--- title: "Romania (RO) — Financial-Integrity Intelligence · Sentinel" canonical: https://sentinel.gi/jurisdictions/romania/ source_html: /jurisdictions/romania/index.html description: "Financial integrity intelligence for Romania (RO): sanctions, beneficial ownership, enabler jurisdictions, conflict finance, digital assets and compliance technology — with sourced findings." generated_at: 2026-11-08T04:46:02Z content_sha256: 88968c5c6527e41ff24115a650b9b68711072306ad0451d6a6b1befb91974ef1 generator: "fe-fleet/md-twin@1.0" --- # Romania (RO) — Financial-Integrity Intelligence · Sentinel Not every instrument is backed by its official text yet. At least one law or rulebook covered here has no official source (tier 1) retrieved for it yet. No finding on this page is shown with confidence above “Probable” until stronger sources are retrieved. Financial Integrity Monitor # Romania RO Domains covered 8 of 8 Sources 163 Role actions 8 Horizon <90d 0 Jurisdiction profile FATF status: Largely Compliant Tier: B Risk direction: Stable Enablement vs enforcement: Mixed Romania's AML/CFT regime rests on Law 129/2019 (transposing EU AMLD4/5), with NOPCML/ONPCSB as FIU, NBR and FSA as prudential AML/CFT supervisors, and ONRC operating the beneficial ownership register. More MONEYVAL's 2023 MER rated regulation/supervision of financial institutions (R.26) non-compliant and beneficial ownership of legal arrangements (R.25) partially compliant, with a March 2026 follow-up noting only partial progress. Key deficiencies - R.26 (regulation and supervision of financial institutions) rated non-compliant in the 2023 MONEYVAL MER - NOPCML/FIU chronically understaffed and lacking technical resources to produce operational financial intelligence - Beneficial ownership register (ONRC Register of Real Beneficiaries) is fee-gated/legitimate-interest access rather than fully public, with contested data accuracy - No overarching national AML/CFT strategy despite numerous sectoral crime strategies - NBR AML/CFT supervision described by assessors as ad hoc, lacking a general strategic direction - Large cash-based underground economy (~30% of GDP) and shell-company use for ML linked to tax evasion Recent developments (18m) - MONEYVAL published a follow-up report (23 March 2026) finding Romania made progress on some technical compliance deficiencies identified in its MER - Romanian anti-corruption prosecutors opened a probe (reported Feb 2026) into a failed EUR 38 million ONRC (Trade Registry/BO register) IT system that blocked 130,000+ business registrations and exposed personal data of 3,000+ individuals - DIICOT conducted a sweeping crypto-laundering crackdown (27 March 2025) against an organised crime network that laundered over $14 million in crypto tied to renewable-energy project embezzlement - OLAF and EPPO jointly uncovered a EUR 9.5 million EU-funds fraud and money-laundering scheme spanning Romania, Cyprus, Czechia and the UAE (announced 10 April 2025), leading to 12 indictments - Romania adopted a new anti-fraud ordinance (published 30 Jan 2026) strengthening EU-funds fraud prevention under the NRRP/PNRR loan agreement Law made at European Economic Area level that applies in Romania is covered once, on the [European Economic Area](/jurisdictions/eea/) page. This page covers Romania’s own layer: implementation, national authorities, national options and local enforcement. Brief ## Lead signal #### Lead Signal Romania's standing in the Council of Europe mutual-evaluation cycle moved this period on two tracks at once. MONEYVAL's second enhanced follow-up report records a confirmed remediation of a FATF Recommendation 24 timeliness deficiency: joint-stock companies are now required to update changes in beneficial ownership within 15 days of a change occurring, closing a gap in Romania's corporate-transparency framework that the original mutual evaluation had flagged. This is a narrow but structural improvement, not an incident; it changes the architecture of how beneficial-ownership data is kept current rather than resolving a single enforcement episode. Read full brief #### Lead Signal Romania's standing in the Council of Europe mutual-evaluation cycle moved this period on two tracks at once. MONEYVAL's second enhanced follow-up report records a confirmed remediation of a FATF Recommendation 24 timeliness deficiency: joint-stock companies are now required to update changes in beneficial ownership within 15 days of a change occurring, closing a gap in Romania's corporate-transparency framework that the original mutual evaluation had flagged. This is a narrow but structural improvement, not an incident; it changes the architecture of how beneficial-ownership data is kept current rather than resolving a single enforcement episode. Alongside that improvement, Romania's financial intelligence unit, the Oficiul National de Prevenire si Combatere a Spalarii Banilor, circulated EU Council acts extending Russia-related restrictive measures, including designations against financial entities in third countries said to be offering crypto services that facilitate sanctions evasion, together with a transaction ban affecting a larger set of Russian banks. This is domestic implementation of an EU-level act rather than an autonomous Romanian designation, consistent with the structural fact that Romania's sanctions regime refers only to the EU and UN lists and maintains no independent national list. #### Other Developments Beneficial-ownership timeliness now codified. The 15-day update obligation for joint-stock companies, recorded by MONEYVAL as remediation of the Recommendation 24 deficiency, is probable-confidence and corroborated by a secondary account describing Romania's improved technical compliance with two FATF recommendations. The primary instrument text was not independently paginated this cycle, so the obligation is reported at the confidence the underlying evaluation report supports. Enhanced follow-up status persists. Romania remains under MONEYVAL's second enhanced follow-up procedure. The beneficial-ownership remediation addresses one deficiency within that procedure; virtual-asset and VASP-related technical-compliance gaps identified in the original mutual evaluation remain open and unresolved, meaning the follow-up procedure itself has not concluded. Sanctions implementation continues on the EU track. The ONPCSB circular implementing the Russia-related designations is consistent with Romania's established posture of direct, without-amendment application of EU Council acts under its domestic sanctions-implementing legislation. The specific count of newly designated third-country financial entities tied to crypto-facilitated evasion, and the exact date that listing took internal effect, were not independently confirmed from the retrieved excerpt, and that gap is recorded rather than filled by inference. #### Cross-Monitor Connections The crypto-services dimension of the sanctions-evasion designations connects directly to work tracking digital-asset architecture risk: entities in third countries using crypto rails to intermediate sanctioned counterparties are a cross-border payments-and-illicit-finance pattern that correspondent-banking and virtual-asset monitoring should both be watching for exposure through Romanian-linked financial entities. The transaction ban on a larger set of Russian banks also bears on correspondent-banking de-risking dynamics more broadly, since banks implementing the ban must assess indirect exposure through intermediary relationships rather than only direct counterparty screening. Separately, the beneficial-ownership timeliness remediation is the kind of structural transparency improvement that conflict-finance and extractive-industry monitoring typically draws on when assessing whether corporate vehicles registered in a jurisdiction can be traced to ultimate owners within a usable window. #### Outlook The near-term question for Romania's AML/CFT architecture is whether the unresolved virtual-asset and VASP technical-compliance deficiencies receive comparable remediation before the next MONEYVAL follow-up checkpoint. The beneficial-ownership fix demonstrates that Romania can close a discrete technical-compliance gap once identified; whether the same capacity extends to the more structurally complex virtual-asset supervision gap is the open question carried into the next cycle. On sanctions, Romania's posture of pure EU/UN list implementation with no autonomous designation capacity is a stable structural feature, not a transitional one, and should be read as durable rather than as a gap awaiting legislative attention. Earlier periodic briefs (7) 4 Nov 2026 · fim-2026-11-01 #### Lead Signal Romania's standing in the Council of Europe mutual-evaluation cycle moved this period on two tracks at once. MONEYVAL's second enhanced follow-up report records a confirmed remediation of a FATF Recommendation 24 timeliness deficiency: joint-stock companies are now required to update changes in beneficial ownership within 15 days of a change occurring, closing a gap in Romania's corporate-transparency framework that the original mutual evaluation had flagged. This is a narrow but structural improvement, not an incident; it changes the architecture of how beneficial-ownership data is kept current rather than resolving a single enforcement episode. Alongside that improvement, Romania's financial intelligence unit, the Oficiul National de Prevenire si Combatere a Spalarii Banilor, circulated EU Council acts extending Russia-related restrictive measures, including designations against financial entities in third countries said to be offering crypto services that facilitate sanctions evasion, together with a transaction ban affecting a larger set of Russian banks. This is domestic implementation of an EU-level act rather than an autonomous Romanian designation, consistent with the structural fact that Romania's sanctions regime refers only to the EU and UN lists and maintains no independent national list. #### Other Developments Beneficial-ownership timeliness now codified. The 15-day update obligation for joint-stock companies, recorded by MONEYVAL as remediation of the Recommendation 24 deficiency, is probable-confidence and corroborated by a secondary account describing Romania's improved technical compliance with two FATF recommendations. The primary instrument text was not independently paginated, so the obligation is reported at the confidence the underlying evaluation report supports. Enhanced follow-up status persists. Romania remains under MONEYVAL's second enhanced follow-up procedure. The beneficial-ownership remediation addresses one deficiency within that procedure; virtual-asset and VASP-related technical-compliance gaps identified in the original mutual evaluation remain open and unresolved, meaning the follow-up procedure itself has not concluded. Sanctions implementation continues on the EU track. The ONPCSB circular implementing the Russia-related designations is consistent with Romania's established posture of direct, without-amendment application of EU Council acts under its domestic sanctions-implementing legislation. The specific count of newly designated third-country financial entities tied to crypto-facilitated evasion, and the exact date that listing took internal effect, were not independently confirmed from the retrieved excerpt, and that gap is recorded rather than filled by inference. #### Cross-Monitor Connections The crypto-services dimension of the sanctions-evasion designations connects directly to work tracking digital-asset architecture risk: entities in third countries using crypto rails to intermediate sanctioned counterparties are a cross-border payments-and-illicit-finance pattern that correspondent-banking and virtual-asset monitoring should both be watching for exposure through Romanian-linked financial entities. The transaction ban on a larger set of Russian banks also bears on correspondent-banking de-risking dynamics more broadly, since banks implementing the ban must assess indirect exposure through intermediary relationships rather than only direct counterparty screening. Separately, the beneficial-ownership timeliness remediation is the kind of structural transparency improvement that conflict-finance and extractive-industry monitoring typically draws on when assessing whether corporate vehicles registered in a jurisdiction can be traced to ultimate owners within a usable window. #### Outlook The near-term question for Romania's AML/CFT architecture is whether the unresolved virtual-asset and VASP technical-compliance deficiencies receive comparable remediation before the next MONEYVAL follow-up checkpoint. The beneficial-ownership fix demonstrates that Romania can close a discrete technical-compliance gap once identified; whether the same capacity extends to the more structurally complex virtual-asset supervision gap is the open question carried. On sanctions, Romania's posture of pure EU/UN list implementation with no autonomous designation capacity is a stable structural feature, not a transitional one, and should be read as durable rather than as a gap awaiting legislative attention. 3 Nov 2026 · fim-2026-11-03 #### Lead Signal Romania enters this cycle with two structural developments running in parallel, both traceable to the same underlying review process. The Council of Europe body that monitors anti-money-laundering performance across member states has recorded that joint stock companies registered in Romania are now required to update changes in beneficial ownership within 15 days of a change occurring, a remediation step tied to the Financial Action Task Force recommendation on beneficial-ownership transparency. At the same time, Romania continues to sit under the second enhanced follow-up procedure of that same monitoring body, meaning the country remains on a heightened reporting track even as individual technical-compliance gaps close. The pairing matters more than either fact alone: a jurisdiction can close a specific gap, such as the 15-day update rule, while the broader architecture problem that put it under enhanced follow-up in the first place persists. The second element of this cycle is the domestic transmission of European Union sanctions instruments, including a batch of designations against third-country financial entities said to be offering crypto-asset services that facilitate evasion of restrictive measures connected to Russia, alongside a transaction ban reaching a larger set of Russian banks. Romania relayed these measures through its financial intelligence unit using the standing national implementing law for international sanctions, rather than through any Romania-specific sanctions list, because Romania does not maintain an autonomous national designation mechanism and refers only to European Union and United Nations lists. Taken together, these two threads describe a jurisdiction whose sanctions and ownership-transparency architecture is reactive to supranational instruments rather than self-generating. The beneficial-ownership obligation originates in a European-level recommendation framework rather than a domestic policy initiative, and the sanctions transmission is a pass-through of European Union Council decisions rather than an independent listing judgment. That dependency is itself the structural story: Romania's financial integrity posture is substantially a function of how faithfully and how quickly it transmits obligations set elsewhere, not of autonomous rule-making. #### Other Developments The beneficial-ownership update window narrows. The requirement that joint stock companies notify changes in beneficial ownership within 15 days of a change occurring was recorded as part of the remediation record against the Financial Action Task Force's recommendation on beneficial ownership. The obligation sits in the country's anti-money-laundering and countering-the-financing-of-terrorism law, applies across obliged sectors, and represents a tightening of what had previously been a looser notification standard. Sanctions transmission channel confirmed rather than replaced. The financial intelligence unit's circulation of the Council designations, including the crypto-services evasion batch, used the existing international sanctions implementing framework. No new domestic legal instrument was created to carry this transmission; the architecture that already existed absorbed the new designations without amendment, which is itself informative about how much of the country's sanctions capacity is really European Union capacity routed through a domestic conduit. Enhanced follow-up status persists alongside incremental technical gains. The improvement on the beneficial-ownership recommendation is real but partial: Romania remains under the heightened monitoring track tied to earlier identified deficiencies, including ones connected to virtual-asset service provider oversight, that have not yet been resolved. A reader should not read the single recommendation improvement as closure of the broader review. #### Cross-Monitor Connections The crypto-services sanctions-evasion designations relayed connect directly to digital-asset and financial-innovation monitoring elsewhere in the fleet: the same entities said to be offering crypto services to third-country counterparts facilitating evasion of Russia-related restrictive measures are a crypto-infrastructure story as much as a sanctions story, and the fact that Romania's domestic transmission mechanism does not distinguish between a conventional banking designation and a crypto-services designation is itself a signal about how undifferentiated the country's sanctions-screening architecture currently is across asset types. The beneficial-ownership tightening also has a bearing on broader conflict-finance and extractive-industry monitoring patterns elsewhere, insofar as faster beneficial-ownership disclosure timelines reduce (without eliminating) the window during which a change in controlling interest in a joint stock company can go unreported to the register. #### Outlook The near-term picture for Romania is one of incremental technical remediation proceeding inside a still-elevated supervisory posture. The 15-day beneficial-ownership update obligation is now in force and should be read as one completed line item within a longer review rather than as evidence the underlying follow-up status is near resolution. On the sanctions side, Romania's posture will continue to track the pace and content of European Union Council decisions rather than diverge from them, given the absence of any autonomous national list; any further batches of third-country or crypto-services designations at the European level should be expected to flow through the same existing implementing framework without requiring new domestic legislation. Readers should treat the enhanced follow-up status as the more durable fact here and the recommendation-specific improvement as one data point within it. 25 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-25 #### Lead Signal Romania has now passed three months beyond the date on which its transitional arrangement for crypto-asset service providers under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation lapsed, and it still has no national authority empowered to receive or process authorisation applications under that regime. Romania chose the maximum eighteen-month transitional window available under Article 143(3), meaning firms registered under prior national law could keep operating without a Markets in Crypto-Assets authorisation only until 1 July 2026. That date has passed. The European Securities and Markets Authority's own interim register, refreshed on 20 October 2026, still records Romania's supervisor field as not yet designated, with zero home-registered entities. A senior official at the Financial Supervisory Authority publicly confirmed in July 2026 that no Romanian authority is currently designated as competent to receive these applications. The structural fact beneath the delay is a draft Emergency Government Ordinance that would designate the Financial Supervisory Authority for crypto-asset service providers and asset-referenced tokens, and the National Bank of Romania for e-money tokens; that ordinance received only a first government reading on 2 April 2026 and has not advanced to adoption. This is best read as a capacity gap rather than a single missed deadline. Six months separate the ordinance's first reading and the transitional deadline's lapse, and a further three-plus months have elapsed since, with the supervisory designation still outstanding. Firms that relied on pre-existing Romanian registration now sit in a jurisdiction where the European Union's own direct-effect regulation applies in full, but no national body stands ready to authorise, supervise, or sanction under it. #### Other Developments Romania's standing anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorist-financing posture remains unchanged. The regime continues to rest on Law No. 129/2019, as amended by Emergency Government Ordinance 10/2025, with the National Office for Prevention and Control of Money Laundering as the receiving financial intelligence unit for suspicious transaction reports, including from crypto-asset service providers brought within scope by the 2025 amendment. The Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures and the Financing of Terrorism, in its second enhanced follow-up report adopted 26-29 May 2026, kept Romania in enhanced follow-up under its fifth-round mutual evaluation, finding the country compliant with seven recommendations, largely compliant with twenty, and partially compliant with thirteen. No Romania-specific delta against this standing position was identified. #### Cross-Monitor Connections The absence of an operative crypto-asset supervisor is a finding with direct read-across to payments-sector market access and to technology-platform exposure, since any firm offering crypto-asset services into Romania sits in a jurisdiction where the licensing route is formally open under European Union law but practically unavailable at the national level. This also bears on the standing anti-money-laundering architecture: obliged-entity status for crypto-asset service providers already attaches under Romanian law via the 2025 amendment to Law No. 129/2019, meaning firms are subject to financial-crime obligations through the national anti-money-laundering authority even while no licensing authority exists to authorise them in the first place. The two tracks, supervisory authorisation and financial-crime obligation, are proceeding on materially different timelines within the same jurisdiction. #### Outlook The draft implementing ordinance is the only visible path to resolution, and it carries a wide uncertainty band, with an estimated impact date as late as the first quarter of 2027. Until it is adopted, the practical effect is that Romania applies the European Union's crypto-asset rulebook directly while withholding the one function, national authorisation, that is supposed to make that rulebook operable for firms. Whether the ordinance advances before the end of 2026 is the development to watch; nothing in the current record points to acceleration, and the gap between the law's requirements and the state's administrative capacity to apply them stands as a structural, not episodic, feature of the jurisdiction as presently evidenced. 18 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-18 #### Lead Signal Romania enters this cycle carrying two concurrent, structurally distinct EU-level compliance pressure points that both touch the integrity of its beneficial-ownership and digital-asset architecture. First, the European Commission opened an infringement procedure on 28 September 2026 against Romania and seventeen other Member States over failure to notify transposing measures for the sixth Anti-Money Laundering Directive provisions on beneficial-ownership access. Second, Romania remains, alongside Hungary and Poland, one of only three jurisdictions in the European Economic Area with zero MiCA-authorised crypto-asset service providers more than three months after the 1 July 2026 transitional-period deadline, because the Autoritatea de Supraveghere Financiara has not yet been formally designated as competent authority under the pending implementing Government Emergency Ordinance. Taken together, these are not isolated administrative delays. Both items describe the same underlying pattern: a transposition and implementation gap between an EU-level obligation taking direct or quasi-direct effect and the domestic machinery needed to operationalise it. The beneficial-ownership access question concerns an existing public register whose practical utility for verification purposes has already been narrowed since May 2025 by a legitimate-interest gate; the MiCA question concerns a licensing regime that cannot process a single application because the enabling national instrument has stalled since a first parliamentary reading on 2 April 2026. #### Other Developments MONEYVAL follow-up shows incremental compliance gains. Romania's second enhanced follow-up report, adopted at MONEYVAL's 71st Plenary in late May 2026 and published on 6 July 2026, recorded improved technical compliance on targeted financial sanctions since the first follow-up report, while Romania remains under enhanced follow-up overall pending further remediation across the wider FATF Recommendation set. The crypto-asset AML perimeter has been extended, even as licensing stalls. Government Emergency Ordinance 10/2025, effective 13 March 2025, amended AML Law 129/2019 to replace the term virtual currency with crypto-asset and to bring crypto-asset service providers within the AML-obliged-entity perimeter on the same footing as financial institutions, while also transposing the EU Funds Transfer Regulation travel-rule requirements. This means the AML-obliged status of crypto firms operating in Romania is more settled than their MiCA licensing status, which remains frozen. Beneficial-ownership register access remains narrowly gated. The ONRC-administered Registrul Beneficiarilor Reali has restricted public access since May 2025 to parties able to demonstrate a legitimate interest, with no change reported this cycle to the underlying 25-percent-plus-one-share ownership threshold used to identify a beneficial owner. #### Cross-Monitor Connections The MiCA authorisation gap identified here connects directly to parallel World Payments Monitor coverage of Romania's payment-services licensing transition, where the same underlying absence of a designated competent authority is read through a market-access and commercial lens rather than a financial-crime lens. The beneficial-ownership infringement procedure likewise intersects with Crypto Monitor findings on Romania's cross-border passporting blockage, since a jurisdiction that cannot authorise domestic crypto-asset service providers also cannot serve as an EU passporting home state, compounding the integrity-architecture gap with a market-structure one. #### Outlook The implementing Government Emergency Ordinance for MiCA remains in draft as at mid-October 2026, with the regulatory horizon pointing to possible adoption in the first quarter of 2027, though this estimate carries a half-year uncertainty band and should be read as scheduled rather than assured. Until ASF receives formal competent-authority designation, Romania's crypto-asset sector will continue to sit in a licensing vacuum even as its AML-obliged status under GEO 10/2025 remains operative. Similarly, the beneficial-ownership infringement procedure opened in September 2026 is at an early stage, and its trajectory toward a reasoned opinion or further escalation has not yet been established from the material reaching this cycle. 11 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-11 #### Lead Signal Romania enters October 2026 carrying simultaneous EU infringement exposure on two distinct fronts of its financial-integrity architecture. On 25 September 2026 the European Commission issued a letter of formal notice to a group of 18 member states, Romania among them, over incomplete transposition of the sixth EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive (Directive (EU) 2024/1640), specifically provisions in the Articles 11-15 lineage governing beneficial-ownership register access. The transposition deadline had passed on 10 July 2026, and Romania now has a two-month window to respond before the Commission could escalate to a reasoned opinion. Separately, and on an unrelated instrument, Romania's Financial Supervisory Authority (ASF) remains undesignated as competent authority under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, more than three months past the transitional deadline that elapsed on 1 July 2026, meaning the jurisdiction has no operative domestic route for authorising crypto-asset service providers. The two exposures sit on different legal instruments and different enforcement clocks, but together they describe a single structural pattern: Romania's domestic implementing capacity has not kept pace with EU-level deadlines across more than one financial-integrity instrument at once. This capacity deficit is not a comment on enforcement intent. A draft emergency ordinance addressing the MiCA designation gap was reviewed by the Romanian government in first reading on 2 April 2026, and the beneficial-ownership transposition gap is procedural rather than substantive refusal. Read together, though, the two infringement tracks are evidence of a jurisdiction where the legislative and regulatory machinery for converting EU financial-integrity instruments into operative domestic law is under sustained strain. #### Other Developments MONEYVAL's 2nd Enhanced Follow-up Report keeps Romania under enhanced monitoring. The Council of Europe's MONEYVAL mechanism adopted its 2nd Enhanced Follow-up Report on Romania on 29 May 2026 (published 6 July 2026), re-rating two FATF Recommendations relating to targeted financial sanctions for terrorism and proliferation financing as largely compliant. Romania's overall standing across the 40 FATF Recommendations is now 7 rated compliant, 20 largely compliant, and 13 partially compliant, with none rated non-compliant. Romania remains in enhanced follow-up and will continue reporting back to MONEYVAL, meaning the jurisdiction's AML/CTF technical-compliance record, while showing incremental improvement on the sanctions-implementation recommendations, has not yet reached a point where enhanced monitoring is lifted. ONPCSB's national risk assessment update identifies fraud as the second-ranked predicate offence. Romania's Financial Intelligence Unit, ONPCSB, published an update to its national money-laundering and terrorist-financing risk assessment stating that fraud-related laundering indicators accounted for roughly 14.56% of disseminations to the Prosecutor's Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice (PICCJ), ranking fraud second among predicate-offence categories generating laundered proceeds. This is a baseline risk-typology finding rather than a new development, but it anchors the jurisdiction's own regulator's view of where illicit-proceeds generation concentrates domestically. EU Council sanctions designations disseminated domestically. ONPCSB disseminated nationally the EU Council's Decision (CFSP) 2026/2164 of 24 September 2026, which added 10 individuals and 17 entities to the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures under the EU's Russia-related human-rights and destabilising-activities regime. No Romania-specific sanctions-evasion case tied to these designations has been identified in the current research window; this is routine domestic implementation of an EU-level listing rather than an independent Romanian finding. #### Cross-Monitor Connections The MiCA designation gap sits at the direct intersection of financial-integrity and crypto/digital-asset monitoring: ASF's inability to authorise crypto-asset service providers domestically is simultaneously a financial-integrity capacity question (can the AML/CTF-relevant gatekeeping function operate at all) and a market-structure question for the crypto monitor (can firms obtain Romanian authorisation). The beneficial-ownership transposition gap under the sixth AML Directive is a candidate for a broader read against the EU AML Package's structural shift of supervision toward the Anti-Money Laundering Authority, insofar as incomplete national transposition of register-access provisions may bear on how AMLA's hybrid supervisory perimeter interacts with Member States still completing their own implementing legislation; however, no AMLA-specific finding for Romania has fed this cycle's input, so that connection is noted as a structural possibility rather than an observed fact. #### Outlook Romania's two-month response window on the 6AMLD infringement letter runs from late September 2026, placing the question of whether a reasoned opinion follows on a horizon in Q4 2026. Whether the draft MiCA implementing ordinance, reviewed in first reading on 2 April 2026, is adopted before year end will determine whether the CASP-authorisation gap persists into 2027 or is resolved. Both tracks are structural rather than episodic: they describe implementation capacity rather than a single enforcement incident, and their resolution will depend on domestic legislative throughput rather than on any further EU-level signal. 29 Sep 2026 · fim-2026-09-28 #### Lead Signal Romania this cycle shows two domains moving in opposite directions. On the AML/CFT architecture side, MONEYVAL's July 2026 follow-up report finds Romania compliant with 7 of the 40 FATF Recommendations, largely compliant with 20, and partially compliant with 13, with improvement recorded specifically on Recommendations 6 and 7 covering targeted financial sanctions. Romania nonetheless remains in MONEYVAL's enhanced follow-up process, meaning the incremental improvement has not been sufficient to exit heightened monitoring. Separately, on the digital-asset side, Romania's national MiCA transitional regime closed decisively: the 18-month grandfathering window under GEO 10/2025 for pre-MiCA crypto-asset service providers expired on 1 July 2026, and the Financial Supervisory Authority (ASF) has begun issuing its first coercive sanctioning decisions against digital-asset entities for periodic-reporting failures. Read together, these signals describe a jurisdiction whose paper compliance architecture is improving gradually while its supervisory posture toward a specific sector, digital assets, has shifted abruptly from permissive to active. The two developments are not contradictory; they describe different clocks. The FATF-recommendation compliance trajectory moves on a multi-year mutual-evaluation cycle, while the MiCA transition was a fixed statutory deadline that simply arrived. #### Other Developments Sanctions screening mechanism unchanged. Romania's exposure to the EU list of high-risk third countries, the 26-country list in force from 29 January 2026, continues to apply via the standard AMLR mechanism, with no Romania-specific autonomous-listing divergence identified this cycle. This is a structural continuity finding rather than a new development, and it confirms Romania has not adopted any national variation from the EU-wide sanctions-screening baseline. FATF grey-list status confirmed absent. Romania is not on the FATF grey list and continues to be assessed instead through the MONEYVAL fifth-round mutual evaluation process, a status distinct from, and independently confirmed alongside, the enhanced follow-up finding above. This T1-sourced confirmation should not be conflated with the enhanced follow-up status: grey-listing and enhanced follow-up are separate mechanisms, and Romania's exposure runs only through the latter. #### Cross-Monitor Connections The MiCA transitional closure and ASF's new enforcement posture connect directly to the crypto monitor's licensing coverage of the same underlying event, and to the world-payments monitor's structural coverage of BNR's role as banking and payments supervisor outside the MiCA-authorisation perimeter. The enhanced-follow-up AML/CFT finding is architecture-level and has no direct payment-corridor or crypto-licensing analogue this cycle, but it forms part of the same national supervisory backdrop against which both the crypto and payments monitors' Romania coverage should be read. #### Outlook The MiCA transition closure is recent enough that the scale and substance of ASF's coercive sanctioning practice remain unestablished; whether this becomes a sustained enforcement programme or a narrow set of reporting-failure actions will be the key data point to watch. On the AML/CFT side, the improvement on Recommendations 6 and 7 is a positive but partial signal; Romania's continued presence in enhanced follow-up means the compliance architecture is still under active MONEYVAL scrutiny, and the next follow-up report will be the natural checkpoint for whether the partial-compliance items narrow further. 5 Sep 2026 · fim-2026-08-21 #### Lead Signal Romania's anti-money-laundering architecture registered a rare positive signal this cycle. MONEYVAL's July 2026 follow-up report, published 6 July 2026, found Romania had improved technical compliance on two of the Financial Action Task Force's 40 Recommendations since the June 2025 review, moving to fully compliant on seven Recommendations, largely compliant on twenty, and partially compliant on the remaining thirteen. The improvement is incremental rather than transformative: Romania remains under MONEYVAL's enhanced follow-up procedure and is expected to report again during 2026-2027, meaning the AML/CFT architecture continues to be assessed as a work in progress rather than a settled strong-compliance baseline. The finding carries High confidence and rests on a Tier-1 Council of Europe/MONEYVAL primary publication, corroborated by the FATF country page, a materially stronger sourcing posture than most of this cycle's other Romania findings. Romania's overall jurisdiction-risk trajectory is assessed as improving with a mixed structural-and-episodic character: the MONEYVAL finding is a structural, institutionally-verified assessment, while other developments this cycle are more episodic in nature. #### Other Developments MiCA transitional window closure. Romania's eighteen-month MiCA transitional registration regime for crypto-asset service providers, established under Government Emergency Ordinance 10/2025, expired on 1 July 2026. From that date, CASPs that had not secured full MiCA authorisation from the Financial Supervisory Authority may no longer lawfully operate for Romanian users. GEO 10/2025 designates the Financial Supervisory Authority as the primary CASP competent authority, with the National Bank of Romania responsible for e-money-token and payment-related crypto services, and the Financial Supervisory Authority additionally imposes a 0.5% monthly supervisory fee on CASP operating income. No formal enforcement action against an unauthorised platform has yet been publicly identified, leaving a near-term supervisory gap between the rule taking effect and any visible enforcement precedent being set; this gap itself raises the probability of a first enforcement precedent surfacing in the coming cycle. EU AML Package build-out continues. The Anti-Money Laundering Authority's consultation on draft Regulatory Technical Standards for Customer Due Diligence under Article 28(1) of the AML Regulation closed 8 May 2026, one item within a twenty-three-item Level-2/3 package due mostly by 10 July 2026, ahead of the AML Regulation and sixth Anti-Money Laundering Directive's full application on 10 July 2027. Romania is bound directly by the AML Regulation as an EU-27 member, and no Romania-specific transposition text for the sixth Directive has been identified as adopted yet this cycle. #### Cross-Monitor Connections The MiCA transitional-window expiry is a direct architecture-level intersection with the Global Crypto Regulatory Monitor's Romania coverage: the same Government Emergency Ordinance 10/2025 framework, the Financial Supervisory Authority's supervisory-fee structure, and the 1 July 2026 deadline anchor both monitors' findings this cycle, and a first enforcement precedent, if and when it emerges, will be a shared evidentiary event for both. The continued absence of visible enforcement action is itself worth surfacing across both monitors as an open supervisory-credibility question rather than a settled non-issue. Separately, the Anti-Money Laundering Authority's Article 28(1) Customer Due Diligence consultation and the broader 2027 full-application date for the AML Regulation and sixth Directive sit upstream of payments-sector obliged-entity obligations that the World Payments Monitor tracks on its own calendar, though no Romania-specific payments-sector AML finding surfaced on the financial-integrity side this cycle to connect the two more directly. #### Outlook Two horizon events define the coming cycles. The AML Regulation and sixth Anti-Money Laundering Directive reach full application on 10 July 2027, at which point the AML Regulation applies directly and identically across the EU-27 including Romania, removing the national interpretive latitude that obliged entities have previously relied on under the directive-based fourth and fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive regime. Nearer-term, the absence of a publicly visible MiCA enforcement action against an unauthorised crypto-asset service provider since 1 July 2026 raises the probability of a first enforcement precedent surfacing in the coming cycle; its emergence, or its continued absence, will be the clearest signal of how seriously the Financial Supervisory Authority is prepared to police the newly-closed transitional gap. Romania's continued placement under MONEYVAL's enhanced follow-up procedure means the next scheduled report, expected during 2026-2027, will be the key structural marker of whether this cycle's incremental technical-compliance improvement continues. Domain intelligence (D1–D8) #### Sanctions Architecture and Evasion Romania's sanctions architecture this period is defined by continuity of structure rather than a change to the structure itself. The Oficiul National de Prevenire si Combatere a Spalarii Banilor circulated EU Council acts extending Russia-related restrictive measures, including designations against financial entities in third countries said to be offering crypto services to facilitate sanctions evasion, alongside a transaction ban affecting a larger set of Russian banks. This is implementation of an EU-level act, not an autonomous Romanian listing decision, and it confirms rather than alters the standing structural fact that Romania's sanctions regime refers only to the EU and UN lists, with no independent national designation capacity of its own. Continue reading The crypto-services angle of the new designations is the analytically significant part of this development, because it names a specific evasion typology: third-country financial entities acting as intermediaries using digital-asset rails to route value around direct sanctions screening. Where such entities have any correspondent, custodial, or settlement relationship touching Romanian-regulated institutions, the designation creates an immediate screening obligation under Romania's sanctions-implementing legislation. The transaction ban on a wider set of Russian banks similarly raises the bar for indirect-exposure assessment: institutions with historical correspondent relationships into the Russian banking sector, even where those relationships are now dormant or wound down, face a renewed obligation to confirm that no residual exposure persists through intermediary chains. What this cycle does not show is any shift in Romania's own designation architecture. Romania continues to operate as a pure transmission point for EU and UN decisions rather than as an independent sanctions-policy actor, a posture that has held stable across prior cycles and is reaffirmed rather than tested by this round of designations. The precise scale of the new crypto-services designation batch, and its exact internal effective date within Romania's implementing framework, were not independently confirmed from the material available this cycle, a gap that is recorded as outstanding rather than inferred. #### Outlook The durable feature to track is less the content of any individual EU designation batch and more whether Romania's screening and reporting obligations keep pace with a sanctions environment that is increasingly naming crypto-facilitated evasion as a distinct typology rather than treating it as a subset of conventional correspondent-banking risk. Romania's posture of EU/UN-list-only implementation is stable and should be read as a structural baseline rather than a developing position. Judgment: ONPCSB continues rolling EU-sanctions implementation; no autonomous designation capacity. Probable #### Beneficial Ownership and Corporate Transparency MONEYVAL's second enhanced follow-up report records a confirmed remediation of a Financial Action Task Force Recommendation 24 technical-compliance deficiency in Romania's beneficial-ownership framework: joint-stock companies are now required to update changes in beneficial ownership within 15 days of a change occurring. This is a structural fix to the timeliness of Romania's beneficial-ownership data, not a single enforcement event, and it is corroborated at a secondary level by reporting describing Romania's improved technical compliance with two Financial Action Task Force recommendations in the same evaluation cycle. Continue reading The durable backdrop against which this cycle's development should be read is the architecture of the European Union's Anti-Money Laundering Package, which separates into three distinct instruments: the directly applicable Anti-Money Laundering Regulation, the sixth Anti-Money Laundering Directive which each Member State transposes into its own law, and the Anti-Money Laundering Authority Regulation, which establishes a dedicated European Union authority. Together these instruments shift supervision of beneficial-ownership and wider anti-money-laundering compliance from a purely national model toward a hybrid regime in which the new Authority holds direct supervisory responsibility for a defined set of higher-risk obliged entities and an indirect, coordinating role over the remainder supervised nationally. No Romania-specific anchor for this horizon architecture was carried in the material available this cycle, so this paragraph states the architecture from standing context rather than from a fresh Romanian development, and the absence of a fresh anchor is recorded honestly rather than papered over. Within that backdrop, Romania's own remediation is narrow in scope, applying specifically to joint-stock companies, but it is the kind of discrete technical-compliance fix that mutual-evaluation processes are designed to surface and that, once surfaced, a jurisdiction can close relatively quickly compared with more structurally complex deficiencies. The fact that this fix came via mutual-evaluation follow-up rather than through a freestanding domestic transparency initiative is itself informative: it suggests Romania's corporate-transparency architecture evolves substantially in response to external evaluation pressure. #### Outlook The open question is whether Romania extends the same remediation discipline to its virtual-asset and VASP-related technical-compliance deficiencies, which remain unresolved within the same enhanced follow-up procedure and are structurally more complex than a reporting-timeliness fix. Progress on beneficial-ownership timeliness does not by itself indicate progress on that separate and harder deficiency. Judgment: 15-day BO update obligation for joint-stock companies remediates a R.24 deficiency. Probable #### Enabler Jurisdictions and Professional Facilitators The most significant financial-integrity signal from Romania this cycle is not a change in law but a disclosure of apparent regulatory capture inside its own designated AML authority for the gambling sector. On 29 July 2026, the deputy director-general of ONJN, Ana-Maria Badea, was made subject to a sought 30-day preventive arrest warrant by the National Anticorruption Directorate of Romania, over allegations that she received bribes of approximately EUR2,500 to expedite gambling-game approvals during a period running from 23 December 2025 to 21 May 2026. Romanian authorities have reportedly placed four further ONJN control and authorisation-department employees under investigation in connection with the same matter, suggesting the alleged conduct was not confined to a single official but potentially reflects a pattern within the licensing-approval function. Continue reading A second, separate allegation reaches further back and further up the institutional hierarchy. Odeta Nestor, a former president of ONJN who also headed the industry trade body AOJND, was arrested in June 2026 over an alleged facilitation of a EUR100,000 bribe between an ONJN official and a Bulgarian national representing a gambling company. Critically, this bribe is alleged to have been intended specifically to cover up money-laundering violations committed by that company. If substantiated, this allegation would represent a direct instance of an enabler figure, in this case a former head of the designated AML supervisory authority itself, facilitating the concealment of a predicate AML failure rather than merely accepting payment for administrative convenience. Both findings are held at the Assessed confidence tier, reflecting corroboration across multiple tier-3 Romanian-language and English-language outlets, but the absence of a retrieved tier-1 prosecutorial or court document this cycle. The enabler-jurisdiction reading of this pattern is that gambling-sector AML supervision in Romania has, on the evidence available this cycle, a demonstrated internal vulnerability at both the working-approval level and, allegedly, at the former-leadership level, to inducement. This is analytically distinct from, and arguably more significant than, a single enforcement action against an external facilitator, because it implicates the credibility of the institution that other jurisdictions and counterparties would rely upon when assessing the gambling-sector AML controls of Romania as a matter of correspondent or counterparty due diligence. Architecture-over-incident framing suggests this should be read as a potential institutional-integrity finding pending the outcome of both prosecutions, rather than as an isolated incident confined to the two named individuals. From a professional-facilitator lens, the AOJND industry-trade-body role held concurrently by the former ONJN president is a structurally interesting detail: it places a single individual at the intersection of industry representation and regulatory leadership, a dual-hat arrangement that, if the allegations are substantiated, would illustrate exactly the kind of structural conflict-of-interest vulnerability that enabler-jurisdiction analysis is designed to surface, independent of whether any individual transaction was itself illicit. This sits against a backdrop of continued political instability in Romania, including multiple stalled prime-ministerial candidacies since the collapse of the government in May 2026, which is separately delaying both a draft amendment to Law 129/2019 intended to strengthen the national-risk-assessment coordination powers of ONPCSB (submitted to the Senate on 19 December 2024, addressing deficiencies identified in the 2023 Moneyval evaluation of Romania) and the full MiCA crypto-asset licensing framework. The coincidence of institutional-integrity questions at ONJN with stalled legislative remediation of Moneyval-identified deficiencies elsewhere in the AML architecture of Romania is a pattern worth monitoring as a potential broader signal about the current capacity of Romanian AML institutions to execute reform under sustained political instability. For compliance teams conducting third-party or correspondent due diligence on Romanian gambling-sector counterparties, the finding this cycle is a reason to place incrementally less reliance on ONJN licensing status alone as a proxy for AML control quality, and to seek independent verification of the AML programme of a counterparty, at least until the outcome of both prosecutions is known. This is a due-diligence-weighting observation, not a recommendation to disengage, and it should be read alongside the otherwise stable FATF standing of Romania. The pattern also illustrates a recurring typology in enabler-jurisdiction analysis: a licensing or approvals function within a regulator becomes a point of leverage precisely because its decisions carry direct commercial value to regulated entities, and the incentive for inducement rises in proportion to the fees, taxes, and approval delays those entities face. The parallel fiscal tightening in Romania this cycle, which raised authorisation and winnings taxes materially for the same gambling sector, arguably increases rather than decreases the commercial incentive for regulated entities to seek expedited or favourable treatment from ONJN officials, a dynamic worth monitoring as the scandal develops. #### Outlook Watch for whether the ONJN investigation widens to implicate additional officials or, more significantly, whether prosecutors establish and pursue the alleged money-laundering-cover-up dimension of the Nestor case, which would be the more consequential outcome from an enabler-jurisdiction perspective. Also watch whether the stalled Law 129/2019 Moneyval-remediation amendment advances once a new government forms, since continued delay would compound the credibility questions raised by the ONJN scandal. This is illustrative orientation for analytical purposes only, not a prediction or a statement of confirmed fact beyond what is recorded in the underlying assessed-tier claims. Judgment: No Romania-specific D3 development this cycle. Uncertain Judgment: No Romania-specific D4 development this cycle. Uncertain #### Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation Romania presents, as at this cycle, a sharp divergence between the formal applicability of European Union crypto-asset law and the practical availability of a national authorisation route to operate under it. The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation applies directly across the European Union, and Romania's transitional accommodation for firms that were registered under pre-existing national law, the maximum eighteen-month window permitted by Article 143(3), expired on 1 July 2026. More than three months beyond that date, no Romanian authority has been designated to receive or process authorisation applications. The European Securities and Markets Authority's own interim register, refreshed 20 October 2026, lists Romania's supervisor as not yet designated and records zero home-registered crypto-asset service providers. This is not an inference from silence: a senior official of the Financial Supervisory Authority stated publicly, in an interview reported in July 2026, that no authority in Romania is currently designated as the competent authority for the regulation. Continue reading The mechanism behind the gap is identifiable and single-threaded. A draft Emergency Government Ordinance, which would designate the Financial Supervisory Authority as competent for crypto-asset service providers and asset-referenced tokens and the National Bank of Romania as competent for e-money token issuance, was reviewed by the Romanian government in first reading on 2 April 2026. It has not been adopted. The six months between that first reading and the transitional deadline's lapse, followed by a further three-plus months of continued non-designation, point toward a structural administrative gap rather than a short administrative lag. For firms and counterparties, the consequence is concrete: the regulatory content of Markets in Crypto-Assets, token classification, disclosure, governance and prudential requirements, applies in Romania as directly-effective European Union law regardless of the designation gap, but the authorisation function that lets a firm demonstrate compliance and operate lawfully as a home-supervised entity does not yet exist nationally. This finding carries weight because of what it implies for enforcement capacity more broadly. A jurisdiction without a designated competent authority cannot meaningfully supervise, inspect, or sanction crypto-asset service providers under the regulation's own terms, even where the underlying law criminalises or restricts the same conduct that a designated authority elsewhere in the European Union would actively police. The gap is therefore a supervisory vacuum with potential downstream financial-integrity consequences: obliged-entity anti-money-laundering obligations for crypto-asset service providers in Romania continue to run through the national financial intelligence unit under Law No. 129/2019 as amended, independent of the Markets in Crypto-Assets designation question, which means firms face financial-crime compliance duties on one track while facing no live prudential or conduct authorisation on another. #### Outlook The draft ordinance remains the only identified mechanism capable of closing this gap, and its own estimated timeline, treated with appropriately wide uncertainty, points toward the first quarter of 2027 at the earliest for resolution, with no evidence in the current record of accelerated movement. Watch for any further government reading or adoption step beyond the 2 April 2026 first reading; absent that, Romania's crypto-asset regime should be read as formally in force under European Union law but administratively non-operative at the national level for as long as the designation question remains open. The precise penalty schedule that would apply once the ordinance is adopted has not yet been located and remains a gap in the present evidence base. Judgment: No Romania-specific AML-adjacent crypto development beyond the standing MiCA/AML registration gap, already held. Uncertain Judgment: No RegTech/active-defence development for Romania this cycle. Uncertain #### AML/CTF Regime MONEYVAL's July 2026 follow-up report is this cycle's standing AML/CTF development for Romania. Published 6 July 2026, the report found Romania had improved technical compliance on two of the Financial Action Task Force's 40 Recommendations since the June 2025 review, moving to fully compliant on seven, largely compliant on twenty, and partially compliant on the remaining thirteen of the 40 Recommendations. The improvement is real but bounded: Romania remains under MONEYVAL's enhanced follow-up procedure, with a further report expected during 2026-2027, so the architecture continues to be treated as a work in progress rather than a settled strong-compliance baseline. The finding is carried at High confidence, resting on a Tier-1 Council of Europe/MONEYVAL primary publication corroborated by the FATF country page, a materially stronger sourcing posture than most other Romania findings this cycle. Continue reading #### Outlook The next scheduled MONEYVAL report during 2026-2027 will be the key structural marker of whether this cycle's incremental improvement continues or stalls, and whether Romania's enhanced follow-up status is eventually lifted. Judgment: Romania remains under MONEYVAL enhanced follow-up; VASP deficiencies unresolved. Probable Judgment: No financial-integrity-sector commercial event located for Romania this cycle. Uncertain Regulatory horizon Proposed 2027-Q1 · ±half_year ### MiCA national implementing Government Emergency Ordinance (ASF/BNR competent-authority designation) Once adopted, ASF becomes the formally designated MiCA competent authority able to accept and process CASP authorisation applications. [Ministry of Finance / Romanian Government Source](https://zic.legal/autorizarea-casp-romania-mica/) In Force Pending 2027-Q3 · ±year ### AMLR direct application to Romania as EU-27 member A harmonised 25% beneficial-ownership threshold and EUR 10,000 cash-payment limit become directly applicable. [European Union Source](https://www.moodys.com/web/en/us/kyc/resources/insights/understanding-the-6th-anti-money-laundering-directive-6amld-key-changes-and-compliance.html) 2 dated · 4 pending date · baseline financial-integrity-2026-07-05 Role action cards MLRO ### Romania closed a beneficial-ownership timeliness gap while its sanctions screening obligations widened on crypto-facilitated evasion. The 15-day beneficial-ownership update rule reduces one source of stale-data risk in customer due diligence, while the new third-country crypto-services designations and the expanded Russian-bank transaction ban add fresh counterparties and intermediaries to screen for, particularly where correspondent or VASP-counterparty relationships exist. 2 evidence refs Compliance ### A confirmed Recommendation 24 remediation narrows one technical-compliance gap, but the virtual-asset deficiency underlying Romania's enhanced follow-up remains open. Policy frameworks keyed to Romania's mutual-evaluation status should reflect the closed beneficial-ownership timeliness gap, but should not treat Romania's enhanced follow-up status as resolved given the unresolved VASP-related deficiency. 2 evidence refs Legal ### Romania continues to implement sanctions purely as an EU/UN transmission point, with new designations touching crypto-facilitated evasion and a widened Russian-bank transaction ban. Liability exposure for Romanian-regulated entities tracks EU Council designations directly, since Romania maintains no autonomous national list; the new crypto-services designations are relevant wherever counterparties may be intermediating sanctioned flows through digital-asset rails. 2 evidence refs Board ### Romania recorded a confirmed structural improvement in corporate-transparency timeliness this cycle, against a backdrop of continuing EU-driven sanctions implementation. The beneficial-ownership fix is a positive, narrow structural development; it does not resolve the broader virtual-asset deficiency that keeps Romania under enhanced international follow-up, which remains the more significant open item for institutional reputational exposure. 2 evidence refs CTO ### New sanctions designations specifically name crypto-facilitated sanctions evasion by third-country financial entities. Platforms and screening systems with any exposure to third-country crypto-services counterparties should treat this designation batch as a direct technical-screening update requirement, given the explicit crypto-services framing of the evasion typology. 1 evidence refs Risk ### Beneficial-ownership timeliness improved structurally, while sanctions-evasion exposure through crypto-facilitated third-country entities and a wider Russian-bank transaction ban both increased. Exposure concentration analysis should reflect the expanded Russian-bank transaction ban as a widened indirect-exposure surface, distinct from the narrower beneficial-ownership improvement which reduces a different category of data-currency risk. 2 evidence refs Operations ### Screening lists require an update to reflect new EU Council designations covering crypto-facilitated sanctions evasion and an expanded Russian-bank transaction ban. Transaction-monitoring and screening workflows should incorporate the newly designated third-country financial entities and the widened Russian-bank list as implemented by Romania's financial intelligence unit under the existing EU/UN-list-only framework. 2 evidence refs Audit ### A mutual-evaluation body has independently confirmed remediation of a beneficial-ownership timeliness control; the virtual-asset control gap remains documented as open. Audit evidence of the 15-day beneficial-ownership update control can now cite external confirmation of remediation, while control-testing scope for virtual-asset-related obligations should continue to reflect the deficiency as unresolved. 2 evidence refs Standing trackers (T1–T6) Tracker Status Note T1 · Russian Sanctions-Evasion Architecture material_change ONPCSB circulated crypto-services evasion designations (17 entities) and a 33-bank transaction ban. T2 · EU AML Package / AMLA no_change No Romania-specific AMLR/6AMLD transposition development this cycle. T3 · FATF Grey List no_change Romania not on the FATF grey list; remains under MONEYVAL enhanced follow-up. T4 · Beneficial-Ownership Register Status improving 15-day BO update obligation recorded as R.24 remediation. T5 · Crypto / VASP Regulatory Framework no_change No new Romania-specific MiCA-adjacent AML development this cycle. T6 · Sanctions Regime Divergence no_change Romania implements EU/UN lists only; no autonomous national list. Registers ### Enforcement actions - 27 Mar 2025 - 10 Apr 2025 - 25 Jan 2025 - 17 Feb 2026 - DIICOT conducted 66 searches nationwide and detained 15 suspects, including legal representatives of several companies, accused of embezzlement, misuse of company assets and laundering over $14 million in cryptocurrency tied to a renewable-energy project, including false claims of crypto-trading profits. 27 Mar 2025 - Following on-the-spot checks in Cyprus and Czechia and analysis of seized IT servers, OLAF and EPPO uncovered a EUR 9.5 million fraud and money-laundering scheme involving EU Regional Development Fund resources for an IT platform, with funds diverted through fictitious contracts. 10 Apr 2025 - EPPO's Romania office indicted 10 individuals and 4 companies for orchestrating a EUR 1.6 million fraud scheme exploiting subsidies meant to help unemployed people gain job skills, using close to 200 false claims via a network of fictitious companies operating 2019-2021. 25 Jan 2025 - Prosecutors opened an investigation into the ONRC's failed IT platform (launched summer 2024), which blocked over 130,000 business registrations for weeks, exposed personal data of 3,000+ individuals, and was signed off nine months before launch without adequate testing per draft audits. 17 Feb 2026 ### Sanctions changes - 23 Apr 2026 - 23 Oct 2025 - 24 Sep 2026 - 1 Oct 2026 - 2026-10 - The EU's 20th sanctions package (adopted 23 April 2026) added 46 shadow-fleet vessels (total 632 listed), 36 Russian energy-sector designations, a first-ever activation of the EU anti-circumvention tool against a third country, and new tanker-sale/scrapping safeguards. As an EU member and Black Sea port state, Romania directly applies and enforces these measures at Constanta and other national ports. 23 Apr 2026 - The EU's 19th sanctions package (23 October 2025) introduced sanctions on the developer of the Russian state-linked stablecoin A7A5, its Kyrgyz issuer, and a platform operator, plus a ban on reinsuring shadow-fleet vessels and further shadow-fleet vessel listings (bringing the total to 557 at the time). These crypto and maritime-insurance measures are directly applicable in Romania as an EU member state with a materially large VASP/crypto sector. 23 Oct 2025 ### Regulatory horizon (register) - 6AMLD beneficial-ownership register transposition milestone - AMLA RTS package submission to the European Commission - 6AMLD beneficial-ownership register transposition milestone - National MiCA implementing Government Emergency Ordinance (dual ASF/BNR authority model) - MONEYVAL 5th-round enhanced follow-up - Romania's next progress report - AMLR direct application to Romania as EU-27 member - 6th AML Directive (2024/1640) transposition in Romania - Romania MiCA implementing emergency ordinance - MiCA national implementing Government Emergency Ordinance (ASF/BNR competent-authority designation) - Draft Emergency Government Ordinance implementing MiCA in Romania - AMLR (Reg 2024/1624) direct application in Romania - 6AMLD transposition deadline for Romania - AMLA supervisory perimeter and standards build-out affecting Romania - MONEYVAL next enhanced follow-up report on Romania ### Active schemes - [HIGH] EU-funds fraud layered through Romania-Cyprus-Czechia-United Arab Emirates network - Crypto-ATM cash-out pipeline for embezzled renewable-energy funds - Black Sea shadow-fleet transit exposure via the Constanta corridor - [HIGH] Restricted, low-integrity beneficial-ownership register exploitation Sources - [https://www.deloitte.com/ro/en/our-thinking/articles/incriminarea-nerespectarii-sanctiunilor-internationale-impuse-de-uniunea-europeana-sanctiuni-derogatorii-de-la-codul-penal-pentru-persoane-juridice.html](https://www.deloitte.com/ro/en/our-thinking/articles/incriminarea-nerespectarii-sanctiunilor-internationale-impuse-de-uniunea-europeana-sanctiuni-derogatorii-de-la-codul-penal-pentru-persoane-juridice.html) - [https://www.wall-street.ro/articol/justitie/director-din-onjn-retinut-pentru-mita.html](https://www.wall-street.ro/articol/justitie/director-din-onjn-retinut-pentru-mita.html) - [https://www.amcham.ro/business-intelligence/amendment-of-law-no.-1292019-reinforced-measures-to-combat-money-laundering-and-terrorist-financing](https://www.amcham.ro/business-intelligence/amendment-of-law-no.-1292019-reinforced-measures-to-combat-money-laundering-and-terrorist-financing) - [https://www.legal500.com/guides/chapter/romania-fintech/](https://www.legal500.com/guides/chapter/romania-fintech/) - [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_in_Romania](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_in_Romania) - [https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/detail/Romania.html](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/detail/Romania.html) - [https://www.coe.int/en/web/moneyval/-/moneyval-romania-has-made-limited-progress-in-enhancing-its-framework-against-money-laundering-terrorist-financing-and-proliferation-financing](https://www.coe.int/en/web/moneyval/-/moneyval-romania-has-made-limited-progress-in-enhancing-its-framework-against-money-laundering-terrorist-financing-and-proliferation-financing) - [https://www.romania-insider.com/council-europe-romania-anti-money-laundering-measures-2026](https://www.romania-insider.com/council-europe-romania-anti-money-laundering-measures-2026) - [https://www.licentium.io/hub/romania](https://www.licentium.io/hub/romania) - [https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/blockchain-crypto-assets-2026/romania/trends-and-developments](https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/blockchain-crypto-assets-2026/romania/trends-and-developments) - [https://finconduit.com/resources/amla-rts-deadline-july-2026](https://finconduit.com/resources/amla-rts-deadline-july-2026) - [https://ezine.eversheds-sutherland.com/global-aml-guide/romania](https://ezine.eversheds-sutherland.com/global-aml-guide/romania) - [https://www.coe.int/en/web/moneyval/-/romania-should-step-up-efforts-to-investigate-and-prosecute-money-laundering-and-strengthen-supervision](https://www.coe.int/en/web/moneyval/-/romania-should-step-up-efforts-to-investigate-and-prosecute-money-laundering-and-strengthen-supervision) - [https://www.onrc.ro/documente/ghidAccesFIRBR.pdf](https://www.onrc.ro/documente/ghidAccesFIRBR.pdf) - [https://www.regpulse.io/blog/eu-aml-package-2026](https://www.regpulse.io/blog/eu-aml-package-2026) - [https://www.moodys.com/web/en/us/kyc/resources/insights/a-review-of-amla-and-amlr-2026.html](https://www.moodys.com/web/en/us/kyc/resources/insights/a-review-of-amla-and-amlr-2026.html) - [https://baciupartners.ro/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/OUG-10-2025-AML.pdf](https://baciupartners.ro/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/OUG-10-2025-AML.pdf) - [https://studiifinanciare.ro/de-la-1-iulie-2026-nicio-firma-crypto-fara-licenta-mica-nu-mai-poate-opera-in-romania-momentul-zero-in-care-piata-crypto-din-uniunea-europeana-iese-din-zona-gri-l/](https://studiifinanciare.ro/de-la-1-iulie-2026-nicio-firma-crypto-fara-licenta-mica-nu-mai-poate-opera-in-romania-momentul-zero-in-care-piata-crypto-din-uniunea-europeana-iese-din-zona-gri-l/) - [https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/-/the-council-of-europe-s-anti-money-laundering-body-will-publish-evaluation-reports](https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/-/the-council-of-europe-s-anti-money-laundering-body-will-publish-evaluation-reports) - [https://www.topograph.co/guides/trade-register-in-romania](https://www.topograph.co/guides/trade-register-in-romania) - [https://www.moodys.com/web/en/us/kyc/resources/insights/understanding-the-6th-anti-money-laundering-directive-6amld-key-changes-and-compliance.html](https://www.moodys.com/web/en/us/kyc/resources/insights/understanding-the-6th-anti-money-laundering-directive-6amld-key-changes-and-compliance.html) - [https://rm.coe.int/moneyval-2026-5-ro-5th-round-2nd-enhanced-fur/48802c6fae](https://rm.coe.int/moneyval-2026-5-ro-5th-round-2nd-enhanced-fur/48802c6fae) - [https://www.coe.int/en/web/moneyval/-/romania-makes-progress-in-technical-compliance-on-targeted-financial-sanctions-related-to-terrorism-and-proliferation-financing](https://www.coe.int/en/web/moneyval/-/romania-makes-progress-in-technical-compliance-on-targeted-financial-sanctions-related-to-terrorism-and-proliferation-financing) - [https://www.radioromania.ro/Actualitate/romania-printre-tarile-carora-comisia-europeana-le-a-trimis-scrisori-de-punere-in-intarziere-pe-tema-combaterii-spalarii-banilor-id221878.html](https://www.radioromania.ro/Actualitate/romania-printre-tarile-carora-comisia-europeana-le-a-trimis-scrisori-de-punere-in-intarziere-pe-tema-combaterii-spalarii-banilor-id221878.html) - [https://startupcafe.ro/platforme-crypto-autorizate-asf-romania-functiona-regulament-european-mica-lege-interna-102828](https://startupcafe.ro/platforme-crypto-autorizate-asf-romania-functiona-regulament-european-mica-lege-interna-102828) - [https://www.unpir.ro/actualizare-onpcsb-acte-normative-privind-regimuri-sanctionatorii-internationale](https://www.unpir.ro/actualizare-onpcsb-acte-normative-privind-regimuri-sanctionatorii-internationale) - [https://onpcsb.ro/ro/info/69e0ceafd6520536874694.pdf](https://onpcsb.ro/ro/info/69e0ceafd6520536874694.pdf) - [https://www.ifcreview.com/news/2026/october/eu-eu-member-states-told-to-comply-with-6amld-beneficial-ownership-access-rules/](https://www.ifcreview.com/news/2026/october/eu-eu-member-states-told-to-comply-with-6amld-beneficial-ownership-access-rules/) - [https://www.openownership.org/en/map/country/romania/](https://www.openownership.org/en/map/country/romania/) - [https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/joint-ventures-2026/romania](https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/joint-ventures-2026/romania) - [https://legalbison.com/casp-license/romania/](https://legalbison.com/casp-license/romania/) - [Unknown Gravity](https://www.unknowngravity.com/en/articulos/mica-license-by-country) - [Bursa.ro (interview with ASF Prim-vicepreședinte)](https://www.bursa.ro/romania-nu-are-desemnata-o-autoritate-pentru-aplicarea-regulamentului-ue-privind-pietele-criptoactivelor-22744951) - [Chambers Practice Guides](https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/blockchain-crypto-assets-2026/romania/trends-and-developments) - [MONEYVAL / Council of Europe](https://rm.coe.int/moneyval-2026-5-ro-5th-round-2nd-enhanced-fur/48802c6fae) - [Capital.ro](https://www.capital.ro/romania-ramane-sub-monitorizare-internationala-raport-moneyval-mai-sunt-deficiente-in-combaterea-spalarii-banilor.html) - [govnet.ro (law firm commentary)](https://www.govnet.ro/Economics/New-challenges-in-crypto-assets-regulation-in-Romania:-The-impact-of-GEO-10/2025) - [ONPCSB (Romanian FIU)](https://onpcsb.ro/ro/info/69e0ceafd6520536874694.pdf) - [Council of Europe (MONEYVAL)](https://rm.coe.int/moneyval-2026-5-ro-5th-round-2nd-enhanced-fur/48802c6fae) - [Romania-Insider](https://www.romania-insider.com/council-europe-romania-anti-money-laundering-measures-2026) - [ONPCSB](https://www.unpir.ro/actualizare-onpcsb-acte-normative-privind-regimuri-sanctionatorii-internationale) - [Eversheds Sutherland](https://ezine.eversheds-sutherland.com/global-sanctions-guide/romania) - [Mutual Evaluation Report of Romania](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/Mutualevaluationreportofromania.html) - [Romania](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/detail/Romania.html) - [Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures (MONEYVAL)](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/global-network/committee-of-experts-on-the-evaluation-of-anti-money-laundering-.html) - [Mutual Evaluation of Romania](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/MER-Romania-2023.html) - [Assessments](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/calendars/assessments.html) - [Consolidated assessment ratings](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/Assessment-ratings.html) - [Mutual Evaluations](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/topics/mutual-evaluations.html) - [Consolidated Processes and Procedures for Mutual Evaluations and Follow-Up Universal Procedures](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfgeneral/Universal-procedures.html) - [Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures Romania](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/fsrb-mer/Romania-Moneyval-Mutual-Evaluation-2023.pdf.coredownload.pdf) - [Publications](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications.html) - [Fighting money laundering and terrorist financing in Romania - Reforms and Investments](https://reform-support.ec.europa.eu/what-we-do/financial-sector-and-access-finance/fighting-money-laundering-and-terrorist-financing-romania_en) - [Fighting money laundering and terrorist financing in Romania - Reform Support](https://ec.europa.eu/reform-support/fighting-money-laundering-and-terrorist-financing-romania_ro) - [Romania Cracks Down on Crypto Laundering Scheme | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/romania-cracks-down-on-crypto-laundering-scheme) - [Romania strengthens its fraud prevention and control system with European funds - European Anti-Fraud Office](https://anti-fraud.ec.europa.eu/media-corner/news/romania-strengthens-its-fraud-prevention-and-control-system-european-funds-2026-02-06_en) - [OLAF and EPPO jointly uncover 9.5 million fraud and money laundering scheme - European Anti-Fraud Office](https://anti-fraud.ec.europa.eu/media-corner/news/olaf-and-eppo-jointly-uncover-95-million-fraud-and-money-laundering-scheme-2025-04-10_en?prefLang=fr) - [1 Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)](https://www.fincen.gov/system/files/2026-05/FinCEN-Year-in-Review-2025.pdf) - [Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 19 June 2026](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/High-risk-and-other-monitored-jurisdictions/increased-monitoring-june-2026.html) - ["Black and grey" lists](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/black-and-grey-lists.html) - [Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 13 February 2026](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/High-risk-and-other-monitored-jurisdictions/increased-monitoring-february-2026.html) - [Countries / Jurisdictions](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries.html) - [High-risk and other monitored jurisdictions](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/High-risk-and-other-monitored-jurisdictions.html) - [High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - 13 February 2026](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/High-risk-and-other-monitored-jurisdictions/Call-for-action-february-2026.html) - [FATF changes its grey listing criteria to further focus on risk](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfgeneral/FATF-grey-listing-criteria.html) - [Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 13 June 2025](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/High-risk-and-other-monitored-jurisdictions/increased-monitoring-june-2025.html) - [Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine: Council sanctions 41 vessels of the Russian shadow fleet - Consilium](https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/12/18/russia-s-war-of-aggression-against-ukraine-council-sanctions-41-vessels-of-the-russian-shadow-fleet/) - [Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine: Council sanctions 9 shadow fleet enablers - Consilium](https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/12/15/russia-s-war-of-aggression-against-ukraine-council-sanctions-9-shadow-fleet-enablers/) - [EU sanctions against Russia: questions and answers - Consilium](https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions-against-russia-explained/) - [Timeline - EU sanctions against Russia - Consilium](https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions-against-russia/timeline-sanctions-against-russia/) - [Daily News 18 / 12 / 2025](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/news/sanctions-member-states-designate-41-additional-vessels-russias-shadow-fleet-2025-12-18_en) - [1 Red ALERT Shadow Fleet Sanctions Evasion and Avoidance Network](https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/who-we-are/publications/753-red-alert-shadow-fleet-sanctions-evasion-and-avoidance-network/file) - [Sanctions adopted following Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine - Finance](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/eu-and-world/sanctions-restrictive-measures/sanctions-adopted-following-russias-military-aggression-against-ukraine_en) - [SANCTIONS ADVISORY - Guidance for Shipping and ...](https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934236/download?inline=) - [Updated Price Cap Coalition Advisory for the Maritime Oil ...](https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/933506/download?inline=) - [EU adopts 20th package of sanctions against Russia - Finance](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/news/eu-adopts-20th-package-sanctions-against-russia-2026-04-23_en) - [19th package of sanctions against Russia: EU targets Russian energy, third-country banks and crypto providers - Consilium](https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/10/23/19th-package-of-sanctions-against-russia-eu-targets-russian-energy-third-country-banks-and-crypto-providers/) - [Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine: 20th round of stern EU sanctions hits energy revenues, military-industrial complex, trade and financial services, including crypto - Consilium](https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2026/04/23/russia-s-war-of-aggression-against-ukraine-20th-round-of-stern-eu-sanctions-hits-energy-military-industrial-complex-trade-and-financial-services-including-crypto/) - [Sanctions on transport - European Commission](https://eu-solidarity-ukraine.ec.europa.eu/eu-sanctions-against-russia-following-invasion-ukraine/sanctions-transport_en) - [Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-programs-and-country-information/russian-harmful-foreign-activities-sanctions) - [1 IMPORT BAN ON REFINED PRODUCTS OBTAINED FROM RUSSIAN CRUDE OIL](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/document/download/dc76791c-72aa-4fd5-b82f-ae13a42e93c0_en?filename=faqs-sanctions-russia-oil-import-ban_en.pdf) - [Gheorghe Bosinceanu | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/project/paradise-papers/gheorghe-bosinceanu) - [Oil imports - Finance - European Commission](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-08/faqs-sanctions-russia-oil-imports_en.pdf) - [Russia's war against Ukraine: EU sanctions - Consilium](https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions-against-russia/) - [European e-Justice Portal - Business registers in EU countries](https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/e-justice/106/EN/business_registers_in_eu_countries?ROMANIA=&member=1) - [Information on Romania national BOR - European Union](https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/e-justice/fileDownload.do?id=f703dcc1-60b4-42e3-a369-a01eaafb8a57) - [Anti-Corruption Probe Launched Into Romanian Business Registry’s Failed IT System | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/anti-corruption-probe-launched-into-romanian-business-registrys-failed-it-system) - [Directory of Open-Source Registries: Romania](https://globenetwork.unodc.org/globenetwork/en/directory-of-open-source-registries/romania.html) - [TI Report: EU Beneficial Ownership Registers Limited and Restricted | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/ti-report-eu-beneficial-ownership-registers-limited-and-restricted) - [Guidance on Beneficial Ownership and Transparency of Legal Arrangements](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Guidance-Beneficial-Ownership-Transparency-Legal-Arrangements.html) - [Patchy progress in beneficial ownership registers in the EU | Global Witness](https://globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/corruption-and-money-laundering/patchy-progress-in-setting-up-beneficial-ownership-registers-in-the-eu/) - [Treasury Department won’t enforce beneficial ownership rule under the Corporate Transparency Act - ICIJ](https://www.icij.org/inside-icij/2025/03/treasury-department-wont-enforce-beneficial-ownership-rule-under-the-corporate-transparency-act/) - [Annex I - Tools and Resources for Anti-Corruption Knowledge](https://track.unodc.org/uploads/documents/UNCAC/WorkingGroups/workinggroup4/2024-September-3-6/Contributions/CU2024-132/Romania_EN.pdf) - [Key Changes in FinCEN’s Proposed Rule to Refocus AML/CFT Programs on](https://www.fincen.gov/system/files/2026-04/Key-Changes-Program-NPRM.pdf) - [FinCEN Proposes Rule to Fundamentally Reform Financial Institution Programs Designed to Fight Illicit Finance | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-proposes-rule-fundamentally-reform-financial-institution-programs) - [Special Measures | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-and-regulations/special-measures) - [Global Crypto Policy Review Outlook 2025/26 Report | TRM Labs](https://www.trmlabs.com/reports-and-whitepapers/global-crypto-policy-review-outlook-2025-26) - [GUIDANCE FOR A RISK-BASED APPROACH THE BANKING SECTOR OCTOBER 2014](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/guidance/Risk-Based-Approach-Banking-Sector.pdf) - [Enforcement Actions | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/news/enforcement-actions) - [MONEY LAUNDERING NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT TOOLKIT – ANNEXES A-C](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Methodsandtrends/Money-Laundering-National-Risk-Assessment-Toolkit-Annexes.html) - [FATF publishes new Guidance on Financial Inclusion and Anti-Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Measures](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Financialinclusionandnpoissues/guidance-financial-inclusion-aml-tf-measures.html) - [Anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism at EU level - Finance](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/financial-crime/anti-money-laundering-and-countering-financing-terrorism-eu-level_en) - [Romania’s Parliament – Law no. 129/2019 from 11 July 2019](https://www.unodc.org/cld/uploads/res/money-laundering-and-terrorism-financing-law-no--129-2019_html/Money_Laundering_and_Terrorism_Financing_Law_no._1292019_.pdf) - [Anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism legislative package - Finance](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/publications/anti-money-laundering-and-countering-financing-terrorism-legislative-package_en) - [Mutual Evaluation Report of Romania](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/n-r/romania/documents/mutualevaluationreportofromania.html) - [Anti-money laundering directive V (AMLD V) - transposition status | European Commission](https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/anti-money-laundering-directive-5-transposition-status_en) - [EU Fines Romania, Ireland for Gaps in Anti-Money Laundering Measures | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/daily/12777-eu-fines-romania-ireland-for-gaps-in-anti-money-laundering-measures) - [Homepage - Authority for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/financial-crime/amla_en) - [Sanctions Programs and Country Information | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-programs-and-country-information) - [Sanctions List Service | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-list-service) - [Where is OFAC's Country List? What countries do I need to worry about in terms of U.S. sanctions? | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-programs-and-country-information/where-is-ofacs-country-list-what-countries-do-i-need-to-worry-about-in-terms-of-us-sanctions) - [Program Tag Definitions for OFAC Sanctions Lists | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/specially-designated-nationals-list-sdn-list/program-tag-definitions-for-ofac-sanctions-lists) - [OFAC Specially Designated Nationals List](https://ofac.treasury.gov/specially-designated-nationals-and-blocked-persons-list-sdn-human-readable-lists) - [Archive of Changes to OFAC's Sanctions Lists | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/specially-designated-nationals-list-sdn-list/archive-of-changes-to-the-sdn-list) - [What are OFAC crypto sanctions?](https://www.elliptic.co/blockchain-basics/what-are-ofac-crypto-sanctions) - [Home | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/) - [Sanctions List Search Tool | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-list-search-tool) - [Additional Sanctions Lists | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/other-ofac-sanctions-lists) - [DIICOT | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/component/tags/tag/diicot) - [OLAF and EPPO jointly uncover 9.5 million fraud and money laundering scheme - European Anti-Fraud Office](https://anti-fraud.ec.europa.eu/media-corner/news/olaf-and-eppo-jointly-uncover-95-million-fraud-and-money-laundering-scheme-2025-04-10_en) - [Ευρωπαϊκή Εισαγγελία - consilium.europa.eu](https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eppo/) - [Romania - Migration and Home Affairs - European Commission](https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/internal-security/organised-crime/together-against-trafficking-human-beings/eu-countries/romania_en) - [OLAF and EPPO investigate alleged fraud and money laundering in Romania - European Anti-Fraud Office](https://anti-fraud.ec.europa.eu/media-corner/news/olaf-and-eppo-investigate-alleged-fraud-and-money-laundering-romania-2023-11-09_en) - [Romania: Prosecutors Overwhelmed | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/project/battered-justice/romania-prosecutors-overwhelmed) - [Romania: 14 Indicted in Employment Fraud Scheme | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/romania-14-indicted-in-eur16m-employment-fraud-scheme) - [Searches Conducted into EU funds Fraud, Money Laundering Investigation | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/searches-conducted-into-eu-funds-fraud-money-laundering-investigation) - [European Public Prosecutor's Office - European Anti-Fraud Office](https://ec.europa.eu/anti-fraud/policy/preventing-fraud/european_public_prosecutor_en) - [Home](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/home.html) - [Economic forecast for Romania - Economy and Finance - European Commission](https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/economic-surveillance-eu-member-states/country-pages/romania/economic-forecast-romania_en) - [1 Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures Ukraine](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/fsrb-fur/Moneyval-Follow-Up-Report-Ukraine.pdf) - [Romania](https://www.elliptic.co/country-guides/romania) - [Global crypto regulation review 2025](https://www.elliptic.co/resources/global-crypto-regulation-review-2025) - [Commission approves ANCOM’s plan to reintroduce regulation in fixed wholesale local access in Romania](https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-approves-ancoms-plan-reintroduce-regulation-fixed-wholesale-local-access-romania) - [FATF urges stronger global action to address Illicit Finance Risks in Virtual Assets](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/targeted-update-virtual-assets-vasps-2025.html) - [Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP): Definition, Compliance & Examples](https://www.trmlabs.com/glossary/virtual-asset-service-provider-vasp) - [The Road to Crypto Regulation Series](https://go.chainalysis.com/2025-road-to-crypto-regulation-series.html) - [What Is a VASP? Virtual Asset Service Provider - Chainalysis](https://www.chainalysis.com/glossary/virtual-asset-service-provider/) - [JUNE 2019 GUIDANCE FOR A RISK-BASED APPROACH VIRTUAL ASSETS AND VIRTUAL](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/guidance/RBA-VA-VASPs.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf) - [Targeted Update on Implementation of the FATF Standards on Virtual Assets and](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/recommendations/2025-Targeted-Upate-VA-VASPs.pdf.coredownload.pdf) - [GUIDANCE FOR A RISK-BASED APPROACH EFFECTIVE SUPERVISION AND ENFORCEMENT BY](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf/documents/reports/RBA-Effective-supervision-and-enforcement.pdf) - [Financial Action Task Force Identifies Jurisdictions with Anti-Money Laundering, Countering the Financing of Terrorism, and Counter-Proliferation Finance Deficiencies | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/financial-action-task-force-identifies-jurisdictions-anti-money-laundering-3) - [Financial Action Task Force Identifies Jurisdictions with Anti-Money Laundering, Combating the Financing of Terrorism, and Counter-Proliferation Finance Deficiencies | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/financial-action-task-force-identifies-jurisdictions-anti-money-laundering-4) - [Cross-Border Information Sharing by Financial Institutions ...](https://www.fincen.gov/system/files/2025-09/Crossborderguidance-508C.pdf) - [Guidance | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-regulations/guidance) - [The EU's 20th sanctions package targets the architecture of crypto sanctions evasion](https://www.elliptic.co/blog/eu-20th-sanctions-package-targets-the-architecture-of-crypto-sanctions-evasion) - [Alerts/Advisories/Notices/Bulletins/Fact Sheets | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/resources/advisoriesbulletinsfact-sheets) - [FINANCIAL ACTION TASK FORCE Mutual Evaluation Report](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/mer/MER%20Austria%20full.pdf.coredownload.pdf) - [Transposition of directives - European Commission](https://ec.europa.eu/implementing-eu-law/transposition-directives/en) - [Anti-money laundering directive IV (AMLD IV) - transposition status | European Commission](https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/anti-money-laundering-directive-4-transposition-status_en) - [NIS2 Directive Implementation in Romania | Shaping Europe’s digital future](https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/nis2-directive-romania) - [February infringements package: key decisions](https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/inf_20_202) - [Timeline for the Implementation of the EU AI Act | AI Act Service Desk](https://ai-act-service-desk.ec.europa.eu/en/ai-act/timeline/timeline-implementation-eu-ai-act) - [Commission takes action to ensure complete and timely transposition of EU directives](https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/inf_25_2654) - [Country report - Romania - Economy and Finance - European Commission](https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/economic-surveillance-eu-member-states/country-pages-including-country-reports/country-report-romania_en) - [MONEYVAL / FATF](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/fsrb-mer/Romania-Moneyval-Mutual-Evaluation-2023.pdf.coredownload.pdf) - [Romania's Parliament / UNODC hosted](https://www.unodc.org/cld/uploads/res/money-laundering-and-terrorism-financing-law-no--129-2019_html/Money_Laundering_and_Terrorism_Financing_Law_no._1292019_.pdf) - [OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/romania-cracks-down-on-crypto-laundering-scheme) - [European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)](https://anti-fraud.ec.europa.eu/media-corner/news/olaf-and-eppo-jointly-uncover-95-million-fraud-and-money-laundering-scheme-2025-04-10_en?prefLang=fr) - [Council of the European Union](https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions-against-russia-explained/) - [Global Witness](https://globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/corruption-and-money-laundering/patchy-progress-in-setting-up-beneficial-ownership-registers-in-the-eu/) - [European e-Justice Portal / Romanian Ministry of Justice submission](https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/e-justice/fileDownload.do?id=f703dcc1-60b4-42e3-a369-a01eaafb8a57) - [OCCRP / Public Record](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/anti-corruption-probe-launched-into-romanian-business-registrys-failed-it-system) - [FATF](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/detail/Romania.html) Coverage gaps fim-int-2026-07-05-G001: Evidence on the specific national v… fim-int-2026-07-05-G001: Evidence on the specific national vehicle and drafting status for Romania 6AMLD transposition (Directive EU 2024/1640) would improve confidence beyond the current default-adopted-stage horizon assessment. [resolved] fim-int-2026-07-05-G002: Vessel-level or shipment-level evid… fim-int-2026-07-05-G002: Vessel-level or shipment-level evidence placing a documented shadow-fleet ship-to-ship transfer inside Romanian territorial waters or the Constanta port itself would upgrade the current structural-proximity assessment to a direct finding. [resolved] fim-int-2026-07-05-G003: The Court of Accounts final audit c… fim-int-2026-07-05-G003: The Court of Accounts final audit conclusion on the ONRC information-technology contract would allow a firmer resolution status for the associated beneficial-ownership infrastructure gap. [resolved] fim-int-2026-07-05-G004: A published NBR/FSA supervisory ref… fim-int-2026-07-05-G004: A published NBR/FSA supervisory reform roadmap addressing the non-compliant R.26 rating would allow the risk-direction assessment for the FATF Grey List tracker to move beyond stable/uncertain. [resolved] fim-int-2026-08-05-G001: No Romania-specific dedicated FATF … fim-int-2026-08-05-G001: No Romania-specific dedicated FATF grey-list statement beyond the country page was retrieved this cycle. [resolved] fim-int-2026-08-05-G002: No Romania-specific dedicated D4 co… fim-int-2026-08-05-G002: No Romania-specific dedicated D4 conflict-finance primary-source finding was identified this cycle beyond the tangential Black Sea corridor signal. [resolved] fim-int-2026-08-05-G003: Enactment status and timeline of th… fim-int-2026-08-05-G003: Enactment status and timeline of the Law 129/2019 Moneyval-driven amendment remain unconfirmed since its December 2024 Senate submission. [resolved] fim-int-2026-08-20-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-08-20-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D1'}): No Romania-specific OFAC/OFSI/EU-Council sanctions designation was researched this cycle; D1 search budget was concentrated on RO-scoped gambling/AML/payments/crypto/data-protection queries. [resolved] fim-int-2026-08-20-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-08-20-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D3'}): No Romania-specific enabler-jurisdiction finding was researched this cycle. [resolved] fim-int-2026-08-20-G003 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-08-20-G003 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D6'}): No RO-specific FCA/JMLSG-equivalent guidance calibrating AI/ML transaction-monitoring supervisory expectations against documented Romanian practice was identified this cycle. [resolved] fim-int-2026-08-20-G004 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-08-20-G004 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D5'}): No T1 ASF/BNR primary source page was directly retrieved corroborating the MiCA transitional-window expiry; reliance is on T2/T3/T4 legal-advisory commentary. [resolved] fim-int-2026-09-05-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-09-05-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D1'}): No RO-specific D1 (Russian sanctions-evasion) primary-source development located this cycle; recorded as a genuine no-material-change finding rather than a coverage gap, but no direct search corroboration beyond the standing collection note. [resolved] fim-int-2026-09-05-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-09-05-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D3'}): No RO-specific D3 enabler-jurisdiction or D4 conflict-finance signal located this cycle; the pooled web-search budget was allocated to the RO-scoped union sweep, leaving Tier-D jurisdiction watch (KH/LA/MX/CO) unsearched. [resolved] fim-int-2026-09-05-G003 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-09-05-G003 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D7'}): No T1 EU Official Journal text was re-fetched this cycle to independently verify the AMLR/6AMLD/AMLA timeline beyond two T3 vendor explainers. [resolved] fim-int-2026-09-05-G004 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-09-05-G004 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D6'}): No RO-specific D6 RegTech/compliance-technology development was located this cycle; the field is recorded as awaiting_primary_source. [resolved] fim-int-2026-09-28-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-09-28-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D1'}): No D1 Sanctions Architecture substantive finding for Romania was located this cycle. [resolved] fim-int-2026-09-28-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-09-28-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D2'}): D2 Beneficial Ownership registry mechanics for Romania were not established this cycle beyond MONEYVAL's general transparency comment. [resolved] fim-int-2026-09-28-G003 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-09-28-G003 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D3'}): D3 Enabler Jurisdictions finding for Romania was not located this cycle. [resolved] fim-int-2026-09-28-G004 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-09-28-G004 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D4'}): D4 Conflict Finance finding for Romania was not located this cycle. [resolved] fim-int-2026-09-28-G005 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-09-28-G005 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D6'}): D6 mandatory enforcement-gap-log entry was not populated this cycle pending primary-source research. [resolved] fim-int-2026-09-28-G006: TBML minimum coverage (2 distinct-c… fim-int-2026-09-28-G006: TBML minimum coverage (2 distinct-corridor entries) was not met this cycle for Romania. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-04-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-10-04-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D7'}): Romania's 6AMLD first-tranche transposition status (communicated vs. facing infringement) could not be established against the Commission's August 2026 monitoring update. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-04-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-10-04-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D5'}): No ASF or BNR primary-source confirmation of the MiCA transitional deadline end date was retrieved this cycle; reliance is on two T3 commentary sources. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-04-G003: Tier-D mandatory watch jurisdiction… fim-int-2026-10-04-G003: Tier-D mandatory watch jurisdictions (KH, LA, MX, CO) were not researched this cycle due to the single-JID scope binding. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-11-G001: Tier D jurisdictions (Cambodia, Lao… fim-int-2026-10-11-G001: Tier D jurisdictions (Cambodia, Laos, Mexico, Colombia) were not reached this cycle owing to pooled search budget; recorded as awaiting_primary_source. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-11-G002: No D3 enabler-jurisdiction finding … fim-int-2026-10-11-G002: No D3 enabler-jurisdiction finding for Romania located this cycle. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-11-G003: No D8 commercial activity (financia… fim-int-2026-10-11-G003: No D8 commercial activity (financial-sector M&A) finding for Romania located this cycle. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-18-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-10-18-G001 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D5'}): No T1 primary ASF/BNR document on MiCA non-implementation was directly retrieved this cycle; findings rest on T3 commentary. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-18-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-10-18-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D1'}): No Tier D jurisdiction, Russian sanctions-evasion/Houthi-Yemen channel, or TBML corridor finding specific to Romania was located this cycle due to search-budget prioritisation. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-18-G003 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-10-18-G003 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D2'}): 6AMLD transposition status for Romania specifically (not yet transposed / partly transposed / fully transposed) was not established this cycle beyond the general EU infringement notice. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-25-G001: No Tier D jurisdiction cross-check … fim-int-2026-10-25-G001: No Tier D jurisdiction cross-check (KH, LA, MX, CO) was performed for Romania this cycle within the pooled search budget. [resolved] fim-int-2026-10-25-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-10-25-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D5'}): No source located for the precise national penalty schedule under the still-unadopted MiCA implementing ordinance. [resolved] fim-int-2026-11-01-G001: Tier D watch jurisdictions (KH, LA,… fim-int-2026-11-01-G001: Tier D watch jurisdictions (KH, LA, MX, CO) were not actively re-searched this cycle; this is a coverage gap, not a confirmed no-change. [open] fim-int-2026-11-01-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', '… fim-int-2026-11-01-G002 ({'scheme': 'financial_integrity', 'value': 'D3'}): Pinpoint date of the specific 17-entity crypto-services sanctions-evasion listing within the ONPCSB circular was not confirmed from the retrieved excerpt. [open] FIM-GAP-001 (D2): MONEYVAL's 2023 MER rated Romania non-comp… FIM-GAP-001 (D2): MONEYVAL's 2023 MER rated Romania non-compliant (NC) on R.26 (regulation and supervision of financial institutions), the only Recommendation to receive the lowest rating; the March 2026 follow-up confirmed only partial progress on such technical compliance deficiencies. FIM-GAP-002 (D2): MONEYVAL assessors found that a lack of te… FIM-GAP-002 (D2): MONEYVAL assessors found that a lack of technical and human resources at NOPCML (the FIU) hampers the quantity and quality of financial intelligence it can provide to law enforcement and other partners, compounded by a shortage of financial investigators more broadly. FIM-GAP-003 (D2): The ONRC's beneficial-ownership register i… FIM-GAP-003 (D2): The ONRC's beneficial-ownership register infrastructure suffered a EUR 38 million IT-platform failure (launched summer 2024) that blocked over 130,000 registrations and exposed personal data of more than 3,000 individuals; auditors found the system was signed off nine months before launch without adequate testing. FIM-GAP-004 (D1): MONEYVAL found no overarching AML/CFT stra… FIM-GAP-004 (D1): MONEYVAL found no overarching AML/CFT strategy exists in Romania; while numerous sector-specific strategies address corruption, trafficking and organised crime, information on the level of risk mitigation actually achieved is not comprehensive. ## Evidence #### Confidence-tiered claims Romania rated compliant on 7, largely compliant on 18, partially compliant on 15 of the 40 FATF Recommendations per MONEYVAL's 6 July 2026 follow-up report; under 5th-round enhanced follow-up procedure [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source RBR remains publicly searchable; draft 2025 legislation may restrict access to parties demonstrating a legitimate interest, mirroring post-2022 CJEU trend; new ONRC filing fees (RON 200) took effect 1 January 2026 [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Uncertain · 1 source 18-month Article 143(3) grandfathering window for legacy crypto-asset providers ended 1 July 2026; unauthorised crypto-asset service provision after that date is unlawful [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Romania directly bound by AMLR (Reg (EU) 2024/1624) from 10 July 2027 as an EU-27 member; harmonised 25% BO threshold (15% for higher-risk sectors) and EUR 10,000 cash-payment limit become directly applicable [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Targeted-financial-sanctions technical compliance remains only partially compliant per MONEYVAL's 6 July 2026 follow-up report, an architecture-level gap [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source EU Commission letter of formal notice (25 Sept 2026) for incomplete 6AMLD transposition [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source MiCA (Regulation (EU) 2023/1114); ASF (Autoritatea de Supraveghere Financiară) is designated as principal competent authority for CASPs in Romania, issuing official operating licences and supervising exchanges, brokers, crypto ATMs, and ART issuers (unlicensed firms barred from operating from 1 July 2026). [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source 2nd Enhanced Follow-up Report: 7 of 40 Recommendations compliant, 20 largely compliant, 13 partially compliant, remains under enhanced follow-up [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source fraud is the #2 predicate offence by laundered-proceeds disseminations (14.56% of PICCJ disseminations) [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source 10 individuals and 17 entities under Russia human-rights restrictive measures regime (Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/2164) [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Zero MiCA-authorised CASPs as of mid-October 2026 [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Public access restricted to parties demonstrating 'legitimate interest' since May 2025; EU Commission infringement procedure opened Sept 2026 over 6AMLD BO-access transposition notification [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source 2nd Enhanced Follow-up Report adopted at 71st Plenary (May 2026), published 6 July 2026; improved technical compliance on targeted financial sanctions since 1st FUR, remains in enhanced follow-up [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source CASPs integrated as AML-obliged entities under Law 129/2019; EU Funds Transfer (travel rule) Regulation transposed, effective 13 March 2025 [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source mica_competent_authority_designated [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Romania remains in MONEYVAL enhanced follow-up under the 5th Round mutual evaluation; compliant with 7 Recommendations, largely compliant with 20, partially compliant with 13. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Joint stock companies must update changes in beneficial ownership within 15 days of a change occurring. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source ONPCSB relayed EU Council designations including sanctions against 17 third-country financial entities offering crypto services to evade Russia sanctions, and a transaction ban covering 33 Russian banks. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Romania remains under MONEYVAL's second enhanced follow-up procedure, with virtual-asset/VASP technical-compliance deficiencies unresolved. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Romania maintains no independent national sanctions list, referring only to EU and UN designations. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Joint-stock companies must update changes in beneficial ownership within 15 days of a change occurring [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Second enhanced follow-up procedure, with virtual-asset/VASP technical-compliance deficiencies from the original mutual evaluation still unresolved [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source Circulated EU Council acts extending Russia-related restrictive measures, including designations against 17 third-country financial entities offering crypto services to facilitate sanctions evasion and a transaction ban on 33 Russian banks [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source EU and UN sanctions lists; no autonomous national designation list [[Source 1]](#sec-sources) Probable · 1 source