficking. In the second, five Costa Rican nationals and five Costa Rica-based entities connected to the Luis Manuel Picado Grijalba cocaine-trafficking network were designated under the same authority. Both actions carry a severity_preliminary rating of CRITICAL in the underlying interpreter record.

The architecture reading of these two actions is more significant than either taken as a discrete incident. A former senior security official's alleged direct involvement, channeled through ordinary professional and commercial vehicles — a law firm, a sports club — indicates that Costa Rica's sanctions exposure this cycle is not confined to informal or overtly illicit actors but extends into licensed, outwardly legitimate intermediary structures. This is the kind of enabler-adjacent finding that the sanctions domain and the enabler-jurisdictions domain jointly describe from different angles.

A second architectural observation is regime divergence. No European Union Council or UK OFSI designation against either the Gamboa network or the Picado Grijalba network has been identified this cycle. Two consecutive OFAC rounds against Costa Rica-linked narcotics money laundering, with no parallel multilateral or UK action, is consistent with a pattern of US-led autonomous listing against Costa Rica that the interpreter record's standing tracker treats as a watch item rather than a settled conclusion. Three-pillar balance requires noting that both actions sit squarely within the AML pillar; no CTF or CPF-specific signal was identified against Costa Rica this cycle, which is itself worth registering as an absence rather than silently passing over.

Outlook

The item to watch next cycle is whether a third OFAC action against a Costa Rica-linked target appears without a parallel EU Council or OFSI designation, which would harden the current sanctions-regime-divergence observation from an assessed pattern into a more confidently structural finding. Absent that, continued OFAC designation activity against professional and commercial vehicles operating inside Costa Rica should be read as sustained pressure on the same enabler architecture rather than as a series of unconnected events.

11 Aug 2026 · fim-2026-08-05

Sanctions Architecture and Evasion

The exposure of Costa Rica on the sanctions axis this cycle is defined by a sustained, unilateral United States cadence rather than by any single event. The Office of Foreign Assets Control designated a cocaine-trafficking and money-laundering network centred on Costa Rica on 22 January 2026, naming five individuals and five Costa Rica-based entities, with the Moin seaport identified as a transshipment and laundering node amid rising violence in the Limon region (fim-2026-W32-002, fim-2026-W32-007). This is the second wave of designation activity in less than a year: in August 2025, OFAC designated Celso Manuel Gamboa Sanchez, a former Vice Minister of Public Security, together with his law firm and a football club, as vehicles for laundering proceeds from selling counter-narcotics intelligence to the trafficking targets his ministry was responsible for pursuing (fim-2026-W32-003).

Read as architecture rather than incident, the pattern is notable for two reasons. First, it is entirely unilateral: no corresponding European Council or OFSI designation against the same individuals or entities has been identified this cycle, which means the sanctions-exposure picture for Costa Rica currently depends on a single jurisdiction enforcement posture rather than a convergent multilateral one. Second, the two waves of designation activity span both a private-sector trafficking network and a former senior security official, indicating that the exposure is not confined to organised-crime actors operating outside the state but extends into a documented instance of state capture: a former Vice Minister of Public Security monetising the very intelligence apparatus meant to counter the activity he was designated for facilitating.

The identification of the Moin seaport as a transshipment and laundering node is a structural signal layered onto this designation activity, tying a specific piece of Costa Rica trade and logistics infrastructure to the broader sanctions-evasion architecture rather than treating each designation as a discrete, unconnected event. Together, the Gamboa designation and the January 2026 network designation describe a corridor, spanning a compromised former official and a seaport transshipment point, rather than an isolated cell.

Against this, the technical-compliance trajectory of Costa Rica with FATF standards has continued to improve on paper: the Fourth Round enhanced follow-up of GAFILAT upgraded the rating of Costa Rica on Recommendation 17 to Compliant and on Recommendations 22 and 28 to Largely Compliant in February 2024 (fim-2026-W32-005). That upgrade sits uneasily alongside the sustained OFAC designation cadence: technical-compliance ratings measure the adequacy of a jurisdiction legal and institutional framework, not the presence or absence of state-capture events within it, and the two signals should not be read as contradictory so much as measuring different things.

Sanctions designations of this kind gain enforcement teeth only if the domestic legal system of Costa Rica can act on them, and the removal of the constitutional bar on extraditing Costa Rican nationals is directly relevant here. Ley N.10730, the 2025 reform to Article 32 of the Constitucion Politica, opened extradition of nationals in narco-trafficking and terrorism cases, and the transfer of Gamboa himself, completed in March 2026, is the first instance of that new pathway being used against a person also under OFAC designation (fim-2026-W32-004). Approximately twenty additional extradition requests for Costa Rican nationals have followed. For sanctions-architecture purposes, this closes part of the gap between designation and consequence that previously left designated individuals functionally untouchable inside Costa Rica.

No CPF-specific or terrorist-financing designation has been identified for Costa Rica this cycle, and the available signal is concentrated entirely in the AML and narcotics-trafficking pillar; that concentration is itself worth naming rather than assuming CTF and CPF exposure is simply absent, since the underlying corridor, seaport transshipment plus a compromised former security official, is exactly the kind of infrastructure that could, in principle, carry a CTF dimension the current designation record does not evidence.

Outlook

The near-term sanctions-architecture question for Costa Rica is whether the January 2026 designation wave produces a third round, and whether any European or United Kingdom counterpart action follows the two unilateral United States rounds to date. The absence of parallel multilateral designation activity is itself worth tracking as a divergence signal: continued unilateral-only action would suggest the sanctions exposure of Costa Rica remains a primarily United States-driven concern, while the appearance of EU Council or OFSI designations against the same network would indicate the corridor has become a shared multilateral priority. The role of the Moin seaport as a named transshipment node also bears watching for any follow-on port-security or customs-enforcement development in subsequent cycles.

D2 Beneficial Ownership

no_changeno_changestanding position

Beneficial Ownership and Corporate Transparency

Costa Rica sits outside the European Union AML Package direct perimeter, and the developments most directly relevant to Costa Rica own regulatory exposure this cycle are domestic and regional rather than EU-originated. The most consequential is the confirmation, via the GAFILAT February 2024 enhanced follow-up, that notary, lawyer and accountant regulation in Costa Rica does not explicitly cover company-formation contribution activity under Recommendation 22, even as Costa Rica technical compliance was upgraded on Recommendation 17 to Compliant and on Recommendations 22 and 28 to Largely Compliant. This unresolved gatekeeping gap sits directly upstream of the front-company laundering scheme the Office of Foreign Assets Control exposed through its January 2026 designation of the Picado Grijalba network, which registered a fishing association, a beauty salon and real-estate corporations as nominally unrelated vehicles to receive, layer and disburse narcotics proceeds.

Continue reading

The second domestically relevant development is the status of Costa Rica own beneficial-ownership registry, the RTBF, established under Decree 41040-H pursuant to Law 7786. The RTBF is a mandatory but non-public registry, administered with cross-checks against tax and financial-institution records, and its practical effectiveness at defeating exactly the kind of shell-company layering exploited in the Picado Grijalba scheme has not been independently tested by any enforcement or evaluation event this cycle. This is a structural judgment drawn from a primary UNCAC review rather than a new development, but it remains the single most significant latent beneficial-ownership-opacity vulnerability Costa Rica carries into its next mutual evaluation.

Globally, the EU AML Package sets the structural direction against which beneficial-ownership regimes worldwide are increasingly measured, but it is not the primary subject matter for a non-EEA jurisdiction such as Costa Rica. That package now comprises three distinct instruments: the AML Regulation, directly applicable across Member States and known as the AMLR, the sixth AML Directive, transposed individually by each Member State, and the AMLA Regulation, which establishes the Anti-Money Laundering Authority and defines its direct and indirect supervisory perimeter. Together these instruments shift supervision of high-risk cross-border obliged entities away from purely national authorities toward a hybrid EU-level regime, with the Anti-Money Laundering Authority beginning direct supervision of a first cohort of high-risk cross-border obliged entities as that regime matures. This is durable structural backdrop rather than a Costa Rica-specific development, since the AMLR, sixth AML Directive and AMLA Regulation perimeter is EU and European Economic Area Member State-specific and does not extend to third countries such as Costa Rica absent an EU high-risk third-country listing, which Costa Rica currently lacks. For Costa Rica, the directly relevant transparency question remains domestic, whether the RTBF registry and the DNFBP gatekeeping gap will withstand the effectiveness testing GAFILAT is expected to apply in the Fifth Round Mutual Evaluation.

Costa Rica remains confirmed absent from both the October 2025 and February 2026 FATF Jurisdictions Under Increased Monitoring lists, having concluded its Fourth Round enhanced follow-up in February 2024 with the technical-compliance upgrades described above. This absence from the grey list, read alongside the untested registry and the unresolved DNFBP gap, illustrates a jurisdiction whose formal technical-compliance rating has improved while the practical effectiveness of its beneficial-ownership architecture remains unverified.

Outlook

The determinative near-term event for Costa Rica beneficial-ownership architecture is the GAFILAT Fifth Round Mutual Evaluation, with onsite timing not yet fixed but indicative Plenary discussion around mid-2027. Unlike the 2024 follow-up, which re-rated technical compliance, the Fifth Round is expected to test effectiveness, whether the RTBF registry and DNFBP supervision actually defeat shell-company layering in practice, directly against the front-company architecture the OFAC designations exposed this cycle. A negative effectiveness finding at that evaluation would represent the first substantive corroboration that the gaps identified in 2024 have produced real-world laundering outcomes rather than remaining theoretical.

Judgment: No CR-specific beneficial-ownership development identified this cycle. Uncertain
Cumulative analysis

Beneficial Ownership and Corporate Transparency — Cumulative Analysis

Across monitoring cycles, the Costa Rica beneficial-ownership posture has remained structurally static at the registry-mechanism level while the residual weakness, DNFBP customer-due-diligence gaps in company-formation channels, has persisted unresolved. The Costa Rica non-public RTBF registry, established under Decree 41040-H pursuant to Law 7786, mandatory but not public and cross-checked against tax and financial-institution records, has not been independently tested against DNFBP-facilitated shell-company layering of the kind alleged in the Picado Grijalba and Gamboa-linked front-company networks OFAC has designated. The GAFILAT Fourth Round Enhanced Follow-up, concluded February 2024, upgraded Recommendation 17 to Compliant and Recommendations 22 and 28 to Largely Compliant, yet the underlying gap those upgrades did not close, DNFBP due diligence on company-formation activity, remains the single most consequential open finding in this domain across every cycle reviewed to date.

Costa Rica sits outside the direct perimeter of the EU AML Package, comprising the directly applicable AML Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2024/1624), the sixth AML Directive transposed at Member State level, and the AMLA Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2024/1620) establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority with its hybrid direct/indirect cross-border supervision perimeter. This EU architecture is durable global structural context rather than a driver of the Costa Rica trajectory, which is instead set by the GAFILAT mutual-evaluation cycle. No AMLA-specific horizon anchor has been carried for Costa Rica in any cycle reviewed, consistent with its status as a non-EU/EEA jurisdiction.

Outlook

The GAFILAT Fifth Round Mutual Evaluation remains the decisive forthcoming test across cycles: it will determine whether the RTBF registry and DNFBP supervision function effectively in practice, closing the gap identified in the Fourth Round follow-up, or whether the company-formation CDD weakness persists into a further evaluation round.

domain_sub_briefs · D2 · Cumulative analysis
Standing baseline position

CONASSIF Acuerdo 2055-2026 (approved 5 Oct 2026, published 14 Oct 2026) requires prospectus disclosure of 10%+ shareholders and fit-and-proper screening of securities-market managers, framed as an AML/capital-legitimation measure; 6-month compliance window for registered issuers.

Periodic updates (3)
18 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-18

Beneficial Ownership and Corporate Transparency

Costa Rica's securities-market beneficial-ownership regime tightened materially this cycle with CONASSIF's unanimous, firm approval of Acuerdo 2055-2026 on 5 October 2026, published in Gazette Supplement No. 138 on 14 October. The amended Reglamento sobre Oferta Publica de Valores now requires issuers to disclose, in their prospectuses, any shareholder holding 10 percent or more of the issuer, counting not only direct holdings but also indirect holdings and those exercised through an economic group. This is a meaningful lowering of the practical disclosure threshold for securities issuers, since economic-group aggregation closes a route by which a controlling interest could otherwise be split across nominally separate direct holdings below a simple ownership cut-off. Investment managers and fund administrators face a parallel tightening: they must now be screened for professional experience, personal and professional background, and exposure to international sanctions or watch lists before they can act in that capacity. The measure is explicitly framed, in reporting on its adoption, as an anti-money-laundering and capital-legitimation tool rather than a pure market-conduct rule, placing it squarely within the beneficial-ownership and corporate-transparency typology even though its vehicle is securities regulation rather than a general corporate-registry reform. The amendment took legal effect immediately upon publication, with a six-month compliance runway for issuers already registered with the regulator, meaning the practical deadline for full compliance falls in mid-April 2027.

As standing structural context, the European Union's AML Package is organised as three distinct instruments: the directly applicable AML Regulation (AMLR, Regulation (EU) 2024/1624), the sixth AML Directive (6AMLD), transposed individually by each EU Member State, and the AMLA Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2024/1620), which establishes the Anti-Money Laundering Authority and begins shifting supervision of higher-risk obliged entities from purely national authorities toward a hybrid EU-level perimeter of direct and indirect AMLA supervision. Costa Rica sits entirely outside this architecture; it is not an EU or EEA jurisdiction and is not bound by AMLR, 6AMLD, or AMLA's supervisory perimeter in any respect. The relevance of the EU architecture to Costa Rica's own position is therefore limited to comparison: it illustrates one model of how a jurisdiction can escalate beneficial-ownership transparency structurally, whereas Costa Rica's own current move is narrower and sector-specific, confined to the securities-issuer and investment-manager population supervised by CONASSIF rather than a general corporate beneficial-ownership register reform. No evidence this cycle points to a parallel general corporate-registry beneficial-ownership initiative in Costa Rica; the finding is confined to the securities sector.

The finding rests on a single Tier 3 quality-press account of the CONASSIF session and gazette publication rather than a directly retrieved primary CONASSIF or Gazette text, which is a gap worth noting for anyone relying on the precise statutory language rather than the reported substance.

Outlook

The six-month compliance window attached to Acuerdo 2055-2026 means the practical test of this reform, whether already-registered issuers restructure disclosure practices or economic-group arrangements to meet the new 10 percent threshold, will not be visible until around April 2027. Separately, the prospective transfer of fintech-sector governance from the Banco Central de Costa Rica to CONASSIF, still at the discussion stage as of the 16 September 2026 board session, would, if adopted, extend CONASSIF's institutional reach over ownership and transparency questions beyond the securities sector into payments and fintech more broadly. Readers tracking Costa Rica's beneficial-ownership posture should watch both the compliance deadline and the BCCR-CONASSIF governance question as the two threads likely to generate the next material development.

4 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-04

Beneficial Ownership and Corporate Transparency

Costa Rica sits outside the European Unions AML Package architecture: the AML Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2024/1624, directly applicable), the sixth AML Directive (6AMLD, transposed per Member State), and the AMLA Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2024/1620) establishing the Anti-Money Laundering Authority form a structural backdrop for EU and EEA jurisdictions, shifting supervision toward a hybrid EU-level regime, but Costa Rica is autonomous and non-EEA and is not bound by that architecture. In Costa Rica, the directly relevant beneficial-ownership development this cycle is narrower and locally sourced: secondary legal commentary, not yet corroborated against the gazette text of Law 10961, states that virtual asset service providers will also need to file annually into Costa Ricas existing Transparencia y Beneficiarios Finales (RTBF) registry, administered by the Central Bank, as the countrys new Article 15 quater VASP registration regime is implemented. If confirmed, this would extend an existing beneficial-ownership filing mechanism to a newly regulated population rather than create a new registry. Until a primary regulatory or statutory source confirms the extension, it remains an open question whether RTBF coverage of VASPs follows automatically from VASP status or requires separate implementing action by CONASSIF or the Central Bank.

Globally, the EU AML Package sets the structural direction for beneficial-ownership transparency architecture that other jurisdictions are sometimes measured against informally, but in Costa Rica the operative question is this narrower, locally specific RTBF extension rather than any EU-aligned transposition exercise.

Outlook

Confirmation or denial of the RTBF-VASP filing extension against the primary gazette text or a CONASSIF implementing regulation would resolve the single open beneficial-ownership question in Costa Rica this cycle. Absent that confirmation, the extension should be treated as reported but unverified.

6 Aug 2026 · fim-2026-08-05

Beneficial Ownership and Corporate Transparency

Costa Rica sits outside the direct perimeter of the EU AML Package; as a non-EU/EEA jurisdiction, transposition obligations and the AMLA direct-supervision selection methodology do not apply to Costa Rica obliged entities. The directly relevant beneficial-ownership signal this cycle is domestic and, on the substantive registry mechanism, unchanged: the Costa Rica non-public RTBF beneficial-ownership registry, established under Decree 41040-H pursuant to Law 7786, carried no reported change this cycle, and the GAFILAT Fourth Round Enhanced Follow-up, which in February 2024 upgraded the Costa Rica technical-compliance rating on Recommendation 17 to Compliant and on Recommendations 22 and 28 to Largely Compliant, continues to flag persistent customer-due-diligence gaps in the DNFBP sector, notaries, lawyers, and accountants, that facilitate company formation, ahead of the jurisdiction Fifth Round evaluation. The residual weakness, in other words, sits at the professional-gatekeeper layer rather than in the registry architecture itself.

Globally, the EU AML Package sets the structural direction for beneficial-ownership and corporate-transparency supervision. It comprises three distinct instruments: the directly applicable AML Regulation (AMLR, Regulation (EU) 2024/1624); the sixth AML Directive (6AMLD), transposed at Member State level; and the AMLA Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2024/1620), which establishes the Anti-Money Laundering Authority and shifts a defined perimeter of cross-border obliged-entity supervision from purely national authorities toward a hybrid EU-level regime of direct and indirect supervision. This is standing structural backdrop rather than a Costa Rica-specific development this cycle; the interpreter carried no AMLA-specific horizon anchor for Costa Rica, consistent with the standing tracker assessment that the EU AML Package is not applicable to Costa Rica as a non-EU/EEA jurisdiction. The Costa Rica own beneficial-ownership trajectory is instead governed by its GAFILAT mutual-evaluation cycle and domestic registry design, not by the AMLA supervisory perimeter.

Outlook

The next material test for the Costa Rica beneficial-ownership architecture is not a new instrument but an evaluative one: the GAFILAT Fifth Round Mutual Evaluation, which will test whether the RTBF registry and DNFBP supervision function effectively against the CDD gaps already flagged in the Fourth Round follow-up, rather than simply re-rating technical compliance on paper. Absent a dedicated legislative fix to DNFBP company-formation CDD obligations before that evaluation, the gap identified this cycle is likely to persist as the primary open finding in the Costa Rica beneficial-ownership and transparency posture.

D3 Enabler Jurisdictions

no_changeno_changestanding position

Enabler Jurisdictions and Professional Facilitators

Costa Rica this cycle illustrates the F3 enabler-jurisdiction filter across two distinct but related tracks, physical trade-based laundering infrastructure and narco-political penetration of state institutions. On the trade side, cocaine originating in Colombia is being trans-shipped through Costa Rica Caribbean ports, principally Moin and Limon, and concealed within containerised banana and pineapple exports using gancho ciego and gancho perdido concealment methods. This is corroborated by a 70 million dollar cocaine seizure inside a Costa Rica-origin pineapple shipment intercepted in Spain in late 2025, and by a primary FATF Free Trade Zone money-laundering-vulnerabilities report alongside investigative reporting describing Costa Rica as an emergent cocaine hub. Costa Rica additionally sits within a documented regional banana route running from Brazil and Ecuador through Costa Rica to Europe, which exploits the established, low-suspicion profile of multinational fruit-export supply chains, compounded by the GAFILAT-identified gap in DNFBP coverage of company-formation contribution activity under Recommendation 22.

Continue reading

This is a systemic capacity question rather than a simple enforcement gap, Costa Rica free-trade-zone and port infrastructure was built to enable a legitimate export-led growth model, and that same infrastructure, combined with relatively light port and customs scrutiny, is now structurally exploited for trans-shipment concealment. Individual seizures and designations expose the scheme without altering the underlying capacity deficit that makes the route attractive.

On the narco-political track, Costa Rica judicial police arrested former Security Minister and Supreme Court Justice Celso Gamboa Sanchez in June 2025, pending extradition to the United States on a Drug Enforcement Administration request for international drug trafficking. This illustrates penetration of narco-linked networks into senior state institutions extending well beyond low-level facilitators. Separately, in September 2025, the Legislative Assembly narrowly failed, by a vote of 34 to 21, short of the required two-thirds threshold, to strip President Chaves of immunity over an alleged influence-peddling investigation, illustrating a structural constraint on anti-corruption enforcement reaching the apex of the state, distinct from but related to the Gamboa case in what it reveals about institutional capacity to hold senior office-holders accountable.

A further, more thinly evidenced facilitator-network signal concerns cross-border bank ownership. A fugitive suspect in the domestic Madre Patria fraud case was recorded on wiretap describing a family arrangement to acquire an ownership representation in a Mexican bank shortly before a relative was appointed deputy director general of that bank and a group he led became its majority investor. This rests on a single tier-two investigative source based on wiretap allegations and has not been independently corroborated by a regulatory or prosecutorial source this cycle, and is carried at an assessed rather than high confidence level accordingly.

Outlook

The enabler-jurisdiction picture for Costa Rica is likely to be shaped over the coming cycles by two distinct tracks moving on different timelines, the GAFILAT Fifth Round evaluation, which will test whether the DNFBP gatekeeping gap and free-trade-zone exposure have been addressed at a structural level, and the domestic political and judicial process around the Gamboa extradition and any renewed effort to test President Chaves immunity, which will indicate whether narco-political penetration of senior state institutions can be addressed through existing accountability mechanisms or whether those mechanisms continue to fall short of the thresholds required to act.

Judgment: No CR-specific enabler-jurisdiction development identified this cycle. Uncertain
Cumulative analysis

Enabler Jurisdictions and Professional Facilitators — Cumulative Analysis

The cumulative enabler-jurisdiction picture for Costa Rica across the cycles reviewed centres on a single structural reform intersecting with a persistent, unresolved professional-facilitator weakness. The Ley 10730 repeal of the constitutional bar on extraditing Costa Rican nationals, for narco-trafficking and terrorism cases, is the most consequential development identified: it removes a historic safe-harbor mechanism that allowed laundering-linked professionals and officials to remain beyond the reach of foreign prosecution while resident in Costa Rica. The first completed transfer under this reform, former Vice Minister of Public Security Celso Gamboa Sanchez, designated by OFAC in August 2025 for operating a law firm and a football club as laundering vehicles while selling counter-narcotics intelligence to trafficking targets, took place in March 2026, with roughly twenty further extradition requests for Costa Rican nationals pending resolution.

Against this structural improvement, the professional-facilitator layer below the state-capture case remains only partially addressed. The GAFILAT Fourth Round Enhanced Follow-up, concluded February 2024, upgraded Recommendation 17 to Compliant, reflecting the extradition-capacity dimension the Ley 10730 reform has since operationalised, while leaving Recommendations 22 and 28, governing DNFBP customer due diligence and supervision, at Largely Compliant. This asymmetry, extradition capacity resolved, DNFBP gatekeeping unresolved, has held constant across cycles and is the clearest standing enabler-jurisdiction weakness in the Costa Rica profile: the front-company infrastructure exposed by both the Gamboa and Picado Grijalba OFAC designations was formed through exactly the notary, lawyer, and accountant channels GAFILAT has not yet certified as adequately supervised.

The Moin seaport corridor, identified as a transshipment and laundering node amid rising Limon-region violence, adds a logistics-level enabler dimension distinct from the professional-services layer, indicating that Costa Rica enabler exposure is multidimensional rather than confined to a single chokepoint. Read cumulatively, Costa Rica enabler-jurisdiction trajectory is best characterised as structurally improving at the state-capacity level (extradition) while remaining structurally static at the professional-gatekeeper and logistics levels, a pattern that has not shifted materially across the cycles reviewed.

Outlook

The cumulative outlook turns on two unresolved questions carried across cycles: whether the pace of extradition transfers beyond the initial Gamboa case confirms the reform as durable rather than symbolic, and whether the GAFILAT Fifth Round Mutual Evaluation finds that DNFBP company-formation CDD gaps have been substantively closed rather than merely re-rated. Neither question has yet been resolved by any cycle reviewed to date.

domain_sub_briefs · D3 · Cumulative analysis
Periodic updates (3)
4 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-04

Enabler Jurisdictions and Professional Facilitators

Costa Ricas enabler-jurisdiction risk profile shows a mixed trajectory this cycle. On the tightening side, Law 10961s registration-without-licensing model for virtual asset service providers closes part of the long-standing FATF Recommendation 15 gap: VASPs must now register with SUGEF and comply with AML/CFT/CPF duties under Article 15 quater of Law 7786, in force around 19 September 2026. That said, the registration-without-licensing design leaves authorisation-level scrutiny thinner than a full licensing gate would provide, and CONASSIFs implementing regulation on thresholds, scope and technical requirements remains unpublished pending a three-month statutory deadline from entry into force.

On the enablement side, a domestic estimate from Costa Ricas Chamber of Commerce, through its Illicit Trade Observatory, placed illicit trade at approximately CRC 1.6 trillion, roughly US$3.6 billion, reported 10 September 2026 as the countrys principal source of criminal financing, alongside an estimated CRC 664 billion, roughly US$1.5 billion, in forgone tax revenue. This estimate rests on a single Tier-3 press account relaying a non-governmental trade-association figure, not a primary government report, which caps the finding at an uncertain confidence level pending independent corroboration.

Read together, the statutory tightening in the virtual-asset sector and the scale of the illicit-trade estimate describe a jurisdiction where formal AML architecture is being built out even as a large informal channel for criminal financing is independently flagged by a domestic business association.

Outlook

Whether the Chamber of Commerce illicit-trade estimate is corroborated by a primary government or association report, and whether CONASSIFs implementing regulation narrows or widens the practical reach of VASP registration, are the two developments most likely to move Costa Ricas enabler-jurisdiction risk assessment in either direction.

14 Sep 2026 · fim-2026-08-21

Enabler Jurisdictions

The clearest enabler-jurisdiction signal this cycle is embedded within the January 2026 OFAC sanctions action: designated entities include a law firm and a sports club functioning as laundering-facilitation vehicles, alongside several Costa Rica-based entities used for storage and transport within a cocaine-trafficking network. This is a single sourced development this cycle, corroborated at High confidence from a Tier 1 U.S. Treasury source, but it has not been independently supplemented by additional enabler-specific findings this cycle — professional-services regulation, gatekeeper-obligation coverage, or company-formation-agent oversight were not otherwise sourced for Costa Rica this cycle.

The interpreter's key judgment treats this as continuity rather than escalation: Costa Rica continues to show enabler-jurisdiction characteristics via professional and commercial-vehicle facilitation of narcotics-linked money laundering, assessed at Assessed confidence. Given the thinness of sourcing beyond the single sanctions action, this sub-brief is flagged as limited-signal this cycle.

Outlook

Whether the newly-registering VASP population becomes a further enabler vector, or whether additional professional-services gatekeepers are named in future OFAC or GAFILAT-linked action, are the open questions carried into next cycle.

11 Aug 2026 · fim-2026-08-05

Enabler Jurisdictions and Professional Facilitators

The profile of Costa Rica as an enabler jurisdiction improved structurally this cycle, even as a specific weakness at the professional-services layer persisted unresolved. The most significant development is Ley N.10730, the 2025 reform to Article 32 of the Constitucion Politica, which removed the constitutional prohibition on extraditing Costa Rican nationals in narco-trafficking and terrorism cases. Approximately twenty Costa Rican nationals have since been the subject of extradition requests, and the first transfer under the new pathway, Celso Manuel Gamboa Sanchez, the former Vice Minister of Public Security separately designated by OFAC in August 2025 for selling counter-narcotics intelligence to trafficking targets, was completed in March 2026 (fim-2026-W32-004, fim-2026-W32-003). This is a durable, constitutional-level change rather than an administrative circular, and it materially reduces the historic function of Costa Rica as a jurisdiction where nationals implicated in laundering-linked activity could not be surrendered regardless of the underlying evidence.

That improvement sits at the level of state cooperative capacity. It does not, on its own, resolve a distinct and longer-standing weakness at the gatekeeper level. The Fourth Round enhanced follow-up of GAFILAT, while upgrading the rating of Costa Rica on Recommendation 17 to Compliant and on Recommendations 22 and 28 to Largely Compliant in February 2024, continues to flag customer-due-diligence gaps in the notary, legal, and accounting channels used for company formation, the classic professional-facilitator layer through which beneficial ownership can be obscured (fim-2026-W32-005, fim-2026-W32-008). These gaps remain unresolved ahead of the Fifth Round evaluation, and they are the more structurally significant of the two signals this cycle precisely because extradition reform addresses accountability after the fact, while DNFBP customer-due-diligence gaps address whether the underlying laundering-enabling activity can be prevented or detected in the first place.

The identification of the Moin seaport as a transshipment and laundering node, surfaced through the January 2026 OFAC designation, adds a physical-infrastructure dimension to the enabler-jurisdiction picture: a specific corridor, rather than a diffuse national vulnerability, is where enabler dynamics are currently concentrated (fim-2026-W32-007). Taken together, the enabler-jurisdiction read for Costa Rica this cycle is one of partial and uneven improvement, stronger accountability mechanisms at the state level, against persistent professional-facilitator weaknesses that predate this cycle and were not resolved within it.

The new virtual-asset-service-provider registration mandate under Decree 10961, though primarily a crypto-sector development, has an enabler-jurisdiction dimension worth naming here: mandatory SUGEF registration extends a comparable due-diligence discipline to a sector that, prior to 19 June 2026, had no dedicated AML supervisor at all (fim-2026-W32-001). Whether that discipline reaches the same standard already achieved, on paper, in the banking sector depends on the CONASSIF implementing regulation still pending, expected in the third quarter of 2026 (fim-2026-W32-006). Until that regulation is finalised, the virtual-asset sector remains a nominally covered but practically under-specified segment of the gatekeeper architecture of Costa Rica.

Enabler-jurisdiction risk is rarely reducible to a single metric, and the case of Costa Rica this cycle illustrates why: a constitutional-level reform that closes an accountability gap can coexist with a persistent, narrower professional-services weakness, and neither signal should be allowed to dominate the reading of the other. The overlap between the enabler-jurisdiction and sanctions signals this cycle is direct rather than coincidental: Gamboa functioned simultaneously as a sanctioned individual and as the clearest illustration of how a compromised senior official can convert public-sector access into a private laundering-facilitation service, which is precisely the professional-facilitator risk the DNFBP findings of GAFILAT are structured to catch at a lower level of the state.

Outlook

The Fifth Round GAFILAT evaluation, not yet scheduled with precision, is the decisive event to watch: it will test directly whether the DNFBP customer-due-diligence gaps flagged through the Fourth Round follow-up have been substantively addressed or remain the residual enabler weakness they have been since at least February 2024. The extradition pathway opened by Ley N.10730 also bears watching for volume: whether the roughly twenty pending requests convert into further transfers, or stall, will indicate whether the transfer of Gamboa was a first instance of a durable pattern or an isolated case.

D4 Conflict Finance

no_changeno_change
Judgment: No CR-specific conflict-finance development identified this cycle. Uncertain

D5 Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation

watchactive

Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation

The defining development for Costa Rica this cycle is the CONASSIF-initiated consultation on amending Acuerdo Sugef 13-19 to bring virtual-asset service providers under Sugef AML supervision. Published via La Gaceta Alcance N.164/N.187 on 5 October 2026, the draft would require VASPs to identify their clients at a reported threshold near US$1,000, attribute wallet addresses to verified individuals, retain operational records, and report suspicious transactions to Sugef and the financial intelligence unit. Press reporting from 23-24 October 2026 indicates the consultation window remains open. This is an architecture-level finding: Costa Rica's virtual-asset sector currently operates under Law 10961's registration duty alone, with no customer-identification or suspicious-activity-reporting layer attached, so the amendment would mark the jurisdiction's first substantive move toward bringing VASPs inside the standard AML perimeter applied to other obliged entities.

Continue reading

A detail worth foregrounding for the digital-asset reading of this development is the explicit clarification, carried in commentary around the proposal, that registration under the amended Sugef 13-19 framework would not amount to an operating authorization or license. That distinction separates the AML-supervisory question (whether a VASP must identify clients and report suspicious activity) from the market-access question (whether a VASP is licensed to operate), and it signals that Costa Rica's regulators are building the AML layer first without resolving the broader licensing architecture for virtual-asset business at the same time. For firms and counterparties assessing exposure to Costa Rican virtual-asset operators, this means the near-term change is one of reporting and identification obligations rather than a wholesale shift in market-entry requirements.

The gap in the current record is material: no primary-tier source (the official gazette text, a Sugef circular, or the CONASSIF consultation portal itself) was reachable to confirm the closing date of the consultation period or the state of the final text. The standing position therefore rests on secondary press (Diario Extra) and a Substack commentary piece, both useful for establishing that the consultation exists and describing its substantive content, but neither capable of confirming procedural status with the certainty a primary document would provide. This is a reporting posture point, not a doubt about whether the consultation itself occurred.

The broader context for reading this development is Costa Rica's general standing on international AML benchmarks, where available assessment material notes compliance or largely-compliant ratings against a majority of the FATF forty recommendations. That baseline suggests the Sugef 13-19 amendment is best understood as closing a specific, identified gap in the virtual-asset segment of an AML framework that is otherwise assessed as reasonably developed, rather than as evidence of a systemic weakness being remedied from a low base.

Outlook

If the amendment proceeds to adoption substantially as drafted, Costa Rica-registered virtual-asset operators would acquire, for the first time, a full customer-identification, record-keeping and suspicious-activity-reporting duty running to Sugef and the financial intelligence unit, converting an administrative registration regime into a supervised AML relationship. The structural significance of this shift lies less in any single reporting threshold and more in the fact that it brings VASPs inside the same supervisory logic already applied to Costa Rica's regulated financial institutions, closing a sector-specific gap rather than introducing a wholly new regulatory concept. The expected timeframe, as reported, points toward the fourth quarter of 2026, though whether the comment period has closed and whether a final adoption date has been set remains unconfirmed in the sources reviewed. Future cycles should watch for the gazetted final text, confirmation of an effective date, and any penalty provisions attached to non-compliance, each of which was absent from the material available this cycle and would materially sharpen the compliance picture once published.

Judgment: CR's VASP AML perimeter is in active transition from a bare registration duty (Law 10961) to an operationalised Sugef AML supervisory regime once the Sugef 13-19 consultation closes. Probable
Cumulative analysis

Crypto, Digital Assets, and Financial Innovation — Cumulative Analysis

The cumulative digital-asset trajectory for Costa Rica across cycles moves from a documented regulatory vacuum to a first structural closure of that vacuum. Prior cycles recorded that no dedicated Costa Rica virtual-asset service provider licensing or supervisory framework had been identified, against a regional backdrop in which Brazil operationalised a comprehensive VASP framework in November 2025 and FATF scheduled a Q1 2026 stablecoin analysis, and an estimated 1.5 trillion dollar 2025 on-chain value figure for the wider Latin American region underscored the scale of the gap Costa Rica had not yet addressed.

This cycle closes that gap at the statutory level. Legislative Decree No. 10961, amending Law 7786 to add Article 15 quater, published 19 June 2026, brings VASPs into the AML/CFT perimeter via mandatory SUGEF registration, explicitly distinguished from an operating licence. This directly resolves the Financial Action Task Force Recommendation 15 deficiency the 2024 mutual-evaluation follow-up had identified and that prior-cycle coverage of the regional vacuum had anticipated as an open risk. The CONASSIF implementing regulation, expected in the third quarter of 2026, is now the operative variable: it will determine whether the statutory registration mandate converts into functioning KYC, CDD, travel-rule, and STR infrastructure, particularly for smaller Costa Rica-domiciled VASPs that have operated to date without any formal AML supervisor.

Throughout, the domain has carried a persistent secondary observation: no Costa Rica-specific virtual-asset dimension has been identified within the narcotics-trafficking and money-laundering exposure otherwise documented in this jurisdiction, including the OFAC designations and the Moin seaport enabler-node findings. The VASP reform is accordingly best read cumulatively as pre-emptive structural remediation of a supervisory blind spot rather than a response to a demonstrated crypto-channel laundering incident. A further standing observation, unresolved across cycles, is the absence of SUGEF guidance on AI/ML transaction-monitoring or perpetual-KYC expectations, a technology-supervision gap that predates and now sits alongside the newly enacted registration mandate.

Outlook

The decisive cumulative test remains the CONASSIF implementing regulation due in the third quarter of 2026: its content will determine whether Costa Rica has moved from regulatory vacuum to registration-only formality, or to a functioning AML/CFT supervisory regime for VASPs. Whether that regulation also closes the standing AI/ML and perpetual-KYC guidance gap is a second, so far unresolved, question carried forward from prior cycles.

domain_sub_briefs · D5 · Cumulative analysis
Standing baseline position

Ley 10961 VASP AML/CFT registration regime in force since 19 September 2026; CONASSIF implementing regulation (thresholds, registration procedure, Travel Rule technical detail) remained unpublished as of 2 October 2026.

Periodic updates (7)
3 Nov 2026 · fim-2026-11-03

Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation

The defining development for Costa Rica is the CONASSIF-initiated consultation on amending Acuerdo Sugef 13-19 to bring virtual-asset service providers under Sugef AML supervision. Published via La Gaceta Alcance N.164/N.187 on 5 October 2026, the draft would require VASPs to identify their clients at a reported threshold near US$1,000, attribute wallet addresses to verified individuals, retain operational records, and report suspicious transactions to Sugef and the financial intelligence unit. Press reporting from 23-24 October 2026 indicates the consultation window remains open. This is an architecture-level finding: Costa Rica's virtual-asset sector currently operates under Law 10961's registration duty alone, with no customer-identification or suspicious-activity-reporting layer attached, so the amendment would mark the jurisdiction's first substantive move toward bringing VASPs inside the standard AML perimeter applied to other obliged entities.

A detail worth foregrounding for the digital-asset reading of this development is the explicit clarification, carried in commentary around the proposal, that registration under the amended Sugef 13-19 framework would not amount to an operating authorization or license. That distinction separates the AML-supervisory question (whether a VASP must identify clients and report suspicious activity) from the market-access question (whether a VASP is licensed to operate), and it signals that Costa Rica's regulators are building the AML layer first without resolving the broader licensing architecture for virtual-asset business at the same time. For firms and counterparties assessing exposure to Costa Rican virtual-asset operators, this means the near-term change is one of reporting and identification obligations rather than a wholesale shift in market-entry requirements.

The gap in the current record is material: no primary-tier source (the official gazette text, a Sugef circular, or the CONASSIF consultation portal itself) was reachable to confirm the closing date of the consultation period or the state of the final text. The standing position therefore rests on secondary press (Diario Extra) and a Substack commentary piece, both useful for establishing that the consultation exists and describing its substantive content, but neither capable of confirming procedural status with the certainty a primary document would provide. This is a reporting posture point, not a doubt about whether the consultation itself occurred.

The broader context for reading this development is Costa Rica's general standing on international AML benchmarks, where available assessment material notes compliance or largely-compliant ratings against a majority of the FATF forty recommendations. That baseline suggests the Sugef 13-19 amendment is best understood as closing a specific, identified gap in the virtual-asset segment of an AML framework that is otherwise assessed as reasonably developed, rather than as evidence of a systemic weakness being remedied from a low base.

Outlook

If the amendment proceeds to adoption substantially as drafted, Costa Rica-registered virtual-asset operators would acquire, for the first time, a full customer-identification, record-keeping and suspicious-activity-reporting duty running to Sugef and the financial intelligence unit, converting an administrative registration regime into a supervised AML relationship. The structural significance of this shift lies less in any single reporting threshold and more in the fact that it brings VASPs inside the same supervisory logic already applied to Costa Rica's regulated financial institutions, closing a sector-specific gap rather than introducing a wholly new regulatory concept. The expected timeframe, as reported, points toward the fourth quarter of 2026, though whether the comment period has closed and whether a final adoption date has been set remains unconfirmed in the sources reviewed. Future cycles should watch for the gazetted final text, confirmation of an effective date, and any penalty provisions attached to non-compliance, each of which was absent from the material available and would materially sharpen the compliance picture once published.

25 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-25

Crypto, Digital Assets, and Financial Innovation

Costa Rica's financial-integrity exposure in digital assets turned on a single structural development: the June 2026 enactment of Law 10961, adding Article 15 quater to Law 7786, brought virtual asset service providers -- exchange, custody, transfer, and issuance or offer services -- within the registration and AML/CTF supervisory perimeter of SUGEF, the national financial supervisor. In early October 2026, the National Council for Financial System Supervision opened a public consultation on a draft amendment to Acuerdo SUGEF 13-19 intended to give that registration requirement operational substance: risk-based customer due diligence, assessment of new-product and new-technology risk, and suspicious-transaction reporting obligations for registered providers. The statutory registration requirement is well evidenced directly from the official gazette text. The content of the draft amendment, by contrast, is currently known only through secondary press reporting describing what the consultation proposes, so the specific shape of the eventual rule -- thresholds, timelines, and the compliance-officer appointment criteria that industry commentary has flagged as unresolved -- should be treated as probable rather than confirmed pending direct access to the consultation text.

The architectural significance of this development outweighs its immediate enforcement content. Costa Rica's virtual-asset sector has operated for years with no AML-specific obligations at all, a condition consistently associated with a non-compliant rating against the Financial Action Task Force's Recommendation 15 governing new technologies and virtual assets. The consultation does not create a licensing or market-conduct regime -- commentary accompanying the underlying law has been explicit that SUGEF registration is not an authorisation, permit, or endorsement to operate -- but it does establish, for the first time, a formal AML/CTF contact point between the supervisor and the sector. That registration gateway is presently the only regulatory foothold a virtual asset provider has in the jurisdiction, since no parallel licensing, custody, or consumer-protection framework exists alongside it. This means the AML perimeter is, in practice, carrying weight well beyond its nominal purpose: it is simultaneously the sector's entry point for financial-crime supervision and its only point of formal regulatory contact of any kind.

Outlook

The consultation remained open as of late October 2026 reporting, with no independently confirmed closing date or expected adoption timeline. Two developments are worth watching jointly going forward: whether the amendment is adopted in a form that substantively matches what has been reported, and whether adoption occurs before the possible 1 November 2026 onsite visit tied to Costa Rica's Fifth Round Mutual Evaluation by the regional Financial Action Task Force body. A credible, operational VASP AML regime in place ahead of that visit would be a materially relevant data point for the evaluation's assessment of Recommendation 15 compliance; a consultation still unresolved at that point would leave the prior non-compliant finding largely unaddressed in substance, even though the statutory registration trigger itself is already in force.

18 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-18

Crypto, Digital Assets, and Financial Innovation

Costa Rica's Virtual Asset Service Provider regime under Ley 10961 is in force but operationally undefined. The statute, which added Article 15 quater to Ley 7786, has required business-conducted virtual-asset exchange, transfer, custody, administration or issuance-linked service activity on Costa Rican territory to register with SUGEF for AML/CFT supervision since 19 September 2026. As of the most recent check on 2 October 2026, however, CONASSIF had not published, nor even opened public consultation on, the implementing regulation that would give that registration duty practical form: there is no registration form, no platform, and no defined registration window. The result is a binding legal obligation operating without the administrative mechanism needed to satisfy it, an implementation gap rather than a drafting gap, since the underlying statutory duty itself is not in question.

This gap sits inside a broader prospective supervisory-architecture question. The Banco Central de Costa Rica board considered, at its 16 September 2026 ordinary session, ceding direct administration of fintech-sector initiatives, including, by implication, oversight adjacent to the crypto space, to CONASSIF. No instrument has been adopted and the matter remains under discussion, but a formal transfer would consolidate crypto and broader fintech AML supervisory authority more clearly under CONASSIF, the same body responsible for the pending VASP implementing regulation. The two threads, if they both resolve, would put VASP supervision and the entity poised to administer it under a single evolving institutional umbrella.

On the sanctions side, Costa Rica carries standing exposure relevant to the crypto and broader financial-innovation space through the U.S. Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control's designation of five Costa Rican nationals and five Costa Rica-based entities for narcotics trafficking and money-laundering involvement; this action predates the current window and is not crypto-specific, but it forms part of the sanctions backdrop against which any Costa Rica-based virtual-asset activity should be read. Commercial activity in the Costa Rican fintech space more broadly shows 123 companies by aggregator count, with 28 funded and three acquisitions recorded cumulatively, though no single in-window transaction was independently verified, so this should be read as background texture rather than a confirmed development specific to the crypto sub-sector.

Outlook

The CONASSIF implementing regulation for VASP registration is anticipated during the fourth quarter of 2026, though this is a quarter-level estimate carrying real uncertainty, and no registration platform, threshold schedule, or supervisory fee framework currently exists to prepare against. Until that regulation is published, Costa Rica's VASP AML/CFT perimeter remains a statutory duty without an operative mechanism, meaning virtual-asset businesses operating in Costa Rica currently face a compliance obligation they cannot yet practically discharge. The possible BCCR-to-CONASSIF governance transfer, still at the deliberation stage, is a second development to track, since its outcome would affect which institution ultimately administers both the VASP registration gap and broader fintech oversight going forward.

4 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-04

Crypto, Digital Assets, and Financial Innovation

Costa Ricas Legislative Assembly unanimously passed Expediente 25.340, published as Law N.246 10961 in Alcance N.246 78 to La Gaceta N.246 113 on 19 June 2026, adding Article 15 quater to the AML/CFT statute Law 7786. The article defines virtual asset and virtual asset service provider and obliges VASPs -- covering exchange, transfer, custody or control, and issuance-related financial services -- to register with SUGEF and comply with AML/CFT/CPF duties. Registration is explicitly stated not to constitute an operating licence. The law entered into force three months after publication, around 19 September 2026, with CONASSIFs implementing regulation due a further three months after that, expected around the fourth quarter of 2026 and not yet published as of this cycle.

Penalties for breach of registration, customer-due-diligence or reporting duties under amended Article 81 run 5% to 50% of the transaction amount, or 2 to 100 base salaries, scaled to gravity and recidivism. This is Costa Ricas first dedicated AML/CFT perimeter for virtual assets, closing part of the FATF Recommendation 15 gap for the sector, though the registration-without-licensing structure means CONASSIFs forthcoming technical regulation will determine much of the regimes practical substance: thresholds, scope, exclusions and fit-and-proper requirements remain unpublished.

Outlook

CONASSIFs implementing regulation, expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, is the single most consequential near-term development for Costa Ricas digital-asset AML architecture, converting a statutory registration duty into an operative regime with defined technical parameters.

28 Sep 2026 · fim-2026-09-28

Crypto, Digital Assets, and Financial Innovation

Costa Rica formally brought virtual asset service providers within AML/CFT obligated-entity status through new Article 15 quater of Law No. 7786, added by Legislative Decree No. 10961 and unanimously approved by the Legislative Assembly on 25 and 27 May 2026. This is the central digital-asset development of the cycle. SUGEF registration is now mandatory for VASPs for AML/CFT supervisory purposes, but the reform is explicit that this registration is not an operating licence or a form of government authorisation to conduct business. From a financial-integrity perspective, the reform's significance is that it closes an identified FATF Recommendation 15 gap for Costa Rica, extending the country's AML/CFT obligated-entity net to a sector previously outside it entirely.

The reform's confidence rests at Probable rather than Confirmed: it is corroborated across domestic press and vendor commentary, but no primary legislative-gazette text was retrieved directly this cycle, leaving the precise legislative language and effective-date mechanics one step removed from primary verification. What the reform does not do is establish token issuance, custody, or exchange-licensing standards; its scope is confined to AML/CFT registration. This produces a structural feature worth flagging for compliance and risk functions: a VASP counterparty in Costa Rica can now be an AML/CFT obligated entity, subject to SUGEF supervision, while remaining functionally unlicensed in every other regulatory sense, because no broader licensing regime exists to close that gap.

Outlook

Watch for retrieval and confirmation of the primary legislative-gazette text for Legislative Decree 10961, and for whether Costa Rica's regulatory perimeter for VASPs extends beyond AML/CFT registration toward substantive licensing in future cycles. This is the SUGEF registration requirement to track most closely, given its direct bearing on Costa Rica's FATF Recommendation 15 standing.

14 Sep 2026 · fim-2026-08-21

Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation

Costa Rica's Legislative Assembly unanimously approved Amendment No. 25.340 to Law No. 7786 on 27 May 2026, inserting new Article 15 quater and bringing virtual-asset service providers into the AML/CFT obligated-entity perimeter through mandatory SUGEF registration. The amendment was published as Legislative Decree No. 10961 in La Gaceta on 19 June 2026. The interpreter record treats this, at Assessed confidence, as closing a documented FATF Recommendation 15 gap on virtual-asset activity — a structural remediation rather than a single enforcement event, consistent with the architecture-over-incident framing this monitor applies throughout.

The reform is explicitly a registration-for-supervision regime, not an operating licence: VASPs must register with SUGEF for AML/CFT purposes, but that registration does not itself authorise the underlying crypto-asset business activity. This distinction matters for how the finding should be read — Costa Rica has closed a supervisory-perimeter gap without yet building a licensing perimeter around the activity itself, leaving crypto companies free to incorporate and operate without a government-issued VASP licence even as their AML/CFT obligations tighten.

Sourcing for this cycle's headline development is Tier 3 professional-services commentary; no Tier 1 La Gaceta or SUGEF primary-text URL was retrieved, a gap the interpreter record flags explicitly.

Outlook

SUGEF implementing regulations for VASP registration are expected within roughly three months of the 19 June 2026 gazette publication — their issuance, and the operational detail they will set for customer due diligence, record-keeping, and suspicious-transaction-reporting mechanics, is the primary item to watch next cycle. Corroboration of the reform against a primary La Gaceta or SUGEF text would also resolve this cycle's principal sourcing gap.

11 Aug 2026 · fim-2026-08-05

Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation

Costa Rica closed a long-flagged gap in its digital-asset AML architecture this cycle. Legislative Decree No. 10961, amending Article 15 quater of Law 7786 and published in La Gaceta on 19 June 2026, brings virtual-asset service providers into a mandatory SUGEF registration regime for the first time (fim-2026-W32-001). The decree is explicit and deliberate on one point: SUGEF registration is not an operating licence. It is an AML/CFT registration requirement, and its function is to close the gap identified in the FATF mutual-evaluation follow-up process of Costa Rica under Recommendation 15, which requires jurisdictions to regulate virtual-asset service providers for money-laundering and terrorist-financing purposes. Before this decree, virtual-asset service providers domiciled in Costa Rica operated with no dedicated AML supervisor at all.

The architecture-over-incident framing matters here because the practical effect of the decree depends entirely on implementation still to come. The CONASSIF implementing regulation, the instrument that will specify the customer-due-diligence, travel-rule, and suspicious-transaction-reporting infrastructure virtual-asset service providers must build, is expected in the third quarter of 2026, a three-month countdown running from the 19 June 2026 publication date (fim-2026-W32-006). Until that regulation lands, the registration mandate exists as a legal obligation without a fully specified compliance standard behind it, and many smaller virtual-asset service providers domiciled in Costa Rica have not previously built the KYC, travel-rule, or reporting infrastructure the regime will eventually require.

This has a knock-on effect beyond the crypto sector narrowly defined: because regulated Costa Rican financial institutions are the counterparties through which the registration status under SUGEF becomes enforceable, the decree functions as a de facto banking-access gate for virtual-asset service providers, even though it is formally an AML registration rather than a licence. A virtual-asset firm that does not complete SUGEF registration risks losing the banking relationships it depends on to operate at all, which gives the AML instrument market-structure consequences that extend past its formal AML/CFT purpose.

No SUGEF or CONASSIF guidance specific to AI-driven or machine-learning transaction-monitoring tools has been published to date, which leaves a supervisory-expectation gap relative to jurisdictions like the United States, where FinCEN has articulated model-risk expectations for automated AML tooling; this is a compliance-technology gap adjacent to, but distinct from, the registration mandate itself, and it is one Costa Rica has not yet closed.

The scope of the decree is virtual-asset service providers generally, not stablecoins specifically, but stablecoin-settlement rails are captured within that general perimeter, since a virtual-asset service provider domiciled in Costa Rica that settles in a stablecoin is a virtual-asset service provider for purposes of the registration mandate. This is a structural point rather than a stablecoin-specific finding: Decree 10961 does not create a bespoke stablecoin framework, and no such framework has been identified for Costa Rica this cycle.

This closes the discussion of the two applicable enabling texts feeding the registration mandate: the underlying legislative decree itself, published as primary legislation in La Gaceta, and the CONASSIF regulation still pending. Only the former currently carries Tier-1 primary-source confirmation within the evidence base of this cycle; the latter procedural detail rests on secondary legal-advisory reporting pending its own publication (fim-2026-W32-001, fim-2026-W32-006).

Outlook

The CONASSIF implementing regulation, expected in the third quarter of 2026, is the single most consequential near-term event in this domain: its content will determine whether the new VASP perimeter of Costa Rica closes the FATF R.15 gap in substance, with a fully specified CDD and reporting standard, or only in form, with a registration requirement that lacks operational teeth. Watch in particular for whether the regulation addresses the compliance-technology gap around automated transaction-monitoring expectations, and whether smaller virtual-asset service providers that have not previously operated under any AML supervision are given a realistic transition timeline or face an abrupt compliance cliff.

D6 Compliance Technology & Active Defence

no_changeno_changestanding position

Compliance Technology and Active Defence

SUGEF has not published AI/ML-based transaction-monitoring or perpetual-KYC supervisory guidance comparable to the model-risk-management expectations financial supervisors such as FinCEN have articulated in more developed markets. This is a supervisory-expectation gap rather than an enforcement finding: no Costa Rica-specific compliance-technology failure or active-defence deficiency was identified this cycle, and this domain status is recorded as watch rather than material change. The gap is relevant primarily as forward context for the VASP AML/CFT registration mandate introduced under Legislative Decree No. 10961: the CONASSIF implementing regulation, expected in the third quarter of 2026, is the mechanism through which SUGEF could, if it chooses, incorporate technology-specific supervisory expectations into the newly formalised VASP AML perimeter.

Continue reading

The broader Costa Rica financial-sector compliance-technology posture, including transaction-monitoring standards applicable to banks and other obliged entities beyond VASPs, was not independently assessed this cycle; the coverage gap reflects a general absence of published SUGEF guidance rather than a substantive negative finding. This domain accordingly carries limited signal this cycle: the observation is an absence, of published guidance, rather than a documented deficiency in existing systems. Absent any Costa Rica-specific enforcement action or active-defence deficiency this cycle, this domain remains appropriately flagged as thin rather than substantively assessed, consistent with the honesty-over-coverage principle applied across this monitor coverage.

Outlook

Whether the CONASSIF implementing regulation for VASP AML/CFT registration incorporates technology-specific supervisory expectations, such as AI/ML transaction-monitoring standards or perpetual-KYC requirements, will be the first concrete test of whether SUGEF intends to close this gap as part of the broader VASP-perimeter build-out, or leave technology-specific supervisory expectations for a later phase.

Judgment: No CR-specific RegTech/compliance-technology development identified this cycle. Uncertain
Cumulative analysis

Compliance Technology and Active Defence — Cumulative Analysis

Across the cycles reviewed, Costa Rica compliance-technology posture has remained an open supervisory-expectation gap rather than a documented deficiency in existing systems. No SUGEF guidance on AI/ML-based transaction monitoring or perpetual-KYC expectations, comparable to standards articulated by supervisors such as FinCEN in more developed markets, has been published in any cycle reviewed. This absence predates and now sits alongside the newly enacted VASP AML/CFT registration mandate under Legislative Decree No. 10961, and is relevant primarily as forward context for whether the forthcoming CONASSIF implementing regulation, expected in the third quarter of 2026, will incorporate technology-specific supervisory expectations into the VASP perimeter it is otherwise building out.

This domain has consistently carried limited signal, reflecting a genuine absence of published guidance rather than a substantive negative finding about existing systems, and no Costa Rica-specific enforcement action or active-defence deficiency has been identified in this domain to date.

Outlook

The cumulative outlook is unchanged across cycles: whether the CONASSIF implementing regulation incorporates AI/ML or perpetual-KYC supervisory expectations remains the first concrete test of SUGEF intent on this gap, and no cycle reviewed to date has resolved that question.

domain_sub_briefs · D6 · Cumulative analysis
Periodic updates (1)
18 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-18

Compliance Technology and Active Defence

The most significant compliance-technology and active-defence signal for Costa Rica this cycle is institutional rather than technological: the Banco Central de Costa Rica board, at its ordinary session of 16 September 2026, considered ceding direct administration of fintech-sector initiatives to CONASSIF, the National Council for the Supervision of the Financial System. This is a supervisory-architecture question rather than a confirmed decision; no instrument has been issued and the matter remains at the discussion stage as reported. If the transfer proceeds, it would consolidate governance of the fintech sector, and by extension questions of compliance-technology oversight and active-defence posture across payment and fintech firms, under a single supervisory body rather than splitting it between the central bank and CONASSIF as has apparently been the case.

This prospective consolidation is directly relevant to the parallel implementation gap in the Virtual Asset Service Provider registration regime under Ley 10961. That registration duty has been in force since 19 September 2026, but CONASSIF, the very body under discussion as the prospective consolidated fintech supervisor, has not yet published or opened consultation on the implementing regulation that would operationalise VASP registration, as of the most recent check on 2 October 2026. The compliance-technology question for firms in this space is therefore currently unanswerable in practice: there is no registration platform or defined technical requirement against which a firm's compliance architecture could be built or tested, even though the underlying legal duty to register already binds covered entities.

No additional compliance-technology developments, such as new screening-tool mandates, transaction-monitoring technology requirements, or active-defence initiatives specific to the financial sector, were identified for Costa Rica this cycle beyond the institutional governance question and the VASP implementation gap already described.

Outlook

The BCCR governance deliberation remains unresolved, and its outcome will materially shape how compliance-technology and active-defence expectations are set and supervised for Costa Rica's fintech and crypto sectors going forward. Should CONASSIF formally absorb fintech governance, firms should expect eventual consolidation of technical and reporting requirements under one regulator, though the timeline for any such consolidation has not been indicated. In the nearer term, the more concrete development to watch is the CONASSIF VASP implementing regulation, anticipated in the fourth quarter of 2026 on a quarter-level estimate, which would for the first time give compliance teams in the virtual-asset space a concrete technical and procedural target to build toward.

D7 AML/CTF Regime

no_changeno_changestanding position

AML/CTF Regime

The clearest AML/CTF signal from Costa Rica this cycle is one of institutional depth rather than legal change: Costa Rican casinos, both physical and internet-based, have been AML-obliged entities under Article 15 bis of Law 7786 since an amendment in 2017, and have operated under the supervisory framework of Acuerdo SUGEF 13-19 since December 2020. This is standing law rather than a development of the current cycle, confirmed directly from SUGEF's own training materials, which reproduce the statute's obliged-activities table naming casinos explicitly. Under that framework, casinos must register with SUGEF and the Financial Intelligence Unit housed at the Costa Rican Drugs Institute, maintain a board-approved AML/CTF and proliferation-financing prevention manual, identify high-stake and frequent players, and report suspicious activity. The reason this standing position matters now is that it supplies the operating template SUGEF appears to be extending to virtual asset service providers through the Acuerdo SUGEF 13-19 amendment currently out for consultation -- the same instrument, the same supervisor, and a broadly similar compliance-architecture logic applied to a new category of non-bank obliged entity.

Continue reading

At the regime level, Costa Rica's broader standing is stable but approaching a formal test. The jurisdiction remains off the Financial Action Task Force's lists of countries with strategic AML deficiencies, and no grey-listing or black-listing action occurred this cycle. It does, however, remain in enhanced follow-up with the regional Latin American Financial Action Task Force body stemming from its 2015 Fourth Round mutual evaluation, and a possible onsite visit for the Fifth Round evaluation has been listed for 1 November 2026, with a possible plenary discussion around July 2027. That evaluation would reassess Costa Rica's technical compliance and effectiveness across the full set of international recommendations, including Recommendation 15 on new technologies, where the jurisdiction's historical rating has been non-compliant, and Recommendation 22 concerning designated non-financial businesses and professions, a category that includes the casino sector already described above.

Outlook

The proximity of the possible November 2026 onsite visit to the open SUGEF 13-19 virtual-asset consultation creates a natural point of convergence worth tracking: evaluators are likely to look at both the maturity of the casino supervisory model, now six years into operation, and the nascent state of the virtual-asset registration regime, which remains at the consultation stage. Whether the amendment is adopted in time to be presented as an operating control rather than a proposal will have a bearing on how the Recommendation 15 finding is treated in the upcoming evaluation cycle, though the evaluation's own timeline and findings are set independently of the consultation's progress.

Judgment: CR's standing AML/CTF regime (Law 7786/10961, Sugef supervision, GAFILAT 2024 follow-up rating Compliant/Largely Compliant on 37 of 40 Recommendations) is unchanged this cycle. Probable
Cumulative analysis

AML/CTF Regime

Costa Rica's AML/CTF regime remains anchored in Law 8204/7786 under SUGEF and CONASSIF supervision, with the ICD functioning as financial intelligence unit. Two developments this cycle bear on the regime's trajectory. First, a Comprehensive AML Law, Bill 6593, is reported to have passed its third reading in the Legislative Assembly on 14 April 2026, replacing decree-level provisions dating to 2001; this claim carries only Low confidence, resting on a single Tier 3 source with no corroborating primary legislative record retrieved this cycle. Second, at Assessed confidence from a Tier 1 FATF/GAFILAT source, Costa Rica is confirmed to remain outside the FATF grey list while continuing in GAFILAT's enhanced follow-up process stemming from its 2015 Mutual Evaluation, with follow-up reporting extending through 2024.

Read together, these two findings describe a regime under active but incompletely-verified reform, operating against a backdrop of continuing multilateral follow-up rather than either grey-list escalation or a clean exit from enhanced monitoring. The interpreter's key judgment frames Bill 6593 as progressing but single-sourced, and this sub-brief carries that caution forward rather than treating the third-reading claim as settled.

Outlook

Corroboration of Bill 6593's legislative status against a primary Legislative Assembly record is the principal open item for next cycle, alongside whatever GAFILAT follow-up reporting emerges beyond the 2024 cycle already on record.

domain_sub_briefs · D7 · Cumulative analysis
Standing baseline position

Costa Rica's AML/CFT statute Law 7786 was amended by Law 10961 (in force ~19 September 2026) to add Art. 15 quater (VASP registration duty) and amend Art. 81 (penalty schedule: 5%-50% of transaction amount or 2-100 base salaries for registration/CDD/reporting failures).

Periodic updates (3)
25 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-25

AML/CTF Regime

The clearest AML/CTF signal from Costa Rica is one of institutional depth rather than legal change: Costa Rican casinos, both physical and internet-based, have been AML-obliged entities under Article 15 bis of Law 7786 since an amendment in 2017, and have operated under the supervisory framework of Acuerdo SUGEF 13-19 since December 2020. This is standing law rather than a development of the current cycle, confirmed directly from SUGEF's own training materials, which reproduce the statute's obliged-activities table naming casinos explicitly. Under that framework, casinos must register with SUGEF and the Financial Intelligence Unit housed at the Costa Rican Drugs Institute, maintain a board-approved AML/CTF and proliferation-financing prevention manual, identify high-stake and frequent players, and report suspicious activity. The reason this standing position matters now is that it supplies the operating template SUGEF appears to be extending to virtual asset service providers through the Acuerdo SUGEF 13-19 amendment currently out for consultation -- the same instrument, the same supervisor, and a broadly similar compliance-architecture logic applied to a new category of non-bank obliged entity.

At the regime level, Costa Rica's broader standing is stable but approaching a formal test. The jurisdiction remains off the Financial Action Task Force's lists of countries with strategic AML deficiencies, and no grey-listing or black-listing action occurred. It does, however, remain in enhanced follow-up with the regional Latin American Financial Action Task Force body stemming from its 2015 Fourth Round mutual evaluation, and a possible onsite visit for the Fifth Round evaluation has been listed for 1 November 2026, with a possible plenary discussion around July 2027. That evaluation would reassess Costa Rica's technical compliance and effectiveness across the full set of international recommendations, including Recommendation 15 on new technologies, where the jurisdiction's historical rating has been non-compliant, and Recommendation 22 concerning designated non-financial businesses and professions, a category that includes the casino sector already described above.

Outlook

The proximity of the possible November 2026 onsite visit to the open SUGEF 13-19 virtual-asset consultation creates a natural point of convergence worth tracking: evaluators are likely to look at both the maturity of the casino supervisory model, now six years into operation, and the nascent state of the virtual-asset registration regime, which remains at the consultation stage. Whether the amendment is adopted in time to be presented as an operating control rather than a proposal will have a bearing on how the Recommendation 15 finding is treated in the upcoming evaluation cycle, though the evaluation's own timeline and findings are set independently of the consultation's progress.

4 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-04

AML/CTF Regime

Costa Ricas core AML/CFT statute, Law 7786, was materially amended this cycle by Law N.246 10961, adding Article 15 quater to bring virtual asset service providers into the registration perimeter administered by SUGEF. Penalties under amended Article 81 for breach of registration, customer-due-diligence or reporting duties run 5% to 50% of the transaction amount, or 2 to 100 base salaries, scaled to gravity and recidivism. The provision entered into force around 19 September 2026, and CONASSIFs implementing regulation on thresholds, scope, exclusions and technical requirements is due within three months of that date, not yet published.

A separate consequence of the same amendment bars SUGEF-regulated banks from maintaining commercial relationships with persons required to register under Articles 15, 15 bis, 15 ter or 15 quater who are not duly registered, functioning as a banking-access lever independent of the underlying AML substance.

On the assessment-cycle front, FATFs global calendar lists a possible onsite period for Costa Ricas 5th-round mutual evaluation in November 2026 and a possible plenary discussion in July 2027. Costa Ricas 4th-round mutual evaluation, from July 2015, and its enhanced follow-up from February 2024, rated the country Compliant on 17 and Largely Compliant on 20 of the 40 FATF Recommendations, with no current FATF grey-list status. The possible 5th-round onsite would be the first independent test of whether the new VASP registration perimeter closes the Recommendation 15 gap in effectiveness terms, not just on paper.

Outlook

The possible GAFILAT onsite in November 2026, followed by a possible plenary discussion in July 2027, is the key date to watch for an independent effectiveness assessment of Costa Ricas amended AML/CFT regime, including the new VASP registration perimeter.

28 Sep 2026 · fim-2026-09-28

AML/CTF Regime

Costa Rica's AML/CTF regime is anchored on Law No. 7786 (1998, as amended), with SUGEF as the principal financial-sector supervisor and the Instituto Costarricense sobre Drogas (ICD) functioning as the financial intelligence unit. This standing architecture was tested and found improving this cycle: GAFILAT concluded enhanced follow-up on Costa Rica's fourth-round mutual evaluation with upgrades on three FATF Recommendations. Recommendation 17, covering reliance on third parties for customer due diligence, moved from partially compliant to compliant. Recommendation 22, covering DNFBP customer due diligence, moved from partially compliant to largely compliant. Recommendation 28, covering regulation and supervision of DNFBPs, moved from non-compliant to largely compliant. Together these upgrades conclude the enhanced follow-up process for the fourth round of mutual evaluations and represent a genuine improving trajectory in Costa Rica's technical-compliance standing, corroborated by a Tier-1 FATF source confirming the existence of the follow-up report, though the specific rating deltas themselves rest on a professional-body secondary summary rather than the primary technical-compliance annex.

A second development this cycle carries materially lower confidence: a single legal-commentary source reports that Bill 6593, characterised as a comprehensive AML/CFT law, passed its third reading on 14 April 2026. Neither the bill's substantive scope nor its relationship to the existing Law 7786 framework has been independently corroborated, and this should be treated as an uncertain, unverified development pending confirmation against a primary legislative record rather than a confirmed addition to Costa Rica's AML/CTF architecture.

Outlook

The GAFILAT upgrades reduce Costa Rica's count of identified technical-compliance deficiencies and position the jurisdiction favourably ahead of any future FATF or GAFILAT assessment cycle. Confirmation of Bill 6593's actual content and legislative status remains the key open item for this domain; until verified, its relationship to Law 7786 and its true significance to the broader AML/CTF regime cannot be assessed with confidence.

D8 Commercial Activity

no_changeno_change
Judgment: No CR-specific commercial activity in the financial-integrity market identified this cycle. Uncertain
Regulatory horizon
Consultation2026-Q4 · ±quarter

Draft amendment to Acuerdo Sugef 13-19 (VASP AML supervision)

If adopted, VASPs become subject to Sugef standard AML customer-identification, record-keeping and suspicious-activity-reporting regime.
Adopted2026-Q4 · ±half_year

Comprehensive AML Law (Bill 6593)

Passage of a single consolidated AML/CFT statute replacing older sectoral decree-level provisions.
In Force Pending2026-Q4 · ±quarter

VASP AML/CFT registration implementing regulations

VASPs move from unregulated status to mandatory SUGEF AML/CFT registration with CDD, STR-to-ICD, and record-keeping obligations.
Proposed2027-Q3 · ±year

GAFILAT 5th-round mutual evaluation of Costa Rica

A possible onsite visit (Nov 2026) and plenary discussion (Jul 2027) would produce Costa Rica's next full mutual evaluation report under the 2022 Methodology.
4 dated · 3 pending date · baseline financial-integrity-2026-07-05
Role action cards
MLRO

Costa Rica has opened consultation on bringing virtual-asset providers under Sugef customer-identification and suspicious-activity-reporting duties.

Where an institution deals with Costa Rican virtual-asset counterparties, the proposed Sugef 13-19 amendment would, if adopted, create a new identification and reporting relationship for those counterparties that does not currently exist, changing the due-diligence picture for such exposures once in force.

1 evidence refs
Compliance

A draft amendment to Acuerdo Sugef 13-19 would place Costa Rican virtual-asset operators inside the standard AML customer-identification and reporting perimeter.

The policy and control-framework implication is that Costa Rica-based or Costa Rica-exposed VASP relationships currently assessed against a bare registration requirement may need re-assessment once the amendment is adopted, since the compliance baseline for those counterparties would shift materially.

1 evidence refs
Legal

Costa Rica clarifies that Sugef 13-19 registration would not itself constitute a license or operating authorization.

The distinction between AML-supervisory registration and a market-access license is a liability-relevant separation: counterparty risk assessments should not treat registration under the amended rule, once adopted, as evidence of licensed operating status.

1 evidence refs
Board

Costa Rica is moving to close a specific gap in its AML framework by bringing virtual-asset providers under Sugef supervision.

This is a structural, not an incident-level, development: it indicates the jurisdiction is extending an already reasonably rated AML framework to a previously unsupervised sector, which is relevant to strategic exposure assessments involving Costa Rican digital-asset relationships.

1 evidence refs
CTO

Proposed Sugef 13-19 amendment would require Costa Rican VASPs to attribute wallet addresses to verified clients and retain operational records.

If adopted, this introduces specific technical obligations around client-wallet attribution and record retention for any platform or infrastructure handling Costa Rican virtual-asset activity, which is a direct architecture and data-handling implication for affected systems.

1 evidence refs
Risk

Costa Rica's virtual-asset sector is moving from an unsupervised registration regime toward an AML-supervised perimeter.

This changes the risk profile of Costa Rica-linked virtual-asset exposure from an unmonitored gap toward a reporting-covered relationship, which is the kind of structural shift that should be reflected in exposure-concentration assessments involving this jurisdiction once the rule is adopted.

1 evidence refs
Operations

A reported identification threshold near US$1,000 and new reporting duties are proposed for Costa Rican virtual-asset operators.

Should the amendment be adopted, transaction-monitoring and screening workflows touching Costa Rican VASP counterparties would need to account for a new identification threshold and a suspicious-activity-reporting channel to Sugef and the financial intelligence unit that does not currently apply.

1 evidence refs
Audit

No primary-tier source confirmed the closing date or final text of the Sugef 13-19 consultation this cycle.

The evidentiary basis for this development currently rests on secondary press and commentary rather than the official gazette or regulator portal, which is a documented gap in the current audit trail that should be closed once a primary source becomes reachable.

1 evidence refs
Scenario sketches

Illustrative transition from national VASP registration toward a hybrid AML-supervised perimeter

Considered as an illustrative structural pattern rather than a prediction, a jurisdiction that moves from a bare market-registration duty for virtual-asset operators toward a full AML identification and reporting perimeter can be expected to surface previously invisible activity within its own reporting channel, while operators seeking to avoid the new perimeter might shift activity toward unregistered or offshore counterparties not reached by the amended rule. This mirrors, at a smaller structural scale, the broader move seen elsewhere from purely national AML supervision toward layered supervisory architectures combining a directly applicable regulation, a transposed directive, and a dedicated supervisory authority. The illustration is offered to orient analysis of how a national VASP AML amendment interacts with cross-border virtual-asset flows, not as an assessment of what Costa Rica will in fact experience.

Illustrative scenario for analytical orientation only. Not compliance advice, not a prediction, and not a statement of observed fact.

Standing trackers (T1–T6)
TrackerStatusNote
T1 · Russian Sanctions-Evasion Architectureno_changeNo CR-specific Russian sanctions-evasion development identified this cycle.
T2 · EU AML Package / AMLAno_changeCR is not an EEA/EU member; AMLR/6AMLD/AMLA have no direct application to CR.
T3 · FATF Grey Listno_changeCR is not on the FATF grey or black list; 2024 GAFILAT follow-up rated CR Compliant on 17 and Largely Compliant on 20 of 40 Recommendations.
T4 · Beneficial-Ownership Register Statusno_changeNo CR-specific BO registry development identified this cycle.
T5 · Crypto & Digital-Asset IntegritywatchCONASSIF's open consultation on amending Sugef 13-19 to bring VASPs under AML supervision continues; follows Law 10961 and GAFILAT's 2023 Non-Compliant rating on Recommendation 15.
T6 · Sanctions Regime Divergenceno_changeNo new CR-specific sanctions designation or divergence item identified this cycle.
Registers

Enforcement actions

  • 18 Aug 2025
  • 22 Jan 2026
  • 23 Jun 2025
  • 18 Aug 2025
  • OFAC designated a network of notorious Costa Rican narcotics traffickers, including individuals based in Limón and San José, and an affiliated Costa Rican law firm, under Executive Order 14059 for their role in illicit drug trafficking. 18 Aug 2025
  • OFAC designated one of the Caribbean's largest narcotics traffickers, Luis Manuel Picado Grijalba, along with family members and several Costa Rican shell entities (a fishing association, a beauty salon, real-estate SAs) used to front and launder trafficking proceeds. 22 Jan 2026
  • Costa Rica's judicial police arrested former Security Minister and Supreme Court Justice Celso Gamboa Sánchez, together with an alleged accomplice, on a US DEA extradition request related to international drug trafficking, highlighting the penetration of narco-linked professional/political networks into senior state institutions. 23 Jun 2025

Sanctions changes

  • 18 Aug 2025
  • 22 Jan 2026
  • 4 Dec 2025
  • 18 Aug 2025
  • 22 Jan 2026
  • 18 Aug 2025
  • 22 Jan 2026
  • OFAC added Costa Rican narcotics-trafficking individuals and an affiliated law firm to the SDN list under the counter-narcotics EO 14059 program. 18 Aug 2025
  • OFAC designated the Picado Grijalba trafficking network and associated Costa Rican front companies under the illicit-drugs EO 14059 program. 22 Jan 2026
  • The European Commission's December 2025 update to the EU list of high-risk third countries (Delegated Regulations (EU) 2026/46 and 2026/83) added Russia, Bolivia and the British Virgin Islands and delisted several African states, but did not add Costa Rica, despite its recurrent appearance in US counter-narcotics money-laundering designations. 4 Dec 2025

Regulatory horizon (register)

  • CONASSIF implementing regulation for VASP AML/CFT registration under Art. 15 quater, Law 7786
  • VASP AML/CFT registration implementing regulations
  • Comprehensive AML Law (Bill 6593)
  • VASP AML/CFT registration implementing regulations
  • Comprehensive AML law (Bill 6593)
  • CONASSIF implementing regulation for Art. 15 quater (Law 7786) VASP thresholds
  • GAFILAT 5th-round mutual evaluation of Costa Rica
  • CONASSIF implementing regulation for VASP registration under Ley 10961
  • Draft amendment to Acuerdo Sugef 13-19 (VASP AML supervision)
  • Proposed amendment to Acuerdo Sugef 13-19 bringing VASPs under Sugef AML supervision
  • GAFILAT Fifth Round Mutual Evaluation of Costa Rica
  • Next EU high-risk third-country list update cycle
  • Next US State Dept INCSR Vol. II money-laundering jurisdiction review

Active schemes

  • [HIGH] Cocaine trans-shipment concealed in Costa Rican agro-exports
  • [HIGH] Shell-company front networks laundering narco-proceeds
  • DNFBP gatekeeping gaps and regional 'banana route' laundering
  • Cross-border bank-stake acquisition using alleged fraud proceeds
Sources
  1. COSTA RICA LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK
  2. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0227
  3. https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250818
  4. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0369
  5. https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20260122
  6. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/detail/Costa-Rica.html
  7. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/FUR-Costa-Rica-2024.html
  8. https://www.step.org/industry-news/costa-rican-government-introduces-vasp-framework
  9. https://consortiumlegal.com/en/category/area/fintech/
  10. https://www.zitadelleag.com/news/where-to-register-a-vasp-company-without-licensing-costa-rica-and-panama
  11. https://www.cubaliteraria.com/crypto-requirements-in-costa-rica-2026-what-virtual-asset-businesses-must-know-about-aml-cft-and-rtbf/
  12. https://www.elfinancierocr.com/economia-y-politica/plataformas-de-criptomonedas-en-costa-rica-deberan/AF6VZ7DNN5DGBDGKJHFH5NEAXY/story/
  13. https://www.step.org/industry-news/only-minor-deficiencies-remain-costa-ricas-aml-measures-says-fatf
  14. https://www.imprentanacional.go.cr/pub/2026/06/19/ALCA78_19_06_2026.pdf
  15. https://bufetedecostarica.com/ley-proveedores-de-servicios-de-activos-virtuales-en-costa-rica-10961/
  16. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/calendars/assessments.html
  17. https://consortiumlegal.com/en/2026/06/24/vasp-regulation-costa-rica/
  18. https://legalbison.com/crypto-license/costa-rica/
  19. https://www.riotimesonline.com/costa-rica-illicit-trade-organised-crime-2026
  20. El Financiero (CR)
  21. Bufete de Costa Rica
  22. Corporacion GC
  23. U.S. Department of the Treasury
  24. KnowYourCountry
  25. El Financiero (CR)
  26. Tracxn
  27. https://www.diarioextra.com/noticia/proveedores-de-activos-virtuales-deberan-reportar-operaciones-sospechosas/
  28. https://josemoras.substack.com/p/la-sugef-empieza-a-vigilar-el-negocio
  29. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/global-network/financial-action-task-force-of-latin-america--gafilat-.html
  30. https://www.easlatam.com/news/hoteles-y-casinos-que-son-sujetos-obligados-ante-sugef-e-icd
  31. https://www.sugef.fi.cr/sujetos%20inscritos%20ley%207786%20-%20(%20apnfd)/informacion%20apnfd/Capacitacion%20Sugef%2011-18%20del%2018-03-2025.pdf
  32. Diario Extra
  33. José Mora (Substack)
  34. KnowYourCountry
  35. https://www.knowyourcountry.com/country-reports/costa-rica/
  36. Costa Rica
  37. Costa Rica continues to strengthen measures against money laundering and terrorist financing
  38. Financial Action Task Force of Latin America (GAFILAT)
  39. Enhanced Follow-up report and Technical Compliance re-rating of Costa Rica
  40. "Black and grey" lists
  41. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 24 October 2025
  42. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 13 February 2026
  43. Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 21 February 2025
  44. High-risk and other monitored jurisdictions
  45. FATF changes its grey listing criteria to further focus on risk
  46. Costa Rica's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing
  47. Costa Rica's progress in strengthening measures to tackle money laundering and terrorist financing
  48. The FATF Recommendations
  49. First follow-up report to Costa Rica’s assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures
  50. International Narcotics Control Strategy Report Volume II Money Laundering
  51. Money Laundering vulnerabilities of Free Trade Zones
  52. 2025 Crypto Regulatory Round-Up
  53. Sanctions Programs and Country Information | Office of Foreign Assets Control
  54. Counter Narcotics Designations and Designation Removal; Counter Terrorism, Global Magnitsky, and Russia-related Designation Updates | Office of Foreign Assets Control
  55. Counter Narcotics Designation | Office of Foreign Assets Control
  56. Sanctions List Service | Office of Foreign Assets Control
  57. Where is OFAC's Country List? What countries do I need to worry about in terms of U.S. sanctions? | Office of Foreign Assets Control
  58. United Nations Security Council Consolidated List | Security Council
  59. Counter Narcotics and Counter Terrorism Designations | Office of Foreign Assets Control
  60. Counter Narcotics Designations | Office of Foreign Assets Control
  61. Archive of Changes to OFAC's Sanctions Lists | Office of Foreign Assets Control
  62. Directory of Open-Source Registries: Costa Rica
  63. Strategy guidance note on beneficial ownership registries
  64. Catalogue of Research Databases | OCCRP ID
  65. U.S. Beneficial Ownership Information Registry Now Accepting Reports | FinCEN.gov
  66. FinCEN Removes Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirements for U.S. Companies and U.S. Persons, Sets New Deadlines for Foreign Companies | FinCEN.gov
  67. Guidance on Beneficial Ownership and Transparency of Legal Arrangements
  68. Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting | FinCEN.gov
  69. Frequently Asked Questions | FinCEN.gov
  70. United Nations CAC/COSP/IRG/II/4/1/Add.11 Conference of the States Parties
  71. CRIMJUST investigative case forum between Costa Rica and Spain promotes cooperation & ensures that drug-related crimes are investigated beyond seizures
  72. Costa Rica Election: Country’s Rise as Drug Hub Fuels Voter Concerns - Bloomberg
  73. Costa Rica
  74. Report: Costa Rica Now a Cocaine Hub for South America
  75. 2025_4abril_CostaRica_PCCP
  76. NarcoFiles: The New Criminal Order | OCCRP
  77. World Drug Report 2025 - Maps
  78. 138 GLOBAL REPORT ON TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS Costa Rica Institutional framework
  79. Cocaine from South America to the United States
  80. Breaking Down Brazil’s New Crypto Framework
  81. Venezuela Country Guide | Elliptic
  82. 2026_23enero_costa_rica_ciberdelito
  83. Global Crypto Policy Review Outlook 2025/26 Report | TRM Labs
  84. 2025 LATAM Crypto Adoption: Latin America Emerges as Crypto Powerhouse
  85. How crypto regulation changed in 2025: a global review
  86. The stablecoin compliance playbook for stablecoin issuers and financial institutions
  87. European Commission updates list of high-risk countries to strengthen international fight against financial crime - Finance
  88. Anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism at international level - Finance
  89. Commission updates list of high-risk countries to strengthen international fight against financial crime - Finance
  90. Protecting the EU’s financial system - Finance - European Commission
  91. EU methodology for the identification of high-risk third countries - Finance
  92. High risk third countries and the international context content of anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism - European Commission
  93. Commission adds Russia to list of high-risk jurisdictions to strengthen international fight against financial crime
  94. Anti-Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Directive 4 - Finance
  95. 16399/25 ECOFIN 1B EN Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 December 2025
  96. High-risk and other monitored jurisdictions
  97. Assessments
  98. 0 │ FIFTH ENHANCED FOLLOW-UP REPORT OF COSTA RICA October 2018
  99. 2022 Procedures for the FATF AML/CFT/CPF Mutual Evaluations, Follow-Up and ICRG
  100. Mutual Evaluations
  101. GAFILAT Mutual Evaluation Report of the Republic of Costa Rica
  102. First follow-up report to Costa Rica’s assessment of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures
  103. Costa Rica's progress in strengthening measures to tackle money laundering and terrorist financing
  104. Costa Rica Wiretaps Raise Questions Over Mexican Bank Takeover Bid | OCCRP
  105. Costa Rica Arrests Officials, Construction Company Leaders for Graft | OCCRP
  106. Costa Rican Bill Seeks to Ban Corrupt Construction Companies | OCCRP
  107. Costa Rica President Chaves Survives Vote to Strip His Immunity - Bloomberg
  108. The Dictators’ Bank: How Central America’s Main Development Bank Enabled Corruption and Authoritarianism | OCCRP
  109. Turkish Journalist Arrested for Allegedly Insulting Erdogan | OCCRP
  110. Costa Rica Arrests Ex-Security Minister Wanted in the US for Drug Trafficking | OCCRP
  111. Costa Rica ex-leader Calderon gets five years for corruption | OCCRP
  112. US bars executives of Costa Rica’s leading newspaper La Nación from entry - ICIJ
  113. Corruption Threatens Democracies Worldwide, Transparency International Warns | OCCRP
  114. [Withdrawn] Doing business in Costa Rica: Costa Rica trade and export guide - GOV.UK
  115. Doing business in Costa Rica - European Commission's trade
  116. Panamanian Law Firm Is Gatekeeper To Vast Flow of Murky Offshore Secrets - ICIJ
  117. Department for Business and Trade Costa Rica - GOV.UK
  118. Overseas business risk: Costa Rica - GOV.UK
  119. A notorious drug kingpin set up shell companies in the British Virgin Islands and Dubai to employ alleged cartel underlings, documents show - ICIJ
  120. COSTA RICA LIMITED overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK
  121. COSTA RICA LIMITED more information - Find and update company information - GOV.UK
  122. COSTA RICA LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK
  123. FATF
  124. GAFILAT / FATF
  125. FATF
  126. FATF
  127. US Treasury OFAC
  128. US Treasury OFAC
  129. European Commission (DG FISMA)
  130. UNODC / UNCAC Implementation Review Group
  131. OCCRP
  132. Bloomberg
  133. OCCRP
  134. OCCRP
  135. Bloomberg
  136. ICIJ
  137. FATF
Coverage gaps
fim-int-2026-07-07-G001: No dedicated Costa Rican VASP/crypt…
fim-int-2026-07-07-G001: No dedicated Costa Rican VASP/crypto-asset sector national risk assessment publication was located to corroborate D5 findings. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-07-07-G002: RTBF beneficial-ownership registry …
fim-int-2026-07-07-G002: RTBF beneficial-ownership registry effectiveness remains untested pending the outcome of the GAFILAT Fifth Round Mutual Evaluation. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-07-07-G003: GAFILAT Fifth Round onsite visit ti…
fim-int-2026-07-07-G003: GAFILAT Fifth Round onsite visit timing for Costa Rica is not yet fixed, limiting precision on the D2 horizon assessment. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-07-07-G004: No live re-pull of a current UK OFS…
fim-int-2026-07-07-G004: No live re-pull of a current UK OFSI/HMT advisory was performed this cycle to independently confirm Costa Rica's UK HRTC status, which is currently inferred from EU alignment. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-07-07-G005: The alleged Costa Rica-Mexico bank-…
fim-int-2026-07-07-G005: The alleged Costa Rica-Mexico bank-stake acquisition (claim fim-2026-W28-011) rests on a single T2 investigative wiretap report with no independent regulatory or prosecutorial corroboration. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-08-05-G001: D4 conflict-finance coverage for Co…
fim-int-2026-08-05-G001: D4 conflict-finance coverage for Costa Rica was thin this cycle; no dedicated CR-specific war-economy or conflict-mineral nexus search was completed. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-08-05-G002: Tier-D jurisdictions (KH, LA, MX, C…
fim-int-2026-08-05-G002: Tier-D jurisdictions (KH, LA, MX, CO) were not independently swept this cycle; collection budget was concentrated on Costa Rica. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-08-05-G003: No T1 CONASSIF/SUGEF primary text f…
fim-int-2026-08-05-G003: No T1 CONASSIF/SUGEF primary text for the implementing regulation was available this cycle; the horizon item relies on secondary legal-advisory sources for procedural detail. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-08-21-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '…
fim-int-2026-08-21-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D5'}): No T1 La Gaceta or SUGEF publication URL was retrieved for Legislative Decree No. 10961 (VASP registration reform); all corroboration this cycle is T3 professional-services commentary. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-08-21-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '…
fim-int-2026-08-21-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D7'}): Bill 6593's third-reading passage is single-sourced (T3) this cycle and not corroborated against a primary legislative record. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-08-21-G003: Tier D jurisdictions (KH, LA, MX, C…
fim-int-2026-08-21-G003: Tier D jurisdictions (KH, LA, MX, CO) were not actively searched this cycle given the CR-bound scope of this dispatch. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-09-28-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '…
fim-int-2026-09-28-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D5'}): No T1 legislative-gazette text retrieved for Legislative Decree 10961 (VASP AML reform); reliance on T3 domestic press and T4 vendor commentary caps confidence at Probable. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-09-28-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '…
fim-int-2026-09-28-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D7'}): Bill 6593's scope, relationship to Law 7786, and enactment/publication status could not be independently corroborated this cycle; single T3 source only. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-09-28-G003: D1, D2, D3, D4 and D6 yielded no CR…
fim-int-2026-09-28-G003: D1, D2, D3, D4 and D6 yielded no CR-specific material this cycle; Tier D watch jurisdictions (KH, LA, MX, CO) were not actively re-swept as the pooled union search budget was concentrated on CR. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-10-04-G001: CONASSIF implementing regulation fo…
fim-int-2026-10-04-G001: CONASSIF implementing regulation for Art. 15 quater (thresholds, scope, exclusions, technical requirements) has not been published as of this cycle; a direct CONASSIF primary source would resolve the operative detail of the registration regime. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-10-04-G002: Whether VASPs are formally extended…
fim-int-2026-10-04-G002: Whether VASPs are formally extended into the RTBF beneficial-ownership filing regime rests only on secondary commentary; a primary regulatory or statutory source would confirm this. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-10-04-G003: No official Ministerio de Hacienda …
fim-int-2026-10-04-G003: No official Ministerio de Hacienda primary notice was independently retrieved this cycle for the broader illicit-trade/criminal-financing estimate; a primary Chamber of Commerce or government report would corroborate the figure. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-10-04-G004: Tier-D watch jurisdictions (KH, LA,…
fim-int-2026-10-04-G004: Tier-D watch jurisdictions (KH, LA, MX, CO) were not covered this cycle due to the operator-bound CR-only scope lock; this is a scope gap, not a finding of no material change in those jurisdictions. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-10-18-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '…
fim-int-2026-10-18-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D2'}): Primary CONASSIF/Gazette text for Acuerdo 2055-2026 was not independently retrieved this cycle; the finding rests on a single T3 quality-press source. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-10-18-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '…
fim-int-2026-10-18-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D1'}): D1, D3, D4 and D6 coverage is thin for Costa Rica this cycle; Tier-D fleet-wide elevated collection requirement was out of scope for this single-JID dispatch. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-10-25-G001: Tier D jurisdiction coverage (Cambo…
fim-int-2026-10-25-G001: Tier D jurisdiction coverage (Cambodia, Laos, Mexico, Colombia) was not actively re-swept this cycle; the pooled research budget was allocated to Costa Rica per the union run's scope. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-10-25-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '…
fim-int-2026-10-25-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D2'}): D2, D3, D4 and D8 domains were checked for Costa Rica but yielded no qualifying finding this cycle; this is a coverage gap, not a confirmed absence of activity. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-10-25-G003 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '…
fim-int-2026-10-25-G003 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D5'}): CONASSIF session minutes and the draft SUGEF 13-19 text itself were not directly retrieved this cycle; the amendment's substantive content rests on T2/T3 secondary reporting rather than the primary draft instrument. [resolved]
fim-int-2026-11-01-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '…
fim-int-2026-11-01-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D5'}): Whether CONASSIF has closed the Sugef 13-19 consultation comment period and published final implementing text was not confirmed this pass. [open]
fim-int-2026-11-01-G002: Tier D jurisdiction watch (KH/LA/MX…
fim-int-2026-11-01-G002: Tier D jurisdiction watch (KH/LA/MX/CO) was not performed this pass; this run is structurally bound to a single JID (CR) under the Union per-JID dispatch model, which conflicts with FIM's global Tier-D-every-cycle requirement. [open]
FIM-GAP-001 (D3): Despite UNODC Container Control Programme …
FIM-GAP-001 (D3): Despite UNODC Container Control Programme training and port scanning capacity-building, Costa Rica's Caribbean ports and free-trade-zone logistics chains remain a primary conduit for cocaine trans-shipment concealed in legitimate agro-exports, with a $70 million cocaine seizure inside a Costa Rica-origin pineapple shipment in Spain in late 2025.
FIM-GAP-002 (D2): GAFILAT's 2024 enhanced follow-up found th…
FIM-GAP-002 (D2): GAFILAT's 2024 enhanced follow-up found that Costa Rica's DNFBP regulation for notaries, lawyers and accountants does not explicitly cover situations where such professionals organise 'contributions' for the creation, operation and management of companies, leaving Recommendation 22 only partially addressed even after re-rating.
FIM-GAP-003 (D3): In September 2025 Costa Rica's Legislative…
FIM-GAP-003 (D3): In September 2025 Costa Rica's Legislative Assembly voted 34-21 to strip President Rodrigo Chaves' immunity over an alleged influence-peddling investigation — a majority, but short of the two-thirds threshold required — leaving the sitting executive shielded from prosecution ahead of the 2026 general election.
FIM-GAP-004 (D5): No dedicated Costa Rican VASP/crypto-asset…
FIM-GAP-004 (D5): No dedicated Costa Rican VASP/crypto-asset licensing framework, nor sector-specific national risk-assessment publications for private banking, TCSP or fund management, were located in this baseline research pass; sector_rna_urls is left empty pending targeted follow-up.

Evidence

Confidence-tiered claims

Virtual asset service providers (exchange, transfer, custody/control, issuance-related financial services) must register with SUGEF; registration is not an operating licence. Law entered into force ~19 September 2026. [Source 1]
Probable · 1 source
Penalties of 5%-50% of transaction amount, or 2-100 base salaries, for registration/CDD/reporting failures under Art. 15 quater. [Source 1]
Probable · 1 source
CONASSIF must issue implementing regulations for Art. 15 quater (thresholds, scope, exclusions, technical requirements) within three months of entry into force (~December 2026); not yet published as of this cycle. [Source 1]
Probable · 1 source
Possible onsite period November 2026 and possible plenary discussion July 2027 under Costa Rica's 5th-round mutual evaluation (2022 Methodology). [Source 1]
Probable · 1 source
Illicit trade estimated at approximately CRC 1.6 trillion (~US$3.6bn), described as Costa Rica's principal source of criminal financing, alongside an estimated CRC 664bn (~US$1.5bn) in forgone tax revenue; reported 10 September 2026. [Source 1]
Uncertain · 1 source
VASPs will reportedly need to file Costa Rica's existing Transparencia y Beneficiarios Finales (RTBF) beneficial-ownership registry annually with the Central Bank, extending BO-registry coverage to the new VASP population; not independently confirmed against the gazette text. [Source 1]
Uncertain · 1 source
Issuers must disclose in prospectuses any shareholder (direct, indirect or via economic group) holding 10% or more; investment managers face experience, background and international-list screening requirements [Source 1]
Probable · 1 source
BCCR board discussed (16 Sept 2026 session, reported 7 Oct 2026) ceding direct administration of fintech-sector initiatives to CONASSIF [Source 1]
Uncertain · 1 source
CONASSIF implementing regulation for VASP registration remained unpublished and no consultation opened as of 2 October 2026 [Source 1]
Probable · 1 source
Outside both FATF call-for-action and increased-monitoring lists; continuing GAFILAT enhanced follow-up on 2024 ratings (17 Compliant/20 Largely Compliant) [Source 1]
Probable · 1 source
Five Costa Rican nationals and five Costa Rica-based entities designated for narcotics trafficking and money laundering involvement (January 2026, predates window) [Source 1]
Probable · 1 source
123 fintech companies, 28 funded, $70.4M cumulative venture funding, 3 acquisitions to date (aggregator data); no single dated in-window transaction independently verified [Source 1]
Uncertain · 1 source
Draft amendment to Acuerdo SUGEF 13-19 operationalising VASP AML/CFT obligations under Law 10961 Art. 15 quater [Source 1]
Probable · 1 source
AML-obliged entities under Law 7786 Art. 15 bis since 2017, supervised under Acuerdo SUGEF 13-19 since 2020 [Source 1]
Probable · 1 source
Fifth Round Mutual Evaluation of Costa Rica, possible onsite period 1 November 2026, possible Plenary discussion around 1 July 2027 [Source 1]
Probable · 1 source
consultation_open [Source 1]
Probable · 1 source
Acuerdo Sugef 13-19 (bringing VASPs under Sugef AML supervision for customer identification and suspicious-activity reporting) [Source 1]
Probable · 1 source
Virtual-asset service providers, as of 2026-09-19, under Law 7786 Article 15 quater, via Sugef registration duty [Source 1]
Probable · 1 source
not_listed [Source 1]
Probable · 1 source