D7 AML/CTF Regime
AML/CTF Regime
Continue reading
Switzerland's AML/CTF regime is best read this cycle through the juxtaposition of a stable risk finding and active structural reform. The Federal Council was briefed on 14 October 2026 on the third national risk assessment produced by the Coordinating Group on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism. That assessment found Switzerland's overall money-laundering and terrorist-financing risk exposure stable, identifying organised crime, corruption, and property and tax crime, each with an international dimension, as the leading threats, with terrorist-financing risk assessed as comparatively limited relative to money-laundering risk.
That finding of stability is not a finding of inactivity. The revised Anti-Money Laundering Act and the new Act on the Transparency of Legal Persons and the Identification of Beneficial Owners entered into force on 1 October 2026, extending AML duties to lawyers, notaries and other advisors performing defined high-risk activities and establishing a non-public federal beneficial-ownership register. This is the most significant standing-state change to the regime captured in the current reporting cycle, and it predates the collection window only in the narrow sense that commencement occurred before the research date; it remains the defining current-state fact for the regime going forward.
Alongside that commencement, FINMA's partial revision of the Anti-Money Laundering Ordinance (AMLO-FINMA) is progressing toward a 1 January 2027 in-force date. The revision, covering sanctions-circumvention screening, beneficial-ownership and control-structure traceability, and enhanced correspondent-banking and payable-through-account controls under draft Art. 9b and Art. 37(5), completed its public consultation on 9 June 2026. Its substance largely codifies existing FINMA supervisory expectations into binding ordinance text rather than introducing novel duties, but the move from supervisory expectation to binding rule is itself a regime-level tightening.
These two structural developments, the TJPG commencement and the AMLO-FINMA revision, are both timed ahead of Switzerland's fifth-round FATF mutual evaluation, scheduled for 2026 to 2027. Switzerland's standing FATF rating is currently compliant on eight Recommendations, largely compliant on twenty-nine, and partially compliant on three. The deliberate sequencing of domestic reform ahead of an external evaluation is itself an architectural signal: Switzerland is consolidating its compliance position in advance of a test it knows is coming, rather than reacting to a prior adverse finding.
A further contextual element bearing on the regime's sanctions dimension, though not itself an AML/CTF instrument, is the September 2026 referendum in which Swiss voters rejected a proposal to enshrine a stricter definition of neutrality in the constitution. The result preserves the Federal Council's existing discretion to align with EU and UN sanctions measures, including those concerning Russia, which is relevant background to how aggressively the AML/CTF regime's sanctions-circumvention screening provisions, once in force under the AMLO-FINMA revision, are likely to be applied in practice.
Outlook
The fifth-round FATF mutual evaluation, scheduled for 2026 to 2027, is the structural horizon against which this cycle's developments should be read. By the time that evaluation proceeds, the TJPG register will have had over a year of operational history and the AMLO-FINMA revision, if it enters into force as scheduled on 1 January 2027, will have had several months of binding effect. Whether the third national risk assessment's conclusion of stable exposure survives that scrutiny, or whether the evaluation identifies gaps the domestic reforms have not yet closed, is the open question carried forward.