---
title: "Taiwan (TW) — Financial-Integrity Intelligence · Sentinel"
canonical: https://sentinel.gi/jurisdictions/taiwan/
source_html: /jurisdictions/taiwan/index.html
description: "Financial integrity intelligence for Taiwan (TW): sanctions, beneficial ownership, enabler jurisdictions, conflict finance, digital assets and compliance technology — with sourced findings."
generated_at: 2026-11-08T04:46:02Z
content_sha256: a88b4620180ac477bd94325a76cad7a52ef7c1273645b349472ab8a161b4973c
generator: "fe-fleet/md-twin@1.0"
---
# Taiwan (TW) — Financial-Integrity Intelligence · Sentinel

Not every instrument is backed by its official text yet. At least one law or rulebook covered here has no official source (tier 1) retrieved for it yet. No finding on this page is shown with confidence above &ldquo;Probable&rdquo; until stronger sources are retrieved.

Financial Integrity Monitor

# Taiwan TW

Domains covered

6 of 8

Sources

154

Role actions

8

Horizon <90d

1

Jurisdiction profile

FATF status: Clean Tier: B Risk direction: Increasing Enablement vs enforcement: Mixed

AML/CFT built on the Money Laundering Control Act and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act, supervised by the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC), which since March 2023 is also competent authority for virtual assets. More Virtual-asset AML/CFT is governed by 2021 Regulations plus a November 2024 amendment tightening overseas-VASP registration; a dedicated crypto special act remains in draft. Taiwan is not a FATF member but is assessed by the APG as &#x27;Chinese Taipei&#x27;.

Key deficiencies

- No comprehensive dedicated virtual-asset/crypto statute yet passed the Legislative Yuan despite a mid-2025 target
- Beneficial-ownership opacity via shell/holding companies (e.g. Taiwan-registered entities used inside the Prince Group network) persists despite Companies Act disclosure rules
- Remittance and gambling-linked channels have been used to move large-scale transnational fraud proceeds into Taiwan
- Non-FATF-member status (assessed only via APG) limits some multilateral leverage and slows update cadence of independent effectiveness ratings

Recent developments (18m)

- Taipei District Prosecutors Office concluded a probe into Prince Group-linked money laundering, identifying NT$10.7bn (~US$337m) in laundered funds entering Taiwan via remittances 2016-2025 (Mar 2026)
- OFAC&#x27;s October 2025 Prince Group TCO designation named Taiwan-registered entities AlphaConnect Investments Co Ltd and AlphaConnect Investments II Co Ltd
- UK OFSI ran parallel and subsequently widened sanctions on the Prince Group network with reported ties to Taiwan&#x27;s financial infrastructure
- FSC&#x27;s November 2024 VASP amendment took effect, requiring overseas platforms to establish local entities and register by September 2025
- Taiwan added Huawei and SMIC to its strategic high-tech commodities entity list (June 2025)
- Taiwan imposed its first unilateral semiconductor export controls on a country (South Africa, Sept 2025)
- Taiwan is weighing stricter AI-chip export controls to align with US measures (reported June 2026)

Brief

## Lead signal

#### Lead Signal

Taiwan&#x27;s virtual-asset sector is moving through a structural tightening of its anti-money-laundering perimeter, with a domestic Travel Rule obligation phasing in from October 2026. Domestic virtual-asset-service-provider-to-provider transfers of NT$30,000 or more now require the sending platform to collect, and the receiving platform to verify, the customer&#x27;s date of birth and residential address. This sits alongside a Financial Supervisory Commission press release dated 20 October 2026 that amends unspecified AML-related regulations; the release title was truncated in the regulator&#x27;s own index and the precise instrument it touches has not been confirmed. Taken together, the two developments point toward a deliberate narrowing of the space available for anonymous or loosely identified crypto transfers inside Taiwan, even though the exact legal mechanics of the October amendment remain unresolved.

Read full brief

#### Lead Signal

Taiwan&#x27;s virtual-asset sector is moving through a structural tightening of its anti-money-laundering perimeter, with a domestic Travel Rule obligation phasing in from October 2026. Domestic virtual-asset-service-provider-to-provider transfers of NT$30,000 or more now require the sending platform to collect, and the receiving platform to verify, the customer&#x27;s date of birth and residential address. This sits alongside a Financial Supervisory Commission press release dated 20 October 2026 that amends unspecified AML-related regulations; the release title was truncated in the regulator&#x27;s own index and the precise instrument it touches has not been confirmed. Taken together, the two developments point toward a deliberate narrowing of the space available for anonymous or loosely identified crypto transfers inside Taiwan, even though the exact legal mechanics of the October amendment remain unresolved.

The practical effect is incremental rather than sweeping: cross-border transfers are not yet covered by the same verification requirement, with that extension targeted for end-2027. For now the architecture change is confined to the domestic leg of virtual-asset transfers, which narrows — but does not close — the principal channel through which identity-light movement of funds has historically been possible on licensed platforms.

#### Other Developments

Standing registration gateway continues to anchor the regime. Separately from the Travel Rule phase-in, the baseline position under Article 6 of the Money Laundering Control Act continues to require any business or person providing virtual-asset services to complete anti-money-laundering registration with the Financial Supervisory Commission before operating, with foreign-established providers required to first incorporate a domestic company or branch. This registration gateway has been in force since 30 November 2024 and remains the operative control while a more comprehensive licensing framework is still being built out.

Full licensing regime remains pending. The Legislative Yuan passed a Virtual Asset Service Act on 30 June 2026 that would name the Financial Supervisory Commission sole regulator across seven categories of virtual-asset business, but the Act and its approximately nine subordinate regulations have not yet commenced. Commencement is not expected before the first quarter of 2027, with a twelve-month window for firms to apply for a licence and up to twenty-one months for final approval to be granted. Until that framework takes effect, the registration-based regime under the Money Laundering Control Act remains the primary control.

#### Cross-Monitor Connections

The tightening of domestic transfer-identification requirements for virtual-asset platforms has a natural read-across to monitors tracking digital-asset infrastructure and emerging-technology evasion vectors, since a jurisdiction narrowing its domestic verification gap while leaving cross-border transfers less controlled until 2027 creates an interim window in which cross-border movement may carry comparatively lighter identification requirements than domestic movement. No conflict-finance, sanctions, or state-capture signal was present in the material reviewed this cycle, so no further cross-monitor connection is supported by the substrate available.

#### Outlook

The near-term question is whether the Financial Supervisory Commission&#x27;s 20 October 2026 amendment, once its full text is confirmed, turns out to formalize the Travel Rule mechanics already reported or to introduce a separate adjustment to the AML framework. Over the medium term, the commencement of the Virtual Asset Service Act — not expected before the first quarter of 2027, with licensing approvals potentially running past that into 2028 given the stated processing windows — will determine whether Taiwan&#x27;s virtual-asset AML architecture shifts from a registration-based gateway to a full licensing regime. Until commencement, firms and observers should treat the current registration requirement under the Money Laundering Control Act as the operative control, with the Travel Rule phase-in as the most consequential near-term addition to it.

Earlier periodic briefs (8) 4 Nov 2026 · fim-2026-11-04

#### Lead Signal

Taiwan&#x27;s virtual-asset sector is moving through a structural tightening of its anti-money-laundering perimeter, with a domestic Travel Rule obligation phasing in from October 2026. Domestic virtual-asset-service-provider-to-provider transfers of NT$30,000 or more now require the sending platform to collect, and the receiving platform to verify, the customer&#x27;s date of birth and residential address. This sits alongside a Financial Supervisory Commission press release dated 20 October 2026 that amends unspecified AML-related regulations; the release title was truncated in the regulator&#x27;s own index and the precise instrument it touches has not been confirmed. Taken together, the two developments point toward a deliberate narrowing of the space available for anonymous or loosely identified crypto transfers inside Taiwan, even though the exact legal mechanics of the October amendment remain unresolved.

The practical effect is incremental rather than sweeping: cross-border transfers are not yet covered by the same verification requirement, with that extension targeted for end-2027. For now the architecture change is confined to the domestic leg of virtual-asset transfers, which narrows — but does not close — the principal channel through which identity-light movement of funds has historically been possible on licensed platforms.

#### Other Developments

Standing registration gateway continues to anchor the regime. Separately from the Travel Rule phase-in, the baseline position under Article 6 of the Money Laundering Control Act continues to require any business or person providing virtual-asset services to complete anti-money-laundering registration with the Financial Supervisory Commission before operating, with foreign-established providers required to first incorporate a domestic company or branch. This registration gateway has been in force since 30 November 2024 and remains the operative control while a more comprehensive licensing framework is still being built out.

Full licensing regime remains pending. The Legislative Yuan passed a Virtual Asset Service Act on 30 June 2026 that would name the Financial Supervisory Commission sole regulator across seven categories of virtual-asset business, but the Act and its approximately nine subordinate regulations have not yet commenced. Commencement is not expected before the first quarter of 2027, with a twelve-month window for firms to apply for a licence and up to twenty-one months for final approval to be granted. Until that framework takes effect, the registration-based regime under the Money Laundering Control Act remains the primary control.

#### Cross-Monitor Connections

The tightening of domestic transfer-identification requirements for virtual-asset platforms has a natural read-across to monitors tracking digital-asset infrastructure and emerging-technology evasion vectors, since a jurisdiction narrowing its domestic verification gap while leaving cross-border transfers less controlled until 2027 creates an interim window in which cross-border movement may carry comparatively lighter identification requirements than domestic movement. No conflict-finance, sanctions, or state-capture signal was present in the material reviewed, so no further cross-monitor connection is supported by the substrate available.

#### Outlook

The near-term question is whether the Financial Supervisory Commission&#x27;s 20 October 2026 amendment, once its full text is confirmed, turns out to formalize the Travel Rule mechanics already reported or to introduce a separate adjustment to the AML framework. Over the medium term, the commencement of the Virtual Asset Service Act — not expected before the first quarter of 2027, with licensing approvals potentially running past that into 2028 given the stated processing windows — will determine whether Taiwan&#x27;s virtual-asset AML architecture shifts from a registration-based gateway to a full licensing regime. Until commencement, firms and observers should treat the current registration requirement under the Money Laundering Control Act as the operative control, with the Travel Rule phase-in as the most consequential near-term addition to it.

3 Nov 2026 · fim-2026-11-03

#### Lead Signal

Taiwan&#x27;s digital-asset anti-money-laundering perimeter is tightening incrementally even as the fuller licensing regime it is meant to anchor remains pending. Reporting places a domestic Travel Rule obligation into effect from October 2026: for virtual asset transfers of NT$30,000 or more between domestic Virtual Asset Service Providers, the sending platform must supply the customer&#x27;s date of birth and residential address, with the receiving platform required to verify those fields. This sits alongside a press release from the Financial Supervisory Commission dated 20 October 2026 announcing an amendment to AML-related regulations, though the index entry describing it is truncated and the underlying instrument has not been confirmed against primary text. Taken together, these are best read as incremental tightening of an existing AML-registration gateway rather than a structural regime change. The broader Virtual Asset Service Act framework, which would move Taiwan from registration-only supervision to full FSC licensing across seven provider categories plus joint Central Bank and FSC approval with full reserve backing for stablecoin issuance, remains in a pending stage, with roughly nine subordinate regulations targeted for commencement no earlier than the first quarter of 2027.

The analytical significance is architectural rather than episodic. Taiwan is layering transaction-level identification requirements onto virtual asset transfers ahead of, and independently of, the comprehensive licensing framework that will eventually supervise the sector. This sequencing matters: it signals that the authorities are not waiting for full licensing machinery before extending Financial Action Task Force Recommendation 16-style travel-rule obligations to domestic virtual-asset flows, even though the entities carrying those new obligations are still, for now, supervised only through the existing anti-money-laundering registration gateway under the Money Laundering Control Act.

#### Other Developments

Pending licensing architecture. The draft Virtual Asset Service Act and its subordinate regulations remain at the in-force-pending stage, targeted for the first quarter of 2027. Once commenced, the package would move domestic virtual asset service providers from the current AML-registration-only supervision to full Financial Supervisory Commission licensing, with stablecoin issuance requiring joint Central Bank and Financial Supervisory Commission approval and full reserve backing. Until that commencement, the standing registration gateway continues to operate unchanged.

Unconfirmed regulatory amendment. A Financial Supervisory Commission press release dated 20 October 2026 refers to an amendment and issuance of AML-related regulations, but the title captured in the regulator&#x27;s own index is truncated and the underlying instrument text has not yet been retrieved or confirmed. The substantive content of the amendment is therefore not yet established.

#### Cross-Monitor Connections

The tightening of domestic travel-rule identification requirements for virtual asset transfers has a natural reading alongside work tracking crypto-infrastructure exposure and digital-asset architecture risk more broadly, given that the obligation falls on the technical and operational layer through which virtual asset transfers are processed and verified. It also has a natural connection to work tracking compliance-technology and active-defence capability, since receiving platforms now carry a verification duty that implies some operational or technical control capacity, even though no such capability-specific finding is established on the present record.

#### Outlook

The near-term marker to watch is whether the Financial Supervisory Commission&#x27;s 20 October 2026 press release, once its full text is retrieved, confirms a substantive amendment or merely a procedural or consequential update to existing regulations. The more structurally significant marker is whether the roughly nine subordinate regulations under the Virtual Asset Service Act commence as scheduled in the first quarter of 2027; until they do, Taiwan&#x27;s virtual-asset sector continues to operate under AML registration rather than full licensing, even as transaction-level identification obligations are already being layered on ahead of that transition.

18 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-18

#### Lead Signal

Taiwan enacted a structural overhaul of its virtual-asset oversight architecture this cycle. The Legislative Yuan passed the Virtual Asset Service Act (VASA) on 30 June 2026 and the President promulgated it on 22 July 2026, creating seven licensed virtual-asset service provider categories under the Financial Supervisory Commission. The Act and its nine subordinate regulations are not yet in force, with the FSC pointing to the first quarter of 2027 at the earliest for joint commencement, so the current operative AML gateway for virtual-asset firms remains the registration regime under Money Laundering Control Act Article 6. This is an architecture finding, not an incident: Taiwan is moving from a registration-only AML perimeter toward a licensing-plus-travel-rule model, which is a probable improvement in the jurisdictions capacity to prevent misuse of virtual-asset channels once the new framework actually binds firms.

Alongside the licensing reform, the FSC has been working to activate Article 7 of its AML/CFT Regulations for Virtual Asset Service Providers, the Travel Rule provision that has sat dormant since 2021. Reporting describes a domestic VASP-to-VASP phase planned for October 2026, requiring baseline originator and beneficiary data on all transfers and enhanced data, including date of birth and address or registration information, above NT$30,000. A formal FSC commencement notice confirming final promulgation had not been located as of the most recent sources reviewed, which caps confidence on the exact activation date at Uncertain even though the underlying direction of travel is well corroborated.

#### Other Developments

Cross-border Travel Rule extension targeted for end-2027. Beyond the domestic phase, FSC-linked reporting describes a plan to bring cross-border virtual-asset transfers into the Travel Rule framework by the end of 2027, aligning Taiwan more closely with FATF Recommendation 16 on a two-stage timeline. This remains a plan reported in commentary rather than a confirmed instrument, and is tracked here as a forward marker rather than an enacted obligation.

APG mutual-evaluation standing unchanged. Taiwan, assessed by the Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering rather than FATF directly, continues to hold the organizations most favourable post-evaluation category, regular follow-up, a status it has held since its third-round Mutual Evaluation was adopted in 2019 and most recently reconfirmed via a 2023 follow-up report. No new plenary action affecting this status was found this cycle. This is a confirmed, stable baseline fact that contextualises the virtual-asset reforms: Taiwan is reforming its crypto AML perimeter from a position of already-favourable standing with its regional FATF-style body, rather than under grey-list pressure.

#### Cross-Monitor Connections

The VASA licensing transition and the pending Travel Rule activation sit at the centre of a three-way overlap with the World Payments Monitor and the Crypto Monitor, both of which are tracking the same statute this cycle from their own vantage points: World Payments on the stablecoin issuance and reserve mechanics the Act creates, and Crypto on the licensing, token-classification and cross-border-transfer dimensions of the same instrument. The underlying architecture fact, that Taiwan is replacing an AML-registration gateway with FSC licensing, is the shared anchor across all three readings, and firms operating across payments and digital-asset lines in Taiwan should expect the same commencement timeline, Q1 2027 at the earliest, to govern obligations tracked on each monitor.

#### Outlook

The near-term marker to watch is whether the FSC issues a formal gazette notice activating the domestic Travel Rule as planned, since no primary confirmation had surfaced as of this cycle despite the October 2026 target date. The medium-term marker is VASA&#x27;s full commencement, expected in Q1 2027 at the earliest, which would convert the current registration-based AML gateway into a licensing regime spanning seven VASP categories. Given Taiwans stable, favourable APG standing, the credible path here is incremental architectural tightening rather than remediation under external pressure, and the operative question for obliged entities is less whether the new regime arrives than how quickly the nine subordinate regulations resolve the current gap between statute and practice.

12 Oct 2026 · fim-2026-10-11

#### Lead Signal

Taiwan&#x27;s domestic crypto-transfer regime moves from a dormant AML registration backstop to live, dated enforcement this cycle. The Financial Supervisory Commission consulted, from 13 August 2026 to 14 September 2026, on draft amendments to Articles 7, 14 and 18 of the Regulations Governing AML/CFT for VASPs, and those amendments apply the FATF Travel Rule to domestic VASP-to-VASP transfers from October 2026, regardless of transfer value, with enhanced originator and beneficiary data required above NT$30,000. This sits alongside, rather than inside, the Virtual Asset Service Act, which the Legislative Yuan passed on 30 June 2026 but which remains enacted and not yet in force. Commencement is expected at the earliest in the first quarter of 2027, pending nine subordinate regulations the FSC has yet to finalise. Until those regulations land, the only operative legal gate for virtual-asset businesses in Taiwan is the AML-registration requirement under Article 6 of the Money Laundering Control Act. The practical effect is a regime tightening in sequence: Travel Rule data obligations arrive first, on top of an AML-registration architecture that predates the licensing law meant eventually to replace it.

#### Other Developments

Beneficial-ownership transparency remains structurally thin. Taiwan continues to operate a non-public beneficial-ownership disclosure model: shareholders crossing a 10 percent threshold file with the Ministry of Economic Affairs rather than appearing on any EU-, UK- or Singapore-style public register. A single, uncorroborated commercial-law source reports that disclosure expectations may be rising at the Investment Commission stage for strategic-sector foreign investment, but this has not been independently corroborated and is treated as a watch item rather than a finding.

The AML/CTF baseline is reaffirmed, not changed. Taiwan&#x27;s governing instruments remain the Money Laundering Control Act, last amended 31 July 2024, and the Counter-Terrorism Financing Act of 2016, with the Money Laundering Prevention Center as financial intelligence unit. Taiwan&#x27;s third-round APG mutual evaluation, concluded in October 2019, produced the best available outcome, regular follow-up, and that standing remains unchanged this cycle.

#### Cross-Monitor Connections

The Travel Rule tightening and the still-dormant VASA sit precisely at the seam between financial-crime architecture and payments regulation: World Payments Monitor coverage of Taiwan&#x27;s stablecoin regime under the same Act, and of the Travel Rule&#x27;s domestic scope, tracks the identical instrument from a market-structure and corridor-dynamics angle rather than an illicit-finance one. Where this brief asks what the Travel Rule closes off for laundering typologies, that monitor asks what it does to transfer cost, settlement timing and corridor volume for the same transactions.

#### Outlook

The near-term question is sequencing, not direction: Taiwan&#x27;s domestic Travel Rule obligations are now live from October 2026, while the broader licensing architecture that is meant to supersede AML-registration waits on subordinate rulemaking not expected before Q1 2027 at the earliest. A cross-border phase of the Travel Rule, extending the same data-sharing obligations to transfers involving overseas VASPs, is reported as targeted for end-2027, though this later phase carries materially lower confidence than the domestic phase already in train. Beneficial-ownership transparency is the item most likely to remain a structural gap rather than a near-term development: the 10 percent MOEA filing model is unlikely to converge toward a public-register standard absent a dedicated legislative push, and the single report of FIA-stage tightening will need independent corroboration before it can be treated as more than a signal to watch.

28 Sep 2026 · fim-2026-09-28

#### Lead Signal

Taiwan has moved from a light-touch, AML-registration-only posture toward a comprehensive licensing architecture for virtual asset service providers. On 30 June 2026 the Legislative Yuan passed the Virtual Asset Service Act (VASA) at third reading, establishing seven licensed VASP categories under the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) and replacing the prior regime under which platforms needed only to register for anti-money-laundering purposes. Existing AML-registered VASPs receive twelve months post-commencement to apply for an FSC licence, and up to twenty-one months, extendable by a further three, to obtain full licensure. Commencement itself has not yet been fixed and is expected to follow finalisation of roughly nine subordinate regulations, with industry participants already building compliance frameworks ahead of that date.

The architecture shift is reinforced by parallel movement on the Travel Rule. The FSC published draft amendments to Articles 7, 14 and 18 of its VASP AML/CFT regulations on 13 August 2026, opening a consultation that closed 14 September 2026 and that would activate a dormant 2021 information-sharing obligation for domestic VASP-to-VASP transfers from October 2026, with cross-border information-sharing targeted for end-2027. Read together, the licensing overhaul and the Travel Rule activation describe a jurisdiction converting a five-year-old paper obligation into an operative supervisory regime.

#### Other Developments

A separate counter-terrorism-financing overhaul remains at the cabinet stage. Taiwan&#x27;s Executive Yuan approved draft amendments on 22 January 2026 that would rename the Counter-Terrorism Financing Act, lower the terrorism-financing mens rea threshold, create a standalone weapons-of-mass-destruction proliferation-financing offence, and impose new asset-freeze and suspicious-transaction-report duties on banks, trust-investment companies and credit cooperatives. The amendment has not yet passed the Legislative Yuan and no primary gazette or bill text was located this cycle; the finding rests on two independent quality-press outlets reporting that the change responds to recommendations associated with the Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering.

Taiwan&#x27;s FATF-adjacent standing is unchanged. Chinese Taipei is assessed through the Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering rather than directly by FATF, and remains off both the FATF grey list and black list this cycle, with no new plenary action identified.

#### Cross-Monitor Connections

The VASA licensing overhaul and Travel Rule activation sit at the intersection of financial-integrity supervision and payments-market structure: a jurisdiction that until now supervised virtual-asset intermediaries only for money-laundering registration is introducing prudential-style licensing, custody-segregation and stablecoin-reserve requirements that will be read by payments-market observers as much as by AML specialists. The pending CTF/WMD Act amendment, if passed, would give Taiwan a domestic trade-ban and asset-freeze mechanism distinct from UN, EU, US and UK sanctions-designation criteria, a divergence relevant to any monitor tracking sanctions-list fragmentation across enabler and transit jurisdictions in the region.

#### Outlook

The near-term marker to watch is commencement: VASA is enacted but not yet in force, and the Executive Yuan has not yet set the date, with subordinate rulemaking targeted for completion in Q1 2027. Domestic Travel Rule information-sharing is scheduled to activate from October 2026 pending the consultation that closed in mid-September 2026, with cross-border information-sharing targeted for end-2027; both dates should be treated as scheduled rather than confirmed until the FSC finalises the underlying rules. The CTF/WMD Act amendment&#x27;s passage through the Legislative Yuan is the item most likely to firm up Taiwan&#x27;s sanctions-architecture posture in the coming cycles, though as of this cycle it carries only cabinet approval and press-sourced corroboration rather than a primary legislative text.

14 Sep 2026 · fim-2026-08-21

#### Lead Signal

Taiwan&#x27;s Legislative Yuan completed the third reading of the Virtual Asset Service Act on 30 June 2026, a structural shift that moves virtual-asset service provider oversight from an AML-registration-only model to Financial Supervisory Commission licensing across seven defined VASP categories. Stablecoin issuers face a distinct sub-regime requiring both FSC and central-bank approval alongside a full, one-hundred-percent reserve requirement. Existing AML-registered firms receive twelve months to apply for licensing and twenty-one months to secure full approval, but the Act&#x27;s commencement date remains pending Executive Yuan designation, leaving a transitional gap during which existing virtual-asset service providers continue operating on the lighter-touch registration-only footing.

#### Other Developments

Fraud-linked enforcement thresholds tightened. Amendments to the Fraud Crime Hazard Prevention Act, passed 30 December 2025, lower the threshold defining large-scale fraud from NT$5 million to NT$1 million and empower judicial and prosecutorial authorities to direct financial institutions and virtual-asset service providers to flag and freeze suspect accounts. A further amendment in August 2026 adds convictions under the Act to the list of offences barring presidential and vice-presidential candidacy, signalling sustained political prioritisation of the anti-fraud agenda. A casino-conduit laundering ring was indicted. Yunlin District prosecutors indicted ten individuals for laundering more than US$1 billion in illegal-gambling proceeds, using inflated credit-card limits on recruited mules and converting the proceeds into gaming chips at Macau casinos before converting them into Hong Kong dollars. A dedicated data-protection authority is being established. Taiwan&#x27;s Personal Data Protection Act Amendment establishes the jurisdiction&#x27;s first dedicated data-protection authority, the Personal Data Protection Commission, with mandatory breach-reporting obligations for non-government agencies; its effective date is still to be set by the Executive Yuan. Taiwan&#x27;s mutual-evaluation status is unchanged. Chinese Taipei continues to be assessed via the Asia/Pacific Group rather than FATF directly, and no new mutual-evaluation or follow-up report dated within this window was located.

#### Cross-Monitor Connections

The Virtual Asset Service Act&#x27;s licensing shift is the lead structural signal for the crypto monitor&#x27;s own licensing, token-classification, stablecoin, and consumer-protection modules, which this brief treats only at the level of its financial-integrity relevance: a medium-term risk-reducing architecture change that nonetheless leaves a transitional enforcement gap. The Fraud Crime Hazard Prevention Act&#x27;s expanded account-freeze powers connect directly to the world-payments monitor&#x27;s payments-infrastructure tracking, since the power to freeze bank, e-payment, credit-card, and virtual-asset accounts reaches the same rails that monitor tracks for market access and product innovation. The same statute&#x27;s laundering-enforcement dimension also connects to the advennt gambling-regulatory monitor, given that the Yunlin indictment and related enforcement actions concern gambling-proceeds laundering specifically. The new Personal Data Protection Commission&#x27;s breach-reporting and inspection powers bear on beneficial-ownership verification and AML-adjacent data-sharing flows, a cross-monitor relevance this brief notes but does not itself analyse in depth, deferring to the data-protection monitor&#x27;s own treatment.

#### Outlook

Two regulatory-horizon items will shape next cycle&#x27;s picture. The Virtual Asset Service Act&#x27;s commencement and Financial Supervisory Commission secondary rules are expected around 2027, with a year-scale uncertainty band reflecting how much remains to be specified on capital, governance, and reserve-asset eligibility. The Personal Data Protection Commission&#x27;s operationalisation is expected within 2026, on a half-year uncertainty band, contingent on the Executive Yuan setting an effective date and the Commission&#x27;s Organizational Act passing. Macau&#x27;s continuing function as the dominant enabler-jurisdiction conduit for Taiwan-originated illegal-gambling proceeds remains the enabler-jurisdiction domain&#x27;s central watch item, particularly whether Macau&#x27;s own regulatory or enforcement posture toward casino-credit-card laundering schemes shifts in response to repeated cross-border prosecutions originating in Taiwan.

11 Aug 2026 · fim-2026-08-05

#### Lead Signal

Taiwan&#x27;s Legislative Yuan passed the Virtual Asset Service Act on 30 June 2026, shifting oversight of virtual-asset service providers from anti-money-laundering registration to full licensing by the Financial Supervisory Commission (fim-2026-W32-001). This is a structural development rather than an incident, and under an architecture-over-incident lens it is the more analytically significant finding of the cycle: it reaches an entire class of financial infrastructure rather than a single transaction chain or a single enforcement target. Implementation risk remains material. The Financial Supervisory Commission is expected to promulgate its licensing regime across seven categories, with existing AML-registered virtual-asset service providers given twelve months to apply and a further nine months, twenty-one in total, to secure full licence approval once an Executive-Yuan-designated commencement date is set, expected around the first quarter of 2027 (fim-reg-2026-051). Until those sub-regulations land, the gap between the announced architecture and its operational reality is the primary uncertainty to track.

#### Other Developments

Two gambling-linked laundering networks surfaced concurrently, at a combined scale in the high hundreds of millions to high single-digit billions of US dollars. Taipei prosecutors indicted thirty-five individuals over a network that laundered more than NT$30.6 billion, or approximately US$975 million, through two custom-built payment platforms, MatchPlay and HeroPay, fronted by an ordinary restaurant business (fim-2026-W32-002). Confidence on this finding is capped at Assessed rather than High, because corroboration is limited to Tier 3 trade press and no Tier 1 judicial filing has yet been located; this is a corroboration-depth limitation, not a doubt about the underlying reporting, and it should be read as a structural feature of Taiwan&#x27;s judicial-record publication practice rather than as weak signal.

A separate, similarly assessed scheme moved NT$278.3 billion, or approximately US$8.66 billion, in illegal-gambling proceeds through inflated credit-card limits cashed out as winnings at Macau casinos (fim-2026-W32-003). Read together, architecture-over-incident framing suggests these are not two isolated events but evidence of a standing structural vulnerability in the interface between Taiwan&#x27;s domestic payment infrastructure, cross-border casino cash-out venues, and consumer credit products, one that predates and is only partially addressed by the Virtual Asset Service Act&#x27;s narrower VASP-specific perimeter.

A sanctions-adjacent transshipment concern was raised at the head-of-state level. Taiwan&#x27;s Office of the President offered Ukraine cooperation on curbing third-country transshipment of Taiwan-origin components allegedly reaching Russian missile production (fim-2026-W32-004). This is an enablement-as-signal finding: the offer of cooperation itself is evidence that a gap exists, and under the three-pillar balance principle it deserves equal analytical weight to an AML enforcement action even though it generates no comparable enforcement volume. Confidence is Assessed, drawn from a single Tier 3 report with no Tier 1 gazette notice located this cycle.

Taiwan&#x27;s sanctions list architecture was updated in the ordinary course. The Investigation Bureau, Ministry of Justice, updated its domestic published list to reflect the UNSCR 1988 Taliban-related amendment, a routine but structurally necessary maintenance action within Taiwan&#x27;s sanctions-designation architecture (fim-2026-W32-008).

#### Cross-Monitor Connections

The Virtual Asset Service Act routes directly to the World Payments Monitor, which tracks the same reform as a market-access and stablecoin-framework development; this brief treats it as a financial-integrity architecture story, while illicit-finance use of any resulting payment or stablecoin rail is a financial-integrity finding to be assessed independently of the payments monitor&#x27;s market-structure conclusions. The two gambling-linked laundering networks intersect with the same payments architecture: the custom-built payment platforms and the credit-card cash-out mechanism identified this cycle are exactly the category of informal payment rail that the new VASP-licensing perimeter is designed, in part, to narrow, though neither scheme has been definitively linked to a registered or licensable virtual-asset service provider in evidence reviewed this cycle. The transshipment-cooperation signal is relevant to conflict-finance and extractive-industry-integrity monitoring insofar as Taiwan-origin dual-use components are alleged to reach Russian missile production through concealed-destination routing; the evidentiary basis remains a single Tier 3 report this cycle, and any escalation toward state-capture or war-economy monitoring would depend on corroboration this brief does not yet have.

#### Outlook

The near-term picture to watch is implementation, not legislation: whether the Financial Supervisory Commission&#x27;s forthcoming sub-regulations narrow the payment-platform informality exploited in this cycle&#x27;s two laundering networks before the targeted first-quarter-2027 commencement date, and whether either the MatchPlay/HeroPay indictment or the Macau-linked credit-card scheme produces a Tier 1 judicial record that would move the current Assessed-confidence findings toward High. Taiwan&#x27;s next National ML/TF/PF Risk Assessment refresh, expected around 2027, is the next structural marker against which these findings will be weighted, given Taiwan&#x27;s currently low overall ML/TF risk ranking (fim-reg-2026-052). Absent a further sanctions-related escalation on the transshipment concern, that thread is likely to remain a single-source, Assessed-confidence watch item rather than a confirmed finding in the near term.

14 Jul 2026 · fim-2026-07-14

#### Lead Signal

Taiwan enters the Financial Integrity Monitor per-jurisdiction baseline this cycle as a Tier B, FATF-clean jurisdiction assessed only through the Asia Pacific Group on Money Laundering mutual-evaluation process, with an overall risk trajectory assessed as increasing. The most structurally significant development this cycle is the passage, on third reading on 30 June 2026, of Taiwan first dedicated Virtual Asset Service Act by the Legislative Yuan, converting virtual-asset-service-provider oversight from a notify-and-register declaratory model to a licensing regime under sole authority of the Financial Supervisory Commission. This architectural upgrade arrives alongside a widening sanctions picture centered on the Prince Group transnational criminal organization: OFAC expanded designation of 23 June 2026, adding Hu Xiaowei and thirty-five further individuals and entities, extends an October 2025 action that had already named two Taiwan-registered AlphaConnect entities as laundering nodes for scam-compound proceeds. A source-fidelity correction applied this cycle also reframes Taiwan exposure to Russian export-control evasion: Taiwan is named by FinCEN as a transshipment point through which restricted exports pass en route to Russia, not as a top-10 subject country in suspected evasion filings, a material distinction between intermediary geography and origin-of-subject geography that an earlier draft framing had conflated.

Read together, the cycle presents a jurisdiction whose regulatory architecture is genuinely improving in one dimension while its enforcement exposure deepens in another. The Virtual Asset Service Act closes a long-standing gap between declaratory registration and effective licensing oversight, yet implementation risk remains open pending an Executive Yuan commencement date, and the compliance status of overseas virtual-asset service providers against the September 2025 local-registration deadline remains unverified. Meanwhile the Prince Group Taiwan nexus, the persistence of unresolved beneficial-ownership verification gaps inside the Companies Act registration model, and continuing divergence among OFAC, OFSI and the European Union in the scope of Prince Group listings together sustain an increasing overall risk direction for the jurisdiction this cycle.

#### Other Developments

The Prince Group sanctions network widens across three regimes. OFAC expanded its Prince Group transnational-criminal-organization designation on 23 June 2026, adding Hu Xiaowei and thirty-five further individuals and entities, extending the October 2025 action. UK OFSI widened its own package on 1 June 2026, naming individuals described as part of the Prince Group Taiwan-linked financial network and freezing further London properties; the two designations name overlapping but non-identical individuals and entities, and the European Union has issued no matching designation as of this cycle.

AlphaConnect entities expose a beneficial-ownership verification gap. AlphaConnect Investments Co Ltd and AlphaConnect Investments II Co Ltd were registered under the Companies Act of Taiwan yet were not flagged prior to the OFAC designation naming them as part of the Prince Group network, demonstrating that formal registration compliance does not equate to effective beneficial-ownership verification.

Domestic prosecutors indict the Taiwan network principals. The Taipei District Prosecutors Office indicted Hu Xiaowei and co-defendants on 4 March 2026 for money laundering, organised-crime participation and organised gambling, following a probe that identified more than NT$10.7 billion, roughly US$337 million, in laundered funds entering Taiwan via foreign-currency remittances between 2016 and 2025.

Taiwan builds an independent export-control layer outside coordinated sanctions architecture. Taiwan added Huawei, SMIC and subsidiaries to its strategic high-tech commodities entity list on 14 June 2025, imposed its first single-country chip export curbs against South Africa on 23 September 2025, and is reported, as of June 2026, to be considering further AI-chip export tightening to align with United States measures, a national control layer operating entirely apart from the coordinated OFAC, EU and UN Russia-sanctions framework.

The Financial Supervisory Commission opens a sales-conduct probe. On 14 May 2025 the FSC opened a formal investigation into ten brokerages, nine asset managers and a bank for allegedly pressuring staff to meet exchange-traded-fund sales quotas, a conduct-supervision matter rather than a financial-crime enforcement action, but indicative of a broader shift toward more active FSC supervisory engagement as the regulator simultaneously assumes new licensing authority under the Virtual Asset Service Act.

A mutual-evaluation baseline has not been refreshed since 2019. The Chinese Taipei fourth-round mutual evaluation report was adopted by the Asia Pacific Group in October 2019, and no interim follow-up report has been identified between 2019 and this cycle; the next possible plenary discussion is not expected before approximately November 2027, leaving the currency of technical-compliance ratings unverifiable in the interim.

#### Cross-Monitor Connections

Three cross-monitor flags arise from this cycle work. The corrected transshipment role of Taiwan inside the FinCEN Russian export-control evasion advisory, together with the ongoing diversion architecture around Huawei and SMIC, is relevant to Extractive and Resource Monitor tracking of commodity-flow evasion, since Taiwan sits inside the intermediary geography between semiconductor manufacturing and onward diversion. Taiwan contemplated tightening of AI-chip export controls intersects with AI governance and dual-use technology-diffusion tracking relevant to monitors following artificial-intelligence hardware proliferation. Finally, the widening scope divergence among OFAC, OFSI and the European Union on the Prince Group Taiwan nexus is a live sanctions-coordination signal relevant to macro-level sanctions-regime tracking, illustrating how three allied regimes can maintain overlapping but non-identical designation lists against the same transnational criminal network without formal reconciliation.

#### Outlook

Three regulatory-horizon items will shape how this baseline develops. Commencement of the Virtual Asset Service Act, expected around the end of 2026, will determine whether Taiwan licensing model closes the operational gap left by the prior declaratory regime, and whether post-deadline overseas virtual-asset-service-provider compliance is finally verified. Taiwan next mutual evaluation under the Asia Pacific Group fifth-round methodology, not expected before approximately November 2027, will re-assess technical compliance and effectiveness across anti-money-laundering, counter-terrorist-financing and counter-proliferation-financing standards, including the new licensing regime and beneficial-ownership transparency. And a possible tightening of Taiwan AI-chip export controls, reported as under consideration for around the third quarter of 2026, would extend Taiwan legal tools to prosecute diversion of artificial-intelligence hardware toward China, aligning domestic enforcement architecture more closely with United States export-control policy. Illustrative scenario material accompanying this brief explores how these dynamics could interact; none of it should be read as a prediction or as compliance guidance.

Domain intelligence (D1–D8)

#### Sanctions Architecture and Evasion

Taiwan enters the sanctions-architecture domain this cycle as a jurisdiction defined less by a single enforcement action than by the accumulation of divergent regime responses to one transnational network. The Prince Group transnational criminal organization, sanctioned by the United States Office of Foreign Assets Control in October 2025 for running forced-labour scam compounds and laundering proceeds through a network spanning Cambodia, Hong Kong, Singapore, the British Virgin Islands, the United Arab Emirates and Taiwan, remains the central architecture this cycle. OFAC expanded that designation on 23 June 2026, adding Hu Xiaowei and thirty-five further individuals and entities. The United Kingdom Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation widened its own parallel sanctions package on 1 June 2026, naming individuals described as part of the Prince Group Taiwan-linked financial network and freezing further London properties. Critically, the two lists name overlapping but non-identical individuals and entities, and no matching European Union designation has been identified as of this cycle. This is not a minor administrative gap: it means obliged entities screening against only one regime, or relying on a single consolidated list, carry a structural blind spot proportional to the extent of that divergence, and the gap has widened rather than narrowed across the two most recent listing rounds.

Continue reading A second, distinct architectural finding this cycle is a source-fidelity correction rather than a new development, and it matters because it changes how Taiwan role in sanctions-evasion typology should be read. A prior draft framing had treated Taiwan as appearing among the top subject countries in suspected Russian export-control-evasion filings tracked by the United States Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. Direct review of the underlying FinCEN advisory text shows this is inaccurate: Taiwan is named in a footnote listing transshipment points through which restricted exports pass en route to Russia, alongside Kyrgyzstan, Mexico, Nicaragua, Serbia, South Africa, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, but Taiwan does not appear in the separate top-10 subject-countries table in the same report. Transshipment-point geography and subject-country geography are analytically distinct categories inside export-control-evasion typology: the first describes where goods pass through, the second where the evasion scheme itself is centered. Treating Taiwan as the latter overstates its centrality to the Russian-export-evasion architecture; treating it correctly as the former still leaves it inside the corridor and therefore inside the compliance-relevant geography for trade-finance and correspondent-banking screening.

A third, independent architectural thread concerns Taiwan own unilateral instruments. Taiwan added Huawei, SMIC and their subsidiaries to its own strategic high-tech commodities entity list in June 2025, imposed its first single-country semiconductor export curbs against South Africa in September 2025, and is reported, as of June 2026, to be weighing further tightening of artificial-intelligence-chip export controls to align with United States measures. None of these three actions sit inside the coordinated OFAC, European Union or United Nations Russia-sanctions framework; they constitute an emerging, independent national control layer that obliged entities operating supply chains through Taiwan must track separately from the multilateral sanctions lists they already screen against.

Underlying all three threads is a jurisdiction whose mutual-evaluation baseline has not been refreshed since October 2019, when the Asia Pacific Group on Money Laundering adopted the fourth-round mutual evaluation report for Chinese Taipei. No interim follow-up report has been identified between 2019 and this cycle, and the next possible plenary discussion is not expected before approximately November 2027. This is a coverage-currency caveat rather than a compliance failing, but it means that the technical-compliance ratings obliged entities may still be relying on predate the Prince Group case, the Virtual Asset Service Act, and the current sanctions-divergence pattern by several years.

#### Outlook

The near-term trajectory for this domain is one of deepening divergence rather than convergence. Absent a matching European Union designation, and absent any signal of formal United States-United Kingdom-European Union list reconciliation, obliged entities with cross-border exposure to the Prince Group network should expect the compliance burden of multi-regime screening to persist rather than resolve. Taiwan independent export-control layer is also likely to expand rather than contract: the reported consideration of AI-chip export tightening, if enacted, would extend Taiwan legal tools to prosecute diversion and would represent a further national instrument operating outside coordinated multilateral sanctions architecture. The next Asia Pacific Group mutual evaluation, not expected before approximately November 2027, will be the first opportunity to formally re-assess Taiwan technical compliance and effectiveness against a baseline that already includes the Prince Group case and the Virtual Asset Service Act; until then, the 2019 evaluation remains the only fourth-round reference point available to obliged entities and assessors alike.

#### Enabler Jurisdictions and Professional Facilitators

Taiwan role inside the Prince Group scam-compound laundering architecture is best characterized as mixed rather than purely enabling or purely victimized. Investigators identified more than NT$10.7 billion, approximately US$337 million, in laundered funds entering Taiwan through foreign-currency remittances between 2016 and 2025, proceeds later layered through gambling operations and cross-border wire transfers before consolidation into large dormant Bitcoin holdings elsewhere in the broader Prince Group network, which itself spanned Cambodia, Hong Kong, Singapore, the British Virgin Islands and the United Arab Emirates in addition to Taiwan. Taiwan domestic financial system functioned, across this period, as both a landing zone for victim proceeds disguised as ordinary foreign-currency remittances and as a layering channel through gambling-linked transactions, placing it inside the enabling architecture even though Taiwan authorities were not themselves complicit in the underlying scheme.

Continue reading The most significant domestic enforcement response identified this cycle is the Taipei District Prosecutors Office indictment, on 4 March 2026, of Hu Xiaowei and co-defendants for money laundering, organised-crime participation and organised gambling, concluding the probe that identified the NT$10.7 billion remittance flow. This indictment demonstrates that Taiwan prosecutorial architecture is capable of building a domestic case against Prince Group Taiwan-network principals, and it followed rather than preceded the international sanctions activity against the same individuals and entities, illustrating a pattern in which domestic criminal-justice response and international sanctions designation proceeded on separate but eventually convergent tracks rather than as a single coordinated action.

The professional-facilitator dimension of this scheme runs through the remittance and gambling channels rather than through traditional company-formation intermediaries: money-service-business-type remittance processing and casino-adjacent layering functioned as the connective tissue moving victim funds from disguised foreign-currency inflows into a form that could be consolidated and moved offshore. This distinguishes the Taiwan enabler role from the more familiar company-formation-agent or trust-and-corporate-service-provider enabler typology documented in other jurisdictions, and indicates that obliged-entity screening priorities for this specific architecture should weight payment-data and transaction-monitoring observability, rather than onboarding-stage company-formation screening alone, since the red flags identified in this scheme are payment-pattern and layering-pattern signals rather than entity-formation signals.

Read against the wider Prince Group architecture, Taiwan mixed role sits alongside Cambodia primary role as the scam-compound host jurisdiction, and alongside Hong Kong, Singapore, the British Virgin Islands and the United Arab Emirates as additional layering and holding-structure jurisdictions. Architecture-over-incident framing suggests that any single-jurisdiction enforcement response, including the Taipei indictment, addresses one node in a structure that spans at least six jurisdictions, and that the persistence of comparable remittance and layering channels in the other five jurisdictions named in the scheme architecture means the underlying laundering capability the Prince Group network exploited has not been comprehensively dismantled by any one national action.

#### Outlook

Taiwan enabler-jurisdiction status is assessed as stable rather than deteriorating or improving this cycle, reflecting the fact that the underlying architecture, once exposed by the Taipei indictment, has already produced a domestic prosecutorial response even as the broader Prince Group network and its cross-border sanctions exposure continue to develop internationally. The open question for coming cycles is whether the domestic indictment translates into structural reform of remittance-channel and gambling-sector monitoring, or whether it remains a single prosecutorial action against identified individuals without a broader control-framework response; the evidence available this cycle supports only the narrower claim that domestic enforcement occurred, not the broader claim that systemic remittance-channel controls have been strengthened as a result.

#### AML/CTF Regime

Taiwan&#x27;s AML/CTF regime is in a transitional phase this cycle, anchored by the enactment of the Virtual Asset Service Act on 22 July 2026 and the pending activation of a long-dormant Travel Rule provision. The Act, passed by the Legislative Yuan on 30 June 2026, replaces the current registration-based gateway for virtual-asset service providers under Money Laundering Control Act Article 6 with FSC licensing across seven categories. This is a probable-confidence, architecture-level finding: the statute has been enacted but is not yet in force, with FSC guidance pointing to Q1 2027 at the earliest for full commencement alongside nine subordinate regulations. Until commencement, firms continue to operate under the existing AML-registration obligation, meaning the formal obligation surface has not yet shifted even though the legal foundation for a stricter regime is now in place.

Continue reading The second pillar of this cycle&#x27;s AML/CTF signal is the planned activation of Article 7 of the FSC&#x27;s AML/CFT Regulations for Virtual Asset Service Providers, the Travel Rule provision aligned with FATF Recommendation 16. A domestic VASP-to-VASP phase has reportedly been targeted for October 2026, requiring originator and beneficiary data on all transfers with enhanced data above NT$30,000, though no Tier-1 confirmation of final promulgation had been located this cycle, keeping this element at an Uncertain confidence tier. A further cross-border extension is reported as targeted for end-2027, though this remains commentary-sourced only.

Taiwan&#x27;s broader standing within the FATF-style regional architecture remains stable and favourable. As a jurisdiction assessed by the Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering rather than FATF directly, Taiwan has held the APG&#x27;s most favourable post-evaluation category, regular follow-up, since its third-round Mutual Evaluation was adopted in 2019, with that status most recently reconfirmed via a 2023 follow-up report. No new plenary action was found this cycle affecting this standing. This is a confirmed, stable baseline fact and provides useful context for the virtual-asset reforms described above: Taiwan is tightening its crypto-specific AML architecture from a position of already-sound standing with its regional FATF-style body, rather than as a remedial response to grey-list or follow-up pressure.

#### Outlook

The principal marker for the AML/CTF regime over the coming cycles is the sequencing of VASA&#x27;s commencement against the Travel Rule&#x27;s domestic activation. If the Travel Rule&#x27;s October 2026 target date is confirmed via a formal FSC notice, Taiwan will have closed a FATF Recommendation 16 gap in advance of the broader licensing regime taking effect in Q1 2027 at the earliest. Taiwan&#x27;s stable APG standing suggests this reform is being pursued as proactive architectural modernisation rather than under external compliance pressure, and the credible trajectory remains steady tightening across both the licensing and data-exchange dimensions of the regime.

Cumulative analysis D7 AML/CTF Regime

Cumulative analysis · cross-cycle historical

#### AML/CTF Regime

Taiwan&#x27;s AML/CTF regime tightened this cycle through amendments to the Fraud Crime Hazard Prevention Act, passed 30 December 2025, which lower the threshold defining large-scale fraud from NT$5 million to NT$1 million and empower judicial and prosecutorial authorities to direct financial institutions and virtual-asset service providers to flag and freeze suspect accounts. A further amendment in August 2026 adds convictions under the Act to the list of offences barring presidential and vice-presidential candidacy, a signal of sustained political prioritisation of the anti-fraud agenda that carries no direct AML-technical effect but indicates the direction of legislative travel is unlikely to reverse.

Taiwan&#x27;s regime continues to tighten via targeted, fraud-linked instruments rather than a wholesale FATF-driven overhaul. Chinese Taipei&#x27;s mutual-evaluation status remains assessed through the Asia/Pacific Group rather than FATF directly, and no new mutual-evaluation or follow-up report dated within this window was located; this baseline element is stable and carried forward rather than newly assessed this cycle.

#### Outlook

Watch for the practical exercise of the new account-freeze powers, how frequently they are used and against which sectors, and for whether a new APG mutual-evaluation or follow-up report for Chinese Taipei surfaces in coming cycles.

Cumulative analysis

#### AML/CTF Regime

Taiwan&#x27;s AML/CTF regime tightened this cycle through amendments to the Fraud Crime Hazard Prevention Act, passed 30 December 2025, which lower the threshold defining large-scale fraud from NT$5 million to NT$1 million and empower judicial and prosecutorial authorities to direct financial institutions and virtual-asset service providers to flag and freeze suspect accounts. A further amendment in August 2026 adds convictions under the Act to the list of offences barring presidential and vice-presidential candidacy, a signal of sustained political prioritisation of the anti-fraud agenda that carries no direct AML-technical effect but indicates the direction of legislative travel is unlikely to reverse.

Taiwan&#x27;s regime continues to tighten via targeted, fraud-linked instruments rather than a wholesale FATF-driven overhaul. Chinese Taipei&#x27;s mutual-evaluation status remains assessed through the Asia/Pacific Group rather than FATF directly, and no new mutual-evaluation or follow-up report dated within this window was located; this baseline element is stable and carried forward rather than newly assessed this cycle.

#### Outlook

Watch for the practical exercise of the new account-freeze powers, how frequently they are used and against which sectors, and for whether a new APG mutual-evaluation or follow-up report for Chinese Taipei surfaces in coming cycles.

domain_sub_briefs · D7 · Cumulative analysis

Standing baseline position Taiwan is assessed by APG rather than FATF directly and is not grey/black-listed; its VASP AML/CFT regulations are under consultation to activate the dormant 2021 Travel Rule provision for domestic transfers from October 2026, with cross-border transfers targeted end-2027.

Periodic updates (1) 28 Sep 2026 · fim-2026-09-28

#### AML/CTF Regime

Taiwan&#x27;s AML/CTF regime record shows material movement on two fronts this cycle, one enacted and one still pending. The enacted front is the Virtual Asset Service Act, passed by the Legislative Yuan on 30 June 2026, which replaces the prior AML-registration-only supervisory model for virtual-asset service providers with a full FSC licensing regime spanning seven VASP categories. This is a durable, structural change to how the jurisdiction supervises a sector that has historically been a focus of illicit-finance typology work, and it is corroborated at Tier-1 primary-source level by the FSC&#x27;s own release together with independent confirmation from the Library of Congress Global Legal Monitor.

The pending front is a Cabinet-approved overhaul of the Counter-Terrorism Financing Act, approved by the Executive Yuan on 22 January 2026, which one of the two corroborating quality-press sources explicitly ties to recommendations associated with the Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering — the FATF-style regional body responsible for Chinese Taipei&#x27;s mutual-evaluation process, since Chinese Taipei is assessed regionally rather than directly by FATF. The amendment would lower the terrorism-financing mens rea threshold, create a standalone proliferation-financing offence for weapons of mass destruction, and impose new asset-freeze and suspicious-transaction-reporting duties on banks, trust-investment companies and credit cooperatives. As of this cycle the amendment has cabinet approval only; it had not passed the Legislative Yuan and no primary gazette or bill text was located, so the finding is held at Probable confidence.

Separately, and providing useful context for both fronts, Taiwan&#x27;s FATF-adjacent standing is unchanged this cycle: Chinese Taipei is not on the FATF grey list (Increased monitoring) or subject to a FATF call for action (Countermeasures), and no new plenary action was identified. Reading the regime as a whole, the direction of travel is toward tightening rather than loosening — a licensing regime replacing simple registration for crypto, and a proposed statutory response to regional peer-review recommendations on terrorism and proliferation financing — even though neither the crypto licensing regime nor the CTF amendment is yet fully operative.

#### Outlook

The crypto-sector licensing tightening is the more advanced and more certain of the two developments, enacted but awaiting commencement pending subordinate rulemaking targeted for completion in Q1 2027. The CTF/WMD Act amendment remains a Legislative Yuan vote away from enactment, and its passage — or failure to pass — in coming cycles will be the clearer signal of whether Taiwan&#x27;s regime-level response to APG-style recommendations translates into binding law. No change to Taiwan&#x27;s FATF grey/black-list status is expected imminently absent a new plenary action.

Baseline-Tracked Domains with No Current-Cycle Escalation (2 of 8)
- D4 Conflict Finance: Standing coverage — no activity this cycle.
- D8 Commercial Activity: Standing coverage — no activity this cycle.

Regulatory horizon

In Force Pending 2026-Q4 · ±half_year

### PDPA Amendment — Personal Data Protection Commission establishment

Establishes Taiwan&#x27;s first dedicated data-protection authority (PDPC) with mandatory breach-reporting obligations for non-government agencies.

[Executive Yuan / Personal Data Protection Commission (Preparatory Office) Source](https://www.klgates.com/New-Developments-in-the-Taiwan-Personal-Data-Protection-Act-1-13-2026)

Proposed 2027-Q1 · ±year

### Counter-Terrorism Financing and Non-proliferation of WMD Act (amendment)

Would add asset-freeze/suspicious-transaction reporting duties on banks/trust companies/credit cooperatives and a new offence for trade with UN- or ROC-sanctioned countries.

[Ministry of Justice / Legislative Yuan (TW) Source](https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2026/01/23/2003851091)

Adopted 2027-Q1 · ±half_year

### VASA subordinate regulations and commencement date

VASP oversight in Taiwan shifts from AML-registration to a full licensing regime with capital, internal-control, custody-segregation, and stablecoin reserve/audit requirements once subordinate rules and the Act take effect together.

[Financial Supervisory Commission / Executive Yuan (TW) Source](https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20260922PD209/taiwan-supply-chain-2026.html)

In Force Pending 2027-Q1 · ±quarter

### Virtual Asset Service Act subordinate regulations

VASPs move from AML registration to FSC licensing across seven provider categories; stablecoin issuance requires joint Central Bank + FSC approval with 100% reserve backing.

[Financial Supervisory Commission (Taiwan) Source](https://www.fsc.gov.tw/en/)

Adopted 2027-Q3 · ±year

### Virtual Asset Service Act — commencement and FSC secondary rules

VASP supervision shifts from a notify-and-register AML model to a prove-fitness FSC licensing model; stablecoin issuers face a 100% reserve requirement and dual FSC/central-bank approval.

[Financial Supervisory Commission / Executive Yuan Source](https://cryptoslate.com/crypto-laws/taiwan-virtual-asset-service-act/)

5 dated · 2 pending date · baseline financial-integrity-2026-07-05

Role action cards

MLRO

### Domestic virtual-asset transfers above NT$30,000 now require date-of-birth and address collection and verification between platforms.

This changes the customer-due-diligence data set that must flow between sending and receiving platforms on qualifying domestic virtual-asset transfers from October 2026. It also raises a reportable-activity consideration where a sending platform cannot complete the required data collection on a transfer that meets the threshold.

1 evidence refs

Compliance

### A new domestic Travel Rule data-field requirement for virtual-asset transfers has entered force, alongside an unconfirmed Financial Supervisory Commission AML amendment.

Policy and control frameworks for virtual-asset-service-provider clients and counterparties should account for the NT$30,000 domestic threshold and the date-of-birth and address fields required. The exact scope of the 20 October 2026 regulatory amendment remains unconfirmed and is a gap in the current picture of obligations.

3 evidence refs

Legal

### Virtual-asset AML registration under Article 6 of the Money Laundering Control Act remains the operative legal gateway while the Virtual Asset Service Act awaits commencement.

Any entity providing virtual-asset services in Taiwan without completed AML registration is exposed under the standing Article 6 prohibition; foreign-established providers face an additional incorporation requirement. The broader licensing regime under the Virtual Asset Service Act carries no binding force until it commences, expected no earlier than the first quarter of 2027.

1 evidence refs

Board

### Taiwan is incrementally tightening its virtual-asset AML perimeter ahead of a larger licensing regime still pending commencement.

The direction of travel is toward stricter identification standards for domestic virtual-asset activity, with a materially larger regulatory shift under the Virtual Asset Service Act still a year or more away from taking effect. Reputational and strategic exposure tied to virtual-asset activity in Taiwan should be read against this phased timeline.

2 evidence refs

CTO

### Platform systems handling domestic virtual-asset transfers must now capture and verify date-of-birth and residential-address data at the NT$30,000 threshold.

This is a concrete data-architecture requirement: sending-side collection and receiving-side verification workflows need to be in place for qualifying domestic transfers. Cross-border transfer infrastructure is not yet subject to the same requirement, creating a near-term asymmetry in system scope between domestic and cross-border rails.

1 evidence refs

Risk

### An identification gap between domestic and cross-border virtual-asset transfers is emerging as a near-term exposure concentration.

Until the cross-border Travel Rule extension targeted for end-2027 arrives, cross-border virtual-asset transfers may carry a lighter identification standard than domestic ones, which is a channel worth monitoring for displacement of activity.

1 evidence refs

Operations

### Transaction-screening and onboarding workflows for domestic virtual-asset transfers need to reflect the NT$30,000 data-collection threshold from October 2026.

Operational workflows for qualifying domestic transfers must now capture date-of-birth and residential-address fields on the sending side and verify them on the receiving side; this is a process-level change tied directly to the threshold and fields reported.

1 evidence refs

Audit

### The exact text and scope of the Financial Supervisory Commission&#x27;s 20 October 2026 AML regulation amendment remains unverified pending review of the full release.

Audit trail and documentation review should flag this as an open item: the press-release index entry was truncated and the underlying instrument it amends has not been confirmed, which is a gap in the current evidentiary record rather than a control failure.

1 evidence refs

Standing trackers (T1–T6)

Tracker Status Note

T1 · Russian Sanctions-Evasion Architecture no_change No material TW change; standing UN Panel/OFAC/OFSI Yemen-Houthi channel check not performed this cycle (union run scoped to TW only).

T2 · EU AML Package / AMLA no_change Not applicable — TW is not an EEA member.

T3 · FATF Grey List no_change No change surfaced this cycle; Taiwan is not subject to the FATF grey/black-list process as a member jurisdiction.

T4 · Beneficial-Ownership Register Status no_change No TW beneficial-ownership register development surfaced this cycle.

T5 · Crypto & Digital-Asset Integrity material_change Domestic crypto Travel Rule phase-in (NT$30,000 threshold, DOB/address fields) reported commencing October 2026, alongside an FSC AML-regulation amendment press-released 2026-10-20 inside this cycle&#x27;s window.

T6 · Sanctions Regime Divergence no_change No TW-specific sanctions-divergence development surfaced this cycle.

Registers

### Enforcement actions

- 14 Oct 2025

- 23 Jun 2026

- 4 Mar 2026

- 1 Jun 2026

- 14 Jun 2025

- 23 Sep 2025

- 14 May 2025

- 5 Jan 2026

- 23 Mar 2026

- 5 May 2025

- 6 Jan 2026

- OFAC designated Chen Zhi, Prince Group Transnational Criminal Organization, and 146 associated individuals/entities including two Taiwan-incorporated AlphaConnect companies used to conceal illicit flows from forced-labor scam compounds. 14 Oct 2025

- Taipei prosecutors concluded a probe into Prince Group-linked money laundering, indicting Hu Xiaowei (a &#x27;second in command&#x27; at Prince Group under multiple aliases) and co-defendants for serious money laundering, organized-crime participation, and organized gambling. 4 Mar 2026

- Taiwan added Huawei, SMIC and several subsidiaries to its strategic high-tech commodities entity list, restricting export of controlled technology to these Chinese chip developers. 14 Jun 2025

- Taiwan unilaterally imposed semiconductor export controls limiting shipments to South Africa, citing actions that undermined Taiwan&#x27;s national and public security. 23 Sep 2025

- FSC opened a probe into brokerages, asset managers and a bank for allegedly pressuring staff to meet sales quotas for newly launched ETFs, following employee complaint letters. 14 May 2025

### Sanctions changes

- 14 Oct 2025

- 23 Jun 2026

- 1 Jun 2026

- 22 Sep 2025

- 16 Jun 2025

- 28 Apr 2026

- OFAC&#x27;s SDN list update added Taiwan-registered ALPHACONNECT INVESTMENTS CO. LTD. and ALPHACONNECT INVESTMENTS II CO. LTD. as Prince Group TCO-linked entities, alongside Chen Zhi and dozens of associated persons/entities. 14 Oct 2025

- UK OFSI/FCDO widened its Prince Group sanctions package, adding individuals described as part of &#x27;the Prince Group&#x27;s international financial network, including in Taiwan,&#x27; and freezing further London properties. 1 Jun 2026

- Taiwan&#x27;s International Trade Administration added Huawei, SMIC and subsidiaries to its national strategic high-tech commodities entity list. 14 Jun 2025

- Taiwan imposed unilateral semiconductor export curbs on South Africa, its first single-country control action of this kind. 23 Sep 2025

### Regulatory horizon (register)

- PDPA Amendment — Personal Data Protection Commission establishment

- Virtual Asset Service Act — commencement and FSC secondary rules

- PDPA Amendment — Personal Data Protection Commission establishment

- VASA subordinate regulations and commencement date

- Counter-Terrorism Financing and Non-proliferation of WMD Act (amendment)

- Virtual Asset Service Act — nine FSC subordinate regulations

- Crypto Travel Rule — cross-border phase

- Virtual Asset Service Act commencement (Act + 9 subordinate regulations)

- FSC Travel Rule Phase 1 (domestic) and Phase 2 (cross-border)

- Virtual Asset Service Act subordinate regulations

- Taiwan special virtual-asset act tabling to Legislative Yuan

- APG fifth-round mutual evaluation of Chinese Taipei

- Potential tightening of Taiwan AI-chip export controls to align with US

### Active schemes

- [CRITICAL] Prince Group scam-compound laundering via Taiwan remittances

- [HIGH] Advanced-chip diversion to China/Russia via Taiwan supply chains

- Unregistered offshore VASPs soliciting Taiwan customers

Sources

- [Public Statement on Virtual Assets and Related Providers](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Public-statement-virtual-assets.html)

- [SiGMA World](https://sigma.world/news/taiwan-illegal-gambling-money-laundering-indictments/)

- [Inside Asian Gaming](https://asgam.com/2026/03/23/taiwan-authorities-crack-credit-card-money-laundering-ring-said-to-have-funneled-us1-billion-through-macau-casinos/)

- [Focus Taiwan (CNA)](https://focustaiwan.tw/business/202606300016)

- [Taipei Times](https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2026/07/01/2003860029)

- [Global Sanctions](https://globalsanctions.com/sanctioning-state/taiwan/)

- [Regtechtimes](https://regtechtimes.com/taiwan-offer-cooperation-to-ukraine-on-preventing/)

- [Jerusalem Strategic Tribune](https://www.jstribune.com/kraemer-taiwans-ongoing-business-ties-with-russia/)

- [Banking Bureau, FSC R.O.C.](https://www.banking.gov.tw/en/home.jsp?id=17&parentpath=0%2C3)

- [Executive Yuan R.O.C.](https://english.ey.gov.tw/News3/9E5540D592A5FECD/6fd57fe8-dc6e-4519-a572-9bf0632fa9ef)

- [SpotedCrypto](https://www.spotedcrypto.com/taiwan-virtual-asset-service-act-2026-fsc-licensing/)

- [https://cryptoslate.com/crypto-laws/taiwan-virtual-asset-service-act/](https://cryptoslate.com/crypto-laws/taiwan-virtual-asset-service-act/)

- [https://english.ey.gov.tw/Page/61BF20C3E89B856/41701f40-54e4-4c6c-b7f3-60772e1272e8](https://english.ey.gov.tw/Page/61BF20C3E89B856/41701f40-54e4-4c6c-b7f3-60772e1272e8)

- [https://www.occrp.org/en/news/a-billion-dollar-casino-scheme-and-a-murder-in-cambodia-expose-taiwans-underworld](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/a-billion-dollar-casino-scheme-and-a-murder-in-cambodia-expose-taiwans-underworld)

- [https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/Mutualevaluationofchinesetaipei.html](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/Mutualevaluationofchinesetaipei.html)

- [https://www.klgates.com/New-Developments-in-the-Taiwan-Personal-Data-Protection-Act-1-13-2026](https://www.klgates.com/New-Developments-in-the-Taiwan-Personal-Data-Protection-Act-1-13-2026)

- [Financial Supervisory Commission (Taiwan)](https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=96&parentpath=0,2&mcustomize=news_view.jsp&dataserno=202606300002&dtable=News)

- [Financial Supervisory Commission (Taiwan)](https://law.fsc.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL004301)

- [Library of Congress](https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2026-09-10/taiwan-virtual-asset-service-act-enacted)

- [Taipei Times](https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2026/01/23/2003851091)

- [Focus Taiwan (CNA)](https://focustaiwan.tw/society/202601220019)

- [21 Analytics](https://www.21analytics.co/blog/taiwan-travel-rule-what-vasps-need-to-know/)

- [FATF](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/detail/Chinese-Taipei.html)

- [AGB](https://agbrief.com/news/cambodia/26/01/2026/cambodia-battles-to-avoid-third-fatf-grey-list-placement-amid-scam-crackdown/)

- [https://www.trmlabs.com/resources/blog/unpacking-taiwans-virtual-asset-service-act-what-crypto-and-stablecoin-issuers-need-to-know](https://www.trmlabs.com/resources/blog/unpacking-taiwans-virtual-asset-service-act-what-crypto-and-stablecoin-issuers-need-to-know)

- [https://www.regtech.com/news/taiwan-crypto-travel-rule-phased-in-from-october-2026](https://www.regtech.com/news/taiwan-crypto-travel-rule-phased-in-from-october-2026)

- [https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9412e67b-c4c4-4901-bb7f-017e7abba5d0](https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9412e67b-c4c4-4901-bb7f-017e7abba5d0)

- [https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4244191d-a2b1-474f-89da-8eb13bd55e80](https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4244191d-a2b1-474f-89da-8eb13bd55e80)

- [https://zephira.ai/how-to-search-gcis-for-free-taiwan-company-registry-data/](https://zephira.ai/how-to-search-gcis-for-free-taiwan-company-registry-data/)

- [https://globallawexperts.com/company-limited-by-shares/](https://globallawexperts.com/company-limited-by-shares/)

- [https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20260922PD209/taiwan-supply-chain-2026.html](https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20260922PD209/taiwan-supply-chain-2026.html)

- [https://www.tcn.tw/news/6753498](https://www.tcn.tw/news/6753498)

- [US Library of Congress, Global Legal Monitor](https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2026-09-10/taiwan-virtual-asset-service-act-enacted)

- [TRM Labs](https://www.trmlabs.com/resources/blog/unpacking-taiwans-virtual-asset-service-act-what-crypto-and-stablecoin-issuers-need-to-know)

- [Anti-Money Laundering Office, Executive Yuan (Taiwan)](https://www.amlo.moj.gov.tw/1523/1524/1528/42811)

- [Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG)](https://apgml.org/about-us/members/members/chinese-taipei)

- [Financial Supervisory Commission (Taiwan)](https://www.fsc.gov.tw/en/)

- [BigGo Finance](https://finance.biggo.com/news/88da7583-5504-4b89-8351-4f9a2dfac4a2)

- [Taiwan Depository & Clearing Corporation](https://www.tdcc.com.tw/portal/en/publication/special/279)

- [https://www.fsc.gov.tw/en/](https://www.fsc.gov.tw/en/)

- [https://finance.biggo.com/news/88da7583-5504-4b89-8351-4f9a2dfac4a2](https://finance.biggo.com/news/88da7583-5504-4b89-8351-4f9a2dfac4a2)

- [https://www.tdcc.com.tw/portal/en/publication/special/279](https://www.tdcc.com.tw/portal/en/publication/special/279)

- [Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG)](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/global-network/asia-pacific-group-on-money-laundering--apg-.html)

- [Assessments](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/calendars/assessments.html)

- [Mutual Evaluation of Chinese Taipei](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/Mutualevaluationofchinesetaipei.html)

- [Mutual Evaluations](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/topics/mutual-evaluations.html)

- [Consolidated assessment ratings](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/Assessment-ratings.html)

- [Publications](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications.html)

- [The FATF Recommendations](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Fatf-recommendations.html)

- [News](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/the-fatf/news.html)

- [Consolidated Processes and Procedures for Mutual Evaluations and Follow-Up Universal Procedures](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfgeneral/Universal-procedures.html)

- [Chinese Taipei](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/detail/Chinese-Taipei.html)

- [A new dawn for Taiwan’s crypto sector, and its impact on businesses](https://www.elliptic.co/blog/analysis/a-new-dawn-for-taiwan-s-crypto-sector-and-its-impact-on-businesses)

- [Taiwan Country Guide | Elliptic](https://www.elliptic.co/country-guides/taiwan)

- [Implications of Taiwan’s guiding principles for the crypto industry](https://www.elliptic.co/blog/implications-of-taiwans-guiding-principles-for-the-crypto-industry)

- [Chinese Taipei&#x27;s measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/Mer-chinese-taipei-2019.html)

- [1 The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s (Treasury)](https://www.fincen.gov/system/files/2025-08/FinCEN-Advisory-CMLN-508.pdf)

- [Taiwan Regulator Probes Firms for Pressuring Staff to Sell ETFs - Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-05-14/taiwan-regulator-probes-firms-for-pressuring-staff-to-sell-etfs)

- [Treasury Convenes Financial Institutions and Law Enforcement to Identify and Dismantle Money Laundering Networks | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/treasury-convenes-financial-institutions-and-law-enforcement-identify-and)

- [Chinese Taipei](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/fsrb-mer/APG-Mutual-Evaluation-Report-Chinese-Taipei%20-%20October%202019.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf)

- [Taiwan Weighs Financial Inspection Rule Easing to Lure Investors - Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-10-23/taiwan-s-fsc-is-looking-at-easing-rules-burden-after-backlash)

- [INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON COMBATING MONEY LAUNDERING AND THE FINANCING OF](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/recommendations/FATF%20Recommendations%202012.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf)

- [2025 Crypto Regulatory Round-Up](https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/2025-crypto-regulatory-round-up/)

- [Global Crypto Policy Review Outlook 2025/26 Report | TRM Labs](https://www.trmlabs.com/reports-and-whitepapers/global-crypto-policy-review-outlook-2025-26)

- [How crypto regulation changed in 2025: a global review](https://www.elliptic.co/blog/how-crypto-regulation-changed-in-2025)

- [What Is a VASP? Virtual Asset Service Provider - Chainalysis](https://www.chainalysis.com/glossary/virtual-asset-service-provider/)

- [Crypto regulatory affairs: US Congress starts work on stablecoin and digital asset legislation](https://www.elliptic.co/blog/crypto-regulatory-affairs-us-congress-starts-work-on-stablecoin-digital-asset-legislation)

- [Crypto regulatory affairs: Hong Kong regulator lays out cryptoasset roadmap](https://www.elliptic.co/blog/crypto-regulatory-affairs-hong-kong-regulator-lays-out-cryptoasset-roadmap)

- [FATF urges stronger global action to address Illicit Finance Risks in Virtual Assets](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/targeted-update-virtual-assets-vasps-2025.html)

- [The implications of Taiwan’s new guiding principles for the crypto industry | Taiwan | Elliptic Connect](https://hub.elliptic.co/analysis/the-implications-of-taiwan-s-new-guiding-principles-for-the-crypto-industry/)

- [Taiwan Imposes Technology Export Controls on Huawei, SMIC - Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-14/taiwan-imposes-technology-export-controls-on-huawei-smic)

- [1 Preventing Russian Export Control and Sanctions Evasion:](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/document/download/ae2e63e2-4c4d-4f77-9757-c408ddbcede1_en?filename=240924-preventing-russian-export-control-sanctions-evasion+.pdf)

- [Taiwan Weaponizes Chip Sector to Deter China on World Stage - Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-24/taiwan-weaponizes-chip-sector-to-deter-china-on-world-stage)

- [US Unveils New Rules to Curb Flow of Advanced Chips to China - Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-01-15/us-unveils-new-rules-to-restrict-flow-of-advanced-chips-to-china)

- [Countering Russian sanctions evasion - guidance for businesses - GOV.UK](https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/countering-russian-sanctions-evasion-and-circumvention/countering-russian-sanctions-evasion-guidance-for-exporters)

- [Suspected Evasion of Russian Export Controls](https://www.fincen.gov/system/files/shared/FTA_Russian_Export_Controls_FINAL_508.pdf)

- [Taiwan Aims to Ensure Its Security With Tech Export Controls - Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-07-18/taiwan-aims-to-ensure-its-security-with-tech-export-controls)

- [Impact of Sanctions and Export Controls on Russia&#x27;s ...](https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/928856/download?inline=)

- [Preventing Russian export control and sanctions evasion - Updated guidance for industry - Finance](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/publications/preventing-russian-export-control-and-sanctions-evasion-updated-guidance-industry_en)

- [Taiwan Weighs Tighter AI Chip Export Controls Targeting China to Align with US - Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-09/taiwan-mulls-curbs-on-ai-chip-exports-to-china-to-align-with-us)

- [Global Crypto Policy Review & Outlook 2024/2025 Report | TRM Labs](https://www.trmlabs.com/reports-and-whitepapers/global-crypto-policy-review-outlook-2024-25-report)

- [Virtual Assets](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/topics/virtual-assets.html)

- [Taiwan Urges $630 Billion Asset Management Sector to Beef Up - Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-24/taiwan-urges-630-billion-asset-management-industry-to-scale-up)

- [Targeted Update on Implementation of the FATF Standards on Virtual Assets and](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/recommendations/2025-Targeted-Upate-VA-VASPs.pdf.coredownload.pdf)

- [Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP): Definition, Compliance & Examples](https://www.trmlabs.com/glossary/virtual-asset-service-provider-vasp)

- [Police Freeze $500 Million From Alleged Fraud Ring in HK, Taiwan - Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-11-04/hong-kong-police-freeze-354-million-in-fraud-ring-assets)

- [Taiwan and Singapore Add to Growing Action Against Alleged Cambodian Crime Group | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/taiwan-and-singapore-add-to-growing-action-against-alleged-cambodian-crime-group)

- [Alleged Hong Kong Crypto Swindler Tied to Singapore Money Laundering Syndicate | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/scoop/alleged-hong-kong-crypto-swindler-tied-to-singapore-money-laundering-syndicate)

- [Singapore, Taiwan Find $700 Million Tied to Alleged Scam Kingpin - Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-03-04/singapore-taiwan-find-700-million-tied-to-alleged-scam-kingpin)

- [Chinese National Pleads Guilty to Laundering Millions in Cryptocurrency Scam Proceeds | TRM Labs](https://www.trmlabs.com/resources/blog/foreign-national-pleads-guilty-to-laundering-millions-in-cryptocurrency-scam-proceeds)

- [Taiwanese Tycoon Jailed for Embezzlement May Have Used Girlfriend to Hide Tens of Millions at Credit Suisse | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/project/suisse-secrets/taiwanese-tycoon-jailed-for-embezzlement-may-have-used-girlfriend-to-hide-tens-of-millions-at-credit-suisse)

- [FATF VIII](https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/fatf.pdf)

- [Inflection Point: Global Implications of Scam Centres, Underground Banking and](https://www.unodc.org/roseap/uploads/documents/Publications/2025/Inflection_Point_2025.pdf)

- [Follow the money: how Southeast Asian countries are fighting cyber-fraud](https://www.unodc.org/roseap/en/2025/11/southeast-asian-cyber-fraud/story.html)

- [Transnational Criminal Organizations Designations; Issuance of TCO-related General License | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20251014)

- [Historic U.S.–U.K. Operation Targets Southeast Asia’s Scam Compounds with Record $15 Billion Bitcoin Seizure | TRM Labs](https://www.trmlabs.com/resources/blog/historic-u-s--u-k-operation-targets-southeast-asias-scam-compounds-with-record-15-billion-bitcoin-seizure)

- [Sanctions Programs and Country Information | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-programs-and-country-information)

- [Prince Group targeted with $15B crypto seizure and sanctions for pig butchering operations](https://www.elliptic.co/blog/prince-group-targeted-with-crypto-sanctions-for-global-pig-butchering-operations)

- [DOJ Seizes $15 Billion in Bitcoin](https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/southeast-asia-crypto-scam-network-mining-pig-butchering-october-2025/)

- [UK Widens Sanctions on Suspected Prince Group Scam Operators | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/uk-widens-sanctions-prince-group)

- [CHEN Zhi - FCDO - UK Sanctions List Search - GOV.UK](https://search-uk-sanctions-list.service.gov.uk/designations/GHR0179/Individual)

- [U.S. Launches New Strike Force to Combat $10 Billion Scam Industry](https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/ofac-targets-pig-butchering-scams-november-2025/)

- [Transnational Criminal Organizations Designations; Cuba Designations; Russia-related Designations Removals; Issuance of TCO-related General License; Publication of OFAC-OFSI Comparative Overview | Office of Foreign Assets Control](https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20260623)

- [Prince Group Transnational Criminal Organization (TCO)](https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934686/download?inline=)

- [United States Department of the Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network - Home | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/)

- [1 Notice to Customers: Beneficial Ownership Information Reference Guide](https://www.fincen.gov/system/files/shared/BOI-Notice-to-Customers-508FINAL.pdf)

- [Beneficial Ownership](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/topics/beneficial-ownership.html)

- [Guidance on Obtaining and Retaining Beneficial Ownership Information | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-regulations/guidance/guidance-obtaining-and-retaining-beneficial-ownership)

- [BEST PRACTICES ON BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP FOR LEGAL PERSONS OCTOBER 2019](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/Best-Practices-Beneficial-Ownership-Legal-Persons.pdf)

- [FinCEN Removes Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirements for U.S. Companies and U.S. Persons, Sets New Deadlines for Foreign Companies | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-removes-beneficial-ownership-reporting-requirements-us-companies-and-us)

- [Federal Register Notices | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-regulations/federal-register-notices)

- [Special Measures | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-and-regulations/special-measures)

- [Treasury Department won’t enforce beneficial ownership rule under the Corporate Transparency Act - ICIJ](https://www.icij.org/inside-icij/2025/03/treasury-department-wont-enforce-beneficial-ownership-rule-under-the-corporate-transparency-act/)

- [Guidance | FinCEN.gov](https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-regulations/guidance)

- [Fatf-gafi](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/mer-fsrb/APG-Mutual-Evaluation-Report-Chinese-Taipei%20-%20October%202019.pdf)

- [Taipei chinois](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/fr/countries/detail/Taipei-chinois.html)

- [Taiwan to Revamp Insurers’ Rules to Ease FX Hedging Burden - Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-12-23/taiwan-to-revamp-insurers-rules-to-ease-currency-hedging-burden)

- [From trading bans to total embrace, a global guide to crypto regulation](https://www.icij.org/investigations/coin-laundry/cryptocurrency-regulations-global-explainer/)

- [Taiwan’s FSC Set To Be Named as Main Crypto Regulatory Body - Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-20/taiwan-s-fsc-set-to-be-named-as-main-crypto-regulatory-body)

- [Taiwan Insurers Explore Easing Rules to Reduce FX Hedging Costs - Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-16/taiwan-insurers-explore-easing-rules-to-reduce-fx-hedging-costs)

- [Taiwan Regulator Meets With Life Insurers as Currency Surges - Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-05-05/taiwan-regulator-summons-life-insurers-as-soaring-currency-bites)

- [1 DEPARTMENT OF STATE North Korea Sanctions Advisory Issued: March 21, 2019](https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/16506/download?inline=)

- [US Treasury Sanctions DPRK Bankers and Front Companies Laundering Proceeds from Cybercrime and IT Worker Operations | TRM Blog](https://www.trmlabs.com/resources/blog/us-treasury-sanctions-dprk-bankers-and-front-companies-laundering-proceeds-from-cybercrime-and-it-worker-operations)

- [Supply, sale or transfer of all refined petroleum products to the DPRK | Security Council](https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/sanctions/1718/supply-sale-or-transfer-of-all-refined-petroleum)

- [Procurement of DPRK coal by Member States | Security Council](https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/sanctions/1718/procurement-of-dprk-coal-by-member-states)

- [North Korea IT Workers: Inside the DPRK’s Crypto Laundering Network](https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/dprk-it-workers-north-korea-crypto-laundering-networks/)

- [Crypto Sanctions: 2026 Crypto Crime Report](https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/crypto-sanctions-2026/)

- [OFAC Targets DPRK IT Workers Using Crypto](https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/ofac-targets-north-korean-it-workers-crypto-march-2026/)

- [OFAC sanctions a fraud network for assisting the North Korean (DPRK) regime](https://www.elliptic.co/blog/ofac-sanctions-a-fraud-network-for-assisting-the-north-korean-dprk-regime)

- [Report Describes Crypto’s $350 Billion Shadow War | OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/report-describes-cryptos-350-billion-shadow-war)

- [Sanctions Risks Related to North Korea&#x27;s Shipping Practice](https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/7726/download?inline=)

- [Mutual Evaluation of Chinese Taipei](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/a-c/chinesetaipei/documents/mutualevaluationofchinesetaipei.html)

- [2022 Procedures for the FATF AML/CFT/CPF Mutual Evaluations, Follow-Up and ICRG](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/5th-Round-Procedures.html)

- [Eurasian Group (EAG)](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/global-network/eurasian-group--eag-.html)

- [Mutual Evaluations](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations.html)

- [The 2022 and 2013 Methodologies for Assessing Technical Compliance with the FATF Recommendations and the Effectiveness of AML/CFT/CPF Systems](https://fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/5th-Round-Methodology.html)

- [Calendars](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/calendars.html)

- [Virtual Assets: Targeted Update on Implementation of the FATF Standards on VAs and VASPs](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/targeted-update-virtual-assets-vasps-2024.html)

- [Quick guide on assessing the Money Laundering risks of virtual assets (VA) and virtual asset service providers (VASP)](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Methodsandtrends/quick-guide-on-assessing-ML-risks-of-VA-and-VASPs.html)

- [FATF’s Report on Recommendation 15: What It Means](https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/fatf-r-15-update/)

- [FATF Updates on Recommendation 15 Implementation in Jurisdictions With Materially Important Virtual Asset Sectors | TRM Labs](https://www.trmlabs.com/resources/blog/fatf-updates-on-recommendation-15-implementation-in-jurisdictions-with-materially-important-virtual-asset-sectors)

- [JUNE 2024 TARGETED UPDATE ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FATF STANDARDS ON VIRTUAL](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/recommendations/2024-Targeted-Update-VA-VASP.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf)

- [12 Month Review of Revised FATF Standards - Virtual Assets and VASPs](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/12-month-review-virtual-assets-vasps.html)

- [Public Statement on Virtual Assets and Related Providers](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Public-statement-virtual-assets.html)

- [FATF / Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG)](https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Mutualevaluations/Mutualevaluationofchinesetaipei.html)

- [U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)](https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20251014)

- [U.S. Department of the Treasury, FinCEN](https://www.fincen.gov/system/files/shared/FTA_Russian_Export_Controls_FINAL_508.pdf)

- [European Commission (DG FISMA)](https://finance.ec.europa.eu/document/download/ae2e63e2-4c4d-4f77-9757-c408ddbcede1_en?filename=240924-preventing-russian-export-control-sanctions-evasion+.pdf)

- [Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-14/taiwan-imposes-technology-export-controls-on-huawei-smic)

- [OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/taiwan-and-singapore-add-to-growing-action-against-alleged-cambodian-crime-group)

- [Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-03-04/singapore-taiwan-find-700-million-tied-to-alleged-scam-kingpin)

- [OCCRP](https://www.occrp.org/en/news/uk-widens-sanctions-prince-group)

- [TRM Labs](https://www.trmlabs.com/reports-and-whitepapers/global-crypto-policy-review-outlook-2024-25-report)

- [Elliptic](https://www.elliptic.co/country-guides/taiwan)

Coverage gaps

fim-int-2026-07-07-G001: No FSC-published compliance list or… fim-int-2026-07-07-G001: No FSC-published compliance list or enforcement data confirms whether overseas VASPs met the September 2025 local-registration deadline, leaving the post-deadline compliance state of the D5 VASP regime unverified. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-07-07-G002: No direct EU Council source was loc… fim-int-2026-07-07-G002: No direct EU Council source was located confirming the absence of an EU designation matching the Prince Group network, so the reported EU non-match relies on inference from the OFAC/OFSI record rather than a primary EU negative-confirmation source. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-07-07-G003: No primary FSC or Legislative Yuan … fim-int-2026-07-07-G003: No primary FSC or Legislative Yuan source (only two T3 vendor/press sources) was available to directly confirm the Virtual Asset Service Act&#x27;s third-reading passage and its precise transitional provisions, limiting this claim to Assessed rather than High confidence. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-07-07-G004: No interim APG follow-up or progres… fim-int-2026-07-07-G004: No interim APG follow-up or progress report on Chinese Taipei covering the period between the October 2019 MER and this cycle was located, leaving the currency of Taiwan&#x27;s technical-compliance ratings unverifiable pending the ~2027 fifth-round evaluation. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-07-14-G001: No dedicated Taiwan beneficial-owne… fim-int-2026-07-14-G001: No dedicated Taiwan beneficial-ownership registry news located this cycle beyond VASA incorporation requirements. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-07-14-G002: Conflict-finance signal limited to … fim-int-2026-07-14-G002: Conflict-finance signal limited to residual Russia coal trade; no direct war-economy financing case documented for TW this cycle. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-07-14-G003: No Taiwan-specific RegTech/AI trans… fim-int-2026-07-14-G003: No Taiwan-specific RegTech/AI transaction-monitoring guidance located this cycle. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-07-14-G004: Taiwan-native domestic AML statutes… fim-int-2026-07-14-G004: Taiwan-native domestic AML statutes cited by Research (Organized Crime Prevention Act, Money Laundering Control Act, Money Laundering Prevention Act) have no matching value in the closed obligation_refs.framework enum, so obligation_refs could not be populated for TW-native claims without inventing a framework value. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-08-05-G001: No Tier-1 judicial filing located f… fim-int-2026-08-05-G001: No Tier-1 judicial filing located for the NT$30.6bn indictment case, capping confidence at Assessed. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-08-05-G002: Tier D jurisdictions KH/LA/MX/CO we… fim-int-2026-08-05-G002: Tier D jurisdictions KH/LA/MX/CO were not searched this cycle given the TW-bound dispatch scope. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-08-05-G003: D6 compliance-technology jurisdicti… fim-int-2026-08-05-G003: D6 compliance-technology jurisdiction-specific guidance for Taiwan was not evidenced this cycle. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-08-21-G001 ({&#x27;scheme&#x27;: &#x27;financial_integrity&#x27;, &#x27;… fim-int-2026-08-21-G001 ({&#x27;scheme&#x27;: &#x27;financial_integrity&#x27;, &#x27;value&#x27;: &#x27;D3&#x27;}): No T1 FSC/Ministry of the Interior primary source located confirming a change to core Criminal Code gambling prohibition intersecting with laundering enforcement this window. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-08-21-G002 ({&#x27;scheme&#x27;: &#x27;financial_integrity&#x27;, &#x27;… fim-int-2026-08-21-G002 ({&#x27;scheme&#x27;: &#x27;financial_integrity&#x27;, &#x27;value&#x27;: &#x27;D7&#x27;}): No T1 FATF/APG mutual evaluation follow-up report for Chinese Taipei dated within this window was located; assessment status carried forward from prior cycle record. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-09-28-G001 ({&#x27;scheme&#x27;: &#x27;financial_integrity&#x27;, &#x27;… fim-int-2026-09-28-G001 ({&#x27;scheme&#x27;: &#x27;financial_integrity&#x27;, &#x27;value&#x27;: &#x27;D1&#x27;}): No T1 primary gazette/bill text was retrieved this cycle for the CTF/WMD Act draft amendment; the bill had not yet passed the Legislative Yuan as of the search window. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-09-28-G002: Laos, Mexico and Colombia (Tier D w… fim-int-2026-09-28-G002: Laos, Mexico and Colombia (Tier D watch jurisdictions) were not actively searched this cycle due to pooled-budget allocation toward the TW-bound union dispatch. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-09-28-G003 ({&#x27;scheme&#x27;: &#x27;financial_integrity&#x27;, &#x27;… fim-int-2026-09-28-G003 ({&#x27;scheme&#x27;: &#x27;financial_integrity&#x27;, &#x27;value&#x27;: &#x27;D2&#x27;}): D2, D3, D4 and D6 had thin or no coverage this cycle for TW; no beneficial-ownership, enabler-jurisdiction, conflict-finance or compliance-technology development was located. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-10-18-G001 ({&#x27;scheme&#x27;: &#x27;financial_integrity&#x27;, &#x27;… fim-int-2026-10-18-G001 ({&#x27;scheme&#x27;: &#x27;financial_integrity&#x27;, &#x27;value&#x27;: &#x27;D5&#x27;}): No T1 FSC gazette notice confirming final promulgation or exact commencement date of the domestic Travel Rule Phase 1 was located this cycle. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-10-18-G002 ({&#x27;scheme&#x27;: &#x27;financial_integrity&#x27;, &#x27;… fim-int-2026-10-18-G002 ({&#x27;scheme&#x27;: &#x27;financial_integrity&#x27;, &#x27;value&#x27;: &#x27;D1&#x27;}): D1/D2/D3 TW-specific substantive findings were not located this cycle; coverage was thin given the pooled single-jurisdiction search budget. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-10-18-G003: Tier D (KH/LA/MX/CO) coverage was n… fim-int-2026-10-18-G003: Tier D (KH/LA/MX/CO) coverage was not separately run within this TW-bound dispatch. [resolved]

fim-int-2026-11-01-G001 ({&#x27;scheme&#x27;: &#x27;financial_integrity&#x27;, &#x27;… fim-int-2026-11-01-G001 ({&#x27;scheme&#x27;: &#x27;financial_integrity&#x27;, &#x27;value&#x27;: &#x27;D5&#x27;}): The 2026-10-20 FSC press release amending AML-related regulations was not opened; its title is truncated in the index and the exact instrument it amends is unconfirmed. [open]

fim-int-2026-11-01-G002: D1-D4 and D6 received no active sea… fim-int-2026-11-01-G002: D1-D4 and D6 received no active search this cycle because the union dispatch scoped financial-integrity research to TW only; Tier D watch (KH/LA/MX/CO) and the T1 Yemen/Houthi channel check were not performed. [open]

FIM-GAP-001 (D5): Taiwan&#x27;s dedicated special act on virtual … FIM-GAP-001 (D5): Taiwan&#x27;s dedicated special act on virtual assets has not yet passed the Legislative Yuan despite an original mid-2025 tabling target, leaving crypto oversight reliant on declaratory AML/CFT compliance rather than a full licensing/prudential regime.

FIM-GAP-002 (D2): Despite Companies Act registration require… FIM-GAP-002 (D2): Despite Companies Act registration requirements, Taiwan-incorporated shell entities (e.g. AlphaConnect Investments Co Ltd and AlphaConnect Investments II Co Ltd) were used within the Prince Group transnational laundering network without early detection.

FIM-GAP-003 (D1): Taiwan is not a FATF member and is assesse… FIM-GAP-003 (D1): Taiwan is not a FATF member and is assessed only via the APG as &#x27;Chinese Taipei&#x27;; no updated full mutual evaluation or follow-up report has been published since the October 2019 MER, ahead of a possible 5th-round evaluation not expected until around November 2027.

## Evidence

#### Confidence-tiered claims

Domestic VASP-to-VASP transfers, effective October 2026, under FATF R.16 [[Source 1]](#sec-sources)

Probable · 1 source

Passed 2026-06-30 by Legislative Yuan; not yet in force; commencement expected at earliest Q1 2027 pending nine subordinate regulations [[Source 1]](#sec-sources)

Probable · 1 source

Non-public 10%+ shareholder filing to MOEA, not a public BO register; possible tightening at FIA stage reported but uncorroborated [[Source 1]](#sec-sources)

Uncertain · 1 source

Money Laundering Control Act (1996, last amended 2024-07-31) and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act (2016); FIU is Money Laundering Prevention Center; APG third-round evaluation (Oct 2019) outcome &#x27;regular follow-up&#x27; [[Source 1]](#sec-sources)

Probable · 1 source

Autonomous Strategic High-Tech Commodities (SHTC) licensing under the Foreign Trade Act, covering Russia/Belarus (since 2022) and Huawei/SMIC (since June 2025); unchanged this cycle [[Source 1]](#sec-sources)

Probable · 1 source

Passed Legislative Yuan 30 June 2026; promulgated by the President 22 July 2026; creates seven licensed VASP categories under FSC authority; not yet in force. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources)

Probable · 1 source

AML-registration remains the current operative VASP gateway pending VASA commencement, expected Q1 2027 at the earliest. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources)

Probable · 1 source

Domestic VASP-to-VASP Travel Rule planned for October 2026; enhanced data (DOB/address or registration data) required above NT$30,000; formal commencement notice not confirmed as published as of research date. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources)

Uncertain · 1 source

Cross-border VASP transfers targeted to be brought into the Travel Rule framework by end-2027. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources)

Uncertain · 1 source

Holds APG &#x27;regular follow-up&#x27; category since 3rd-round Mutual Evaluation (adopted 2019), reconfirmed via a 2023 follow-up report. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources)

Probable · 1 source

amendment_published_unconfirmed [[Source 1]](#sec-sources)

Uncertain · 1 source

NT$30,000 [[Source 1]](#sec-sources)

Probable · 1 source

AML-related regulations (title truncated in press-release index), dated 2026-10-20 [[Source 1]](#sec-sources)

Uncertain · 1 source

Domestic VASP-to-VASP transfers of NT$30,000 or more require sending-platform collection and receiving-platform verification of customer DOB and residential address, phased in from October 2026; cross-border transfers targeted end-2027. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources)

Probable · 1 source

Any business or person providing virtual-asset services must complete AML registration with the FSC before operating; foreign-established providers must first incorporate a domestic company or branch. [[Source 1]](#sec-sources)

Probable · 1 source
