Financial Integrity Monitor

Slovenia SI

Domains (D1–D6)
3
Sources
11
Role actions
8
Horizon <90d
3
Jurisdiction profile
CompliantTier BRisk: StableMixed

Slovenia's AML/CFT regime rests on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Act (ZPPDFT-2), transposing EU AMLD, supervised by the FIU (UPPD, Ministry of Finance) and Banka Slovenije for banks.

MoreA free public beneficial-ownership register is maintained via AJPES. MONEYVAL rates Slovenia largely compliant technically (all Recommendations bar R.5 at LC/C) but the country remains in enhanced follow-up, with persistently low money-laundering conviction rates relative to predicate-crime investigations.

Key deficiencies
  • Low ML prosecution/conviction rate relative to volume of predicate-offence investigations (tax evasion, fraud, drug trafficking), a finding carried from the 2017 MER through subsequent follow-up reports
  • VASP oversight rated only Partially Compliant in the 2021 Follow-Up Report due to deficiencies in the definition of virtual asset service providers
  • No comprehensive domestic review of the NPO sector's terrorist-financing risk exposure identified in the 2017 MER
Recent developments (18m)
  • MONEYVAL 5th-round mutual evaluation on-site assessment of Slovenia tentatively scheduled around late September 2025 per the FATF assessment calendar, opening a new evaluation cycle
  • EU AMLA became operational (Frankfurt, mid-2025) creating a new indirect supervisory layer over Slovenian obliged entities
  • EU added Russia, Bolivia and the British Virgin Islands to its high-risk third-country list (December 2025), triggering enhanced due diligence obligations for Slovenian obliged entities
  • Eurojust-coordinated dismantling and Reggio Calabria sentencing (October 2025) of an 'Ndrangheta money-laundering/cocaine-trafficking network in which Slovenian authorities participated as one of nine cooperating jurisdictions
  • MiCA transitional period for legacy-registered crypto-asset service providers, including Slovenia-domiciled exchanges, closed 1 July 2026
Weekly brief

Lead signal

Lead Signal

Read full brief

Lead Signal

Slovenia's sixth-round MONEYVAL mutual evaluation report, adopted at the May 2026 plenary and published 7 July 2026, places the jurisdiction in enhanced follow-up, with compliant or largely-compliant ratings on 30 of the 40 FATF Recommendations. The same report assesses Slovenia's virtual-asset-service-provider sector as carrying a medium-high proliferation-financing threat with no specific mitigating measures demonstrated. Read together, these two findings describe a jurisdiction whose technical AML architecture is broadly sound but whose practical risk posture around crypto-asset intermediaries has not caught up, an architecture-over-incident distinction that matters more for forward risk than any single enforcement event would.

Other Developments

Beneficial-ownership access tightened ahead of the EU deadline. Slovenia's AJPES beneficial-ownership register ended unrestricted public access in August 2025, moving to a model that requires demonstrated legitimate interest, ahead of the EU-wide 10 July 2026 deadline for AMLD6 Articles 11-13 and 15, under which AMLA is due to publish twenty-three technical standards. The assessment of this shift rests on a single Tier-3 vendor source, without a corroborating primary AJPES or Ministry of Justice text, which caps confidence at Assessed rather than High.

MONEYVAL calls for a formal national strategy. The same sixth-round report calls on Slovenia to adopt a formal AML/CFT strategic framework aligned to its 2025 national risk assessment, an architecture-level recommendation rather than a finding tied to any single institution or transaction.

Slovenia's crypto framework enters its terminal transition phase. The national MiCA implementing act, ZIUTK, has been in force since 23 November 2024, splitting authorisation between the Slovenian Securities Market Agency for crypto-asset service providers and the Bank of Slovenia for e-money and asset-referenced tokens. The national VASP grandfathering window expired 1 July 2025 and the EU-wide CASP-authorisation cliff-edge follows on 1 July 2026. Layered onto this authorisation transition, Slovenia introduced a flat 25 percent tax on individual crypto-asset capital gains effective 1 January 2026, a fiscal-transparency development adjacent to, but distinct from, the authorisation question.

Global FATF list movement, with a mixed enabler-jurisdiction picture. The FATF's 19 June 2026 plenary added Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iraq to its increased-monitoring list and removed Algeria and Namibia. Cambodia remains absent from the list, consistent with its prior delisting progress, while Laos remains listed, with casino and special-economic-zone supervision in the Golden Triangle corridor cited as an ongoing deficiency.

Cross-Monitor Connections

The compliance-perimeter risk building around Slovenia's VASP sector, and around any correspondent or payment relationship that touches it, is a structural signal relevant beyond financial-integrity analysis alone: a jurisdiction in enhanced MONEYVAL follow-up with an unmitigated proliferation-financing rating on its crypto-asset sector is the kind of architecture finding that monitors tracking payment-rail access or correspondent-banking relationships would want visibility into. Laos's persistent casino and special-economic-zone supervisory deficiency is a comparable structural signal for monitors tracking gambling-sector or conflict-adjacent financial flows in that corridor, though no Slovenia-specific gambling-sector connection is evidenced in this cycle's material, and none is asserted here.

Outlook

The next concrete checkpoint is the EU-wide MiCA CASP-authorisation cliff-edge on 1 July 2026, alongside AMLA's expected build-out of its first work programme and supervisory methodology in the fourth quarter of 2026. Whether Slovenia's AJPES legitimate-interest access model settles into a documented, harmonised mechanism, consistent with the wider AMLD6 Article 11-13 and 15 transposition due 10 July 2026, remains an open question this cycle. Watch also for whether Slovenia publishes the formal AML/CFT strategic framework MONEYVAL has called for, which would be the clearest signal of a practical, rather than purely technical, response to the enhanced follow-up placement.

weekly_brief_draft · JID SI
Domain intelligence (D1–D6)

D1 Sanctions

Not covered

Sanctions is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.

D2 Beneficial Ownership and Corporate Transparency

Beneficial Ownership and Corporate Transparency

Continue reading

Slovenia's beneficial-ownership register, maintained by AJPES, ended unrestricted public access in August 2025 in favour of a model requiring demonstrated legitimate interest. This move sits ahead of the EU-wide 10 July 2026 deadline for the sixth Anti-Money Laundering Directive's Articles 11 through 13 and 15, the provisions governing beneficial-ownership register access and interconnection, by which point the Anti-Money Laundering Authority is due to have published twenty-three technical standards supporting the transposition. Whether Slovenia's current legitimate-interest mechanism already satisfies the fuller AMLD6 model is not established this cycle: the only source available for the AJPES mechanics is a single Tier-3 vendor characterisation, without a corroborating primary AJPES or Ministry of Justice text, which caps the assessment at Assessed confidence rather than High.

The durable structural backdrop against which this national development should be read is the EU AML Package itself, which comprises three distinct instruments rather than a single directive. The AML Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2024/1624, the AMLR) is directly applicable across Member States without national transposition; the sixth AML Directive (6AMLD) requires transposition per Member State, of which Slovenia's AJPES move is a national instance; and the AMLA Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2024/1620) establishes the Anti-Money Laundering Authority itself, which is progressively assuming a direct and indirect supervisory perimeter over cross-border obliged entities that shifts the architecture from a purely national supervisory model toward a hybrid EU-level regime. Slovenia's beneficial-ownership access tightening this cycle is best read as a national data point within that structural shift rather than an isolated domestic policy choice.

Slovenia's MONEYVAL sixth-round mutual evaluation, published 7 July 2026, separately places the jurisdiction in enhanced follow-up and calls for a formal national AML/CFT strategic framework aligned to the 2025 national risk assessment, a recommendation that touches directly on the institutional capacity behind beneficial-ownership verification and corporate-transparency enforcement. The jurisdiction-risk assessment for Slovenia this cycle characterises risk direction as increasing and the enforcement-versus-enablement posture as mixed, reflecting a jurisdiction tightening access on paper while full harmonisation with the EU-wide model remains unconfirmed. The AJPES restriction is also relevant to obliged-entity due-diligence workflows assessing fund structures and high-net-worth beneficial owners specifically, the customer typologies the underlying finding is tagged against, since verification of those structures now depends on a legitimate-interest showing rather than open access.

Outlook

The next concrete marker is the 10 July 2026 AMLD6 Article 11-13/15 transposition deadline itself, alongside AMLA's anticipated fourth-quarter 2026 publication of its first work programme and supervisory methodology. Whether Slovenia's legitimate-interest access model is formally confirmed as compliant with the fuller harmonised standard, and whether a primary AJPES or Ministry of Justice text becomes available to corroborate the access mechanics currently resting on a single vendor source, are the two developments most likely to move this domain's confidence rating next cycle.

D3 Enabler Jurisdictions and Professional Facilitators

Enabler Jurisdictions and Professional Facilitators

Continue reading

Slovenia's own standing as an enabler-adjacent jurisdiction moved this cycle with the publication, on 7 July 2026, of its sixth-round MONEYVAL mutual evaluation report, adopted at the May 2026 plenary. The report places Slovenia in enhanced follow-up despite compliant or largely-compliant ratings on 30 of the 40 FATF Recommendations, an architecture-over-incident reading: the technical framework scores well, but the follow-up placement signals the assessors were not satisfied that implementation matches the text. The same report calls on Slovenia to adopt a formal AML/CFT strategic framework aligned to its 2025 national risk assessment, a capacity-level finding rather than a transaction-level one.

Elsewhere, the global enabler-jurisdiction picture this cycle is genuinely mixed rather than uniformly deteriorating or improving. Cambodia remains absent from the FATF's 19 June 2026 increased-monitoring list, consistent with its prior delisting trajectory, a data point on the enforcement side of the enforcement-versus-enablement ledger. Laos, by contrast, remains listed, with casino and special-economic-zone supervision in the Golden Triangle corridor cited as an ongoing deficiency, a structural rather than episodic weakness: the underlying supervisory capacity gap around casino and SEZ financial flows has persisted across cycles rather than arising from a single incident.

The FATF's 19 June 2026 plenary itself added Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iraq to the increased-monitoring list and removed Algeria and Namibia, the routine churn against which Slovenia's separate, non-FATF-list MONEYVAL enhanced-follow-up placement should be read: Slovenia is not grey-listed, but its MONEYVAL outcome nonetheless signals a supervisory-perimeter concern of the same analytical family as an increased-monitoring listing, applied through a different mechanism.

Outlook

Watch for whether Slovenia publishes the national AML/CFT strategic framework MONEYVAL has called for, and for any indication of how quickly Slovenia's enhanced follow-up status might be revisited. On the global side, the next FATF plenary is the relevant checkpoint for whether Laos's casino and SEZ supervisory deficiencies begin to shift, or whether Cambodia's delisting trajectory is formally confirmed.

D4 Conflict Finance

Not covered

Conflict Finance is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.

D5 Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation

Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation

Continue reading

Slovenia's national MiCA implementing act, ZIUTK, has been in force since 23 November 2024, splitting authorisation between the Slovenian Securities Market Agency (ATVP), which licenses ordinary crypto-asset service providers, and the Bank of Slovenia, which authorises electronic-money tokens and asset-referenced tokens. This bifurcated model is now entering its terminal transition phase: the national VASP grandfathering window expired on 1 July 2025, and the EU-wide CASP-authorisation cliff-edge follows on 1 July 2026, after which any crypto-asset service provider without full MiCA authorisation loses the ability to serve Slovenian and wider EU clients.

Against this authorisation-transition backdrop, Slovenia's sixth-round MONEYVAL mutual evaluation separately assessed the domestic virtual-asset-service-provider sector as carrying a medium-high proliferation-financing threat, with no specific mitigating measures demonstrated. That finding sits uncomfortably alongside the authorisation cliff-edge: a sector moving through a binary compliance gate on the market-access side has not, on this cycle's evidence, been shown to have closed the corresponding gap on the proliferation-financing side. The combination is the clearest three-pillar imbalance visible in Slovenia's crypto posture this cycle, since the market-access architecture (MiCA/ZIUTK) is well-documented while the CPF mitigation picture is not.

Layered onto the authorisation question, Slovenia introduced a flat 25 percent tax on individual crypto-asset capital gains, effective 1 January 2026. This is a fiscal-transparency development distinct from the authorisation regime, but it bears on the same underlying population of crypto-asset holders and intermediaries, and increases the incentive for holders to route gains through jurisdictions or structures outside Slovenia's reporting perimeter, a dynamic this cycle's evidence flags without further substantiation.

Outlook

The 1 July 2026 EU-wide CASP-authorisation cliff-edge is the immediate checkpoint: any Slovenia-facing crypto firm not authorised by that date faces a binary loss of market access. Watch also for whether Slovenia's MONEYVAL-flagged proliferation-financing gap in the VASP sector is addressed through the national AML/CFT strategic framework the same report calls for, since the authorisation and mitigation tracks are, on current evidence, running on separate timelines.

D6 Compliance Technology & Active Defence

Not covered

Compliance Technology & Active Defence is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.

D7 AML/CTF Regime

Not covered

AML/CTF Regime is not yet covered for this jurisdiction in this report.

Regulatory horizon
Consultation2026-Q3 · ±quarter

AMLD6 beneficial-ownership register provisions (Articles 11-13, 15)

National BO registers move to a harmonised legitimate-interest model with cross-border interconnection via BRIS.
In Force Pending2026-Q3 · ±quarter

MiCA CASP-authorisation cliff-edge

Legacy VASP registrations become invalid EU-wide; only MiCA-authorised CASPs may serve EU clients.
In Force Pending2026-Q4 · ±half_year

AMLA Work Programme / build-out

AMLA stands up in Frankfurt and publishes its first work programme and supervisory methodology.
source not collected
3 dated · 4 pending date · baseline financial-integrity-2026-07-05
Role action cards
MLROHigh

Slovenia's enhanced MONEYVAL follow-up and tightened AJPES access raise the practical bar for beneficial-ownership verification.

The AJPES legitimate-interest access model makes independent verification of concessionaire and counterparty beneficial ownership harder, at the same time as MONEYVAL has called for a formal national AML/CFT strategy. Both point toward closer scrutiny of due-diligence documentation for Slovenia-linked structures.

4 evidence refs
ComplianceHigh

Slovenia's AML/CFT control-framework adequacy has been formally questioned by MONEYVAL this cycle.

The enhanced follow-up placement, coupled with the AJPES access restriction and the approaching AMLD6 transposition deadline, means Slovenia-facing compliance programmes should expect the local supervisory and transparency baseline to keep moving over the next two cycles.

4 evidence refs
LegalAssessed

The MiCA CASP-authorisation cliff-edge is a binary legal gate for Slovenia-facing crypto activity from 1 July 2026.

Any crypto-asset service provider serving Slovenian clients without full MiCA authorisation by the cliff-edge date faces loss of legal market access, not merely heightened supervisory attention. Slovenia's MONEYVAL enhanced follow-up separately signals a live enforcement-trajectory question worth tracking.

2 evidence refs
BoardAssessed

Slovenia's enhanced-follow-up placement and unmitigated VASP proliferation-financing rating are reputational and strategic risk signals.

A jurisdiction moving to enhanced MONEYVAL follow-up, with a flagged medium-high proliferation-financing threat in its crypto sector, represents a strategic-level regulatory-direction signal for any institution with Slovenia-linked exposure, even absent a specific enforcement action.

2 evidence refs
CTOAssessed

Slovenia's MiCA authorisation architecture and VASP proliferation-financing gap both bear directly on crypto-infrastructure exposure.

Any platform or infrastructure serving Slovenian crypto clients needs to confirm counterparty MiCA authorisation status ahead of the 1 July 2026 cliff-edge, and should treat the MONEYVAL-flagged proliferation-financing gap as a technical-control question, not solely a policy one.

3 evidence refs
RiskAssessed

Slovenia's risk trajectory is assessed as increasing, driven by a mixed enforcement-versus-enablement and structural-versus-episodic profile.

The combination of MONEYVAL enhanced follow-up, an unmitigated VASP proliferation-financing rating, and the AJPES transparency restriction constitutes a genuine multi-domain risk-concentration signal for Slovenia this cycle, distinct from the more stable global FATF-list picture.

5 evidence refs
OperationsPossible

MiCA authorisation status and AJPES access mechanics both affect operational screening workflows for Slovenia-linked counterparties.

Screening and onboarding workflows touching Slovenian crypto counterparties should incorporate CASP-authorisation-status checks ahead of the cliff-edge, and beneficial-ownership verification workflows should account for the legitimate-interest access requirement now in force at AJPES.

2 evidence refs
AuditPossible

MONEYVAL's call for a formal national AML/CFT strategy and the AJPES access change both create documentation-adequacy questions.

Audit scope for Slovenia-linked control testing should note that the national AML/CFT strategic framework MONEYVAL has called for is not yet confirmed published, and that the AJPES beneficial-ownership access mechanics rest on a single secondary source rather than primary documentation.

2 evidence refs
Decision lens
MLRO

Slovenia's enhanced MONEYVAL follow-up and tightened AJPES access raise the practical bar for beneficial-ownership verification.

Compliance

Slovenia's AML/CFT control-framework adequacy has been formally questioned by MONEYVAL this cycle.

Legal

The MiCA CASP-authorisation cliff-edge is a binary legal gate for Slovenia-facing crypto activity from 1 July 2026.

Board

Slovenia's enhanced-follow-up placement and unmitigated VASP proliferation-financing rating are reputational and strategic risk signals.

CTO

Slovenia's MiCA authorisation architecture and VASP proliferation-financing gap both bear directly on crypto-infrastructure exposure.

Risk

Slovenia's risk trajectory is assessed as increasing, driven by a mixed enforcement-versus-enablement and structural-versus-episodic profile.

Operations

MiCA authorisation status and AJPES access mechanics both affect operational screening workflows for Slovenia-linked counterparties.

Audit

MONEYVAL's call for a formal national AML/CFT strategy and the AJPES access change both create documentation-adequacy questions.

Shared evidence: 6 refs
Scenario sketches

AMLA supervisory perimeter reshapes cross-border AML evasion routing

Illustrative orientation only: as AMLA progressively assumes direct and indirect supervision of cross-border obliged entities under the AMLA Regulation (Reg (EU) 2024/1620), alongside the directly-applicable AMLR (Reg 2024/1624) and per-state 6AMLD transposition, obliged entities and their counterparties could shift compliance-shopping behaviour away from national supervisors perceived as lenient and toward jurisdictions where AMLA direct supervision has not yet taken hold, altering rather than eliminating the underlying evasion incentive. This is architecture-over-incident illustration, not a prediction of any specific institution's conduct.

Illustrative scenario for analytical orientation only. Not compliance advice, not a prediction, and not a statement of observed fact.

MiCA cliff-edge as a displacement trigger for unauthorised CASP activity

Illustrative orientation only: as the EU-wide MiCA CASP-authorisation cliff-edge takes effect on 1 July 2026, crypto-asset service providers unable to complete authorisation in time could illustratively seek to continue serving EU clients through unauthorised or third-country routed channels, testing the practical enforceability of the authorisation perimeter rather than its legal existence. This is a structural illustration of a possible mechanism, not an observed development.

Illustrative scenario for analytical orientation only. Not compliance advice, not a prediction, and not a statement of observed fact.

Standing trackers (T1–T6)
TrackerStatusNote
T1 · Russian Sanctions-Evasion Architectureno_changeNo material change identified touching Slovenia this cycle.
T2 · EU AML Package / AMLAwatchAMLR directly applicable EU-wide from 10 July 2027; 6AMLD transposition mostly due 10 July 2027 (BO-register provisions due 10 July 2026); AMLA supervisory build-out continues. No SI-specific transposition text located.
T3 · FATF Grey Listno_changeSlovenia is not FATF/MONEYVAL grey-listed; 6th-round MER resulted in enhanced follow-up, not grey-listing.
T4 · Beneficial-Ownership Register StatuswatchEU-wide BO-register-interconnection provisions under AMLD6 due by 10 July 2026; no SI-specific update located this cycle.
T5 · Crypto & Digital-Asset Integritymaterial_changeSI's MiCA transition period for pre-existing crypto providers expired 1 July 2025; ATVP sole gateway for CASP activity; ~3 MiCA-authorised CASPs on ESMA interim register as of Aug 2026; flat 25% capital-gains tax on individual crypto disposals from 1 January 2026.
T6 · Sanctions Regime Divergenceno_changeNo SI-specific EU/US/UK autonomous-listing divergence identified this cycle; Slovenia applies EU Council sanctions directly.
Registers

Enforcement actions

  • Following a May 2023 multinational operation involving Belgium, Germany, Portugal, France, Spain, Romania, Slovenia, Brazil and Panama that saw over 2,700 officers conduct raids and arrest 132 network members, the Reggio Calabria court issued its first judicial decision against 76 defendants who requested a shortened procedure. 21 Oct 2025
  • Per FATF's assessment calendar, Slovenia's next MONEYVAL mutual evaluation on-site assessment was scheduled around late September 2025, opening the 5th-round evaluation cycle against the 2022 FATF Methodology, with plenary discussion of results indicatively scheduled around May 2026. 29 Sep 2025
  • MONEYVAL's most recent adopted Follow-Up Report (published 7 May 2024, at the outer edge of the enforcement window but the most recent adopted decision still governing Slovenia's current standing) re-rated Recommendation 15 (new technologies/VASPs) and Recommendation 32 (cash couriers) from Partially Compliant to Largely Compliant. 7 May 2024

Sanctions changes

  • Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/46 (adopted 3 December 2025) added Russia to the EU's list of high-risk third countries with strategic AML/CFT deficiencies under Directive (EU) 2015/849, requiring Slovenian obliged entities to apply enhanced due diligence to Russia-linked transactions and customers. 3 Dec 2025
  • Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/83 (adopted 4 December 2025) added Bolivia and the British Virgin Islands to the EU high-risk third-country list and delisted Burkina Faso, Mali, Mozambique, Nigeria, South Africa and Tanzania, altering the enhanced-due-diligence perimeter applicable to Slovenian obliged entities. 4 Dec 2025
  • HM Treasury's June 2026 Money Laundering Advisory Notice updated the UK's High-Risk Third Country list (MLR reg.33) to track the FATF's 19 June 2026 plenary outcomes; the UK list continues to differ in composition and timing from both the EU delegated-regulation list and the underlying FATF lists, creating cross-jurisdiction compliance friction for firms with both EU and UK nexus, including Slovenian-linked entities transacting with UK counterparties. 22 Jun 2026

Regulatory horizon (register)

  • MiCA transitional period closes for legacy CASPs
  • EU AMLR direct-application date across Slovenia
  • AMLA direct-supervision perimeter build-out
  • MONEYVAL 5th-round Plenary outcome for Slovenia

Active schemes

  • [HIGH] Cross-border company-formation laundering network
  • Correspondent-banking channel used for Iran-linked funds
  • Kingpin Act shell-entity designation reaching Slovenia
  • MiCA transition exposure for Ljubljana-domiciled VASP
Sources
  1. FATF/MONEYVAL
  2. Ministry of Finance, Republic of Slovenia (UPPD)
  3. U.S. Department of the Treasury, OFAC
  4. European Commission (DG FISMA)
  5. HM Treasury
  6. Global Witness
  7. OCCRP
  8. OCCRP
  9. Elliptic
  10. Council of the European Union
  11. FATF
Coverage gaps
Money-laundering prosecutions and convictions in Slovenia re…
Money-laundering prosecutions and convictions in Slovenia remain disproportionately low relative to the volume of investigations into proceeds-generating predicate crimes such as tax evasion, fraud and drug trafficking, a finding first identified in the 2017 MER and not resolved through subsequent follow-up reports.
MONEYVAL's 2021 Follow-Up Report found Slovenia's VASP-relat…
MONEYVAL's 2021 Follow-Up Report found Slovenia's VASP-related measures only Partially Compliant with Recommendation 15 due to deficiencies in the definition of virtual asset service providers, a gap only partially closed (upgraded to Largely Compliant) by the 2023/2024 Follow-Up Report.
The 2017 MER found Slovenia had not undertaken a domestic re…
The 2017 MER found Slovenia had not undertaken a domestic review of the non-profit sector to identify which parts might be at particular risk of terrorist-financing misuse, and no risk-based supervision framework for NPOs was in place at that time.
This baseline could not directly access UPPD's (national FIU…
This baseline could not directly access UPPD's (national FIU) own Slovenian-language annual STR/operational statistics publication within the research window; findings on FIU output rely on multilateral (MONEYVAL/FATF) and investigative secondary sourcing rather than the primary national FIU report itself.

Evidence

Confidence-tiered claims

No structured claims published for this jurisdiction yet.