---
title: "Singapore — Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation | Financial Integrity Monitor"
canonical: https://sentinel.gi/jurisdictions/singapore/crypto-digital-assets/
source_html: /jurisdictions/singapore/crypto-digital-assets/index.html
description: "Singapore — Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation: D5 Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation Continue reading Singapore&amp;#x27;s Monetary Authority closed Consultation Paper P015-2026 on 1"
generated_at: 2026-11-07T15:09:33Z
content_sha256: 4471ecc68718b0c6d6105a210328c51616d8284593135e2add024a24137f7eca
generator: "fe-fleet/md-twin@1.0"
---
# Singapore — Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation | Financial Integrity Monitor

Singapore (SG) · Module Detail

# Singapore: Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation

[&larr; Full Singapore overview](/jurisdictions/singapore/)
[Build report with Singapore](/reports/?t=entry&j=SG)
[Request deeper dive](/reports/?ask=SG#ask)

#### Crypto / Digital Assets / Financial Innovation

Continue reading Singapore&#x27;s Monetary Authority closed Consultation Paper P015-2026 on 16 October 2026, a consultation on amendments to the Payment Services Act 2019 intended to implement the MAS-regulated Single-Currency Stablecoin framework in statute. The draft provisions include a new Part 2A letting MAS designate, by Gazette order, any stablecoin circulating in Singapore as a designated systemic stablecoin regardless of where it is issued, together with a power to direct licensed exchanges to delist a non-compliant issuer&#x27;s token. From a financial-integrity perspective, the designation and delisting mechanism functions as a control point over stablecoin circulation that does not depend on the issuer being within Singapore&#x27;s jurisdiction, giving MAS reach over illicit-finance exposure in offshore-issued tokens that nonetheless circulate domestically through licensed exchanges.

The consultation also proposes an interest-payment ban on stablecoin holders, mandatory stress testing, and recovery and wind-down planning for issuers, together with a requirement that issuers maintain the technical capability to trace, freeze and burn tokens linked to illicit activity. This trace/freeze/burn capability requirement is the most directly AML/CFT-relevant element of the package: it would give MAS and issuers an operational tool to interrupt illicit flows moving through designated stablecoins after the fact, a capability that does not currently exist on a statutory footing for stablecoins in Singapore. None of these provisions are yet in force; the consultation&#x27;s 16 October 2026 close is a procedural milestone, and MAS has not announced a commencement date.

The proposed framework sits alongside Singapore&#x27;s existing AML/CFT architecture for payment and crypto-asset service providers, including MAS Notice PSN02 governing digital-payment-token service providers&#x27; AML/CFT obligations. The stablecoin consultation would extend comparable AML/CFT-relevant infrastructure, reserve rules, and designation powers specifically to the stablecoin product category, which has not previously been subject to a dedicated statutory regime in Singapore.

#### Outlook

MAS&#x27;s own regulatory horizon estimates an impact window in the second quarter of 2027 for the resulting legislation, with a half-year uncertainty band rather than a firm date. Whether the trace/freeze/burn technical capability requirement and the systemic-designation power survive into the final legislation in their consulted form, and how MAS defines the threshold for systemic designation, are the features most likely to determine the practical AML/CFT impact of this reform once it takes effect.
