--- title: "Dominican Republic (DO) — Financial-Integrity Intelligence · Sentinel" canonical: https://sentinel.gi/jurisdictions/dominican-republic/ source_html: /jurisdictions/dominican-republic/index.html description: "Financial integrity intelligence for Dominican Republic (DO): sanctions, beneficial ownership, enabler jurisdictions, conflict finance, digital assets and compliance technology — with sourced findings." generated_at: 2026-11-08T04:46:02Z content_sha256: 63f7467247dc4e9347c958396bf812e4469dbe0e1a74bc61887c4bf06f8c7e84 generator: "fe-fleet/md-twin@1.0" --- # Dominican Republic (DO) — Financial-Integrity Intelligence · Sentinel Not every instrument is backed by its official text yet. At least one law or rulebook covered here has no official source (tier 1) retrieved for it yet. No finding on this page is shown with confidence above “Probable” until stronger sources are retrieved. Financial Integrity Monitor # Dominican Republic DO Domains covered 8 of 8 Sources 147 Role actions 8 Horizon <90d 1 Jurisdiction profile FATF status: Clean Tier: B Risk direction: Stable Enablement vs enforcement: Mixed AML/CFT/CPF framework rests on Law 155-17 (2017) and Decrees 407/408-2017, coordinated via CONCLAFIT and the UAF (Financial Analysis Unit). More GAFILAT's 2018 MER found the legal framework largely aligned with FATF standards but effectiveness incipient outside banking/securities, especially DNFBP supervision, BO transparency and TF investigation capacity. Key deficiencies - Risk-based supervision and CDD implementation remain weak outside banking/securities sectors, particularly DNFBPs (real estate, casinos, lawyers/notaries) - Limited beneficial ownership transparency and reliance on tax-authority (DGII) records rather than a dedicated centralized BO registry - Porous land/maritime border with Haiti enabling bulk-cash, arms and narcotics smuggling with weak interdiction capacity - Historically low volume of proactive UAF-disseminated intelligence relative to reliance on ad hoc prosecutorial requests - Uncertain current Egmont Group full-membership status for the UAF (flagged as a 2018 MER priority action; not reconfirmed in this research pass) Recent developments (18m) - Public Prosecutor's Office 'Operation Owl' custody orders against Coop-Herrera cooperative executives for simulated loans, inorganic financial certificates and money laundering - February 2025 interdiction in the Dominican Republic of a Miami-sourced arms shipment (Barrett M82, sniper rifles, Uzi, 36,000+ rounds) destined for Haiti gangs - Dominican law-enforcement seizure of two large illicit firearms shipments cited by UN Security Council members (mid-2025) as a positive contribution to Haiti arms-embargo enforcement - Dominican Republic named as a transport node in an April 2026 Europol-coordinated dismantling of a Balkan cocaine-cartel logistics cell - Participation in the November 2025 Panama City regional meeting to strengthen implementation of the UN arms embargo on Haiti - Continued non-listing on FATF grey list, EU high-risk third-country list, and UK MLR Schedule 3ZA through the 2025-2026 review cycles despite regional peers (Haiti, BVI, Bolivia) cycling onto those lists Brief ## Lead signal #### Lead Signal The Dominican Republic's gambling-sector oversight has shifted institutional hands at a moment when the sector carries anti-money-laundering obligations that depend on continuity of supervision. Ley 86-26, the new consolidated gambling statute, replaced the Direccion de Casinos y Juegos de Azar (DCJA) with a newly created Direccion General de Juegos de Azar (DGJA) as of 13 October 2026. The DCJA had previously held the sector-supervisor role for casino and lottery obliged entities registered under Law 155-17, the Dominican Republic's anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorist-financing statute. Press reporting describes the DGJA provisionally and conditionally transferring operator databases to the tax authority, DGII, for fiscal oversight purposes, a data-sharing arrangement that sits adjacent to, but is distinct from, the Financial Analysis Unit's reporting-entity supervision under Law 155-17. No primary instrument from the Financial Analysis Unit or the national anti-money-laundering coordination body has yet been located that states explicitly whether the DGJA inherits the DCJA's AML-supervisory competence over gambling obliged entities outright, or whether a transitional gap exists until the law's implementing regulation is issued. This is a structural question rather than an isolated incident: the answer determines who is accountable for AML supervision of a cash-intensive obliged-entity sector during the period before the implementing regulation lands. Read full brief #### Lead Signal The Dominican Republic's gambling-sector oversight has shifted institutional hands at a moment when the sector carries anti-money-laundering obligations that depend on continuity of supervision. Ley 86-26, the new consolidated gambling statute, replaced the Direccion de Casinos y Juegos de Azar (DCJA) with a newly created Direccion General de Juegos de Azar (DGJA) as of 13 October 2026. The DCJA had previously held the sector-supervisor role for casino and lottery obliged entities registered under Law 155-17, the Dominican Republic's anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorist-financing statute. Press reporting describes the DGJA provisionally and conditionally transferring operator databases to the tax authority, DGII, for fiscal oversight purposes, a data-sharing arrangement that sits adjacent to, but is distinct from, the Financial Analysis Unit's reporting-entity supervision under Law 155-17. No primary instrument from the Financial Analysis Unit or the national anti-money-laundering coordination body has yet been located that states explicitly whether the DGJA inherits the DCJA's AML-supervisory competence over gambling obliged entities outright, or whether a transitional gap exists until the law's implementing regulation is issued. This is a structural question rather than an isolated incident: the answer determines who is accountable for AML supervision of a cash-intensive obliged-entity sector during the period before the implementing regulation lands. #### Other Developments FATF plenary outcome confirms no grey-list change. The Financial Action Task Force's 30 October 2026 Plenary did not add the Dominican Republic to its list of jurisdictions under increased monitoring. The country remains off that list, consistent with its existing membership-body follow-up status. This is a continuity finding rather than a new development, but it matters as the backdrop against which the gambling-sector supervisory transition should be read: the country's overall AML/CFT standing with the Task Force has not been disturbed by the domestic institutional change described above. New regulator inherits an enforcement posture, not yet a confirmed AML mandate. The DGJA's first operational actions, issued in its opening days, addressed unlicensed gambling establishments and set a declaration window for unregistered lottery bancas and betting shops. These are gambling-regulatory actions on their face. What is not yet confirmed in the available record is whether these same actions, or the underlying registration data they generate, feed into or substitute for the AML reporting-entity obligations that obliged entities in this sector carry under Law 155-17. The provisional database transfer to the tax authority is the only concrete data-flow development located this cycle, and it is fiscal rather than AML in its stated purpose. #### Cross-Monitor Connections The regulatory restructuring described here sits squarely at the intersection of gambling-sector oversight and anti-money-laundering supervision, and the gap in the public record is itself the signal: a consolidating statute that changes who regulates a cash-intensive, historically higher-risk sector, without yet stating who inherits AML-supervisory competence, is the kind of structural seam that enabler-jurisdiction analysis is built to flag, whether or not any enforcement action or illicit-flow incident is yet visible. Because the Dominican Republic's FATF standing is unchanged this cycle, the signal here is purely domestic-institutional rather than one that has yet registered with the international standard-setter. Analysts tracking regional gambling-sector developments on other products should note the parallel regulatory consolidation, while analysts tracking Caribbean and Central American sanctions or beneficial-ownership exposure should treat this as a watch item rather than a confirmed gap, pending the implementing regulation. #### Outlook The determinative event ahead is the issuance of Ley 86-26's implementing regulation, which the executive is required to publish within ninety days of the statute's 2 October 2026 publication, placing the expected date at approximately the end of December 2026. That regulation is the most likely vehicle to state explicitly how AML-supervisory competence for gambling obliged entities is allocated between the DGJA, the Financial Analysis Unit, and the tax authority. Until it issues, the continuity question identified this cycle remains open, and it should be revisited directly against whatever primary text the implementing regulation and any accompanying Financial Analysis Unit guidance ultimately provide. Earlier periodic briefs (8) 4 Nov 2026 · fim-2026-11-01 #### Lead Signal The Dominican Republic's gambling-sector oversight has shifted institutional hands at a moment when the sector carries anti-money-laundering obligations that depend on continuity of supervision. Ley 86-26, the new consolidated gambling statute, replaced the Direccion de Casinos y Juegos de Azar (DCJA) with a newly created Direccion General de Juegos de Azar (DGJA) as of 13 October 2026. The DCJA had previously held the sector-supervisor role for casino and lottery obliged entities registered under Law 155-17, the Dominican Republic's anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorist-financing statute. Press reporting describes the DGJA provisionally and conditionally transferring operator databases to the tax authority, DGII, for fiscal oversight purposes, a data-sharing arrangement that sits adjacent to, but is distinct from, the Financial Analysis Unit's reporting-entity supervision under Law 155-17. No primary instrument from the Financial Analysis Unit or the national anti-money-laundering coordination body has yet been located that states explicitly whether the DGJA inherits the DCJA's AML-supervisory competence over gambling obliged entities outright, or whether a transitional gap exists until the law's implementing regulation is issued. This is a structural question rather than an isolated incident: the answer determines who is accountable for AML supervision of a cash-intensive obliged-entity sector during the period before the implementing regulation lands. #### Other Developments FATF plenary outcome confirms no grey-list change. The Financial Action Task Force's 30 October 2026 Plenary did not add the Dominican Republic to its list of jurisdictions under increased monitoring. The country remains off that list, consistent with its existing membership-body follow-up status. This is a continuity finding rather than a new development, but it matters as the backdrop against which the gambling-sector supervisory transition should be read: the country's overall AML/CFT standing with the Task Force has not been disturbed by the domestic institutional change described above. New regulator inherits an enforcement posture, not yet a confirmed AML mandate. The DGJA's first operational actions, issued in its opening days, addressed unlicensed gambling establishments and set a declaration window for unregistered lottery bancas and betting shops. These are gambling-regulatory actions on their face. What is not yet confirmed in the available record is whether these same actions, or the underlying registration data they generate, feed into or substitute for the AML reporting-entity obligations that obliged entities in this sector carry under Law 155-17. The provisional database transfer to the tax authority is the only concrete data-flow development located, and it is fiscal rather than AML in its stated purpose. #### Cross-Monitor Connections The regulatory restructuring described here sits squarely at the intersection of gambling-sector oversight and anti-money-laundering supervision, and the gap in the public record is itself the signal: a consolidating statute that changes who regulates a cash-intensive, historically higher-risk sector, without yet stating who inherits AML-supervisory competence, is the kind of structural seam that enabler-jurisdiction analysis is built to flag, whether or not any enforcement action or illicit-flow incident is yet visible. Because the Dominican Republic's FATF standing is unchanged, the signal here is purely domestic-institutional rather than one that has yet registered with the international standard-setter. Analysts tracking regional gambling-sector developments on other products should note the parallel regulatory consolidation, while analysts tracking Caribbean and Central American sanctions or beneficial-ownership exposure should treat this as a watch item rather than a confirmed gap, pending the implementing regulation. #### Outlook The determinative event ahead is the issuance of Ley 86-26's implementing regulation, which the executive is required to publish within ninety days of the statute's 2 October 2026 publication, placing the expected date at approximately the end of December 2026. That regulation is the most likely vehicle to state explicitly how AML-supervisory competence for gambling obliged entities is allocated between the DGJA, the Financial Analysis Unit, and the tax authority. Until it issues, the continuity question identified remains open, and it should be revisited directly against whatever primary text the implementing regulation and any accompanying Financial Analysis Unit guidance ultimately provide. 3 Nov 2026 · fim-2026-11-03 #### Lead Signal The Dominican Republic has carried out a structural change at the institutional center of its gambling sector oversight. Under Ley 86-26, the Direccion de Casinos y Juegos de Azar (DCJA) has been dissolved and replaced by a new Direccion General de Juegos de Azar (DGJA), operational since 13 October 2026. The DGJA is now transferring operator databases to the tax authority, DGII, on a provisional and conditional basis for fiscal purposes. This is an architecture-level development rather than an enforcement incident: the DCJA had functioned as sector supervisor for casino and lottery entities classified as obliged entities under Law 155-17, and that institutional role has now moved to a newly created body. The available secondary reporting describes the fiscal data-sharing arrangement with DGII clearly, but it does not address whether, or how, the DGJA will carry forward the anti-money-laundering supervisory functions the DCJA held for gambling-sector obliged entities. That continuity question sits adjacent to, but is distinct from, the Financial Analysis Unit (UAF) reporting-entity framework under Law 155-17, which is not reported as having changed. Because no primary instrument from the UAF or the national AML coordinating body has yet been located addressing this handoff explicitly, the finding is assessed as probable rather than confirmed, resting on a single secondary press account. The structural significance is nonetheless real: a sector-supervisor transition of this kind, even where the underlying obliged-entity registration law is unchanged, creates a window in which oversight continuity for a historically higher-risk sector depends on implementing regulation that has not yet been reported as issued. #### Other Developments Fiscal data-sharing precedes AML clarification. The reported transfer of operator databases from DGJA to DGII is framed in the available source as fiscal in purpose, which means the step that has actually been taken so far addresses tax oversight of gambling operators rather than AML reporting-entity supervision. The absence of any companion statement on AML supervisory continuity, in reporting that otherwise covers the transition in some detail, is itself notable: it suggests the question either has not yet been settled by regulation or has not yet been publicly communicated. Obliged-entity classification under Law 155-17 remains the operative framework. Casino and lottery operators continue to sit within the sujetos obligados registration structure under Articles 32-33 of Law 155-17, a framework that predates and is not reported as altered by the DCJA-to-DGJA transition. The open question is institutional (which body supervises AML compliance for this class of obliged entity going forward) rather than legal (whether the obligation itself persists). #### Cross-Monitor Connections A sector-supervisor transition of this kind is the type of structural change that other monitors tracking commercial activity and regulatory architecture in gambling and gaming would also register from their own vantage points, particularly where licensing and operational continuity for casino and lottery operators intersect with fiscal reporting obligations. Where a jurisdiction creates a new regulatory body to take over functions from a dissolved one, the resulting gap period is a recurring enabler-jurisdiction pattern worth tracking in parallel across any monitor with visibility into enforcement posture for the same obliged-entity class. #### Outlook The DGJA transition is likely to remain a probable-confidence structural watch item until a primary instrument, whether from the UAF or through implementing regulation, clarifies AML supervisory continuity for gambling-sector obliged entities. As scheduled, further detail on this handoff would be expected to surface either through UAF guidance addressed to casino and lottery obliged entities or through implementing regulations under Ley 86-26 itself. Until such an instrument is located, this remains an institutional architecture question rather than a resolved compliance position, and the gap between fiscal data-sharing (now reported as underway) and AML supervisory continuity (not yet addressed in available reporting) is the detail to watch. 26 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-26 #### Lead Signal The Dominican Republics tax authority, the Direccion General de Impuestos Internos, has reiterated a standing beneficial-ownership identification and filing duty for legal persons and legal arrangements registered under the national taxpayer registry. The notice, issued 17 April 2026, restates the obligation first established under Ley 155-17, using a twenty-percent-ownership-or-effective-control test, with filing required at registration, at any update of corporate particulars, and again on the annual income tax return. The fact that this duty is being reiterated rather than introduced is itself the signal: repeated administrative reminders of an existing obligation are a marker of persistent under-compliance in the absence of a dedicated, searchable public beneficial-ownership register. The country continues to rely on a self-declaration model lodged with the tax authority rather than a register with independent verification capacity, leaving the practical reliability of beneficial-ownership data resting on taxpayer behaviour rather than structural assurance. Alongside this, a congressional bill that would create the jurisdictions first dedicated virtual-asset licensing and anti-money-laundering gateway remains in consultation. Filed in March 2026, the bill proposes that the securities regulator issue a certifying-quality licence to exchanges and custodians, classify crypto gains as taxable property, and fold in money-laundering controls, but it has not been enacted and no primary legislative-tracking source confirms its status beyond a public hearing held in mid-2026. #### Other Developments Gambling-sector fit-and-proper filings proceed under the existing suitability regime. Casino and slot-hall operators, lottery and betting-bank concessionaires, bingo and raffle operators, and equipment manufacturers were required to file sworn suitability declarations covering shareholders, board members, senior management and key staff, with a filing deadline in mid-May 2026 under a resolution and an accompanying external circular. The underlying instrument was not independently retrieved and the finding rests on secondary trade-press reporting, but the direction is consistent with a broader regional push to bring gambling obliged entities into fuller customer-due-diligence coverage. No change to the countrys FATF standing. The jurisdiction remains outside the FATF grey list and the black list of countries with strategic deficiencies, and continues as a member of GAFILAT, the FATF-style regional body for Latin America, consistent with its most recent mutual evaluation and follow-up reporting. This is a stable backdrop against which the incremental tightening described above should be read, rather than a cycle development in its own right. The crypto bill sits downstream of an implementing-regulation timeline for gambling-sector AML continuity. A separate gambling law is expected to generate implementing regulation addressing how fit-and-proper and anti-money-laundering obligations continue under a restructured gaming-licensing authority, with that detail due within roughly ninety days of an early-October 2026 publication. This is a procedural marker to watch rather than a substantive finding. #### Cross-Monitor Connections The beneficial-ownership reiteration intersects directly with payments-sector licensing activity tracked elsewhere: as the jurisdiction expands its regulated-entity taxonomy for non-bank payment providers, the adequacy of the underlying corporate-ownership data those new entities will rely on for their own due diligence becomes more consequential. A self-declaration model with no independent register is a weaker foundation for a payments ecosystem being deliberately broadened to include wallet providers, payment-initiation firms and payment gateways. On the digital-asset side, the absence of any licensing or anti-money-laundering gateway for virtual-asset service providers is a structural gap that payments-sector digitisation initiatives elsewhere in the country do not currently address, since virtual-asset activity sits outside the central-bank-led payments-infrastructure build-out being pursued in parallel. Any future convergence between a licensed virtual-asset sector and the domestic instant-payments rail would depend on the currently unenacted bill actually reaching the statute book. #### Outlook The near-term picture is one of incremental, administrative tightening rather than structural reform. The beneficial-ownership duty will likely continue to be enforced through repeated reminder notices rather than through a register overhaul, absent a distinct policy decision to build independent verification capacity. The gambling-sector suitability regime appears to be bedding in, with implementing regulation expected in the closing months of 2026 to clarify how it interacts with the broader anti-money-laundering supervisory structure. The crypto bill remains the single lever that could most change the jurisdictions risk profile across both beneficial-ownership and virtual-asset typologies, since an enacted version would, for the first time, bring exchanges and custodians inside a licensed, AML-supervised perimeter; until it clears committee and reaches a floor vote, the jurisdiction remains in a watch posture on this front, with FATF and GAFILAT standing unchanged in the interim. 18 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-18 #### Lead Signal The Dominican Republic's enactment of Law 86-26 restructures gambling regulation and, in the same statute, writes a new anti-money-laundering infrastructure requirement directly into a sector that has historically sat outside sustained supervisory technology investment. The DGJA, the newly created gambling regulator, and the DGII, the tax authority, are jointly required to build a shared technology platform within six months of promulgation to monitor gaming transactions and report financial irregularities to the national Financial Intelligence Unit through the goAML system, with an effective date around April 2027. This is a Compliance Technology and Active Defence development read alongside the Dominican Republic's standing AML/CTF Regime: a RegTech mandate layered onto a cash-intensive, previously loosely supervised sector reported to include over seventy-one thousand registered lottery and betting shops. The characterisation of this mandate rests on a single Tier 4 aggregator report of the statutory provision; the primary gazetted text of Law 86-26 was not independently retrieved this cycle, so the platform's technical specification and its precise statutory basis remain to be corroborated against the primary instrument. #### Other Developments Standing AML/CTF architecture unchanged. The Dominican Republic's baseline AML/CTF regime, grounded in Ley 155-17, is unchanged this cycle. The Unidad de Análisis Financiero remains the designated national Financial Intelligence Unit, and obligated entities must report suspicious transactions to the UAF within five business days under Article 55. Separately, published guidance from the tax authority DGII requires obligated entities to retain transaction, due-diligence and account records for at least ten years after the end of the business relationship or the transaction date. Norma 03-18 further provides that outsourcing customer due diligence to a third party does not relieve the obligated entity of its own responsibility. None of these standing provisions moved this cycle; they are carried forward as the backdrop against which the new gambling-sector platform mandate is read. FATF status unchanged. The Dominican Republic does not appear on FATF's 19 June 2026 Increased Monitoring list, and the next possible GAFILAT mutual-evaluation on-site visit is not due until November 2029. This places the jurisdiction outside both FATF's call-for-action and increased-monitoring designations at present. Unresolved sectoral consultation draft. A July 2024 public-consultation draft, the Propuesta de modificación de la Normativa Sectorial PLAFT, would assign a compliance officer and risk-based customer due diligence duties specifically to gambling operators. Its adoption status is unconfirmed, and it remains unclear whether Law 86-26 has superseded, absorbed, or simply left this draft pending. This is a live gap in understanding the sector's prospective AML architecture rather than a resolved development. #### Cross-Monitor Connections The gambling-sector platform mandate sits directly at the intersection of this monitor's Compliance Technology and AML/CTF domains and the payment-system risk surface tracked elsewhere: a sector handling high transaction volumes through physical shops and, under the same statute, newly licensed internet operations, is being brought into a goAML-linked reporting architecture for the first time. The scale cited for the sector, over seventy-one thousand registered lottery and betting shops, underscores why a cash-intensive retail gambling network becoming subject to transaction monitoring and FIU reporting is a structural development rather than an isolated compliance update, even though it currently rests on thin sourcing. #### Outlook The DGJA-DGII platform's six-month build deadline places its expected operational date around April 2027. Corroboration of this mandate against the primary gazetted text of Law 86-26 would materially strengthen confidence in its precise scope and reporting triggers. Separately, whether the 2024 PLAFT sectoral consultation draft is finalised, absorbed into Law 86-26's forthcoming implementing regulations, or left pending will determine whether gambling operators face a formal risk-based CDD and compliance-officer obligation distinct from the general Ley 155-17 regime. Both threads warrant continued attention as the Dominican Republic's implementing regulations for Law 86-26 are published over the following several months. 11 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-11 #### Lead Signal The Dominican Republic has restructured oversight of a sector long identified as an AML weak point. Ley 86-26, replacing a gambling framework that had stood since 1964, creates the Dirección General de Juegos de Azar as the sole regulator across all gambling verticals and states objectives that include preventing fraudulent behaviour and money laundering. The reform is structurally significant because casinos and gambling have been identified as a historically weak point in the jurisdiction's designated non-financial business and profession (DNFBP) supervision, with prior mutual evaluation ratings of non-compliant on the FATF recommendations covering DNFBP supervision and regulation. Whether consolidation under a single regulator closes that gap cannot yet be assessed: no implementing regulations have been confirmed, and the architecture-over-incident principle applies directly here — a structural reorganisation of supervisory responsibility is more analytically significant at this stage than any single enforcement action, because there have been none to report. #### Other Developments Reported bank-freeze and blocking powers remain unconfirmed. Secondary commentary states that Ley 86-26 empowers banks and payment providers to freeze transfers linked to unlicensed gambling operations, and empowers the regulator together with the telecommunications authority to block unlicensed gambling domains. This is carried at reduced confidence: the primary Gazette text for the relevant articles has not been independently retrieved this cycle, and the claim rests on secondary reporting rather than the promulgated statute itself. FATF grey-list status is unchanged. The Dominican Republic does not appear on the FATF Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring list published 19 June 2026, which carried 22 jurisdictions; this is a stable tracker position, not a new development. Crypto bills remain in committee. Two competing legislative proposals for a Dominican crypto regulatory framework, filed in March and April 2026 respectively, remain under Chamber of Deputies Finance Committee review, with hearings involving the central bank, the banking superintendency and the tax authority still pending. No dedicated AML/crypto registration gateway currently exists in the jurisdiction, so enactment of either bill would be a first-of-kind development rather than an incremental one. A large foreign-capital casino investment has completed. Lopesan Hotel Group opened three new Punta Cana resorts, each including casino operations, representing a disclosed investment exceeding $350 million and the group's largest Caribbean expansion to date. The timing of this completed investment alongside the gambling-sector reregulation is notable as a coincidence of capital inflow and regulatory overhaul in the same vertical, though no causal or compliance link between the two is evidenced. #### Cross-Monitor Connections The reported bank-transfer-freeze power, if confirmed, carries a direct payments-infrastructure dimension that intersects with World Payments Monitor coverage of correspondent and domestic payment-provider obligations in the jurisdiction. The casino-sector investment and the DGJA's consolidation of licensing authority are also relevant to the commercial-activity and market-structure lens that Advennt tracks for the gambling vertical specifically, though FIM's interest here is confined to the AML/CTF and DNFBP-supervision dimension rather than market or licensing mechanics. No conflict-finance, extractive-industry, or information-operations connections were identified this cycle. #### Outlook The determinative question for the AML/CTF reading of this reform is implementation. The DGJA's creation addresses a structural gap identified in prior mutual evaluation, but a consolidated regulator with an unconfirmed enforcement toolkit and no yet-evidenced supervisory practice does not, on its own, resolve the DNFBP weakness. Watch for implementing regulations from the Consejo de Juegos de Azar, for primary-text confirmation of the reported bank-freeze and domain-blocking powers, and for the committee disposition of the two pending crypto bills, any of which would materially change this reading. 4 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-04 #### Lead Signal The Dominican Republic has consolidated AML/CFT supervisory authority over its gambling sector under a newly created regulator, the Dirección General de Juegos de Azar (DGJA), established by Ley 86-26 and published in Gaceta Oficial 11263 on 2 October 2026. Under Ley 155-17, Article 2(17), the body that holds gambling-licensing authority is designated the AML/CFT supervisor for gambling-sector non-financial obligated subjects, including casinos, lottery banks, sports-betting outlets, bingo and online gambling. That body is now the DGJA, replacing whatever authority previously held that designation under the dispersed pre-2026 licensing framework. This is an institutional-architecture development: the statute reassigns supervisory competence by operation of law rather than announcing a new enforcement action or a change to AML/CFT obligations themselves. #### Other Developments Gambling-sector AML supervision under new leadership. The practical significance of the DGJA's new AML/CFT supervisory role depends substantially on its resourcing and institutional capacity, which cannot yet be assessed from available evidence. The sector has historically been under-supervised for AML/CFT purposes relative to the formal financial sector, and a change in which body holds supervisory authority is, in the architecture-over-incident frame, potentially more significant over time than any single enforcement event, whether that significance turns out to be strengthening or weakening in practice. #### Cross-Monitor Connections The same institutional reassignment of gambling-sector AML/CFT supervisory authority to the DGJA is separately relevant to the World Payments Monitor, where the DGJA also gained a new statutory coordination role with the banking sector and the telecommunications regulator to block and freeze transfers linked to unlicensed online gambling operators; that coordination mechanism is a correspondent-banking and payment-access consideration distinct from, but adjacent to, the AML/CFT supervisory-architecture finding here. #### Outlook A FENABANCA-coordinated technical working group is expected to conduct a ninety-day review of Ley 86-26, running into the first quarter of 2027, and may propose further amendments. Industry compliance programs have not yet been confirmed to have adapted to the new DGJA AML/CFT supervisory architecture, and the full consolidated text of Ley 86-26 establishing the AML/CFT implementing detail beyond the institutional-transfer inference drawn from Ley 155-17 has not yet been independently retrieved. Watch for confirmation of the DGJA's operational AML/CFT supervisory practice and for the outcome of the FENABANCA review as the points most likely to clarify whether this architecture change strengthens or weakens the jurisdiction's gambling-sector AML/CFT posture. 14 Sep 2026 · fim-2026-08-21 #### Lead Signal The most consequential development for the Dominican Republic this cycle is a new fit-and-proper governance obligation imposed on the gambling sector. Resolution 161-2026, issued by the Ministry of Finance and Economy, requires shareholders, board members, senior management and key collaborators of gambling operators and other non-financial obligated subjects to file sworn suitability declarations within thirty working days. This is an architecture-level finding rather than an isolated enforcement incident: it tightens the governance layer of the AML/CTF regime in the Dominican Republic for a sector that has drawn persistent international scrutiny, including exposure through floating casinos operating aboard cruise ships. The obligation applies across the ownership and management layer of covered entities rather than to licence holders alone, which is the structural feature that distinguishes this instrument from ordinary licensing paperwork: it is a governance-suitability filing regime layered onto an existing licensing structure. Read against the three-pillar AML, CTF and CPF framework, this is squarely an AML-pillar development, and it addresses, at least on paper, one of the more commonly cited gaps in gambling-sector oversight in the region, namely thin verification of who stands behind licensed operators. The finding is assessed-confidence, resting on a single trade-press source, with no primary Ministry or Financial Analysis Unit text retrieved this cycle, and the underlying enforcement severity is preliminarily elevated rather than confirmed. #### Other Developments Cryptocurrency regulatory bill deposited. A bill titled Ley para la Prevencion, Control y Regulacion de las Criptomonedas was formally deposited in the Legislative Secretary on 16 March 2026, proposing a VASP registry for the Dominican Republic. The deposit follows reported year-on-year growth of 52 percent in domestic cryptocurrency use. The Central Bank of the Dominican Republic continues to maintain that cryptocurrency is not legal tender under Law 183-02, and no dedicated crypto law is yet in force; the finding is assessed-confidence and rests on a single lower-tier source. Structurally, the bill would create a first dedicated virtual-asset-service-provider registration regime for the Dominican Republic, addressing an architecture gap that has persisted despite rising domestic adoption; until enacted, digital-asset activity in the jurisdiction continues to sit outside a bespoke licensing or registration perimeter, governed instead by the general proposition that cryptocurrency is not legal tender. FATF standing confirmed. The Dominican Republic is not on the FATF grey list or call-for-action list. The grey list stood at 22 jurisdictions following the 19 June 2026 plenary, which added Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iraq and removed Algeria and Namibia. This is a high-confidence, primary-source finding and provides the standing baseline against which the gambling-sector and crypto-sector developments described this cycle should be read: neither development reflects FATF-driven pressure, but both represent the jurisdiction building regulatory architecture ahead of, rather than in response to, grey-list-type scrutiny. The plenary simultaneous additions and removals, the entry of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iraq alongside the exit of Algeria and Namibia, illustrate that grey-list status is an actively managed, bidirectional mechanism rather than a one-way escalation list, reinforcing that the absence of the Dominican Republic from either list this cycle is a stable, not merely provisional, standing. #### Cross-Monitor Connections The Dominican Republic signal this cycle is architecture-building rather than incident-driven, and it does not carry a corroborated nexus to conflict-finance, enabler-jurisdiction or state-capture typologies; no material finding surfaced in those domains for this jurisdiction this cycle. That absence is itself a data point under an enablement-as-signal reading: the gambling-sector AML tightening and the pending VASP-registry bill in the Dominican Republic are both capacity-building moves rather than responses to a proximate enforcement or state-capture event. The absence of enforcement action or grey-list pressure is analytically meaningful in its own right under this reading, rather than an evidentiary gap to be filled. Where the finding this cycle intersects most directly with adjacent monitoring is at the regulatory-architecture layer: a gambling-sector governance obligation and a digital-asset registration framework, evolving in parallel but independently, both increase the documentary and registration footprint available to any future compliance-technology or enabler-jurisdiction analysis of the Dominican Republic. #### Outlook The near-term Dominican Republic picture is defined by implementation rather than further legislative change: the thirty-working-day filing window under Resolution 161-2026 and the still-undetermined legislative path for the VASP-registry bill are the two items most likely to generate the next material finding. Because both the gambling-suitability finding and the crypto-bill finding rest on single-source, sub-Tier-1 corroboration, the highest-value evidence gain for the next cycle would be primary Ministry, Financial Analysis Unit, or Legislative Secretary text confirming either development directly. A secondary item to monitor is whether the suitability-declaration regime is extended, in a future resolution, to non-gambling non-financial obligated subjects beyond the casino and slot-hall sector named this cycle, which would mark a broader AML-pillar architecture shift rather than a sector-specific correction. Absent that confirmation, the standing profile of the Dominican Republic remains structurally stable: off the FATF grey list, implementing UN sanctions only, and without a public beneficial-ownership registry. 11 Aug 2026 · fim-2026-08-05 #### Lead Signal The gambling sector of the Dominican Republic absorbed its most consequential anti-money-laundering instrument this cycle in Resolution 161-2026, issued by the Direccion de Casinos y Juegos de Azar and the Ministry of Finance to establish a fit-and-proper suitability regime covering shareholders, board members, senior management, key personnel and equipment manufacturers across casino, slot-hall, online-gambling, lottery, sports-betting and bingo/raffle operators. Read as architecture rather than incident, this closes a designated-non-financial-business-and-profession gap the sector has historically carried, and it arrives alongside a February 2026 cooperation agreement between the Ministry of Finance and the Financial and International Business Association to develop a parallel AML-certification track for gambling-sector personnel. Neither instrument has been corroborated against primary regulator text, so confidence sits at Assessed rather than High, but the direction of the architecture is unambiguous: a sector-wide filing and suitability obligation replacing what had previously been a comparatively thin compliance perimeter. #### Other Developments Sanctions-regime divergence widens. The Dominican Republic continues to implement United Nations Security Council designations only, holding no autonomous public sanctions list of its own, a standing structural condition that keeps it outside the OFAC and EU Council autonomous-listing tradition. This cycle sharpens the regional contrast: on 30 June 2026, OFAC and FinCEN sanctioned two Mexican nationals and nine entities tied to CJNG-linked fuel-smuggling and tax-evasion schemes, extending the cartel-finance targeting theory beyond narcotics into fuel theft and tax revenue streams. The gap between an autonomous, actively expanding United States listing regime and a UN-implementation-only Dominican posture is a structural fact worth carrying forward rather than a single-cycle anomaly. Cambodia signals renewed grey-list exposure. Governor Chea Serey of the National Bank of Cambodia publicly warned that Cambodia risks a third FATF grey-list placement, citing casino- and scam-centre-linked laundering alongside undeclared cash movements and cross-border payment abuse. The statement is a capacity-deficit signal rather than an enforcement action, and it underscores that the casino and scam-centre laundering vector remains structurally unresolved despite the 2023 grey-list exit achieved by that jurisdiction. Crypto restriction holds steady. The Banco Central de la Republica Dominicana maintains its position that cryptocurrencies are not legal tender and that regulated financial institutions are prohibited from engaging with them, while individual use remains an unregulated grey area. No new instrument changed this position this cycle; it is carried forward as standing context against which the AML tightening described above should be read. #### Cross-Monitor Connections The broadened OFAC and FinCEN targeting of Mexico-linked cartel fuel-smuggling and tax-evasion revenue is architecturally significant beyond a single designation action: it signals that United States Treasury enforcement theory against cartel finance now extends into commodity-adjacent revenue streams, namely fuel theft and tax evasion, rather than narcotics-trafficking proceeds alone, a pattern with clear relevance to commodity-flow and extractive-integrity monitoring elsewhere in the region. The casino- and scam-centre-linked laundering exposure reported for Cambodia similarly sits at an intersection point relevant to monitors tracking information-operations-adjacent illicit finance, given the well-documented overlap between scam-centre operations and cross-border trafficking and coercion networks. Neither connection is elaborated further here; each is a routing signal for the relevant adjacent monitor rather than a finding developed within this brief. #### Outlook The reform horizon for the Dominican Republic is dominated by the unified gambling and betting law, which the Chamber of Deputies approved in two readings on 24 July 2026 and which now awaits Senate concurrence; if adopted, it would consolidate licensing, AML and tax obligations under a single DGJA regulator, materially upgrading the coherence of the sector compliance architecture beyond what Resolution 161-2026 alone achieves. Confidence in the gambling-sector AML tightening itself remains capped at Assessed pending retrieval of primary DCJA or Gaceta Oficial text, and the February 2026 AML-certification cooperation agreement remains an unconfirmed institutional signing rather than a delivered programme. Watch for Senate action on the unified bill, for confirmed certification-body output from the FIBA cooperation agreement, and for whether the Cambodia grey-list warning develops into a formal FATF plenary action next cycle. Domain intelligence (D1–D8) #### Sanctions Architecture and Evasion This baseline D1 record establishes a mixed enabler-and-interdiction posture for the Dominican Republic relative to the United Nations arms embargo on Haiti, sustained by a reciprocal flow: embargoed weapons moving toward Haiti and gang-financing proceeds moving in the opposite direction. Haitian armed gangs procure Miami-sourced weapons and ammunition that transit land and maritime routes across the porous Dominican Republic-Haiti border, financed by extortion, kidnapping and drug-trafficking proceeds smuggled the opposite direction as bulk cash, moved through unregulated money-transfer channels and front companies. This is a textbook F2/F4 architecture case: an active sanctions instrument is being evaded through a documented scheme with a traceable source-channel-deployment structure, and the jurisdiction sits at the geographic chokepoint of that structure by virtue of being the sole land-border neighbor of Haiti. Continue reading Two enforcement data points anchor the interdiction side of the ledger. In February 2025, Dominican customs and law-enforcement authorities interdicted a Miami-sourced shipment before onward transit, seizing a Barrett M82 rifle, sniper rifles, an Uzi submachine gun and over 36,000 rounds of ammunition. A second seizure in June 2025 was cited directly at a UN Security Council briefing as a positive example of Dominican embargo-enforcement capacity. Set against these is the assessment by the UN Panel of Experts of a region-wide consistent failure to enforce the embargo, a finding that, read in isolation, would characterize the Dominican Republic as an enablement failure. The architecture-over-incident correction applied this cycle is that the two findings are not in tension: a January 2026 UNODC briefing credits border-control strengthening in the Dominican Republic with disrupting established supply chains, meaning jurisdiction-specific enforcement improvement coexists with a persistent regional deficit that the Dominican Republic alone cannot close. The sanctions instrument itself received a corrected characterization this cycle. UN Security Council Resolution 2794, adopted 17 October 2025, renewed the Haiti sanctions measures, travel ban, asset freeze, arms embargo, for one year, and separately extended the mandate of the Panel of Experts for thirteen months. Treating these as a single duration, as prior baseline research had done, understates the granularity of the compliance calendar that border-enforcement authorities and cross-sector obliged entities must track. A benchmark-progress assessment by the Secretary-General is due no later than 1 September 2026, directly testing Dominican border-enforcement performance against Panel of Experts benchmarks. The comparative standing of the Dominican Republic within the broader sanctions and high-risk-list architecture reinforces the F2 assessment. The jurisdiction remains absent from the FATF Increased Monitoring and Call for Action lists through the June 2026 Plenary, and it was not added to the European Commission AML/CFT high-risk third-country list when Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/83 (4 December 2025) added Bolivia and the British Virgin Islands while delisting several African jurisdictions. The last full mutual evaluation was the 2018 GAFILAT fourth round, with a 2019 follow-up re-rating Recommendation 18 (internal controls) from Partially Compliant to Largely Compliant; no fifth-round on-site date is confirmed. This clean-list standing, combined with frontline exposure to Haiti-related arms and cash smuggling, creates a latent risk that formal listings have not yet caught up with a structural enforcement burden the jurisdiction carries by geography rather than choice. The active-scheme inventory records this corridor as active and high severity, with a documented red-flag indicator, bulk cash movement via unregulated money-transfer channels and front companies, observable through payment data and linked to money-service-business and corporate customer typologies. This gives obliged entities operating in or adjacent to Dominican Republic correspondent and remittance relationships a concrete detection anchor distinct from the sanctions-list screening obligation that Resolution 2794 imposes at the cross-sector level. #### Outlook The most consequential near-term event is the benchmark-progress assessment by the Secretary-General due no later than 1 September 2026, which will test Dominican border-enforcement performance directly against Panel of Experts benchmarks and may recalibrate the regional failure-to-enforce narrative in either direction. The next biannual review of the European Commission high-risk third-country list, expected mid-to-late 2026, is a second watchpoint: the non-listed status of the Dominican Republic has held through both the June and December 2025 review cycles, but regional volatility involving Haiti and the British Virgin Islands means that status should not be assumed static. A confirmed fifth-round GAFILAT and FATF mutual evaluation on-site date remains outstanding and would, when scheduled, be the first assessment of Dominican effectiveness under the 2022 Methodology, including for the first time virtual-asset and beneficial-ownership dimensions directly relevant to this sanctions-architecture picture. Judgment: No DO-specific sanctions-architecture signal located this cycle. Uncertain #### Beneficial Ownership and Corporate Transparency The standing structural fact behind any reading of Dominican beneficial-ownership developments is the architecture of the European Unions anti-money-laundering package, which proceeds on three distinct legal instruments: a directly applicable Anti-Money Laundering Regulation, a sixth Anti-Money Laundering Directive transposed individually by each Member State, and a separate Anti-Money Laundering Authority Regulation establishing a new EU-level supervisory body. That architecture shifts supervision of cross-border obliged entities from a purely national model toward a hybrid regime combining direct and indirect EU-level oversight. The Dominican Republic sits entirely outside this perimeter, but the direction of travel it represents, toward less reliance on self-declaration and more reliance on independently verified, centrally supervised ownership data, is the benchmark against which the jurisdictions own model can usefully be read. Continue reading Against that backdrop, the Dominican Republics own beneficial-ownership regime continues to rely on a self-declaration duty administered by the tax authority rather than a dedicated, independently verified register. The duty, grounded in Ley 155-17s provision requiring legal persons and legal arrangements to identify and keep updated beneficial-owner information using a twenty-percent-ownership-or-effective-control test, is triggered continuously: at initial registration with the national taxpayer registry, at any subsequent update of corporate particulars, and again annually on the income tax return. The tax authoritys issuance of a fresh notice reiterating this duty in April 2026 is not, on its own, a change to the legal obligation. It is nonetheless a meaningful signal: regulators do not typically re-issue reminders of obligations that are already being reliably met. The pattern of repeated administrative notices is consistent with persistent gaps in voluntary filing, and in the absence of a public, searchable register with independent verification capacity, the jurisdiction has limited means of detecting non-compliance beyond administrative follow-up at the point of routine tax filings. This matters for corporate-transparency risk typologies because a self-declaration model without independent verification is structurally more exposed to misreporting, nominee arrangements, and layered ownership structures designed to obscure the true twenty-percent-or-effective-control threshold. Financial institutions and other obliged entities conducting due diligence on Dominican corporate counterparties cannot currently rely on an authoritative public register; they must instead treat beneficial-ownership declarations made to the tax authority as a starting point for further verification rather than a conclusive source. The absence of a dedicated register also limits the jurisdictions capacity to respond quickly to law-enforcement or international information requests concerning beneficial ownership, since the underlying data sits within tax administration records rather than a structure built for cross-agency or cross-border retrieval. No other beneficial-ownership development was identified this cycle beyond the reiteration notice itself. There is no indication of a parallel move toward a centralised corporate-transparency register, and no legislative proposal addressing beneficial ownership specifically was located alongside the broader crypto-sector and gambling-sector developments tracked elsewhere this cycle. The structural picture therefore remains one of continuity: an existing, continuously-triggered obligation, administered through repeated reminders rather than register-based assurance, operating in a jurisdiction that sits outside the EU supervisory architecture described above and shows no near-term indication of adopting an equivalent model. #### Outlook Absent a distinct policy decision to build independent verification capacity, the most probable near-term path is continued enforcement through administrative reminder rather than structural reform. The tax authority is likely to keep repeating the existing beneficial-ownership notice at registration and annual filing touchpoints, and compliance levels will likely continue to depend on taxpayer behaviour rather than on any register-based cross-check. Any meaningful shift toward a model resembling the EU architecture described above would require a distinct legislative initiative that has not yet surfaced in the material reviewed this cycle, and expectations should be calibrated accordingly: this is a domain of persistent administrative friction rather than impending structural change. Judgment: No change to DO's DGII taxpayer-registry BO declaration mechanism (Decree 408-17) this cycle. Probable #### Enabler Jurisdictions The Dominican Republic's relevance to enabler-jurisdiction analysis this cycle is institutional rather than transactional. Ley 86-26, the new consolidated gambling statute published on 2 October 2026, dissolved the Direccion de Casinos y Juegos de Azar (DCJA) and replaced it with a newly created Direccion General de Juegos de Azar (DGJA), operational since 13 October 2026. The DCJA had previously functioned as the sector supervisor for casino and lottery operators registered as obliged entities under Law 155-17, the country's anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorist-financing statute. A gambling sector of this kind is a classic cash-intensive channel through which illicit value can be layered, and the quality of its AML supervision is a standard enabler-jurisdiction variable independent of whether any specific illicit flow has yet been observed. Continue reading What the available record shows concretely is a data-sharing arrangement: the DGJA is reported to be transferring operator databases provisionally and conditionally to the tax authority, DGII, for fiscal oversight. This is a revenue-collection measure on its face, and it is distinct from the reporting-entity supervision that the Financial Analysis Unit (UAF) exercises over obliged entities under Law 155-17. No primary text from the UAF or the national AML coordination apparatus has been located that states whether the DGJA inherits the DCJA's AML-supervisory role for gambling obliged entities in full, in part, or not at all, pending the law's implementing regulation. That silence is itself the structural fact worth recording: a jurisdiction that reorganises supervision of a higher-risk sector without yet clarifying who holds AML competence over it presents a textbook short-term enabler-jurisdiction watch item, distinct from and prior to any question of enforcement laxity or deliberate permissiveness. There is no evidence this cycle of intent to weaken supervision; the gap identified here is a sequencing gap between a fast-moving legislative consolidation and the slower administrative task of reallocating AML competence, and it should be read in those terms rather than as an enforcement failure. The Dominican Republic's standing with the Financial Action Task Force provides relevant context without resolving the domestic question: the country remains off the FATF's list of jurisdictions under increased monitoring as of the 30 October 2026 Plenary outcome, a continuity finding consistent with its existing follow-up status within its regional FATF-style body. That international standing has not yet been tested against the domestic institutional change described here, because the implementing regulation that would clarify AML-supervisory allocation has not yet been published. #### Outlook The implementing regulation for Ley 86-26, due within ninety days of the statute's 2 October 2026 publication and therefore expected at approximately the end of December 2026, is the primary vehicle through which this supervisory-competence question should be resolved. Analysts should watch for either an explicit statement that the DGJA assumes AML-supervisory responsibility for gambling obliged entities, a continuation of UAF supervision independent of the DGJA's fiscal/licensing role, or a hybrid arrangement. Any of these outcomes would be a structural clarification rather than an incident, and the absence of a clear answer by the time the regulation issues would itself be a notable finding. Judgment: Ley 86-26 replaced the DCJA with the new DGJA as gambling-sector regulator; because DCJA previously held AML-supervisory competence for gambling DNFBP obliged entities under Law 155-17, this institutional transition creates a short-term continuity question pending the law's implementing regulation. Probable #### Conflict Finance and Extractive-Industry Integrity The dominant conflict-finance channel identified for the Dominican Republic this cycle is the arms-for-cash financing chain sustaining Haitian armed gangs, which transits Dominican territory in both directions. No material extractive-industry integrity finding surfaced this cycle; the assessment below therefore concentrates on the conflict-finance dimension of the F4 filter. Continue reading The three-stage source-channel-deployment trace resolves clearly on the evidence available. The source is criminal proceeds: extortion, kidnapping and drug-trafficking revenue generated by Haitian armed gangs. The channel is financial: bulk cash smuggling, unregulated money-transfer services and front companies move that revenue across the Dominican Republic-Haiti border, with front-company real-estate purchases identified as a specific deployment vector for laundered proceeds. The deployment is military: the same corridor, run in reverse, moves Miami-sourced weapons and ammunition into Haiti, arming the gangs whose criminal proceeds financed the purchase. This is a closed loop in which the same geographic corridor and, plausibly, overlapping facilitator networks serve both the revenue-generation and the arms-procurement legs of the chain. Two 2025 enforcement actions demonstrate partial disruption of the arms-procurement leg without evidence of parallel disruption on the financing leg. Dominican customs and law-enforcement authorities interdicted a Barrett M82 rifle, sniper rifles, an Uzi submachine gun and over 36,000 rounds of ammunition in February 2025 before onward transit, and a second shipment was seized in June 2025, cited by the UN Security Council as a positive enforcement example. Neither the underlying research nor the challenge-stage review located a comparable enforcement data point on the bulk-cash or front-company financing side of the corridor, meaning the arms-interdiction improvements credited by the January 2026 UNODC briefing describe supply-side disruption rather than demand-side, financing, disruption. This channel directly implicates politically-connected economic elites on both sides of the border, given that front-company real-estate purchases require some degree of local facilitation and given the broader DNFBP and beneficial-ownership transparency gaps described elsewhere in this cycle assessment. The severity of this finding is assessed as HIGH, reflecting the direct sustaining role the corridor plays in an active, UN-designated armed-conflict and gang-violence context in Haiti, and its persistence despite an active sanctions regime and documented, if partial, interdiction success. The active-scheme inventory records this channel under the terrorist-financing scheme type, active status, with a documented red-flag indicator, bulk cash movement via unregulated money-transfer channels and front companies, observable through payment data and linked to money-service-business and corporate customer typologies. This gives compliance functions handling remittance or correspondent exposure to the Dominican Republic-Haiti corridor a concrete detection anchor beyond generic sanctions-list screening. This finding sits squarely within the CTF pillar rather than the more commonly enforced AML pillar, and is surfaced here deliberately to correct the structural under-weighting that CTF and CPF findings otherwise receive relative to AML enforcement volume: an active terrorist-financing-adjacent channel sustaining armed-gang violence in a neighboring state is, on an architecture-over-incident basis, at least as significant as any single money-laundering prosecution recorded elsewhere in this cycle. No extractive-industry integrity finding has surfaced for the Dominican Republic this cycle, an absence that is itself recorded rather than silently omitted, consistent with the F4 filter requirement to trace conflict-finance flows wherever the underlying sourcing supports the trace and to note explicitly where it does not. #### Outlook The benchmark-progress assessment due from the Secretary-General no later than 1 September 2026 is the key forcing event for this domain as much as for the sanctions-architecture assessment, since Haiti sanctions-regime benchmarks are inseparable from cross-border enforcement performance on the same corridor that sustains the conflict-finance chain. A material change in future cycles would be evidenced by a comparable enforcement data point on the financing leg of the chain, a bulk-cash interdiction, a front-company designation, or a money-transfer-channel enforcement action, none of which has been located in the sourcing reviewed this cycle. Cross-reference to SCEM conflict-finance coverage has been flagged at medium severity given the direct sustaining role of this channel in Haitian gang violence. Judgment: No DO-specific conflict-finance signal located this cycle. Uncertain #### Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation The Dominican Republics digital-asset sector remains without a dedicated licensing or anti-money-laundering gateway, and the single development worth tracking this cycle is the continued, unresolved progress of a congressional bill that would create one. Filed in March 2026 and titled as a law for the prevention, control and regulation of cryptocurrencies, the bill would have the securities regulator issue a certifying-quality licence authorising exchanges and custodians to operate legally, would classify digital-asset gains as taxable property, and reportedly carries anti-money-laundering provisions, though the precise content of those provisions has not been independently confirmed from a primary legislative source. The bill remains in committee consultation; a public hearing took place in mid-2026, but no Tier-1 confirmation of its current procedural status beyond that point was located this cycle, and it has not been enacted. Continue reading The analytical significance of this gap is best understood through the lens of enablement rather than enforcement. A jurisdiction with no licensing requirement for virtual-asset exchanges or custodians is not merely under-regulated in a passive sense; the absence of any obliged-entity gateway means there is currently no mechanism by which Dominican-domiciled or Dominican-facing virtual-asset businesses are brought within customer-due-diligence, suspicious-activity-reporting, or beneficial-ownership-verification requirements specific to digital assets. This is a structural condition rather than an incident, and it persists regardless of whether any individual enforcement action has or has not occurred against a Dominican virtual-asset operator. The bills progress, however slow, represents the only currently visible mechanism by which that gap could close, and its materiality should be weighed accordingly: enactment would for the first time bring exchanges and custodians inside a licensed, supervised, anti-money-laundering-relevant perimeter. The three-pillar balance across anti-money-laundering, counter-terrorist-financing and counter-proliferation-financing considerations is difficult to assess properly for this sector given the current absence of any supervisory touchpoint; there is no reporting channel through which counter-terrorist-financing or counter-proliferation-financing typologies specific to virtual assets would currently surface in the Dominican Republic, and this cycles material does not identify any sector-specific enforcement or typology development that would allow a more granular assessment. This is itself consistent with the broader picture: without a licensing gateway, the typology base from which such findings would be drawn simply does not yet exist in a form regulators or researchers can observe. No change to the jurisdictions FATF or GAFILAT standing bears on this domain directly, since the current mutual evaluation framework addresses the broader anti-money-laundering architecture rather than virtual-asset-specific gaps in isolation, though the pending bill if enacted would likely be referenced in any future evaluation cycle as evidence of a maturing gateway. #### Outlook The bill remains the single variable most likely to change the risk profile of this domain, and its current status, in consultation with no confirmed timeline beyond a committee hearing, suggests enactment is not imminent. Tracking should focus on confirming the bills procedural status through a primary congressional or securities-regulator source, since secondary trade-press reporting is currently the only available evidence of its content and progress. Until enacted, the jurisdiction should be read as an unregulated gap for virtual-asset licensing and anti-money-laundering obligations specific to that sector, with the gap persisting as a structural feature of the operating environment rather than a transient condition awaiting a single scheduled event. Judgment: No material AML/CFT-specific crypto development located for DO this cycle; full detail ceded to crypto consumer per module-subscription. Uncertain #### Compliance Technology and Active Defence No material RegTech or SupTech development has been identified for the Dominican Republic this cycle, and the evidentiary base for assessing the active-defence and supervisory-technology posture of the jurisdiction is thin, confined largely to the 2018 GAFILAT Mutual Evaluation Report and its 2019 follow-up. No 2020-to-2026 FATF or GAFILAT follow-up report, national risk-assessment update, or Superintendencia de Bancos enforcement bulletin was located in accessible open sources this cycle, constraining assessment of perpetual-KYC, artificial-intelligence or machine-learning transaction monitoring, or agentic-compliance adoption in the jurisdiction. Continue reading One governance-relevant correction was made this cycle within the cross-pillar D6 assessment. The Egmont Group membership status of the Unidad de Analisis Financiero, the Dominican Republic financial-intelligence unit, is corrected from an unresolved framing to a current-member assessment as of 2025-2026. This is based on the 181-member Plenary count following the July 2025 Plenary, in which the Dominican Republic was not among the four newly accepted financial-intelligence units, indicating prior membership, though a precise admission date remains unconfirmed. Egmont membership matters structurally for D6 because it is the channel through which the Unidad de Analisis Financiero exchanges financial-intelligence information with foreign counterpart units, a capability directly relevant to cross-border tracing of the Haiti corridor and cartel-transit flows described elsewhere in this cycle. #### Outlook The sourcing gap on Dominican Republic RegTech and SupTech adoption is flagged as a priority for direct retrieval from Dominican-language primary sources in future cycles, given that the 2018-2019 GAFILAT documentation is now seven years old and unlikely to reflect current supervisory-technology practice. Confirmation of a precise Egmont Group admission date, and any post-2019 GAFILAT follow-up or Superintendencia de Bancos bulletin, remain the two concrete items that would most improve the evidentiary base for this domain. Judgment: No RegTech/active-defence development located for DO this cycle. Uncertain #### AML/CTF Regime The Dominican Republic's baseline anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorist-financing position is unchanged at the international-standing level this cycle: the Financial Action Task Force's 30 October 2026 Plenary did not place the country among jurisdictions under increased monitoring, and it remains off that list. This is a confirmed, Tier-1-sourced continuity finding. Set against that stable international backdrop, a domestic institutional change has introduced a specific open question within the regime's architecture. Law 155-17 is the Dominican Republic's governing AML/CFT statute, and it designates categories of obliged entities, including casino and lottery operators, who carry registration and reporting duties toward the Financial Analysis Unit (UAF). Until 13 October 2026, the Direccion de Casinos y Juegos de Azar (DCJA) functioned as the sector-specific supervisory body for these gambling obliged entities. Ley 86-26 dissolved the DCJA and created the Direccion General de Juegos de Azar (DGJA) in its place as the sector's general regulator. Continue reading The available record does not yet state, in any primary UAF or national AML-coordination instrument, whether the DGJA has formally assumed the DCJA's AML-supervisory competence over gambling obliged entities, whether that competence reverts wholly to the UAF, or whether a transitional arrangement applies pending Ley 86-26's implementing regulation. The one concrete data-flow development located this cycle, the DGJA's provisional and conditional transfer of operator databases to the tax authority DGII, is described in the reporting as a fiscal-oversight measure rather than an AML-reporting mechanism, and it should not be read as resolving the supervisory-competence question. This matters for the regime's three-pillar architecture specifically on the AML and CTF sides, since a cash-intensive obliged-entity sector without a clearly designated AML supervisor for even a short window is a recognised vulnerability point, independent of whether any report volume or enforcement statistic has moved. No evidence located this cycle indicates deterioration in the country's overall regime strength, nor does any evidence indicate that UAF registration and reporting obligations under Law 155-17 themselves have changed; the obliged-entity framework persists, and the open question is narrowly one of which body currently exercises sector-specific supervisory oversight over it for gambling obliged entities. #### Outlook Resolution of this question is tied to the same implementing regulation discussed elsewhere this cycle, expected at approximately the end of December 2026, ninety days after Ley 86-26's 2 October 2026 publication. Analysts should treat the UAF's own forthcoming guidance, if any, as the most likely primary source to confirm the allocation of AML-supervisory competence, and should not assume continuity of DCJA-era supervisory practice under the DGJA absent that confirmation. Judgment: The sector-supervisor transition from DCJA to DGJA has not yet been clarified as to AML-supervisory competence; FATF status unchanged (DO remains off grey list per 30 Oct 2026 plenary). Probable #### Commercial Activity Lopesan Hotel Group completed the opening of three new resorts in Punta Cana on 7 July 2026, each incorporating casino operations, representing a disclosed investment of more than $350 million and described as the group's largest Caribbean expansion to date. The investment adds over 1,000 new rooms to the group's Dominican Republic portfolio. This is a confirmed, completed commercial event corroborated by the company's own press materials and wire-service republication, distinguishing it from the probable- or uncertain-confidence regulatory claims elsewhere in this cycle's Dominican Republic coverage. Continue reading The commercial significance of this investment sits adjacent to, rather than inside, the AML/CTF reform occurring in the same period. Ley 86-26's consolidation of gambling-sector oversight under the new Dirección General de Juegos de Azar, and its stated objective of preventing money laundering alongside fraud, means that new and expanding casino operations — such as those now opening within the Lopesan resorts — fall within the scope of a regulator whose AML mandate and enforcement toolkit are still being established. The completed investment itself carries no compliance finding; it is recorded here as a scale and timing data point that sharpens the stakes of the regulatory consolidation tracked under this cycle's AML/CTF domain. A capital-intensive casino sector expanding at the same time its supervisory architecture is being rebuilt is the kind of structural coincidence that an architecture-over-incident analytical approach treats as worth flagging, without asserting a causal or compliance link that the evidence does not support. No beneficial-ownership, financing-structure, or counterparty detail beyond the disclosed investment amount and the investor's identity was located this cycle. #### Outlook Watch for any further foreign-capital entry into the Dominican Republic's gambling and hospitality sector as the new licensing and registration regime under Ley 86-26 beds in, and for whether the DGJA's supervisory practice extends in practice to large, newly capitalised casino operators such as the Lopesan resorts. Judgment: No commercial transactions among financial-integrity-market participants identified for DO this cycle. Uncertain Regulatory horizon Proposed 2026-Q4 · ±quarter ### Ley 86-26 implementing regulation (gambling-sector AML continuity) Expected to detail how AML/fit-and-proper obligations (Resolución 161-2026) and UAF registration continue under the new DGJA licensing structure. [Poder Ejecutivo / Consejo de Juegos de Azar Source](https://abogadom.net/uploads/legislaciones/leyes/20261004142436-937654fb295c.pdf) In Force 2027-Q1 · ±quarter ### FENABANCA-coordinated 90-day technical review of Ley 86-26 Possible near-term legislative amendments to Ley 86-26 following a 90-day industry-government technical review. [FENABANCA, in coordination with DGJA Source](https://alienwp.com/dominican-republic-senate-approves-new-gambling-and-betting-law/) 2 dated · 1 pending date · baseline fim-2026-07-10 Role action cards MLRO ### Gambling-sector AML supervisory competence is unsettled following the DCJA-to-DGJA regulator transition. The body responsible for AML reporting-entity supervision of casino and lottery obliged entities under Law 155-17 is not yet confirmed following the dissolution of the DCJA. Obliged-entity reporting duties under Law 155-17 themselves are unaffected, but the supervisory channel for those duties is currently unclear pending the implementing regulation. 1 evidence refs Compliance ### A new gambling regulator (DGJA) has replaced the DCJA, with AML-supervisory competence over the sector not yet confirmed. Compliance functions with gambling-sector counterparties or obliged-entity relationships in the Dominican Republic should note the regulator change and the open question over which body currently exercises AML-specific oversight, pending the law's implementing regulation expected around the end of December 2026. 2 evidence refs Board ### The Dominican Republic's FATF standing is unchanged, while a domestic gambling-regulator transition raises an open AML-supervision question. The country remains off the FATF list of jurisdictions under increased monitoring as of the 30 October 2026 Plenary, so there is no elevated international standing concern. Separately, the replacement of the DCJA by the DGJA as gambling-sector regulator leaves a short-term question over AML-supervisory allocation that merits monitoring rather than immediate escalation. 2 evidence refs Risk ### A regulator-transition supervisory gap in the Dominican gambling sector is a structural risk signal to track, not an incident. The DCJA-to-DGJA transition creates a short-term AML-supervisory continuity question for a cash-intensive obliged-entity sector. This is a structural risk-concentration signal pending resolution in the forthcoming implementing regulation, expected around the end of December 2026. 1 evidence refs Audit ### Documentation confirming AML-supervisory allocation for Dominican gambling obliged entities is not yet available in the public record. Audit trails relying on confirmation of which body supervises gambling obliged entities under Law 155-17 cannot yet cite a primary instrument settling that allocation following the DCJA-to-DGJA transition; this should be flagged as an open item pending the implementing regulation. 1 evidence refs Scenario sketches ### Illustrative supervisory-gap exploitation during a regulator transition Illustrative scenario for analytical orientation only: in a jurisdiction undergoing a consolidation of sector regulators, a window can open in which obliged entities in a cash-intensive sector are uncertain which body exercises AML-reporting oversight over them. In an illustrative version of such a scenario, an obliged entity could delay or deprioritise reporting-entity obligations during the ambiguity, citing uncertainty over the correct supervisory channel, without any single body treating this as a compliance failure in real time. This is a structural mechanism to watch for during any sector-regulator transition, not a description of observed conduct in any specific case. Illustrative scenario for analytical orientation only. Not compliance advice, not a prediction, and not a statement of observed fact. ### Illustrative EU AML Package / AMLA supervisory-transition analogue Illustrative scenario for analytical orientation only: as the European Union moves cross-border obliged entities from purely national AML supervision toward direct or indirect oversight by the Anti-Money-Laundering Authority under the AMLA Regulation (Reg (EU) 2024/1620), alongside the directly-applicable AML Regulation (Reg (EU) 2024/1624) and national transposition of the sixth AML Directive, a comparable transitional ambiguity could in principle arise during the handover period, where obliged entities and national supervisors are uncertain which body holds day-to-day supervisory authority. This is architecture-level illustration of a supervisory-transition mechanism, not a prediction of how the EU transition will in fact unfold, and it is not a statement about the Dominican Republic specifically. Illustrative scenario for analytical orientation only. Not compliance advice, not a prediction, and not a statement of observed fact. Standing trackers (T1–T6) Tracker Status Note T1 · Russian Sanctions-Evasion Architecture no_change No DO-specific signal located this cycle. T2 · EU AML Package / AMLA no_change Not applicable; DO is not an EEA/EU member state. T3 · FATF Grey List no_change FATF's 30 October 2026 Plenary outcome confirms DO remains off the grey list. T4 · Beneficial-Ownership Register Status no_change DO continues to rely on DGII taxpayer-registry BO declaration under Decree 408-17 rather than a dedicated public register. T5 · Crypto & Digital-Asset Integrity no_change DO continues to lack a dedicated VASP AML registration gateway; full detail in crypto consumer. T6 · Sanctions Regime Divergence no_change No DO-specific sanctions-divergence signal located this cycle. Registers ### Enforcement actions - 4 Oct 2025 - 15 Feb 2025 - 25 Jun 2025 - 15 Apr 2026 - 30 Jun 2026 - Four executives remanded to 18-month preventive detention and three placed under house arrest for a scheme simulating loans and issuing inorganic financial certificates to embezzle over US$40 million from members and savers, styled 'Operation Owl'. 4 Oct 2025 - Interdiction of a US-procured arms shipment intercepted in the Dominican Republic including a Barrett M82 semi-automatic rifle, sniper rifles, an Uzi submachine gun and over 36,000 rounds of ammunition, part of enforcement of the UN Haiti arms embargo. 15 Feb 2025 - Dominican law enforcement seized two large shipments of illicit firearms, cited at a June 2025 UN Security Council briefing as a positive contribution to enforcement of the Haiti arms embargo amid broader 'consistent failure to enforce' concerns raised by the Panel of Experts. 25 Jun 2025 - International police sweep dismantled a Balkan Cartel drug-trafficking cell, arresting 12 suspects tied to smuggling of over 4.2 tonnes of cocaine and cannabis; the network's transport/logistics coordination named the Dominican Republic among transit jurisdictions. 15 Apr 2026 ### Sanctions changes - 17 Oct 2025 - 4 Dec 2025 - 30 Jun 2026 - 30 Jun 2026 - UN Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 2794 (2025), renewing the Haiti sanctions regime (travel ban, asset freeze, arms embargo) for 13 months, adding two individuals to the sanctions list, and directing Member States — including neighboring Dominican Republic — to strengthen border-control mechanisms against arms trafficking and diversion. 17 Oct 2025 - European Commission adopted Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/83 (4 December 2025), adding Bolivia and the British Virgin Islands to the EU high-risk third-country AML/CFT list and delisting Burkina Faso, Mali, Mozambique, Nigeria, South Africa and Tanzania; the Dominican Republic was not added, maintaining its non-listed status distinct from several Caribbean/regional peers. 4 Dec 2025 ### Regulatory horizon (register) - UK ECCTA 2023 failure-to-prevent-fraud offence — enforcement uplift - UK ECCTA 2023 failure-to-prevent-fraud offence — enforcement uplift - FENABANCA-coordinated 90-day technical review of Ley 86-26 - Dominican Republic crypto regulatory framework bills (De Pérez / Frías) - Dominican crypto bill (SIMV licensing/AML gateway) - Ley 86-26 implementing regulation (gambling-sector AML continuity) - UN Secretary-General Haiti sanctions benchmark assessment - Next EU high-risk third-country list biannual review - GAFILAT/FATF 5th-round mutual evaluation scheduling for DR ### Active schemes - [HIGH] Haiti gang arms and cash financing via the Dominican Republic transit corridor - [HIGH] Caribbean cocaine transshipment via Dominican logistics nodes - PEP-linked resort and real-estate structuring architecture - Financial-cooperative simulated-loan laundering scheme Sources - [https://www.castellum.ai/global-sanctions-index/americas/dominican-republic-sanctions-guide](https://www.castellum.ai/global-sanctions-index/americas/dominican-republic-sanctions-guide) - [https://cdcgaming.com/brief/dominican-republic-casino-operators-face-strict-new-aml-rules/](https://cdcgaming.com/brief/dominican-republic-casino-operators-face-strict-new-aml-rules/) - [https://g3newswire.com/dominican-republic-casino-operators-face-strict-new-rules-under-new-anti-money-laundering-regime/](https://g3newswire.com/dominican-republic-casino-operators-face-strict-new-rules-under-new-anti-money-laundering-regime/) - [https://www.lightspark.com/knowledge/is-crypto-legal-in-dominican-republic](https://www.lightspark.com/knowledge/is-crypto-legal-in-dominican-republic) - [https://sigma.world/news/cambodia-anti-gambling-drive-fatf-grey-list/](https://sigma.world/news/cambodia-anti-gambling-drive-fatf-grey-list/) - [https://www.millerchevalier.com/publication/where-fto-designated-cartels-operate-2026-update](https://www.millerchevalier.com/publication/where-fto-designated-cartels-operate-2026-update) - [https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/detail/Dominican-Republic.html](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/detail/Dominican-Republic.html) - [https://www.businessdataguide.com/blog/jurisdictions/dominican-republic-company-search-guide](https://www.businessdataguide.com/blog/jurisdictions/dominican-republic-company-search-guide) - [https://www.spendnode.io/crypto-cards/country/dominican-republic/](https://www.spendnode.io/crypto-cards/country/dominican-republic/) - [https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-issues-supplemental-alert-fuel-smuggling-and-tax-evasion-schemes-southern](https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-issues-supplemental-alert-fuel-smuggling-and-tax-evasion-schemes-southern) - [https://agbrief.com/news/cambodia/26/01/2026/cambodia-battles-to-avoid-third-fatf-grey-list-placement-amid-scam-crackdown/](https://agbrief.com/news/cambodia/26/01/2026/cambodia-battles-to-avoid-third-fatf-grey-list-placement-amid-scam-crackdown/) - [https://english.iari.site/colombia-2026-abelardo-de-la-espriella-anti-cartel-offensive-u-s-interests-and-operational-picture/](https://english.iari.site/colombia-2026-abelardo-de-la-espriella-anti-cartel-offensive-u-s-interests-and-operational-picture/) - [https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67f8ef1845705eb1a1513f35/Failure+to+Prevent+Fraud+Guidance+-+English+Language+v1.6.pdf](https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67f8ef1845705eb1a1513f35/Failure+to+Prevent+Fraud+Guidance+-+English+Language+v1.6.pdf) - [Diario Libre](https://www.diariolibre.com/politica/gobierno/2026/10/02/decreto-abinader-designa-a-quico-tabar-director-de-juegos-de-azar/3677328) - [SoloAzar](https://www.soloazar.com/en/category/legislation/cambodia-prepares-new-casino-license-renewal-framework) - [U.S. Department of the Treasury](https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-issues-supplemental-alert-fuel-smuggling-and-tax-evasion-schemes-southern) - [https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/High-risk-and-other-monitored-jurisdictions/increased-monitoring-june-2026.html](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/High-risk-and-other-monitored-jurisdictions/increased-monitoring-june-2026.html) - [https://fc-abogados.com/nueva-ley-de-juegos-de-azar-en-republica-dominicana-que-cambia-con-la-ley-num-86-26/](https://fc-abogados.com/nueva-ley-de-juegos-de-azar-en-republica-dominicana-que-cambia-con-la-ley-num-86-26/) - [https://www.hotel-online.com/news/lopesan-hotel-group-opens-three-new-resorts-in-punta-cana-marking-its-largest-caribbean-expansion-to-date](https://www.hotel-online.com/news/lopesan-hotel-group-opens-three-new-resorts-in-punta-cana-marking-its-largest-caribbean-expansion-to-date) - [RegFollower](https://regfollower.com/dominican-republic-enacts-comprehensive-games-tax-and-regulatory-framework/) - [Dirección General de Impuestos Internos (DGII)](https://dgii.gov.do/legislacion/prevencionLavado/informacionEspecializada/Documents/BrochureLavadoDeActivos.pdf) - [FATF](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/High-risk-and-other-monitored-jurisdictions/increased-monitoring-june-2026.html) - [FATF/GAFILAT](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/global-network/financial-action-task-force-of-latin-america--gafilat-.html) - [Ministerio de Hacienda (Dominican Republic)](https://dgii.gov.do/legislacion/normasGenerales/Documents/Normas%20Sectoriales/Norma03-18.pdf) - [SC Lawyer (law-firm commentary quoting Ley 155-17)](https://www.sclawyer.com.do/base-de-datos/ley-155-17-sobre-lavado-de-activos?lang=en) - [Ministerio de Hacienda (public-consultation draft)](https://www.hacienda.gob.do/transparencia/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Propuesta-de-modificacio%CC%81n-de-la-Normativa-Sectorial-PLAFT-DJ15072024-Limpio-Consulta-Publica.pdf) - [https://dgii.gov.do/publicacionesOficiales/avisosInformativos/Documents/2026/04-26.pdf](https://dgii.gov.do/publicacionesOficiales/avisosInformativos/Documents/2026/04-26.pdf) - [https://criptodominicano.do/en/bitcoin-digital-assets-law-dominican-republic/](https://criptodominicano.do/en/bitcoin-digital-assets-law-dominican-republic/) - [https://membercheck.com/aml-cft-legislation-in-the-dominican-republic/](https://membercheck.com/aml-cft-legislation-in-the-dominican-republic/) - [FATF](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/High-risk-and-other-monitored-jurisdictions/increased-monitoring-october-2026.html) - [Listín Diario](https://listindiario.com/economia/20261013/arranca-direccion-juegos-azar-conoce-clausuras-sanciones-bancas-loterias_926040.html) - [UAF Dominican Republic](https://uaf.gob.do/es) - [Membercheck](https://membercheck.com/aml-cft-legislation-in-the-dominican-republic/) - [Financial Action Task Force of Latin America (GAFILAT)](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/global-network/financial-action-task-force-of-latin-america--gafilat-.html) - [Dominican Republic](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/detail/Dominican-Republic.html) - [Mutual Evaluation of Dominica](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/d-i/dominica/documents/mutualevaluationofdominica.html) - [Mutual Evaluations](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/topics/mutual-evaluations.html) - [Assessments](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/calendars/assessments.html) - [Dominican Republic's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/Mer-dominican-republic-2018.html) - [Consolidated assessment ratings](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/Assessment-ratings.html) - [Dominica](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/detail/Dominica.html) - [Dominican Republic's progress in strengthening measures to tackle money laundering and terrorist financing](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/Fur-dominican-republic-2019.html) - [Saint Vincent & the Grenadines' measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/St-Vincent-Grenadines-MER-2024.html) - ["Black and grey" lists](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/black-and-grey-lists.html) - [Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 13 February 2026](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/High-risk-and-other-monitored-jurisdictions/increased-monitoring-february-2026.html) - [Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 19 June 2026](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/High-risk-and-other-monitored-jurisdictions/increased-monitoring-june-2026.html) - [FATF changes its grey listing criteria to further focus on risk](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfgeneral/FATF-grey-listing-criteria.html) - [Countries / Jurisdictions](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries.html) - [Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 24 October 2025](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/High-risk-and-other-monitored-jurisdictions/increased-monitoring-october-2025.html) - [High-risk and other monitored jurisdictions](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/High-risk-and-other-monitored-jurisdictions.html) - [Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 13 June 2025](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/High-risk-and-other-monitored-jurisdictions/increased-monitoring-june-2025.html) - [Sanctions Programs and Country Information | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-programs-and-country-information) - [Counter Narcotics Designation; Issuance of Counter Terrorism General License and Amended Frequently Asked Question | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20221214) - [Sanctions List Updates](https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/sanctions-list-updates) - [Recent Actions | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions) - [Sanctions List Service | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-list-service) - [Democratic Republic of the Congo-Related Sanctions | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-programs-and-country-information/democratic-republic-of-the-congo-related-sanctions) - [OFAC Related Press Releases | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/press-releases) - [Archive of Changes to OFAC's Sanctions Lists | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/specially-designated-nationals-list-sdn-list/archive-of-changes-to-the-sdn-list) - [Program Tag Definitions for OFAC Sanctions Lists | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/specially-designated-nationals-list-sdn-list/program-tag-definitions-for-ofac-sanctions-lists) - [Blog - Chainalysis](https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/) - [Dominican Republic Arrests 12 in Odebrecht Corruption Scandal | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/dominican-republic-arrests-12-in-odebrecht-corruption-scandal) - [Dominican Republic Judge Orders Custody for Executives of Financial Institution | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/dominican-republic-judge-orders-custody-for-executives-of-financial-institution) - [CRIMJUST workshop on the detection of money laundering and risk in financial and commercial instruments in the Dominican Republic](https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/drug-trafficking/crimjust/news/crimjust-workshop-on-the-detection-of-money-laundering-and-risk-in-financial-and-commercial-instruments-in-the-dominican-republic.html) - [A Foreign Affair: Trump’s Dominican Republic deal | Global Witness](https://globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/corruption-and-money-laundering/a-foreign-affair-trumps-dominican-republic-deal/) - [Dominican Republic May Reopen Lawsuit Against Odebrecht | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/dominican-republic-may-reopen-lawsuit-against-odebrecht) - [Country Profile: Dominican Republic](https://www.unodc.org/corruption/en/country-profiles/data/DOM.html) - [Dominican Republic Detains Ex-Ministers; Opposition Protests | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/dominican-republic-detains-ex-ministers-opposition-protests) - [Articulo 8](https://sherloc.unodc.org/cld/es/legislation/ecu/reglamento_-_ley_de_lavado_de_activos_y_del_financiamiento_de_delitos/titulo_i_-_capitulo_i/articulo_8/articulo_8.html) - [Articulo 6](https://www.unodc.org/cld/es/legislation/ecu/reglamento_-_ley_de_lavado_de_activos_y_del_financiamiento_de_delitos/titulo_i_-_capitulo_i/articulo_6/articulo_6.html) - [Articulo 73](https://www.unodc.org/cld/es/legislation/slv/ley_organica_de_la_fiscalia_general_de_la_republica/articulo_73/articulo_73.html) - [Articulo 15](https://sherloc.unodc.org/cld/es/legislation/ecu/reglamento_-_ley_de_lavado_de_activos_y_del_financiamiento_de_delitos/titulo_i_-_capitulo_ii/articulo_15/articulo_15.html) - [CHILE LAVADO DE ACTIVOS Y UAF LEY NUM. 19.913 ...](https://www.unodc.org/cld/uploads/res/document/chl/2005/ley_num__19_913_que_crea_la_unidad_de_analisis_financiero_y_modifica_diversas_disposiciones_en_materia_de_lavado_y_blanqueo_de_activos_html/Chile_Ley_Num_19.913.pdf) - [capacitacionuafchile](https://www.unodc.org/colombia/es/press/capacitacionuafchile.html) - [THEMATIC COMPILATION OF RELEVANT INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY URUGUAY](https://www.unodc.org/documents/corruption/WG-Prevention/Art_14_Prevention_of_money-laundering/Uruguay.pdf) - [Investigaciones Financieras contra el Lavado de Activos: Fortaleciendo Capacidades en Ecuador para Combatir el Crimen Organizado Transnacional](https://www.unodc.org/rocol/es/noticias/ecuador/investigaciones-financieras-contra-el-lavado-de-activos_-fortaleciendo-capacidades-en-ecuador-para-combatir-el-crimen-organizado-transnacional.html) - [Nueva guía nacional estandariza la información financiera para mejorar investigaciones de lavado de activos en Ecuador](https://www.unodc.org/rocol/es/noticias/ecuador/nueva-guia-nacional-estandariza-la-informacin-financiera-para-mejorar-investigaciones-de-lavado-de-activos-en-ecuador.html) - [COMBATE AL ABUSO FINANCIERO TERRORISTA DE ...](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/translations/Recommendations/Spanish-BPP-Combating-TF-Abuse-NPO-R8.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf) - [Record cocaine seizure in Haitian waters underlines country’s ‘pivotal’ trafficking role | UN News](https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/11/1166460) - [TREASURY CRACKS DOWN ON REMITTANCES TO DOMINICAN REPUBLIC | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/treasury-cracks-down-remittances-dominican-republic) - [Dominican Republic, Panama and Spain review current state of their criminal justice cooperation during CRIMJUST Inter-Regional Investigative Case Forum in Santo Domingo](https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/drug-trafficking/crimjust/news/dominican-republic--panama-and-spain-review-current-state-of-their-criminal-justice-cooperation-during-crimjust-inter-regional-investigative-case-forum-in-santo-domingo.html) - [Explainer: Organized crime and gang violence in Haiti](https://www.unodc.org/unodc/frontpage/2026/January/explainer_-organized-crime-and-gang-violence-in-haiti.html) - [International Narcotics Control Strategy Report Volume II Money Laundering](https://syntheticdrugs.unodc.org/uploads/syntheticdrugs/res/library/cybercrime_html/US_International_Narcotics_Control_Strategy_Report_Money_Laundering.pdf) - [Balkan Drug Cartel Cell Targeted in Massive International Crackdown | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/balkan-drug-cartel-cell-targeted-in-massive-international-crackdown) - [World Drug Report 2025 - Maps](https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/world-drug-report-2025-maps.html) - [Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean](https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/drug-trafficking/mexico-central-america-and-the-caribbean.html) - [Virtual Assets](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/topics/virtual-assets.html) - [Global Crypto Policy Review Outlook 2025/26 Report | TRM Labs](https://www.trmlabs.com/reports-and-whitepapers/global-crypto-policy-review-outlook-2025-26) - [FATF urges stronger global action to address Illicit Finance Risks in Virtual Assets](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/targeted-update-virtual-assets-vasps-2025.html) - [Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP): Definition, Compliance & Examples](https://www.trmlabs.com/glossary/virtual-asset-service-provider-vasp) - [2025 Crypto Regulatory Round-Up](https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/2025-crypto-regulatory-round-up/) - [Quick guide on assessing the Money Laundering risks of virtual assets (VA) and virtual asset service providers (VASP)](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Methodsandtrends/quick-guide-on-assessing-ML-risks-of-VA-and-VASPs.html) - [1 EASY GUIDE TO FATF STANDARDS AND METHODOLOGY Virt ual Asset s:](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf/documents/bulletin/FATF-Booklet_VA.pdf) - [What Is a VASP? Virtual Asset Service Provider - Chainalysis](https://www.chainalysis.com/glossary/virtual-asset-service-provider/) - [Updated Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach to Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Guidance-rba-virtual-assets-2021.html) - [Targeted Update on Implementation of the FATF Standards on Virtual Assets and](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/recommendations/2025-Targeted-Upate-VA-VASPs.pdf.coredownload.pdf) - [1 United States Department of the Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network](https://www.fincen.gov/system/files/advisory/advis16.pdf) - [MUTUAL EVALUATION REPORT OF DOMINICAN REPUBLIC September 2018](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/fsrb-mer/GAFILAT-MER-Dominican-Republic-2018.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf) - [United States Department of the Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network](https://www.fincen.gov/system/files/advisory/advis16w.pdf) - [Special Measures | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-and-regulations/special-measures) - [PPSI-AMLCFT-NPRM.pdf](https://www.fincen.gov/system/files/2026-04/PPSI-AMLCFT-NPRM.pdf) - [Financial Action Task Force Identifies Jurisdictions with Anti-Money Laundering, Combating the Financing of Terrorism, and Counter-Proliferation Finance Deficiencies | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/financial-action-task-force-identifies-jurisdictions-anti-money-laundering-2) - [Chair of Security Council Sanctions Committee Concerning Haiti Briefs Committee Members on Visit to Haiti, Dominican Republic | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases](https://press.un.org/en/2023/sc15374.doc.htm) - [Dominican Republic Rejects $4 Billion Barrick Mine Contract](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-02-27/dominican-republic-rejects-barrick-contract-on-4-billion-mine) - [Precipitate Provides Results from Barrick's Drilling at Pueblo Grande Project, Dominican Republic - Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/press-releases/2021-07-14/precipitate-provides-results-from-barrick-s-drilling-at-pueblo-grande-project-dominican-republic) - [Bloomberg - Are you a robot?](http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-08/barrick-agrees-to-amend-dominican-republic-mine-contract-1-) - [The Legend of Jacinto’s Gold: How Family Lore Sent Thousands of Dominicans on a Hunt for Riches](https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2019-dominican-gold-treasure-hunt/) - [Part 2b – Minerals Crime: Illegal Gold Mining](https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/Crimes%20on%20Environment/ECR25_P2b_Minerals_Crime.pdf) - [Barrick Forms New Leadership Group to Pursue North American IPO - Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-03-31/barrick-forms-new-leadership-group-to-pursue-north-american-ipo) - [The Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/resources/international/egmont-group-financial-intelligence-units) - [The Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units The Egmont Group](https://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/UNCAC/WorkingGroups/workinggroup2/2011-August-25-26/Presentations/Boudewijn_Verhelst_Egmont_Group.pdf) - [International Co-operation on Money Laundering Detection, Investigation, and](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/reports/International-Cooperation-ML-Detection-Investigation-Prosecution.pdf.coredownload.pdf) - [International Programs | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/resources/international-programs) - [Fatf-gafi](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/mer-fsrb/GAFILAT-MER-Dominican-Republic-2018.pdf) - [2025‌ Effective informal operational and strategic information exchange](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/reports/Informal%20Int%20Cooperation%20Brochure%20-%20For%20FIUs.pdf.coredownload.pdf) - [The Egmont Group Of Financial Intelligence Units Exceeds The 100-Member Mark During Its Annual Meeting Hosted By The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/egmont-group-financial-intelligence-units-exceeds-100-member-mark-during-its) - [2653 Sanctions Committee (Haiti)](https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/sanctions/2653) - [Haiti is under a UN arms embargo: So why are 500,000 illegal weapons in circulation? | UN News](https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/10/1166121) - [Security Council Speakers Call for Rigorous Sanctions Compliance to Address Multidimensional Crisis in Haiti | UN Meetings Coverage and Press Releases](https://press.un.org/en/2025/sc16247.doc.htm) - [Security Council Renews Sanctions Regime on Haiti, Unanimously Adopting Resolution 2794 (2025) | UN Meetings Coverage and Press Releases](https://press.un.org/en/2025/sc16195.doc.htm) - [Caribbean States and international partners convene in Panama to advance implementation of the UN arms embargo on Haiti](https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/firearms-protocol/news/2025/caribbean-states-and-international-partners-convene-in-panama-to-advance-implementation-of-the-un-arms-embargo-on-haiti.html) - [Resolutions | Security Council](https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/sanctions/2653/resolutions) - [Haiti is under a UN arms embargo: So why are 500,000 illegal weapons in circulation? | United Nations in Haiti](https://haiti.un.org/en/304494-haiti-under-un-arms-embargo-so-why-are-500000-illegal-weapons-circulation) - [Top United Nations Officials Urge Swift Global Action as Haiti Nears Collapse | UN Meetings Coverage and Press Releases](https://press.un.org/en/2025/sc16111.doc.htm) - [Security Council | UN Meetings Coverage and Press Releases](https://press.un.org/en/security-council) - [Security Council Committee Established Pursuant to Resolution 2653 (2022) concerning Haiti Briefed by UNODC | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases](https://press.un.org/en/2025/sc16145.doc.htm) - [European Commission updates list of high-risk countries to strengthen international fight against financial crime - Finance](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/news/european-commission-updates-list-high-risk-countries-strengthen-international-fight-against-2025-12-04_en) - [Anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism at international level - Finance](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/financial-crime/anti-money-laundering-and-countering-financing-terrorism-international-level_en) - [Commission updates list of high-risk countries to strengthen international fight against financial crime - Finance](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/news/commission-updates-list-high-risk-countries-strengthen-international-fight-against-financial-crime-2025-06-10_en) - [High risk third countries and the international context content of anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism - European Commission](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/financial-crime/high-risk-third-countries-and-international-context-content-anti-money-laundering-and-countering_en) - [EU methodology for the identification of high-risk third countries - Finance](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/financial-crime/anti-money-laundering-and-countering-financing-terrorism-international-level/eu-methodology-identification-high-risk-third-countries_en) - [Protecting the EU’s financial system - Finance - European Commission](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/news/protecting-eus-financial-system-2025-07-16_en) - [Anti-Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Directive 4 - Finance](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/regulation-and-supervision/financial-services-legislation/implementing-and-delegated-acts/anti-money-laundering-and-terrorist-financing-directive-4_en) - [HM Treasury Advisory Notice: High Risk Third Countries - GOV.UK](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/money-laundering-advisory-notice-high-risk-third-countries--2/hm-treasury-advisory-notice-high-risk-third-countries) - [ECSH31555 - Schedule 3ZA - High-Risk Third Countries - HMRC internal manual - GOV.UK](https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/economic-crime-supervision-handbook/ecsh31555) - [Commission adds Russia to list of high-risk jurisdictions to strengthen international fight against financial crime](https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_2910) - [FATF / GAFILAT](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/fsrb-mer/GAFILAT-MER-Dominican-Republic-2018.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf) - [FATF](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/High-risk-and-other-monitored-jurisdictions/increased-monitoring-june-2026.html) - [European Commission](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/news/european-commission-updates-list-high-risk-countries-strengthen-international-fight-against-2025-12-04_en) - [OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/dominican-republic-judge-orders-custody-for-executives-of-financial-institution) - [OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/dominican-republic-arrests-12-in-odebrecht-corruption-scandal) - [UNODC](https://www.unodc.org/unodc/frontpage/2026/January/explainer_-organized-crime-and-gang-violence-in-haiti.html) - [United Nations in Haiti](https://haiti.un.org/en/304494-haiti-under-un-arms-embargo-so-why-are-500000-illegal-weapons-circulation) - [UN Department of Global Communications](https://press.un.org/en/2025/sc16195.doc.htm) - [OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/balkan-drug-cartel-cell-targeted-in-massive-international-crackdown) - [Global Witness](https://globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/corruption-and-money-laundering/a-foreign-affair-trumps-dominican-republic-deal/) - [FinCEN, US Department of the Treasury](https://www.fincen.gov/system/files/advisory/advis16.pdf) Coverage gaps fim-int-2026-07-07-G001: The precise Egmont Group admission … fim-int-2026-07-07-G001: The precise Egmont Group admission date for the Dominican Republic Unidad de Analisis Financiero has not been located, though current membership is now assessed as established. [resolved] fim-int-2026-07-07-G002: No post-2019 GAFILAT follow-up repo… fim-int-2026-07-07-G002: No post-2019 GAFILAT follow-up report or effectiveness reassessment has been located to confirm current DNFBP risk-based supervision remediation. [resolved] fim-int-2026-07-07-G003: Quantified data on Dominican Republ… fim-int-2026-07-07-G003: Quantified data on Dominican Republic-Haiti border interdiction infrastructure (scanner capacity, unofficial crossing counts) beyond narrative Panel of Experts assessment has not been located. [resolved] fim-int-2026-07-07-G004: Independent verification of the com… fim-int-2026-07-07-G004: Independent verification of the completeness and data quality of DGII-held beneficial-ownership records has not been located, as no dedicated public registry exists to audit against. [resolved] fim-int-2026-07-07-G005: Current Superintendencia de Bancos … fim-int-2026-07-07-G005: Current Superintendencia de Bancos RegTech and SupTech adoption posture and any post-2019 enforcement bulletins have not been located in accessible open sources. [resolved] fim-int-2026-08-05-G001: No T1 DCJA/Gaceta Oficial primary t… fim-int-2026-08-05-G001: No T1 DCJA/Gaceta Oficial primary text was retrieved for Resolution 161-2026, limiting confidence to Assessed. [resolved] fim-int-2026-08-05-G002: No DO-specific D4 (conflict finance… fim-int-2026-08-05-G002: No DO-specific D4 (conflict finance) material was located this cycle; logged as a coverage gap rather than a null finding. [resolved] fim-int-2026-08-05-G003: No underlying OFAC press release wa… fim-int-2026-08-05-G003: No underlying OFAC press release was independently re-verified for the CJNG fuel-smuggling designation action; law-firm secondary summary only. [resolved] fim-int-2026-08-05-G004: No confirmed output has been observ… fim-int-2026-08-05-G004: No confirmed output has been observed from the February 2026 Ministry of Finance / FIBA AML-certification cooperation agreement, limiting confidence to Possible. [resolved] fim-int-2026-08-21-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-08-21-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D7'}): No T1 Ministry of Finance/UAF primary text located for DO gambling-sector AML suitability rules this cycle. [resolved] fim-int-2026-08-21-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-08-21-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D3'}): No DO-specific enabler-jurisdiction or conflict-finance material located this cycle. [resolved] fim-int-2026-08-21-G003: Laos search did not surface cycle-s… fim-int-2026-08-21-G003: Laos search did not surface cycle-specific material; recorded as awaiting primary source, not a stable no-change finding. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-04-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-10-04-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D7'}): Full consolidated text of Ley 86-26 has not been independently retrieved; the AML/CFT implementing detail for the new DGJA is not yet confirmed beyond the institutional-transfer inference from Ley 155-17 Art. 2(17). [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-04-G002: Laos and Colombia (Tier D watch jur… fim-int-2026-10-04-G002: Laos and Colombia (Tier D watch jurisdictions) carried no sourced material this cycle; recorded as a coverage gap, not a finding of stability. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-11-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-10-11-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D7'}): Primary Gazette text (11263) for Ley 86-26's AML/bank-freeze provisions was not directly retrieved; obligated-entity registration under Ley 155-17 not confirmed for gambling operators this cycle. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-11-G002: Tier D jurisdiction watch (KH/LA/MX… fim-int-2026-10-11-G002: Tier D jurisdiction watch (KH/LA/MX/CO) and D4/D6 enforcement-gap log were not separately researched this cycle; pooled search budget was concentrated on DO. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-18-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-10-18-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D7'}): No Tier-1 primary text of Law 86-26 was retrieved; the DGJA-DGII goAML platform characterisation rests on a single T4 aggregator and would be upgraded by direct access to the gazetted statute. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-18-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-10-18-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D1'}): D1-D6 (Sanctions, Beneficial Ownership, Enabler Jurisdictions, Conflict Finance, Crypto, Compliance Technology) received only thin or no coverage this cycle given the pooled search budget shared across five consumers; this is a coverage gap, not an assertion of no material change in those domains. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-18-G003 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-10-18-G003 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D7'}): Whether the 2024 PLAFT sectoral consultation draft for gambling operators has been finalised, absorbed into Law 86-26's implementing regulations, or left pending is unresolved. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-25-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-10-25-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D5'}): No official congressional or SIMV document retrieved confirming the current status of the crypto bill beyond the 8 June 2026 public hearing. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-25-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-10-25-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D7'}): Underlying Resolución 161-2026 / Circular MHE-2026-011897 text was not independently retrieved; reliant on secondary trade-press report. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-25-G003 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-10-25-G003 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D1'}): No DO-specific sanctions designation or conflict-finance nexus was found this cycle; Tier-D jurisdiction watch (KH/LA/MX/CO) was not actively searched given single-jurisdiction dispatch scope. [resolved] fim-int-2026-11-01-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-11-01-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D3'}): No primary UAF or CONCLAFIT instrument located this cycle addressing whether DGJA inherits DCJA's AML-supervisory competence outright, or whether a transitional gap exists pending Ley 86-26's implementing regulation. [open] fim-int-2026-11-01-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-11-01-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D1'}): No DO-specific material located this cycle for sanctions architecture, beneficial ownership change, conflict finance, or crypto-AML specifically. [open] FIM-GAP-001 (D2): GAFILAT's 2018 MER found that outside bank… FIM-GAP-001 (D2): GAFILAT's 2018 MER found that outside banking and securities, supervisors were only beginning to implement risk-based AML/CFT supervision, with DNFBPs showing limited understanding of ML/TF risk and CDD obligations; no subsequent full mutual evaluation has been located to confirm remediation at effectiveness level. FIM-GAP-002 (D1): Despite DR interdictions in February and m… FIM-GAP-002 (D1): Despite DR interdictions in February and mid-2025, the UN Panel of Experts assessed a 'consistent failure to enforce' the Haiti arms embargo, with Haiti lacking even a single large-format cargo scanner and the DR-Haiti border still traversed extensively through unofficial crossings. FIM-GAP-003 (D3): The 2018 MER recorded the UAF as still pur… FIM-GAP-003 (D3): The 2018 MER recorded the UAF as still pursuing Egmont Group admission at that time; this research pass could not locate a current, dated confirmation of full Egmont membership status for the Dominican Republic's UAF, leaving international financial-intelligence-sharing capacity unverified for this baseline. FIM-GAP-004 (D6): The bulk of authoritative technical-compli… FIM-GAP-004 (D6): The bulk of authoritative technical-compliance material on the Dominican Republic's AML/CFT system available in this research pass dates to the 2018 GAFILAT Mutual Evaluation Report and its 2019 follow-up report; no more recent (2020-2026) FATF/GAFILAT follow-up report, national risk assessment update, or Superintendencia de Bancos enforcement bulletin was located in English- or readily-accessible open sources. ## Evidence #### Confidence-tiered claims gambling-sector non-financial obligated subjects (casinos, lottery banks, sports-betting outlets, bingo, online gambling) [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source 20 casino licences revoked, 29 suspended out of 195 reviewed [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Supplemental alert on fiscal fuel theft (huachicol fiscal) tied to CJNG, Sinaloa and Gulf cartels [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Ley 86-26 creates DGJA as sole gambling regulator and states objectives including preventing fraud and money laundering; a historically weak DNFBP supervision gap (FATF R.22 NC, R.26 NC) may be partially addressed if implemented effectively. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Banks/payment providers reportedly empowered to freeze transfers linked to unlicensed gambling operations; DGJA/INDOTEL reportedly empowered to block unlicensed gambling domains. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Uncertain · 1 source Not on FATF 'Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring' list published 19 June 2026 (22 jurisdictions listed; DO not among them). [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Two competing crypto bills (De Pérez, filed 16 Mar 2026; Frías, filed 9 Apr 2026) remain under committee review; hearings with BCRD, Superintendencia de Bancos and DGII pending as of 11 Sep 2026 tracker; no further movement within this cycle's window. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Opened three new Punta Cana resorts with casinos on 7 July 2026, over $350m invested, largest Caribbean expansion to date. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source DGJA and DGII must build, within 6 months of promulgation (~April 2027), a shared technology platform to monitor gaming transactions and report financial irregularities to the FIU via goAML [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Unidad de Análisis Financiero (UAF) is the national FIU; obligated entities (sujetos obligados) must report suspicious transactions to the UAF within five business days (Art. 55) [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Obligated entities must retain transaction, due-diligence and account records for at least ten years after the end of the business relationship or the transaction date [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Outsourcing of CDD to a third party does not relieve the obligated entity of responsibility (Norma 03-18, Art. 21) [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source The Dominican Republic does not appear on FATF's 19 June 2026 Increased Monitoring (grey) list; next possible GAFILAT on-site not due until November 2029 [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source A July 2024 public-consultation draft would assign a compliance officer and risk-based CDD duties to gambling operators; adoption status not confirmed, and it is unclear whether Law 86-26 has superseded, absorbed or left it pending [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Uncertain · 1 source DGII's Aviso 04-26 (17 April 2026) reiterates the Ley 155-17 Art.104 beneficial-ownership identification/filing duty, using a ≥20% ownership or effective-control test, filed at RNC registration/update and on the annual ISR return. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Bill filed 16 March 2026 proposes a SIMV-issued 'Calidad Certificante' licence for exchanges/custodians, classifies crypto as taxable property, and reportedly includes AML provisions; remains in consultation, not enacted. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Casino, slot-hall and online-gambling licence holders, lottery/betting-bank concessionaires, bingo/raffle operators and equipment manufacturers required to file sworn suitability declarations for shareholders, board members, senior management and key staff by 14 May 2026. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Not on the FATF grey or black list; GAFILAT member; last mutual evaluation 2018, follow-up 2019. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Ley 155-17 (2017) is the governing AML/CFT statute; UAF is the FIU; GAFILAT is the relevant FSRB. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source 2026-10-13 [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source DGJA replaces Dirección de Casinos y Juegos de Azar (DCJA) as gambling sector regulator under Ley 86-26, operational since 13 October 2026, with provisional database transfer to DGII for fiscal oversight. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Remains off the FATF grey list as of the 30 October 2026 FATF Plenary. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source